logo
Maryland advocates rally in support of bills aimed at immigration protection rights

Maryland advocates rally in support of bills aimed at immigration protection rights

CBS News19-02-2025

Maryland immigration advocates rallied in front of the State House on Wednesday in support of a bill aimed at protecting the state's immigrant communities from President Donald Trump's policies.
The Maryland Data Privacy Act Video, one of three bills that the immigrant-rights group CASA listed in its legislative agenda this session, had its first committee hearing on Wednesday.
The legislation aims to make it so federal agents enforcing federal immigration law can't get sensitive and personal information from state databases unless they have a warrant from a state or federal judge.
. @CASAforall is pushing for support for the Maryland Data Privacy Act/SB0977, one of 3 bills it's supporting this session that aims to bolster protections for immigrants.
The bill has its 1st committee hearing in less than an hour. pic.twitter.com/mCcOt7GToL
— Dennis Valera (@dennisreports) February 19, 2025
State Sen. Clarence Lam, The bill's sponsor, said this is a follow-up bill he passed during Trump's first term in the White House.
The two other bills in CASA's legislative agenda -- the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act and the Maryland Values Act -- have their first committee hearings on Thursday.
Rallying in support
Immigration advocates held signs and spoke out in support of immigration protection rights ahead of the bill's hearing with the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee on Wednesday.
Alex Vazquez, CASA's Director of Organizing, read an account of one of the group's members when private data was used by federal agents to find them.
"As I stood there in handcuffs, one of the agents casually admitted how they found me," Vazquez read. "They had used Maryland's [Motor Vehicle Administration's] database to track my location."
Protecting state data
Federal agents are now barred from accessing MVA data due to a bill Lam passed in 2021. But now he wants to expand that to all state databases.
Lam said this bill is even more important now because of the recent actions by the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.
A federal judge ruled against a group of 14 Democratic state attorneys general that tried to block DOGE and Elon Musk from accessing data systems and making personnel decisions at various federal agencies.
"What we're incredibly concerned about is the federal government coming into our state and trying to access our state's information, where we have built a level of trust with our residents...that we want to continue," Lam said.
Maryland Comptroller Brooke Lierman testified in support of the bill to the committee, saying immigrants may start avoiding giving their personal information to the state.
She adds that could lead to a reduction in tax revenue, among other impacts.
"In 2022 alone, [immigrants] contributed $5.3 billion in state and local taxes, and over $6 billion to social services programs like Social Security and Medicaid," Lierman said.
Clarity and safety concerns
During the committee hearing, State Sen. Chris West was one of several senators concerned that the bill doesn't lay out the parameters for federal agents to get a warrant.
Morningside Police Chief Daniel Franklin said he understood the bill's intention but is worried about unintended consequences that could lead to safety issues and loss of state-federal relationships.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump confirms US-China deal done, says rare earth deal and 55% tariffs finalised
Donald Trump confirms US-China deal done, says rare earth deal and 55% tariffs finalised

Business Upturn

time18 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Donald Trump confirms US-China deal done, says rare earth deal and 55% tariffs finalised

Donald Trump touts 55% tariffs and rare earth supply in pending China deal By News Desk Published on June 11, 2025, 17:56 IST Last updated June 11, 2025, 17:57 IST Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump on Tuesday announced via social media that a new deal with China has been reached, pending final approval from both himself and Chinese President Xi Jinping. According to Trump, the agreement includes upfront Chinese supply of 'full magnets' and 'any necessary rare earths' to the U.S. In return, the U.S. will uphold previously agreed terms, which Trump said include allowing Chinese students to continue studying at American colleges and universities — a relationship he described as 'always been good with me!' Trump emphasized that under the new deal, the U.S. will receive a combined total of 55% in tariffs, while China will get 10%. 'Relationship is excellent!' Trump declared in the post, adding thanks for attention to the matter. The post, shared on June 11, 2025, at 8:04 AM, comes amid ongoing geopolitical and trade tensions between the world's two largest economies. No official confirmation has yet been released by Chinese authorities or the U.S. State Department. News desk at

JD Vance Calls Lack Of Rate Cuts ‘Malpractice' After Soft Inflation
JD Vance Calls Lack Of Rate Cuts ‘Malpractice' After Soft Inflation

Forbes

time22 minutes ago

  • Forbes

JD Vance Calls Lack Of Rate Cuts ‘Malpractice' After Soft Inflation

Vice President JD Vance went after the Federal Reserve for declining to lower interest rates, as President Donald Trump has continuously demanded, in the latest White House criticism of the historically operationally independent central bank. Vance's criticism followed the May consumer price index release which revealed less inflation than ... More economists expected. 'The president has been saying this for a while, but it's even more clear: the refusal by the Fed to cut rates is monetary malpractice,' Vance posted to the X social media platform Wednesday morning. Vance's critique came immediately after the Bureau of Labor Statistics released May's consumer price index inflation report, which revealed less price increases than economists anticipated. Trump has loudly called for the Fed to lower rates since taking office in January, even teasing the firing of Fed Chairman Jerome Powell. This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

Trump's Pardons Are Part Of Remaking DOJ
Trump's Pardons Are Part Of Remaking DOJ

Forbes

time25 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Trump's Pardons Are Part Of Remaking DOJ

Donald Trump has not been shy about his approach to pardons. In some cases, it reflects his ... More makeover of the Department of Justice. In 2025, President Donald Trump issued a series of high-profile pardons and commutations, notably surpassing his previous clemency record (143 pardons and 85 commutations). A significant action was the mass pardon on January 20, 2025, for approximately 1,500 individuals convicted in connection with the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol attack. This included full pardons for leaders of extremist groups such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. Other notable clemency recipients included Ross Ulbricht, founder of the Silk Road dark web marketplace, who received a full and unconditional pardon; 23 anti-abortion activists convicted under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act; former New York Congressman Michael Grimm and former Connecticut Governor John Rowland. Grimm and Rowland were pardoned in May. Critics have raised concerns that these actions may undermine the justice system and that these pardons are the result of Trump insiders simply paying those close to the president for access for a commutation or pardon. However, Trump's DOJ issued new guidance on enforcement, that was critical of past 'over broad and unchecked corporate and white-collar enforcement [that] Government prosecutors are not going to want to bring a case that Trump may toss with a commutation or pardon. While the big government shakeup being experienced in the U.S. continues, pardons and commutations seem to be an almost daily part of the Trump administration. Trump appointed Alice Johnson, herself the recipient of a Trump pardon in his first term, as Pardon Czar and her focus has been on those who received long sentences that now seem draconian. As was pointed out in a Washington Post piece about Johnson's work, she looks closer to what prison personnel have to say about someone seeking a pardon over the objections of US prosecutors. In some cases, Trump's pardons come without the need to talk to prison officials as pardons are being given to those who have not even seen the inside of a prison. There is an old adage that many prisoners will state that they were or are wrongly imprisoned. In fact, in my business, many tell me about over prosecutions that led them to prison. I have heard the line, 'You've probably heard this before, but I didn't do it.' Why would someone admit to a crime they did not commit? In our justice system it happens everyday because of something called the Trial Penalty. The federal trial penalty refers to the significantly harsher sentences defendants face if they reject a plea deal and choose to go to trial. This penalty stems from the belief that defendants who go to trial are seen as unapologetic about their behavior, leading to prosecutors to seek longer sentences. As a result, many defendants plead guilty to avoid the risk of a much more severe punishment. However, the primary way to properly preserve one's rights to an appeal is to go to trial. It is an old problem that many have just accepted as a way the system works. Kay Rogers currently has a pending pardon application. Rogers, a former Butler county Ohio Auditor (Republican), who went to prison for 24 months for a bank loan that the bank says she does not even owe, has been asking for someone to look at her case. Now, out of prison for many years and off of supervised release, Rogers sees Trump as a possible way to clear her name and save her home. 'I pled guilty,' Rogers said in an interview, 'but I was a single mother with 6 kids and going to trial just was something I could not afford.' Rogers wants the pardon because even though the bank says she had nothing to do with the fraud that sent her to prison, the US government still wants to collect restitution. 'They have a lien on my home,' Rogers told me in an interview, 'and I have no idea where this money they want from me would even go.' Other women who believe they were overcharged in their crimes have made repeated requests to have their cases reviewed for pardons. Aaron Zahn, former CEO of the Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA), was convicted in March 2024 of conspiracy to embezzle federal property and wire fraud for allegedly orchestrating a $40 million payout linked to JEA's privatization. Prosecutors claimed this scheme would have cost Jacksonville taxpayers hundreds of millions, but Zahn's defense argued no such scheme existed. Zahn is currently appealing his 4-year sentence, asserting he was wrongly prosecuted for defrauding a city of property that never existed. Zahn and JEA's CFO, Ryan Wannemacher, were tried together, with Wannemacher being found not guilty. Before Zahn became CEO, JEA faced major financial challenges, including declining sales and a poor power contract. Privatization was discussed, but political resistance hindered progress. Zahn, brought in to drive change, pushed for privatization and was involved in the creation of a strategic plan that included the possibility of selling JEA. Despite the suspension of the Performance Unit Plan (PUP), a leaked memo exaggerating its costs led to public outrage, Zahn's termination, and an investigation. Zahn's Garrity statement, pertaining to statements given under immunity during an internal investigation, was used in his prosecution. Such statements are typically protected from being used against an individual in criminal cases, raising concerns about legal precedent, something Zahn's is contesting in his appeal. Zahn is currently imprisoned at FCI Edgefield satellite camp. Some have criticized the Trump administration and the pardons given, but the pardon and commutation system has been inconsistent in doling out fairness in the past. Those with access have always been moved to the top for presidential consideration and Alice Johnson, who definitely deserved her pardon, would likely be still in prison had it not been for advocates, namely Kim Kardashian, who personally pled with Trump for her release. Biden, and even Trump in his first term, gave commutations sparingly throughout their terms until it came to the last days of the administration. Now, there is an ongoing process of review and action that is leading to action, and that is a refreshing change.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store