
Two-child benefit cap – the cost, effect and what people are saying about it
Anti-poverty campaigners have long called for the two-child cap to be scrapped, and now Reform UK has described removing it as 'the right thing to do'.
Here, the PA news agency takes a look at what the policy is, the costs of doing away with it and what various parties are saying.
– What is the two-child cap?
The two-child cap or limit was first announced in 2015 by the Conservatives and came into effect in 2017. It restricts child tax credit and universal credit to the first two children in most households.
It is a separate policy to the benefit cap.
The benefit cap, introduced in 2013 under the then-Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government, sees the amount of benefits a household receives reduced to ensure claimants do not receive more than the limit.
– What is the effect of the two-child cap?
Organisations working in the sector argue that 109 children across the UK are pulled into poverty by the policy every day.
Last month groups, including Unicef UK, the National Education Union, food bank organisation Trussell and the National Children's Bureau signed a letter which was handed in to the Treasury, saying the two-child limit 'has to go'.
They warned: 'It cannot be scrapped for some families and not others as this would result in some of the most vulnerable families remaining in poverty – with no way to pull themselves out.'
While the policy applies across the UK, the Scottish Government has pledged to mitigate the impacts for people there, although payments for this are not expected to begin until 2026.
– How many children in the UK are currently living in poverty?
Data published by the Government in March 2025 estimated the number of children living in poverty in the UK reached a record high.
There were 4.45 million children estimated to be in households in relative low income, after housing costs, in the year to March 2024, data published by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) showed.
The latest figure is the highest since comparable records for the UK began in 2002/03, having risen from an estimated 4.33 million in the year to March 2023.
A household is considered to be in relative poverty if it is below 60% of the median income after housing costs.
– How much would it cost to scrap the cap and what would be the effect?
The Child Poverty Action Group (Cpag) said its analysis suggests an estimated 350,000 children would be lifted out of poverty immediately if the policy was scrapped.
Estimates for the cost of scrapping the policy vary.
The Resolution Foundation think tank has estimated it would be around £3.5 billion by the end of this Parliament (2029/30).
Cpag and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation have lower estimates of around £2 billion for 2025/26, rising to £2.8 billion at the end of this Parliament (2029/30).
The New Economics Foundation think tank estimates a cost of £1.9 billion from April 2025, rising to £2.6 billion by 29/30.
The Resolution Foundation said the differences in calculations are as a result of different methodology and also an 'inherent uncertainty' in costing the policy because it is based on predicted birth rates.
– What has the Government said?
Last year, before becoming Prime Minister, Sir Keir said he would scrap the two-child limit 'in an ideal world' but added that 'we haven't got the resources to do it at the moment', with ministers since then citing economic constraints.
Throughout their first year in office, the Labour Government has been under pressure from campaigners to scrap the cap, as well as facing anger over winter fuel payments and controversial reforms to the welfare system.
On Tuesday, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said the Government's child poverty taskforce is 'certainly looking' at the policy, adding 'nothing's off the table but this is not straightforward, the costs are high'.
The strategy had been due to be published in spring but has now been delayed until autumn in order to be aligned with the Chancellor's budget.
– What have other parties said?
Pressure has ramped up on the Government after Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said his party believes lifting the two-child benefit cap is 'the right thing to do'.
Speaking at a press conference in central London, he said: 'We believe lifting the two-child cap is the right thing to do. Not because we support a benefits culture, but because we believe for lower-paid workers this actually makes having children just a little bit easier for them.
'It's not a silver bullet, it doesn't solve all of those problems. But it helps them.'
He said this is 'aimed at British families'.
But Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has insisted the policy remains 'right' and 'fair'.
She told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips on Sky News: 'Nigel Farage and Keir Starmer are just saying things to people – they're not doing what is right.
'I am saying what is the right thing to do – it may not be popular, but it is absolutely the right thing to do.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
5 minutes ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves is about to make huge spending decisions - these could be the winners and losers
A week today, Rachel Reeves presents the spending review; how the budget is divided between government departments between 2026 and 2029 - the bulk of this parliament. It's a foundational moment for this government - and a key to determining the success of this administration. So, what's going to happen? The chancellor did boost spending significantly in her first year, and this year there was a modest rise. However, the uplift to day-to-day spending in the years ahead is more modest - and pared back further in March's spring statement because of adverse financial conditions. Plus, where will the £113bn of capital - project - spending go? So, we've done a novel experiment. We've taken Treasury documents, ministerial statements and reports from the Institute for Fiscal Studies. We put them all into AI - into the deep research function of ChatGPT - and asked it to write the spending review, calculate the winners and losers and work out what goes where, and why. It comes with a health warning. We're using experimental technology that is sometimes wrong, and while ChatGPT can access up-to-date data from across the web, it's only trained on information up to October 2023. There are no answers because discussions are still going on. Think of it like a polling projection - clues about the big picture as things move underneath. But, critically, the story it tells tallies with the narrative I'm hearing from inside government too. The winners? Defence, health and transport, with Angela Rayner's housing department up as well. Everywhere else is down, compared with this year's spending settlement. The Home Office, justice, culture, and business - facing real terms squeezes from here on in. The aid budget from the Foreign Office, slashed - the Ministry of Defence the beneficiary. You heard about that this week. Health - a Labour priority. I heard from sources a settlement of around 3%. This AI model puts it just above. Transport - a surprise winner. Rachel Reeves thinks this is where her capital budget should go. Projects in the north to help hold voters who live there. But, could this spell trouble? Education - down overall. Now this government will protect the schools budget. It will say 'per pupil' funding is up. But adult education is at risk. Is this where they find the savings? So much else - Home Office down, but is that because asylum costs are going down. Energy - they're haggling over solar panels versus home insulation. Justice should get what it wants, I am told. This isn't about exact percentages. But you can see across lots of departments - things are tight. Even though Rachel Reeves has already set the budgets for last year and this, and only needs to decide spending allocations from 2026 onwards, the graphs the Treasury will produce next week compare what will be spent to the last set of Tory plans. This means their graphs will include the big spending increases they made last year - and flatter them more.


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
The World Tonight More killings near US-Israeli backed Gaza aid site
More Palestinians have been killed near an aid distribution site in Gaza. Israel says it will investigate. The Labour Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee says it's time to sanction Israeli government ministers. Also tonight: The government is under pressure to spend even more on defence than planned - just a day after publishing its defence review. We ask one of the report's authors whether its figures are already out of date. As the Dutch government collapses, we examine how rows over immigration are reshaping European politics. And as the Serpentine Pavilion celebrates 25 years, the leading Bangladeshi architect behind this year's creation has been giving me a tour.


Sky News
12 minutes ago
- Sky News
AI foot scanner recognises warning signs of heart failure to keep people out of hospital, researchers say
A foot scanner that uses AI to recognise the warning signs of heart failure could be used at home to keep people out of hospital, researchers have said. The device takes and analyses almost 2,000 pictures a minute, in a similar manner to facial recognition, to calculate the level of fluid in the feet and ankles. Such water retention, known as oedema, is one of three major warning signs heart failure is becoming more severe and potentially life threatening. The AI scanner is roughly the size of a smart speaker and can alert healthcare professionals so they can take action, such as increasing the patient's medication. The device, developed by Cambridge-based start-up Heartfelt Technologies, is mounted to the wall and typically installed at a patient's bedside. It automatically takes 1,800 pictures a minute of the foot and lower leg and multiple angles, only scanning the legs to a height of 50cm off the floor, and then uses AI to calculate the level of fluid they contain. It also works without wifi. The Foot Study, which is being presented at the British Cardiovascular Society annual conference in Manchester, suggests the alerts come 13 days before a person would end up in hospital. It used the AI device to monitor 26 heart failure patients from five NHS trusts who were enrolled between 2020 and 2022 and asked them to weigh themselves using Bluetooth-enabled scales. Seven instances of worsening heart failure were detected in six patients, while one death from the condition was recorded. Researchers found in patients enrolled in the study for at least two weeks before an alert was triggered, the average lead time before hospital admission was 13 days. The lead time averaged eight days when all five triggers picked up by the device were analysed. The study also found monitoring using scales failed to predict any heart failure-related hospital admissions, with researchers suggesting this was because patients struggled to stick to tracking their weight, whereas the AI device did not require any action. The early warning provided by the device could allow specialist staff to react quickly to changes in a patient's condition, potentially allowing them to stay out of hospital. Dr Philip Keeling, senior author of the study and a consultant cardiologist at Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, said: "Only about half of people admitted to hospital with heart failure currently get assigned an early review by a heart failure nurse who can check to see if they are suffering a harmful build-up of fluid because their heart is not working properly. "Amid a shortage of heart failure nurses, a device like this can be like a virtual nurse, tracking people's health." Heart failure is a long-term condition where the heart is unable to pump blood around the body properly, typically because it has become too weak or stiff, and is estimated to affect 920,000 people in the UK. The three main symptoms indicating the condition is getting worse are increased breathlessness, weight gain and swelling in the legs or ankles. Discussing the findings, Professor Bryan Williams, chief scientific and medical officer at the British Heart Foundation (BHF), said: "This small study suggests a simple device could significantly improve outcomes for at-risk patients with heart failure by keeping them out of hospital. "This study is a good example of how technology might aid earlier interventions and treatment, by allowing people to track a key sign of their heart health at home."