Explainer: When will we see the white smoke and a new pope?
Diarmuid Pepper
in Rome
CATHOLICS FROM ALL over the world waited, and waited, and waited some more last night for black smoke to emerge from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel.
Everyone was expecting black smoke, because in the first round of voting in the conclave, achieving the two-thirds majority needed to become the new leader of the Catholic Church is verging on impossible.
The crowds had been informed by Vatican observers to expect black smoke before 8pm – black smoke was spotted for the first time in the
2013 conclave that elected Pope Francis at 7.41pm.
A priest takes the weight off his feet in St Peter's Square while awaiting the black smoke
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
But instead, it was 9pm before the black smoke billowed from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel.
So why the long wait?
This is the largest conclave in history with 133 cardinal electors – cardinals aged 80 and under when a pope dies or resigns a vote.
This means there are 18 extra voting cardinals this time round than in 2013 – one of whom is voting from his sickbed at the Santa Martha guesthouse.
Lots were drawn yesterday to see which cardinal would have to travel between the Sistine Chapel and the guesthouse to gather this vote.
But this doesn't quite explain it.
When the master of papal ceremonies and Archbishop Diego Ravelli proclaimed 'Extra omnes' ('everyone out,' in Latin) from the Sistine Chapel yesterday, all non-voting cardinals left, except for Ravelli himself and 90-year-old Cardinal Raniero Cantalamessa.
Archbishop Diego Ravelli says, Extra omnes, (everyone out). After everyone has left, the door closes and the conclave begins
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
Before the voting begins, and with everyone else locked out, someone gives a special meditation to the voting cardinals on the seriousness of their duties.
When the meditation is concluded, both of these men depart the Sistine Chapel.
Last week, the cardinals chose Cantalamessa for this task, but he is not known for brevity.
Indeed, there are reports that what was supposed to be a 15-minute pep talk turned into a 50-minute sermon.
These reports caused some concern because cardinals are meant to take an oath of secrecy, with the penalty being excommunication from the Church.
And besides, v
oting cardinals have had their phones confiscated.
However, Vatican insider and Pope Francis's biographer Austen Ivereigh, who reported the long sermon, noted that Cantalamessa is not an elector and isn't in the conclave.
For those getting very excited about breaking oaths and so on: Cantalamessa was not an elector. He wasn't in the conclave. He gave his ferverino and left. The porters outside, similarly not bound by any oaths, because also not in conclave, noted the time he came out.
https://t.co/29flCQgnJs
— Austen Ivereigh (@austeni)
May 8, 2025
'The porters outside, similarly not bound by any oaths, because also not in conclave, noted the time he came out.'
So what will happen today?
This morning is when the conclave starts proper after cardinals have had an opportunity to sleep on their decision after having seen how others voted.
Advertisement
Cardinals vote two times in the morning, break for lunch, then have two further rounds of voting in the afternoon.
If there is no pope elected in the first round of voting this morning, cardinals immediately proceed with another vote and it is after this second ballot that the crowd will see black or white smoke.
The same goes for the afternoon voting – if there is a two-thirds consensus after the first round of balloting in the afternoon, we will see white smoke – otherwise, we won't have an indication as to how voting went until after the second round.
Group of faithful arrive at St. Peter's Square on the second day of the conclave
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
Pope Francis noted in his memoir, Hope, that during the conclave, the first round of voting often involves 'a vote for a friend, for a person of respect…'
However, some front-runners and strong candidates will have emerged and cardinals have had the entire night to reflect on their vote and the thoughts of others.
This morning, cardinals begin to put their cards on the table and they have two ballots, before a break for lunch.
In the first round of voting this morning, the field will start to take shape and then from the third round of balloting onwards, the viable candidates become more clear.
Francis remarked that in the 2013 conclave, the 'situation' within the first two morning ballots was 'clearly fluid, uncertain, and for this reason there was nothing that particularly surprised me'.
So when will a pope be elected?
Probably not this morning.
The last time a pope was elected on the third ballot was in 1939 with Pope Pius XII.
In 2005, the conclave to elect Pope Benedict XVI took four ballots (the first ballot on the first afternoon of voting).
For Francis, it was the fifth ballot (the second ballot on the first afternoon of voting).
In 2013, the white smoke to signal the election of Francis was seen at 7.06pm.
However, it wasn't until around 8.15pm that Francis appeared to the crowds in St Peter's and the waiting crowd got to greet their new pope.
he newly elected Pope Francis being presented to the crowd at St Peter's in 2013
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
This hour-long wait is because the cardinals congratulate the new pope and pass on words of advice.
One cardinal embraced Francis to say: 'Don't forget the poor'.
The new pope also goes to the sacristy in the Sistine Chapel to be fitted with papal attire for their first appearance from the central balcony of St Peter's Basilica.
It's called the 'room of tears', because tears are often shed here when the new pope begins to feel the weight of the responsibility that has been placed upon them.
For example, Benedict XVI said his head began to spin when he realised he would become pope and that it felt like a 'guillotine' was falling on him.
So around an hour after we see the famous white and hear the ringing of the bells of St Peter's, we will hear 'habemus papam' and see the new pope for the first time when he appears on the balcony of St Peter's Basilica.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
10 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
World's tallest railway bridge higher than Eiffel Tower opens in India as £200million project hailed as ‘crown jewel'
INDIA has unveiled the world's highest railway bridge - built with 30,000 tonnes of steel and towering 359 metres above the river bed. The Chenab Bridge, linking India to Kashmir, has been hailed as the 'crown jewel of India' amid major tensions over the disputed region controlled by rival neighbours India and Pakistan. 5 The Chenab Bridge sits 359 metres high and spans 0.8 miles Credit: Alamy 5 Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi stands on the Chenab Bridge in Jammu and Kashmir, India Credit: EPA 5 Modi holds the Indian national flag at the bridge's inauguration Credit: EPA India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi opened the £200 million bridge in his first visit to Kashmir since the conflict between India and Pakistan in April. The bridge's inauguration comes just a month after a Waving the national flag over the bridge, Modi said: "Pakistan will never forget… its shameful loss.' He added: 'Today's event is a grand festival of India's unity and firm resolve.' Dubbed by Indian Railways as one of the most challenging tracks in the world, the bridge is seen as a symbol of India's economic strength. Stretching 0.8 miles long, the structure has been built to withstand 165mph winds and high-intensity earthquakes. The idea for the railway was first floated in 1892 by the then ruling Maharaja Hari Singh, who brought in British engineers to survey the rugged terrain. But given its complexity, the plan was ultimately shelved. Most read in The US Sun The 169-mile railway line starts in the garrison town of Udhampur in Jammu and winds its way through Srinagar, the main city in Indian-administered Kashmir. It ends in Baramulla, near the heavily militarised Line of Control that divides the Himalayan region between India and Pakistan. India & Pakistan accuse each other of breaking ceasefire as explosions heard hours after deal The bridge is the focal point of the £3.7bn Udhampur-Katra-Baramulla project - set to connect Jammu and Kashmir with 36 tunnels and 943 bridges. It is expected to slice in half - to around three hours - the time taken to travel from Katra, a town in Kashmir's Hindu-majority Jammu region to Srinagar, Kashmir's main city which has a Muslim majority. Around 16 million people live in Kashmir, split between the Indian-controlled and Pakistani-controlled areas. When India and Pakistan gained independence from British rule in 1947, Indian troops took control of two-thirds of Kashmir, while Pakistan seized the northern third. Since then, the dispute between the two nuclear-armed neighbours has evolved into one of the world's most intense geopolitical rivalries. India accused Pakistan of backing the recent Pahalgam massacre - a claim Islamabad firmly denies. US President "We pray for the souls of those lost, and for the recovery of the injured. "Prime Minister Modi, and the incredible people of India, have our full support and deepest sympathies." In response to the terror attack, India launched "Operation Sindoor", striking nine sites across and Pakistani-controlled Kashmir. Read more on the Irish Sun Pakistan officials said the "unprovoked" strikes killed at least 31 people, including several children, as well as injuring 46 others. The fraught period also saw India and Pakistan cancelling visas for each other's citizens. 5 An Indian soldier patrols after the attack in Pahalgam 5 People carry the body of Vinay Narwal, a Navy officer, who was killed in the Pahalgam attack


Irish Post
a day ago
- Irish Post
Face to face with the Ulster warlord
I FIRST met Andy Tyrie, the leader of an armed loyalist group, who died last week, in 1986. A BBC religious affairs programme, Sunday Sequence on Radio Ulster, had started hiring me as a freelance reporter and interviewing Tyrie was one of my first jobs. He was of interest to a religious affairs programme because the producers thought he might have thoughts on how much loyalist violence against Catholics was religiously motivated. I had to travel to a part of Belfast I did not normally feel safe in, where the population was almost entirely Protestant and unionist. Esther who managed reception, pressed the buzzer to let me through the security gate and directed me up the stairs to Short Kesh. This was the joke name for Tyrie's office, a pun on Long Kesh, the site of the Maze prison which housed loyalist and republican convicts. I found Tyrie affable and witty. He was a stout and tawny man with dark hair and a thick moustache. I assumed that the loyalist sectarian marauders he governed had at least the good sense not to shoot a journalist, one who might air their case, if they had one. We spent a couple of hours talking and then I recorded the interview. We covered a lot of ground. His basic theory was that sectarian tension in Northern Ireland was about territory. Most working class Protestants lived in housing developments that were almost exclusively Protestant but the Catholic population was increasing and needed housing too. The Ulster Defence Association which he led was ostensibly about defending Northern Ireland, or Ulster as they called it, against the IRA. In reality it was more concerned to scare away Catholics who had moved into houses in what loyalists regarded as Protestant areas. We talked also about new ideas being developed at that time about loyalist culture. Tyrie said that loyalists had been surprised to see that republicans in the prisons were able to communicate using the Irish language. They realised that a coherent Irish culture reinforced the argument for Irish unity and the preservation of a singular Irish identity. To match that, loyalists had to explore their own identity. They were now taking an interest in Ulster Scots, a rural dialect that their forebears had brought from Scotland. Before I left Tyrie, one of his close colleagues came into the room. He remarked that I bore a strong resemblance to Jim Campbell, a former news editor of mine who had been shot and wounded by men of the UDA that Tyrie led, perhaps with Tyrie's approval. The new arrival said, 'Sometimes we drive past Campbell's house and wave to him just to scare the shite out of him.' This was closer to the raw humour of vicious people than the amicable chat I had been having with Tyrie. This man took from his pocket a large brass folding knife, opened it and held the blade up to my face. 'If we just cut off a bit of the beard here and another bit here, you'd look just like Jim Campbell,' he said. I edited the interview and it was broadcast at length. On the day after broadcast the production assistant called me and asked for Tyrie's address. The BBC, which paid interviewees back then, sent him a cheque for £83. A few weeks later, Terry Sharkie, my producer and I went to Moneymore to report on an Orange Ceili, one of those presentations of loyalist culture that Tyrie had spoken of. This was held in the ballroom of a hotel. Tyrie was there. I went over to talk to him and realised that the men around him were not happy with my presumption of familiarity. I said something light-hearted to Tyrie to evoke a similarly friendly response that would reassure these goons that I was no threat. Tyrie said nothing so I walked away. There was further embarrassment that night when I was called out to draw the raffle ticket for a clock made by a loyalist prisoner. This clock was built onto a brass map of Northern Ireland on a wooden plaque. I drew the ticket and to enormous embarrassment my producer Terry Sharkie had the winning ticket. There was stamping of feet and shouts of 'Fenian Fix! The Taigs have got the clock'. But Tyrie's people assured us we had won the clock fair and square and even invited us to stay on. I danced with one of the loyalist women in a cumbersome country waltz. 'We're not sectarian here,' she said. That clock sat on a filing cabinet in the BBC's religious affairs office for about three years and was then blown onto the floor by an IRA bomb in the street below us. In the year before my interview with Tyrie his organisation had shot and killed one Catholic. He was later usurped by more murderous younger members who raised that tally considerably after trying also, and failing, to kill Tyrie himself. Perhaps I had seen a hint of that emerging tension myself, between the cheery bloke that he was when we were alone together and the sterner figure he became when hard men were around. See More: Andy Tyrie, IRA, Ulster

The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Trump says Musk has 'lost his mind' as he considers ditching his Tesla amid public bust-up
DONALD TRUMP HAS declared that Elon Musk has 'lost his mind' amid a spiralling public bust-up that has seen government contracts threatened, conspiracy theories hurled, and even a potential presidential Tesla sale in the works. In a phone interview with ABC News, the US President brushed off suggestions of a reconciliation call with the Tesla and SpaceX boss. 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump quipped. A White House official later confirmed that no such call is planned, and that Trump is not interested in speaking to his former ally. According to numerous reports, the US President is now considering selling his Tesla – a car he once praised as Musk's 'baby' – in a very public break from the tech billionaire. Musk and Trump pictured in a Model S Tesla vehicle on the South Lawn of the White House. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Trump and Musk had posed inside the car at a bizarre event in March, when the president turned the White House into a pop-up Tesla showroom after viral protests against Musk's role as head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'Big ugly spending bill' The once-close relationship between the pair imploded this week, just days after Musk exited his position as head of the DOGE . What followed was a dramatic volley of posts and counterclaims across social media platforms. Musk slammed Trump's flagship 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (a major tax and spending package) as a 'big ugly spending bill' that gutted electric vehicle subsidies. The bill, passed by House Republicans in May, removed key EV incentives Musk's companies rely on. Trump responded by claiming he personally asked Musk to step down from his government role, saying he had been 'wearing thin.' Advertisement Musk denied that and escalated further, alleging that Trump 'is in the Epstein files,' a claim swiftly dismissed by the White House as 'baseless.' The Tesla CEO is also now backing calls for the US president to be impeached. The White House said Musk's outrage was nothing more than an 'unfortunate episode' sparked by his disappointment over the EV subsidy cuts. Trump, speaking to reporters, claimed Musk had known the bill's contents 'better than anybody,' and only objected when he saw how it would hit his bottom line. Trump addressed the feud with reporters today. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Musk fired back: 'False. This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it.' Markets reacted swiftly – Tesla shares plunged 14.3% yesterday, wiping around $150 billion off the company's value. Musk also threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, a vital link to the International Space Station, after Trump floated pulling federal contracts. He later reversed course, posting: 'Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' 'Expiration date' For now, reconciliation looks unlikely. Trump has made clear he's moving on, and Musk, once a key part of his policy team, appears ready to go to war. Trade Advisor Peter Navarro, whom Musk once called 'dumber than a sack of bricks' in an argument over Trump's tariffs, refused to gloat but said the tycoon had an 'expiration date.' 'No, I'm not glad or whatever,' he told reporters. 'People come and go from the White House.' Vice President JD Vance also stuck by Trump amid the blazing row, blasting what he called 'lies' that his boss was 'impulsive or short-tempered', but notably avoided criticising Musk. Additional reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal