Greed, poor leadership upends liberation dream
ANC president Nelson Mandela smiles on April 27, 1994, as he casts his first vote at the polling station at John Langalibalele Dube's Ohlange High School in Inanda, near Durban, in South Africa's first democratic general elections. On his right is former minister Jeff Radebe.
Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu
This year marks 31 years of South Africa's freedom from apartheid. The advent of democracy in 1994 was characterised by euphoria and ecstasy. This was expected, especially among those who had been excluded from voting.
The apartheid regime used its 'divide and rule' strategy through what it called the 'Tricameral Parliament' which somewhat accommodated coloureds and Indians through the House of Representatives and the House of Delegates. It was only in 1994 that all South Africans of voting age cast their votes.
There were high hopes and optimism about the future of post-apartheid South Africa. Among the anticipated changes were the creation of jobs, reduction and eventually ending of poverty, embracing racial equality, and many such developments.
In a way, those who held such high hopes were vindicated when Reconstruction and Development (RDP) houses were built to ensure that South Africans had their dignity restored. Many jobs were created in the construction industry.
On racial equality, all races were represented in parliament. Government policies such as Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment were said to be geared towards ensuring racial equality. Phrases such as 'rainbow nation' 'nation building' and 'social cohesion' brought a glimmer of hope that South Africa was embarking on a new political trajectory.
Over three decades later, the question becomes: how far have we gone as a nation in realising the goals of freedom? In other words. To what extent has South Africa's political freedom improved the lives of her citizens? Importantly, which factors have contributed to either the acceleration or stagnation of progress in various areas of life? Lastly, what is the way forward?
In addressing these questions, it is important to begin with the positive developments. One of them is that on 10 May 1994, Nelson Mandela was sworn in as the first black president – with Thabo Mbeki and FW de Klerk becoming the first and second Deputy Presidents respectively. Both the cabinet and the National Assembly included South Africa's various racial groups. It is correct, therefore, to argue that politically, South Africa experienced positive change.
The new constitution (Act 108 of 1996) brought a glimmer of hope that South Africa was on a new political path. The many rights enshrined in Chapter 2 of the country's constitution left many South Africans convinced that indeed things were changing for the better. Whether these sections of the constitution were going to be implemented or not did not seem to bother South Africans. All they were excited about was a constitution which embraced the views of South Africans across the racial divide.
On the economic front, the country showed signs of improvement. The global community also offered a helping hand to consolidate South Africa's nascent democracy. Private companies used this changing situation to invest in the country thereby creating job opportunities.
On the academic front, the first Education Act was passed in 1997. This was followed by the reconfiguration of the higher education sector. Tertiary institutions were merged to reflect the changed political environment. At the basic education level, learners could now attend any school of their choice. Similarly, at the tertiary level, students could enrol at any institution of their choice without being forced to attend institutions reserved for certain racial and ethnic groups.
Even in religion, the fact that South Africa was declared a circular state meant that no religious formation would be deemed better than others. This resonated with the 1648 Westphalia agreement which separated the church from the state.
But if our freedom has brought so many good things, how come the lives of the people have worsened? Why do we still have the triple challenges of unemployment, poverty and inequality? Why is the level of crime so high? Why is our economy not growing? Why has our justice system lost credibility? Why is the country's education system said to be weaker when compared to other countries? Why is there rampant corruption both in the public and public sectors?
These are some of the questions the country must wrestle with as it reflects on 31 years of freedom. I will only proffer responses to some of them without claiming to be prescriptive or conclusive.
The main culprit is our political leadership. Politicians have ceased to put people first. Instead, they focus on their own needs. Secondly, factionalism has meant that these politicians operate along factional lines when they elect leaders or render services. The same goes for the prosecution of those implicated in wrongdoing. Depending on the faction one belongs to, the case either sticks or simply disappears in thin air.
This is what has created fertile ground for corruption to thrive. By extension, this has delayed service delivery. Thirty-one years down the line, voter apathy has become a lived reality. The excitement of 1994 is gone as evidenced by recent voter turnouts in each election.
Another factor is the electorate. Instead of voting for an idea, voters tend to follow individual politicians and political parties blindly. This has reversed many of the gains of our freedom.
Thirdly, failure to implement legislation and policies has delayed development.
Fourthly, the deployment of people with no requisite skills and knowledge has produced negative results for the country. The ANC's 'Cadre Deployment' policy is not wrong in principle. But when incompetent people are deployed, this takes the country backwards.
Fifthly, after thirty years, South Africa's honeymoon is over. Countries that used to support South Africa financially have either reduced their support or ended it entirely. As the political leadership tries to find its feet, it has made many political blunders. A recent case is how both President Ramaphosa and Former Ambassador Ibrahim Rassool handled President Trump's political posture.
Therefore, as we celebrate 31 years of freedom it is important to reflect on the road the country has travelled critically. There is no doubt that South Africa is better now than it was under apartheid. Equally, the country is not where it is supposed to be. Many things have gone wrong.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
Luxury travel buddy: Who is Paul Mashatile's wife?
Paul Mashatile has been condemned by parliament for spending millions on luxury travel alongside his wife, Humile. The deputy president and the Second Lady – who have a 24-year age gap – wed in 2023 after both their partners died in 2020. Over the past few days, Deputy President Paul Mashatile has been grilled over his five-star luxury travel he made with his wife Humile on unofficial trips, at the expense of the taxpayer. In a recent parliament sitting, it was revealed that Paul spent over R2 million on a six-night stay in London last year. Earlier this year, he travelled to Japan, where he splurged almost R1 million on a four-night stay with his wife. Since being sworn in last July, Paul has spent almost R8 million on four international trips. Paul Mashatile's younger, attractive wife is no stranger to the spotlight. Humile was first married to former ANC Western Cape secretary Songezo Mjongile, who died in 2020 after a battle with colon cancer. At the time, Paul was the treasurer of the ANC. Paul's first wife, Manzi Ellen Mashatile, died in July 2020 after contracting COVID-19. Paul has four children with his late wife, while Humile has two from her marriage to Songezo. The couple's nuptials occurred just days after Paul was sworn in as SA's new deputy president. Paul Mashatile and his wife Humile Mjongile. Images via X: @pmashatile/ RODGER BOSCH, AFP According to her Instagram account, the second lady is a philanthropist who recently launched her own charity, the Humile Mashatile Foundation. Her areas of interest are autism, HIV/ Aids treatment in young children, and holistic healing. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
ActionSA demands parliamentary inquiry into NPA, calls for Batohi's removal
ActionSA has become the latest political party to call for the removal of National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) Shamila Batohi, citing ongoing failures within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and alleged political interference in its operations. The party is demanding a full parliamentary inquiry into the institution's leadership, accountability, and effectiveness. At a press briefing on Saturday, ActionSA leaders expressed deep concern over what they described as a "crisis of credibility" facing the NPA. According to the party, public trust in the prosecuting authority has deteriorated sharply, particularly in the wake of persistent delays in high-profile prosecutions, limited progress in tackling corruption, and the continued perception of political shielding for powerful individuals. 'South Africans are losing faith in the very institution meant to uphold justice and the rule of law,' said ActionSA national chairperson Michael Beaumont. 'We need to know the full extent to which political interference has infected the operations of the NPA. We believe this requires a transparent and independent parliamentary investigation. 'The party's demand follows similar concerns raised in recent months by civil society organisations, legal experts, and opposition parties over the NPA's perceived inaction on key corruption cases, many of them stemming from the revelations of the Zondo Commission of Inquiry into State Capture.


The Citizen
9 hours ago
- The Citizen
ActionSA-ANC slams Zille's plans for Joburg: ‘They do not believe in black excellence'
A political expert believes that Zille could be the right person to fix Johannesburg. ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba said he is shocked by Helen Zille's dream to become the next mayor of Johannesburg. The DA's federal council chairperson is considering putting her hand up to become mayor of the City of Johannesburg after next year's local government elections. According to weekend reports, Zille has been approached by some people in the DA who want her to take up this position. Black excellence in the DA In an interview with The Citizen on Sunday, Mashaba stated that this clearly shows the DA has no confidence in black leadership. 'This is deeply concerning that Helen and the DA thinks that they cannot find a single black person in this province to take over this responsibility. 'These people do not have confidence in black leaders. They have proven beyond reasonable doubt that they do not believe in black excellence,' he said. Controversy around service delivery in townships He said Joburg's townships would suffer under the leadership of a DA mayor. 'These people are under the impression that South Africa can be rescued by white people. 'If she becomes mayor the people of Soweto and Alexandra can forget about getting services,' he said. Can Zille get the numbers? Mashaba said he does not believe that Zille will become the mayor of Johannesburg because the DA has allegedly failed to function in a coalition in Johannesburg. 'She will never the get the numbers to govern on her own and I do not see her even getting support from the black communities,' he said. Can the ANC fix Johannesburg? Meanwhile, ANC regional secretary Sasa Manganye said he believes the ANC is the only party that can fix the City of Johannesburg. 'Joburg has been messed up by the DA when they took over in 2016 that is when the City even started having financial problem. How will Helen fix Johannesburg. They had an opportunity to govern Joburg and they failed,' he said. Manganye said the party hopes to retain the mayoral position beyond the 2026 local government elections. 'As the ANC we are in the right direction to fix the City and even the president is supporting our efforts in fixing the City. We will be able to put order in a number of areas and we have a number of priority, including the water issues,' he said, ALSO READ: 'Deception': Who really won the VAT fight? Political analyst weighs in Theo Neethling, a political analyst from the University of Free State (UFS), says there are positive and negative aspects to Zille's candidacy for the position of mayor in Johannesburg. 'Helen Zille has proven experience at all three levels of government and is one of the most experienced and respected politicians in South Africa. 'In my opinion, she was the most successful mayor of a metro in South Africa since 1994 and managed the city of Cape Town with great competence and efficiency. 'In 2008, she deservedly received the 2008 World Mayor Prize, which considers outstanding mayors from all over the world for the award,' he said. Neethling said he believes Zille might be the right person to fix the dilapidated city of Johannesburg. However, he said Zille's ability to lead Johannesburg will depend on the DA's performance in the upcoming municipal election. 'The DA currently stands at 26%, still behind the ANC which is at 34%, and the city will, in all likelihood, once again be governed by a coalition. 'Coalition politics in Gauteng is marked by a high degree of political turbulence, and the question is whether she would be stepping into a position that is vulnerable to potentially unstable coalition politics,' he said. The Citizen had reached out to DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp regarding some of the comments made by the ANC and ActionSA. This article will be updated as soon as the comments are received. NOW READ: Zille to the rescue: Will she save Joburg as the city's mayor?