RCMP Visit BC Ostrich Farm to Prepare for Potential Cull Enforcement and Arrests
RCMP liaison officers have visited a British Columbia ostrich farm to prepare for potential arrests at the property where protesters are trying to prevent a cull of about 400 birds ordered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
Multiple livestreams broadcasting from the Universal Ostrich Farm, in Edgewood, B.C., on Wednesday morning showed three officers in police liaison jackets and another in uniform at the farm.
They told protesters and the farm's owners they wanted whatever happened at the farm to be lawful and peaceful, with one telling livestreamer Jim Kerr they wanted to ensure the group understands what's happening.
'If there is enforcement that takes place, we want to make sure that it happens in a very peaceful manner. If you guys want to be arrested, if there's an injunction that's issued, we just don't want anyone to get hurt,' the officer said.
He added that there was a right to protest in Canada.
'Sometimes that's lost in policing, and it has in the past. It's our job to ensure that our teams are all very calm and that things go off without anyone getting hurt. That's the biggest goal.'
Related Stories
5/19/2025
5/17/2025
Katie Pasitney, whose parents own the farm, told officers in the meeting that lasted less than an hour that 'people are on edge,' as she asked police not to bring weapons onto the property.
The Regional District of Central Kootenay said last week that its landfill would not accept any ostrich carcasses without further testing for avian flu, but the Canadian Food Inspection Agency said on Saturday the cull will still proceed, and the timing will not be made public.
Pasitney's mother, Karen Espersen, is seen in one of the videos streamed Wednesday standing behind a fence with the ostriches and telling the officers that the group does not stand for aggression.
An officer was asked when the cull might happen but he said he had 'no idea.'
The RCMP did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the visit.
In a statement issued later Wednesday, the family said their goal was to save what they say are healthy animals from 'an inhumane and unjustified death' and that the policies around the cull do not serve the public interest.
'Farmers are juggling biosecurity measures, animal care, community concerns and so much more
—
this isn't about avoiding hard conversations, it's about supporting those who work tirelessly as farmers and for what is right,' the statement says.
The food inspection agency ordered the birds destroyed in December after an avian flu outbreak that killed dozens of ostriches, and a Federal Court judge recently upheld the decision.
In a response to questions about whether the current health of the remaining birds had any impact on the decision to cull, the agency said Tuesday that a single laboratory confirmed case of avian flu 'is sufficient to declare a premises infected, given how easily the disease can spread to other birds.'
The agency said Saturday that under the Health of Animals Act, if an owner refuses to meet 'depopulation' requirements it could move forward itself or use a third-party contractor and potentially withhold part or all compensation from the owners.
Last week's court decision says the farm could be compensated up to $3,000 per ostrich, potentially representing a payout of about $1.2 million if all are culled.
The family disputes the $3,000-per-bird price tag in their statement, saying a rooster is worth $7,500, while an 'antibody-producing hen' is worth $93,000.
The farmers say their flock has developed herd immunity against avian flu and is valuable to science.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
Sean Combs's Ex-Girlfriend Will Continue Testimony About Unwanted Sex
The 18th day of testimony in the federal trial of Sean Combs will continue on Friday with a woman who described the encounters she had with a succession of men at the music mogul's direction as a 'Pandora's box' of unwanted sex. The woman, who is testifying under the pseudonym 'Jane,' is the second witness put forward by prosecutors as a victim of sex trafficking by Mr. Combs, who also faces charges of racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution. Mr. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to all charges, and his lawyers have strongly denied that any of his sexual arrangements were nonconsensual. The first of those witnesses, Casandra Ventura — the singer known as Cassie, who was in an off-and-on relationship with Mr. Combs for 11 years — has played a prominent role in Mr. Combs's legal troubles over the last year and a half. Her bombshell lawsuit, filed in November 2023, led to the government's investigation, and a leaked hotel security video showing Mr. Combs brutally assaulting her has been a key piece of evidence, shown to jurors repeatedly since the trial began four weeks ago. Before Jane took the stand on Thursday afternoon — under strict conditions from the court to protect her privacy — little had been known about her. In filings before the trial began, prosecutors referred to her in filings only as 'Victim-2,' saying that the 'financial losses, dependency and social isolation' she experienced during her relationship with Mr. Combs from 2021 to 2024 'made her more vulnerable to his coercion.' At the start of her testimony, she described herself as a single mother who was earning her living through social media promotions when she met Mr. Combs in 2020 on a trip to Florida. They began flirting, and gave each other nicknames: She was Bert and he was Ernie, after the 'Sesame Street' characters. By early 2021, she said, they were in a passionate, intimate relationship (though Mr. Combs was clear that he was seeing other women at the same time). What she says happened next parallels parts of Ms. Ventura's testimony. Mr. Combs brought Jane to a Miami hotel suite where she said she saw 'assistants' setting up with lights and beverages, and draping bedsheets over the furniture. Mr. Combs invited a male escort to the room and gave the two detailed sexual directions, she testified, while the famed music producer watched and masturbated. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
News24
8 hours ago
- News24
Another Diddy ex testifies to ‘obligation' in coerced, choreographed sexual encounters
A key witness, 'Jane,' has provided graphic testimony in the federal trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs, alleging coercive sexual encounters. Combs allegedly orchestrated disturbing acts involving multiple women, with testimony also backing claims made by ex-girlfriend Casandra Ventura. The trial has featured intense courtroom moments, including accusations of witness manipulation by Combs and shocking allegations from witnesses about violent and exploitative behaviour. A key witness took the stand in the federal trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs Thursday, giving graphic detail of choreographed sexual encounters with the music mogul that were allegedly coercive, testimony that's core to the prosecution's case. The woman, who is speaking in court under the pseudonym Jane, began delivering testimony that is expected to last for days and which so far mirrors descriptions provided by another marquee witness against Combs, his ex-girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura. Combs, 55, faces upwards of life in prison if convicted of racketeering and sex trafficking crimes. Both Jane and Ventura are key witnesses to the latter charges. Jane took the stand after some courtroom drama: the judge threatened to remove Combs after he was 'looking at jurors and nodding vigorously' while a different witness testified. Calling Combs's behaviour 'absolutely unacceptable,' Judge Arun Subramanian said, 'It cannot happen again.' READ | 'Sometimes I scream in my sleep': Witness claims Diddy dangled her from 17th-story balcony Communications between a defendant and a jury are strictly prohibited. The court had been hearing testimony from Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Ventura's who had alleged that Combs dangled her from a 17th-story balcony before throwing her against furniture. Combs's gestures to the jury took place as Bongolan was under tense questioning from his defence team, who sought to cast her as an unreliable witness who abused drugs. 'Hotel nights' Jane's testimony was highly anticipated: she began by detailing how she had met Combs through a friend who was dating him at the time. But he came on strongly to Jane, she said, and when her friend got engaged to someone else, she began seeing Combs romantically. Their relationship began in earnest during a whirlwind five-day date at a Miami hotel, she said, describing Combs - as many others during the trial have - as 'larger than life.' READ MORE | Hush money bombshell: Hotel worker testifies Diddy paid to bury Cassie assault video 'I was pretty head over heels for Sean,' she told jurors. Several heady months followed, including a romantic trip to Turks and Caicos and the Bahamas in February 2021. She said Combs first gave her illicit drugs on that trip. When the vacation ended, he wired her $10 000 because she had been unable to work - at the time, she was creating content for brands on social media - and was a single mother. Jane silently collected herself and held her face in a tissue as she described how her blissful early days with Combs took a sharp turn in May 2021 when he began talking about his fantasies of seeing her with other men. She acquiesced because she wanted to make Combs happy, she said, and to her surprise, he arranged for another man she dubbed Don to meet them at a hotel that very night. AFP Jane thought the experience was a one-time thing, but she said instead, it became 'a door I was unable to shut.' The 'hotel nights' became a regular feature of their relationship, Jane told jurors, even when she said she didn't want it. 'He was just dismissive,' she said, saying that approximately 90 percent of their relationship became a pattern of her having sex with other men under Combs's direction. Full-time job Jane's descriptions of the 'hotel nights' - her provocative attire that Combs requested, red mood lighting, heavy drug use and copious baby oil - closely tracked with the testimony that Ventura gave on the stand of what she called 'freak-offs.' Jane said that the amount of time she spent getting ready for hotel nights with Combs, which he demanded at a moment's notice and sometimes flew her to, meant she did not work. Money from Combs and child support from her previous relationship were essentially her only income, she said. That testimony echoed Ventura's, who had said her freak-offs with Combs came to feel like a full-time job. Combs put Jane up in a home in Los Angeles for $10 000 a month, she said, and when she spoke against hotel nights, he would bring up that point. ALSO READ | 'You post the great times': Witness asked to defend Instagram posts in Sean Combs trial 'My feeling of obligation really started to stem from the fact that my partner was paying my rent,' she said. Jane told jurors their relationship continued up until Combs's arrest in September 2024. Prosecutors say he ran a criminal enterprise of high-ranking employees and bodyguards who enforced his power with illicit acts, including kidnapping, bribery and arson. Along with Ventura and Jane, witnesses have included former employees of Bad Boy Enterprises, Combs's company. Jane's testimony will continue on Friday. The trial is expected to last at least another month.
CNN
10 hours ago
- CNN
Officer who used excessive force allowed to plead guilty to misdemeanor after felony conviction
A Los Angeles sheriff's deputy will serve four months in prison on a misdemeanor conviction for using excessive force after the new Trump-appointed US attorney offered an unusual plea deal despite a jury convicting him of a felony. The victim's attorney asked a federal appeals court to reinstate the felony conviction, but the court declined to do so on Thursday. Deputy Trevor Kirk was recorded tackling and pepper-spraying an older woman while she filmed a man being handcuffed outside a supermarket in June 2023. A federal jury in February found Kirk guilty of one felony count of deprivation of rights under color of law, a crime that carries a prison sentence of up to 10 years. Felony convictions also prevent law enforcement officials from continuing to serve or owning a gun. But when US Attorney Bill Essayli took office a few months later, federal prosecutors offered Kirk a plea deal — a dismissal of the felony if Kirk pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor, and a recommendation of one year of probation. A judge agreed to the lessened charge but sentenced Kirk to four months in prison on Monday. Essayli said in a video posted online that prosecutors also offered Kirk a misdemeanor plea agreement under the prior administration, which he turned down. 'After reviewing this case extensively and thoroughly and carefully reviewing the facts and the law, I made the decision to re-extend the misdemeanor plea agreement to Deputy Kirk,' Essayli said. In court filings signed off by Essayli, prosecutors wrote they believed that Kirk's actions fell on the lower end of the excessive force spectrum, the woman did not suffer 'serious bodily injury,' and that the case was prosecuted improperly. Some former prosecutors and police conviction experts called the step highly unusual, especially without any indication of prosecutorial misconduct, ethical violations or new evidence in the case. It follows President Donald Trump's vow to 'protect and defend' law enforcement officers from prosecution and his efforts to assert greater control over the US Justice Department. 'It's very unusual to offer a plea deal after a conviction,' said Jeffrey Bellin, a former federal prosecutor from Washington, D.C., who is now a law professor at William and Mary Law School. In cases where it could happen, there's usually new evidence of innocence, 'not just the same evidence from a different perspective,' he said. Kirk's attorney, Tom Yu, said they filed a motion for acquittal that was denied but planned to appeal the decision. Caree Harper, who represents the woman Kirk injured, said in court filings that the federal government changed its account of the incident to make Kirk's actions seem justified. In the original indictment, prosecutors wrote Kirk 'violently' threw the woman to the ground. In the new plea agreement, the government alleged the woman 'swatted' at Kirk and 'resisted,' Harper wrote, which she said was not proven in the criminal trial nor testified to in civil litigation. She said her client did not commit a crime, had no weapon, and did not try to flee or resist. She suffered from a black eye, a fractured bone in her right wrist, multiple bruises, scratches and significant chemical burning from the pepper-spray. Harper said the plea agreement sent a 'dangerous message' that law enforcement officials could be convicted of a felony and still 'cut a backroom deal after the trial.' Philip Stinson, a former police officer and attorney who studies police misconduct, said the plea deal offered to Kirk was 'seemingly without precedent' in federal court cases prosecuting police officers for their on-duty crimes, according to his search of an internal database of more than 24,000 arrest cases in the last 20 years involving sworn law enforcement officers. LA County Sheriff's Department spokesperson Nicole Nishida said Kirk will remain employed with the agency but relieved from duty while it conducts an internal investigation to determine if any policy or procedures were violated. Kirk's case is the latest showing the Trump administration's plan to take a lighter hand in the federal government's traditional role in prosecuting police misconduct. Trump's April executive order on policing promised the 'unleashing' of law enforcement and support for their legal defense. The Justice Department announced in May it was canceling proposed consent decrees reached with Minneapolis and Louisville to implement policing reforms in the wake of the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. The department also announced it would retract its findings in six other sweeping investigations into police departments that the Biden administration had accused of civil rights violations. Trump-appointed federal judges have also played a hand in dismissing cases against police officers, including murder charges against a former Atlanta police officer who shot and killed an unarmed man hiding in a closet in 2019. Experts say the reliance on the federal government to perform this policing oversight comes from the close relationship between local prosecutors and police officers, who regularly work together to investigate crimes. 'We are often looking at the federal government to serve as a check and balance for local law enforcement officials who are accused of really egregious activity toward the public,' said Devin Hart, a spokesperson for the National Police Accountability Project. All four members of the original prosecutors withdrew from the case after the new plea deal was presented, and at least one resigned from the office, according to court filings. Two others took the buyout offered to federal employees, spokesperson Ciaran McEvoy confirmed.
