
BC opioid rules were aimed at reducing overdoses. But they cut cancer patients' pain meds
Rule changes designed to reduce opioid overdose deaths in British Columbia in 2016 inadvertently harmed cancer and palliative-care patients by reducing their access to pain killers, a new study has found.
The study published this week in the Canadian Medical Association Journal describes the impact of a practice standard issued by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC that June, about two months after the province declared a public health emergency over opioid deaths.
The rule changes were designed to mitigate prescription drug misuse, including the over-prescribing of opioids among patients with chronic non-cancer related pain.
The rules weren't meant for cancer and palliative-care patients, but lead author Dimitra Panagiotoglou said there was a "spillover" effect as doctors applied "aggressive tapering" of the painkillers.
"(With) the ongoing messages that physicians were getting at the time — opioids being bad — individuals decided to pull back on their prescribing, but there was this larger population-level effect in doing so," she said.
"We focus on these two groups because far and wide, it's considered completely acceptable to prescribe opioids for these groups and the concerns around opioids are very different," she said of cancer and palliative-care patients.
There were already downward trends in opioid prescriptions for people with chronic non-cancer pain and those receiving palliative care, Panagiotoglou said, and the study shows that trend continued after the change.
But among cancer patients, there was a surprising "nose dive" in access to opioids right after the release of the new standard, said Panagiotoglou, who is an associate professor in the department of epidemiology, biostatistics and occupational health at McGill University.
The rules were legally enforceable, and physicians found non-compliant could be disciplined or fined under the Health Professions Act and College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC bylaws. The rules were revised in 2018 to address concerns that they were being misinterpreted.
The changes in 2016 set a recommended dose ceiling at 90 morphine milligram equivalents or less per day and used "strong language" around co-prescribing with benzodiazepines given the drug poisoning risk, Panagiotoglou said.
Among cancer patients, the study found opioid dispensations were 15 per cent lower per person than expected two years after the implementation of the 2016 rules. Over 30 days, that translates to 4.5 fewer days of supply, it says.
For people receiving palliative care, the per-person dosage was 6.1 per cent lower, translating to 1.8 fewer days' supply, the study says, while for patients with chronic non-cancer pain — the target population of the rules — dispensations were 8.2 per cent lower.
"Over time, people were seeing a meaningful decline in their doses and in the days supplied," Panagiotoglou said of the period between the implementation of the 2016 practice standard and its revision in 2018.
The study did not include opioids dispensed in hospitals or long-term care facilities, rather for prescriptions for people living at home.
The study says the changes led doctors to increase "aggressive tapering" of patients' medication. Panagiotoglou said evidence suggests this can lead to pain and increase in overdose risk by pushing people toward illicit opioids.
The BC college revised its standard in 2018 in response to concerns that misinterpretation was leading to "more conservative prescribing to all patients," not just those with chronic non-cancer pain, the study says.
"When the language relaxed and ceiling thresholds were removed, for example, there's this rebound effect where you see, in fact, the amount being prescribed kind of stabilizes or inflects upwards," Panagiotoglou said.
The study concludes that its findings show how practice standards can modify physician behaviour, but also highlight "how misinterpretation can harm patients."
Panagiotoglou said the findings underscore the potential for "unintended consequences" of sweeping changes to practice standards.
Physicians must be careful prescribing opioids, she said, especially given the underlying context of the toxic drug crisis that has claimed more than 16,000 lives in BC since the health emergency was declared in 2016.
But Panagiotoglou said it's important to include a diversity of voices at the decision-making table, such as patient-care advocacy groups.
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC said in an email it could not comment on the study because it was not directly involved in the research.
But it said the 2016 practice standard was informed by the "best available guidance at the time," and it has since been "revised substantially."
"In the 2016 practice standard, (the college) was explicit in acknowledging and endorsing the use of aggressive pharmacotherapy in the context of active cancer, palliative, and end-of-life care," it said in the statement.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 14, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
15 hours ago
- CBC
Nunavik's tuberculosis outbreaks are a result of decades of colonial neglect, professor says
Nunavik is on track to set another record number of tuberculosis cases, which one scholar says is unacceptable in this day and age. There have been 56 cases so far this year of tuberculosis reported in the region, according to Quebec's health department. On Monday, the region's 14 mayors released a letter, calling on the Quebec government to declare a public health emergency over the rates of tuberculosis. The Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services has said the incidence of tuberculosis in the region is 1,000 times higher than among non-Indigenous people born in Canada. Health Minister Christian Dubé told CBC News he "will continue to follow the recommendations of public health experts on the subject," though he stopped short of committing to a declaration. Natasha MacDonald, a McGill University professor from Kuujjuaraapik who researches culturally responsive care for tuberculosis in Nunavik, said she doesn't believe Quebec is treating the tuberculosis situation in Nunavik with the same urgency as elsewhere in the province. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. What do you make of this call from the mayors to declare a public health emergency over the tuberculosis situation? It's unfortunate that we are in a time and place where we have to make such calls to action. Under a number of international, national and provincial jurisdictions, including the Viens Commission, the Quebec government has a responsibility to ensure that health care in our communities is adequate and is on par with those of non-Indigenous populations. Because of the urgent situation that Nunavik is in right now, the mayors have had no choice but to unite together as one voice to demand that the government do its job. Why do you think we're seeing this upward trajectory in cases of tuberculosis, in 2025? What's unbelievable is that we are a first world nation in Canada, and we have a third world disease within Canada. It exists in Nunavik in our Inuit communities, and it's the same strain that has been in Nunavik since 1928. Quebec made efforts with the City of Montreal, not that long ago, to stop the spread of tuberculosis. Cases were found, contact tracing was done, people were isolated and medicated. In Nunavik, it has been left to grow and we have outbreaks in six of our 14 communities. This is unacceptable, and it should not happen. We are part of Quebec, we are part of Canada. You've alluded to the damage that tuberculosis has wreaked on families historically, with Inuit being sent south for care. Given that history, what do you believe we, as a society, still don't understand treating tuberculosis in Nunavik? What's happening in Nunavik is a result of decades of systemic colonial neglect. Inuit are expected to adapt to those systems, rather than the government adapting those systems to meet the needs of Inuit. The way the regional health board has been implanted by the provincial government makes it a very program-centred health-care system and not a person-centred health-care program. One of the infectious disease nurses said at one point, in all of Nunavik, they ran out of sputum testing kits. So she had to beg and plead from the province of Manitoba to send over 40,000 sputum testing kits. Quebec didn't have any and it wouldn't procure more. There aren't even X-rays in most of our communities, much less X-ray technicians in those communities. And Inuit feel uncomfortable going to the clinic or hospital because of decades of mistrust in medical care and the systemic and individual racism that exists. One of the calls to action in the mayors' letter is about Inuit health sovereignty. What does that look like? For things to change in our communities, Inuit need to be the ones who determine how our programs and systems run, so that they are tailored to the way we think and work. Inuit are being expected to move around the calendars and schedules of health-care workers, and they are workers are told they should not be going house to house for testing. If it were Inuit leading our organizations, we would have a better understanding on how to do more screening. It's not somebody from Quebec City who should be dictating how much money should be going toward basic equipment, We should be. We're the ones in our communities. We're the ones that know that the X-ray machine is broken in this one town, or that we have a new graduate who's just finished their radiography course who could be hired into a position within their community. What we are talking about here is structural change. Can you compare what the system looks like now with Nunavik's health organizations, to that ideal vision you've just talked about? Systemic change would come when Inuit are able to create a new system altogether, through self-determination or self-government. Or if we can appropriate the system and have an Inuk lead who can hire resources, because we know best on how to allocate our resources and where the needs are. The midwifery program in Nunavik is a perfect example of that. This is a system where Inuit have designed how our mothers want to give birth in a community with support, in an Inuit way, and it is unbelievably successful. This is not rocket science. We also understand that translators are as key as any doctor or nurse. Right now, you have French-speaking nurses and doctors that come into our community, and English is often the lingua franca because most Inuit in Nunavik still speak Inuktitut. When you're translating, for example, with a term like tuberculosis, you have to be very careful to make the difference between tuberculosis, which is a disease that can kill you, and something like bronchitis. You can't just say it's a lung problem. I understand that we have to collaborate with the Ministry of Health in Quebec, but at the same time, they have to understand we are not just another region within Quebec. We are distinct and we have needs that have not been met for decades. It's also an example of systemic racism because Inuit in Nunavik have been ignored, have been left behind, have been left to die for decades, and this is unacceptable. It was unacceptable after the first TB case. It was unacceptable after the first death. It's unacceptable now when our numbers are record high. We have nurses who are burnt out. And if this were anywhere else in Quebec, there would be an outcry and the government would be immediately addressing this, so we are expecting the same.


CTV News
3 days ago
- CTV News
Survivors of MK-Ultra brainwashing experiments want judge to approve class-action lawsuit
It was called the MK Ultra project, meant to experiment on mind control using patients as guinea pigs. Lana Dean Ponting remembers her parents having her hospitalized at the Allan Memorial Institute, because she was a troublesome teen who often ran away. 'I was drugged up so bad I can't remember half of what they did to me,' explains the woman, who is about to turn 84. The abuse wasn't just medical. 'I bore a son when i was at the Allan Memorial and I got pregnant without ever knowing who the father was.' Ponting says she suffered from the debilitating effects of the treatments all her life. The experiments were sponsored by the CIA, funded by the Canadian government, and handled by a McGill University independent researcher named Donald Ewen Cameron between the 1940s and 1960s. It's reported the medical team used electroshocks, and experimental drugs on patients, including LSD. Ponting and several other survivors and their families were in court Monday as their lawyer is trying to get authorization for a class-action lawsuit filed in 2019. It's the first step before the case can move ahead. 'I think there is no question no one has ever taken responsibility. No one has ever apologized. There was some modest compensation in 1992 without any admission of liability,' said lawyer Jeff Orenstein, who's taking on the case on behalf of the consumer law group. He said that in the early 1990s, some survivors were offered settlements, without anyone taking responsibility for what happened. The courts already prevented the group from suing the U.S government. The CIA successfully argued the courts here have no jurisdiction. The other parties, such as the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) and the Canadian government, argue they can't be sued because the plaintiffs waited too long. 'There are many psychological reasons of blockages that just don't allow people to take action,' Orenstein said, liking it to women who wait decades to denounce sexual aggressors because of fear and stigma. Julie Tanny remembers how her father, Charles Tanny, was admitted over a neurological pain issue in his face. The doctors thought he had psychiatric issues, and began treating him. His daughter says he came out with permanent mental health damages from which he never recovered. 'He didn't know me or my two siblings. He remembered my mother, but he didn't remember he had children or that he had a business or anything. And he was very detached. That never changed. He never came back to the person he was before,' Tanny said. It could take a few months for the court to decide if the class-action can be authorized. If the case moves forward, the plaintiffs may finally have a shot at getting some closure that has eluded them for seven decades.

Montreal Gazette
3 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
‘It's destroyed a lot of lives': Families attend authorization hearings in Montreal for brainwashing class-action suit
News By Lana Ponting was only 15 years old when she was admitted to the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal. As a rebellious teenager, it was believed the psychiatric hospital could address her 'stubbornness and disobedience.' Instead, she says, she was subjected to severe physical and mental abuse, along with psychiatric experimentation that would later become infamously known as the Montreal experiments. Now 83, frail and requiring a walker, Ponting travelled from Winnipeg to be at the Montreal courthouse Monday as authorization hearings in a class-action lawsuit over the alleged abuse began. 'It's destroyed a lot of lives,' Ponting said outside the courtroom, anger in her voice. '(I want them) to see us, to feel us. I'm alive. I will not stop. I will fight until the end.' Filed in 2019, the class-action request alleges the Canadian government funded psychiatric treatments by Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron at the institute between 1948 and 1964. The experiments were allegedly part of the CIA's MK-ULTRA program of covert mind-control. In addition to the government, the lawsuit also targets McGill University, which was affiliated to the psychiatric hospital, and Montreal's Royal Victoria Hospital. 'This is not a medical or professional malpractice case. ... This is a case of systemic abuse,' lawyer Jeff Orenstein told the court on Monday. 'When people went to the Allan Memorial, they were told they would be receiving legitimate treatment,' he added. 'Instead they were human guinea pigs.' The defendants are contesting the class-action request, partly arguing the families waited too long to file their claims according to the law. The Canadian government also contends that some families accepted $100,000 payments from the federal government in the 1990s, which then barred them from pursuing further legal action. They will plead their case on Tuesday. Orenstein, for his part, argues the victims were unable to act earlier because of the trauma and psychological pain they endured. He believes the suit could grow to include several hundred people. The lawsuit had tried to include the U.S. government as a defendant, but Quebec's Court of Appeal ruled that the U.S. cannot be sued in Canada for its alleged role in the experiments; the Supreme Court of Canada refused to review the case. Julie Tanny, the lead plaintiff in the case, said she spent years not speaking about what happened to her father, Charles, because of the stigma attached. The few times she did, she added, she was met with disbelief. Present for the hearing, Tanny said she still can't accept the way her father changed after his stay at the institute in 1957 to treat facial pain. She described the warm and engaged father she once knew as having completely 'evaporated' after his treatment. He grew distant and barely recognized his children. 'For a kid, it's very traumatizing to have that relationship go away and not really understand why,' said Tanny, 71. 'It was the beginning of a nightmare for hundreds and hundreds of families.' In court on Monday, Orenstein detailed the experiments Cameron carried out on patients, noting how they were all well-documented at the time. Rather than scientific efforts, he compared them to acts of psychological torture. He described how patients were allegedly subjected to sensory deprivation and drug-induced comas, forced to listen to repeated audio messages on loop and to undergo extensive electroshock treatment. In some cases, he said, people were reduced to a childlike state. Others left the hospital as 'robots with no human emotions.' Lisa Moore, whose mother Hélène was sent to the hospital in the early 1960s, left the courtroom in tears as the alleged abuse was described, her emotions too difficult to contain. Now 54, Moore grew up in foster care and spent decades resenting her mother for how she treated her. But hearing the extent of what she went through laid bare in court on Monday provided a new perspective. 'It wasn't her fault. They took away her ability for compassion,' said Moore, who reconciled with her mother in recent years. 'It's very overwhelming,' she added. 'I just keep imagining what it was like for her.'