Takeaways: Trump's campaign has received scores of donations from problematic donors
WASHINGTON (AP) — When President Donald Trump directed his attorney general last month to investigate online fundraising, he cited concerns that foreigners and fraudsters were using elaborate 'schemes' and 'dummy accounts' to funnel illegal contributions to politicians and causes.
Instead of calling for an expansive probe, however, the president identified just one potential target: ActBlue, the Democrats' online fundraising juggernaut, which has acknowledged receiving over 200 potentially illicit contributions last year from foreign internet addresses.
Trump's announcement also contained a glaring omission — his own political committees have received scores of contributions from potentially problematic donors.
The White House did not respond to questions about Trump's fundraising. Instead, a senior administration official pointed to a recent House Republican investigation of ActBlue, which the White House alleges 'uncovered specific evidence of potentially unlawful conduct.'
The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment.
Here are some takeaways from the AP's review of Trump's political committees:
Trump's committees received questionable donations from overseas
It's against the law for U.S. candidates and political committees to accept contributions from foreign nationals. Laws also place strict limits on donation amounts and prohibit the laundering of contributions to get around legal caps. For the most part, such donations have been policed by campaigns and the Federal Election Commission, with only the most egregious examples being targeted by federal law enforcement.
The AP identified only two Trump donors out of more than 200 living abroad whose U.S. citizenship was listed as 'verified' in the president's campaign finance reports. He received over 1,000 contributions from 150 donors who omitted key identifying details such as their city, state, address or country. Trump also received at least 90 contributions from people who omitted their full name, are listed as 'anonymous' or whose donations include the notation 'name not provided.'
Many of them were made through WinRed, the Republicans' online fundraising platform that is the GOP's answer to ActBlue.
Campaign finance disclosures indicate that only a few dozen of these contributions were later refunded. WinRed officials did not respond to a requests for comment.
Some of the donations would typically raise red flags
U.S. citizens living abroad are free to donate to politicians back home. But it can be difficult even for campaigns to discern who is allowed to give and whether a person may be serving as a 'straw' donor for someone else.
Jiajun 'Jack' Zhang, for example, is a jet-setting Chinese businessman whose Qingdao Scaffolding Co. boasts of being one of the 'biggest manufacturers and suppliers in China' of scaffolding. In October, he used WinRed to donate $5,000 to Trump, campaign finance disclosures show.
Zhang lives in China's Shandong province, according to his LinkedIn account, and is described in French business filings as a Chinese national. But his contribution to Trump lists a La Quinta Inn in Hawaiian Gardens, California, as his address, records show. The donation was made around the time that Zhang posted a photo on social media of his family visiting Disneyland, which is near the hotel.
Zhang did not respond to an email seeking comment.
Other potentially troublesome donations identified by the AP include four from unnamed donors that listed an address of '999 Anonymous Dr.' And a series of contributions made through WinRed that listed the donor's address as a vacant building in Washington that was formerly a funeral home. The donor, identified only as 'Alex, A' on Trump's campaign finance report, gave nearly $5,000 spread across more than 40 separate transactions last year.
Trump has never cared much about campaign finance violations
The donations fit a pattern for Trump, who has in the past exhibited indifference toward campaign finance rules and used his presidential powers to assist those facing legal trouble in such matters.
In January, Trump's Justice Department dropped its case against former Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, a Nebraska Republican accused of accepting a $30,000 contribution from a Nigerian billionaire. During his first term, Trump pardoned conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza and Republican donor Michael Liberty, who were both convicted of using straw donors to evade contribution limits. He also pardoned former California Rep. Duncan Hunter, who was convicted in 2020 of stealing $250,000 from his campaign fund.
Trump's political efforts have also drawn contributions from straw donors and foreigners who have subjected to legal scrutiny.
Among them is Barry Zekelman, a Canadian steel industry billionaire, who was fined $975,000 in 2022 by the Federal Election Commission for funneling $1.75 million to America First Action, Trump's official super PAC, in 2018. The contribution helped Zekelman secure a dinner with Trump at which steel tariffs were discussed.
Democrats are nervous about the investigation
Democrats are outraged by the call for an investigation. They say it smacks of political retribution, considering WinRed has also accepted potentially problematic donations.
'This is him taking direct aim at the center of Democratic and progressive fundraising to hamstring his political opponents,' said Ezra Reese, an attorney who leads the political law division at the Elias Law Group, a leading Democratic firm that does not represent ActBlue. 'I don't think there's any question that they picked their target first. He's not even pretending.'
But Democrats are also worried. Some predict a hit worth as much as a $10 million in the short term if ActBlue is forced to shut down. That has led some Democrats to begin thinking about alternatives, though they acknowledged it might be too late to create something as successful as ActBlue with the midterms around the corner.
'There is a pervasive fear that ActBlue could cease to exist,' said Matt Hodges, a veteran Democratic operative who served as the director of engineering for Joe Biden's 2020 campaign. 'That's the worst fear people have — that this will escalate or drain legal resources that hinder their ability to operate.'
—-
Peoples reported from New York.
__
Contact AP's global investigative team at Investigative@ap.org or https://www.ap.org/tips/
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
17 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Donald Trump campaigned on eroding democracy. Now, he's just fulfilling his promises
In late May, the Trump administration started a fire. According to reporting by the Wall Street Journal, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller gave an address at the headquarters of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), where he told officials that federal agents need to 'just go out there and arrest illegal aliens.' U.S. President Donald Trump wanted to see, at minimum, 3,000 ICE arrests per day, and that wasn't going to happen if agents first developed target lists, presented warrants and the like. So Mr. Miller instructed ICE to go to places like Home Depot and swoop up as many illegal immigrants as possible. The fire took, of course. Over the weekend, people in L.A. took to the streets – with a few of them turning violent – to protest ICE raids and Mr. Trump's immigration policies more broadly. Though the majority of the protests were peaceful, a few clashes with police and cars set ablaze were all the pretext Mr. Trump needed to throw some kerosene on his fire: that is, to call in the National Guard, under a provision of the U.S. code that allows the President to do so to repel an invasion or suppress a rebellion, even though the protests were lawful and the situation was being managed by local forces. On Monday, the Trump administration mobilized more National Guard troops, as well as 700 marines. If the situation escalates further, Mr. Trump will likely invoke the Insurrection Act, which will empower troops to participate in civilian law enforcement (for now, they can only protect structures and personnel). The President has already used the word 'insurrectionists' to describe protesters on the ground in L.A., and has even gone so far as to muse about arresting the state's Democratic Governor, Gavin Newsom. The situation could explode suddenly – dramatically, catastrophically – which would give Mr. Trump further pretext to engage in his most authoritarian fantasies, which could even mean assuming federal control of the state or delaying future midterm elections. That would sound like a hysterical prediction if the U.S. government hadn't already enabled masked, plain-clothed agents to snatch people off the streets; if it wasn't trying to deport someone who is legally in the U.S. over a college newspaper op-ed; if it wasn't openly defying court orders; and if it wasn't musing about arresting political adversaries, planning a military parade for the President's birthday and – oh yeah – calling in the National Guard, over state objections, to quell dissent. When things are on fire, you can give yourself permission to do all sorts of things. That's exactly what the U.S. President is doing – and it's exactly what he promised. Opinion: For Trump, the L.A. protests are an opportunity to wield power and spread fear He said explicitly during the campaign that he would not hold back on sending troops to dismantle protests like he did following the death of George Floyd in 2020. 'Next time,' he told a crowd in 2023, 'I'm not waiting.' He spoke openly to Fox News back in October about using the National Guard or military to deal with 'the enemy from within.' Mr. Trump was frustrated in his first term by objections from then-defense secretary Mark T. Esper to having U.S. troops patrolling American streets, and he has been clear – both in his statements, and his appointments of only the most obsequious minions to his inner circle – that he won't be constrained this time. Nothing that leaks from Mr. Trump's lips is ever rhetorical. None of this should be a surprise. In fact, very little of what Mr. Trump has done in the first few months of his second term should come as a shock. He said he was going to implement tariffs, and he did. He said he was going to gut government agencies, and he has. These were never really threats. Threats offer an opportunity to change course; they warn of the consequences for failing to change an action or behaviour. But there was never an opportunity to redirect Mr. Trump. The President, who loves the idea of tariffs, was going to impose them one way or another – whether a trade deficit was real or imaginary, or whether Canada controlled the miniscule amount of fentanyl crossing the border or not. And so Mr. Trump invented an economic emergency, and did what he intended to all along. He's following the same course with the protests in L.A., which were fairly standard in terms of intensity before the President summoned the National Guard. Indeed, Mr. Trump's threats were actually promises; now, he's making good. So when the President says he will, for example, prosecute his political enemies, or seek out a third term, we'd be wise to see those not as threats, but as vows – ones that Mr. Trump will endeavour to keep.
Winnipeg Free Press
27 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Federal immigration raid at Omaha food production plant sparks protests
OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Immigration authorities raided at least one Omaha food production plant Tuesday morning, inspiring some small protests, but details about how many workers were affected weren't immediately clear. Omaha police and the Douglas County sheriff said immigration officials had warned them about their plans, and their departments helped block off traffic around the neighborhood where many food production plants are located while U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers worked. ICE officials didn't immediately respond to questions. Meatpacking plants rely heavily on immigrant workers who are willing to do the physically demanding work. The industry has not yet been the focus of President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement efforts, but the administration has been intensifying its efforts in recent weeks. Trump called out the National Guard this week to respond to ongoing protests in Los Angeles over his immigration policies. In Omaha, a small group of people came out to protest the raids, and some of them even jumped on the front bumper of a vehicle to try to stop officers. Glenn Valley Foods officials didn't immediately respond to an inquiry from The Associated Press, but WOWT reported that CEO and owner Gary Rohwer said he wasn't made aware of the operation ahead of time and that there was no warrant. 'Of course not. It's a raid,' said Rohwer, whose company makes the Gary's QuickSteak brand of ready-to-grill steak. Federal agents entered the plant around 9 a.m. Tuesday with a list of 97 people they wanted to screen, Rohwer said. He said the company regularly checks the immigration status of employees with the federal E-Verify database. The raids prompted one Douglas County Commissioner to walk out in the middle of a meeting Tuesday to head down to the area he represents in southeast Omaha where the plants are located. Commissioner Roger Garcia and City Councilman Ron Hug both expressed concern about the impact of the raids on families. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'These actions are deeply harmful to the South Omaha community,' Hug said in a statement. 'Not only are they unjust and disruptive, but they also directly undermine the economic stability and growth of District 4 and the broader community.' Douglas County Sheriff Aaron Hanson said his agency is 'not privy to the exact nature of the ICE operation' but that his agency is there to assist with assuring 'peace and safety' of everyone in the area. Asked when he learned of the operation, he said his department received 'respectful and ample notification.' He says he got the notification about a week ago.
Winnipeg Free Press
41 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
FACT FOCUS: A Craigslist ad is not proof of paid protesters in LA. It was posted as a prank
As demonstrations in Los Angeles over immigration raids unfolded in recent days, social media users falsely cited a Craigslist ad as evidence that protesters had been paid to participate. 'We are forming a select team of THE TOUGHEST dudes in the area,' the ad, which is no longer live, read. 'This unit will be activated only when the situation demands it — BUT YOU GET PAID EVERY WEEK NO MATTER WHAT. high-pressure, high-risk, no room for hesitation. We need individuals who do not break, panic, or fold under stress and are basically kickass dudes.' It offered $6,500-$12,500 in compensation per week. But the ad was a prank, it is not related to the Los Angeles protests. Here's a closer look at the facts. CLAIM: A Craigslist ad seeking 'the toughest badasses in the city' is proof that Los Angeles demonstrations over immigration raids are made up of paid protesters. THE FACTS: This is false. The ad, which appeared in Craigslist's Los Angeles section for general labor jobs, was bait for a prank show and had nothing to do with the protests in Los Angeles, the ad's creator told The Associated Press. It was posted on Thursday, the day before the protests began. In a livestreamed episode on Friday, the show's hosts called and spoke with people who responded to the ad. 'I literally had no idea it was ever going to be connected to the riots. It was a really weird coincidence,' said Joey LaFleur, who posted the ad on Craigslist. The ad was developed as part of a new prank show called 'Goofcon1,' said LaFleur, who hosts the podcast with Logan Quiroz. On their show Friday, the day protests began, they spoke live on the phone with people who responded during Goofcon1's third episode. LaFleur noted during the episode that he also posted a more 'militaristic' version of the ad in Craigslist's Austin section, but didn't get many responses. Screenshots of the ad were used in social media posts on multiple platforms, cited as proof that those involved in the Los Angeles protests had been paid. The posts gained tens of thousands of likes, shares, and views. 'CALIFORNIA RIOT IS A FUNDED OPERATION,' reads one X post sharing the ad. 'Destabilizing the Trump administration and the United States in general is the goal. Then, they receive billions of federal funding to 'fix' the damage and pocket the money.' A TikTok video sharing the ad viewed approximately 14,100 times called protesters 'paid agitators' who are turning 'what was initially a peaceful protest of just marching into a full-blown riot.' Others pointed to the ad as evidence that the protests 'aren't organic' or have been faked by Democrats. After screenshots of the ad spread on social media, LaFleur posted about the confusion on his Instagram story multiple times. 'Accidentally goofed the entire nation on the latest @goofcon1,' one post reads. In another, he muses: 'I don't really know what to do with any of this. I guess get on Newsmax, or something. If I get on Newsmax, that could be funny.' False claims about paid protesters regularly spread around demonstrations, especially those that attract national or international attention. Similar false claims spread widely in 2020 during demonstrations over George Floyd's death at the hands of Minneapolis police. ___ Find AP Fact Checks here:
