logo
‘Act Responsibly For Humankind' – Palau President On Deep Sea Mining Order

‘Act Responsibly For Humankind' – Palau President On Deep Sea Mining Order

Scoop3 days ago

Palau's president says the US order to fast-track deep sea mining is not a good idea., RNZ Pacific Journalist
Palau's president says the US order to fast-track deep sea mining is not a good idea.
Deep sea mining frontrunner The Metals Company (TMC) has since confirmed it will not apply for a mining license through the International Seabed Authority (ISA), instead opting to apply through US regulations.
Surangel Whipps Jr. said the high seas belongs to the entire world so everyone must exercise caution.
'We should be responsible, and what we've asked for is a moratorium, or a temporary pause ….until you have the right information to make the most important informed decision,' Whipps told RNZ Pacific.
Whipps said it's important for those with concerns to have an opportunity to speak to US President Donald Trump.
'Because it's about partnership. And I think a lot of times it's the lack of information and lack of sharing information.
'It's our job now as the Pacific to stand up and say, this direction could be detrimental to all of us that depend on the Pacific ocean and the ocean and we ask that you act responsibly for humankind and for the Pacific.'
Trump's executive order states: 'It is the policy of the US to advance United States leadership in seabed mineral development.'
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was directed to, within 60 days, 'expedite the process for reviewing and issuing seabed mineral exploration licenses and commercial recovery permits in areas beyond national jurisdiction under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act'.
It directs the US science and environmental agency to expedite permits for companies to mine the ocean floor in the US and international waters.
The Metals Company has praised the US deepsea mining licencing pathway.
In a press release, its chief executive Gerard Barron made direct reference to Trump's order, titled 'Unleashing America's Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources'.
He said he was heartened by its call 'for a joint assessment of a seabed benefit-sharing mechanism' and was certain that 'big ocean states' like Nauru would continue to play a leading role in the deep sea mining industry.
There are divergent views on deep sea exploration and mining in the Pacific, with many nations, civil society groups, and even some governments advocating for a moratorium or outright ban.
However, Tonga, Nauru, Kiribati and the Cook Islands have exploration contracts with mining representatives.
Vanuatu's Climate Minister Ralph Regenvanu told RNZ Pacific in 2023 that Vanuatu's position is for no deep sea mining at any point.
'We have a lot to think about in the Pacific. We are the region that is spearheading for seabed minerals,' he said.
The Cook Islands has sought China's expertise in seabed mining through 'high-level' discussions on Prime Minister Mark Brown's February 2025 trip to China.
Whipps said 'you have to give [The Metals Company] credit' that they have been able to get in there and convince Donald Trump that this is a good direction to go.
But as the president of a nation with close ties to the US and Taiwan, and the host of the PIF Ocean's Commissioner, he has concerns.
'We don't know the impacts to the rest of what we have in the Pacific – which is for us in the Pacific, it's tuna [which] is our biggest resource,' Whipps said.
'How is that going to impact the food chain and all of that?
'Because we're talking about bringing, first of all, impacting the largest carbon sink that we have, which is the oceans, right? So we say our islands are sinking, but now we want to go and do something that helps our islands sink.
'That's not a good idea.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can California leave the United States? What you need to know about secession
Can California leave the United States? What you need to know about secession

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Can California leave the United States? What you need to know about secession

Could California leave the United States? It's complicated. Photo: Unsplash Explainer - One of last year's big movies was Civil War , a gritty look at an America torn apart by conflict into separate territories. Fiction, right? But talk of seceding from the rest of the country is a very real hot topic in certain parts of California during the second presidential term of Donald Trump. When Trump ordered the National Guard and US Marines into Los Angeles to tackle protests over his administration's immigration crackdown , that talk became a roar in some circles. Some people said it was time for California - a frequently left-leaning, progressive state where Trump got only 38 percent of the vote in last year's election - to leave the United States of America entirely. But could California actually leave the US, which it's been part of for 175 years? Here's what you need to know about secession. The National Guard was called in by President Trump over Los Angeles protests. Photo: AFP / SPENCER PLATT Republican Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, have clashed for some time, but recent protests in Los Angeles over Trump's aggressive efforts to deport migrants have taken it to a new level . Trump ordered in the National Guard to quell protests - a task that is usually the responsibility of governors and has resulted in a lawsuit by Newsom and California against Trump's administration. Trump then upped the ante more by also deploying US Marines . He also appeared to endorse the unprecedented idea of having Newsom arrested if he defied Trump's orders. The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward… Since his inauguration in January for a second term as President, Trump has broadly expanded presidential powers and cracked down on dissent. Last week, CNN reported that Trump has looked at cancelling much of California's federal funding. However, Trump may be the President, but Newsom is still the twice-elected leader of America's most populated state with nearly 40 million people. California has economic muscle on its side. It's the fifth largest economy in the world with a GDP of nearly US$3.9 trillion as of 2023 - larger than India, the United Kingdom and France. If California did split away - and that's a very big if - it would instantly become one of the world's economic superpowers. Anger against Trump's immigration policies has fuelled protests. Photo: ROBYN BECK "No, the US Constitution does not provide for a state to peacefully secede," University of Otago international relations professor Robert Patman said. Still, clashes between the federal government and the rights of states have been a thread all through American history. The last - and only - time secession happened, there was a bloody Civil War. In the climax of a long-brewing conflict over the existence of legalised slavery of Black Americans, 11 states seceded from the rest of the country. The four-year struggle from 1861 to 1865 left nearly 700,000 Americans dead and remains the single deadliest war in the nation's history. There have always been secession and split movements brewing in parts of the United States. None of them have actually gotten very far. For instance, in California, for years there's been scattered talk of splitting the rural far north of the state and parts of southern Oregon into a new "State of Jefferson." In the heightened environment of the Trump years, talk of dividing up the country by political factions has grown louder. "Growing political polarisation between 'blue' and 'red' states in the US poses a significant threat to its stability and democratic institutions," Patman said. "The conditions that led to an attempted insurrection on 6 January 2021 in the US have not yet moderated and so further outbreaks of instability cannot be ruled out." Georgia Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene called in 2023 for a "national divorce" between so-called red (Republican-leaning) and blue (Democrat) states. A 2021 poll by the University of Virginia Center for Politics found 52 percent of Trump voters and 41 percent of Biden voters at least somewhat agreed that they favoured blue and red states seceding from the union to form their own separate country. And in January, a poll conducted by YouGov for the pro-secession group the Independent California Institute found that 61 percent of Californians polled said California would be better off if it peacefully seceded. The American Civil War of 1861-1865 left at least 700,000 Americans dead. Photo: Bridgeman Images via AFP Pretty slim. California's own state constitution clearly says in Article III, Section 1 that "The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land." Meanwhile, the US Constitution has no mechanisms within it to allow secession at all. Back in 1869, shortly after the US Civil War, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Texas V. White that states do not actually have the right to unilaterally secede and that the union was "perpetual": "There was no place for reconsideration or revocation, except through revolution or through consent of the States." That precedent has pretty much remained ever since. Some say that could mean that all states might have to concede to one state's secession, or the Constitution itself would need to be amended, a long and complicated process. The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in a letter in 2010 , "If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede." It's theoretically possible a state could just declare itself independent and devil take the consequences, but again, last time that happened hundreds of thousands died in civil war. "The possibility of a second US Civil War is a serious concern, with surveys showing a significant number of Americans worrying about such a prospect," Patman said, noting that while the issues are quite different from the 1860s, many factors are fuelling division. "These include the rise of far-right extremism, growing economic inequality, cultural conflicts, and the divisive impact of the social media." California's flag has carried a 'Republic' tag since the state joined the union in 1850. Photo: Unsplash A movement called "CalExit" is hoping to put a measure on the ballot for California to vote on in November 2028 which would ask, "Should California leave the United States and become a free and independent country? CalExit organiser Marcus Ruiz Evans has been trying to get secession on the table for years. "Californians are aware they just don't think like Americans," he told RNZ's Saturday Morning in an interview in 2018 during Trump's first term. "You know, the average American is not sure if climate change is real, questions if immigration is a good idea, wants to have massive amounts of guns and hates any regulations against them and is generally distrustful of government." Organisers would need to get 546,000 signatures to put Ruiz Evans' latest measure on the ballot . To pass, 50 percent of registered voters must participate in the election and at least 55 percent of them would then have to say yes. That doesn't mean that CalExit then becomes a thing. Instead organisers say "it would constitute 'a vote of no confidence in the United States of America' and 'expression of the will of the people of California' to become an independent country, but would not change California's current government or relationship with the United States". If the ballot measure is approved, a 20-member commission would then evaluate the feasibility of California becoming an independent nation. However, there would be a long road to any actual change, and the courts might well put a stop to it. "Even if this [ballot measure] passes, there's virtually no way it can result in California leaving the union," David A. Carrillo, director of the California Constitution Center at UC Berkeley Law School, told ABC News 10 . And civil war? That's not really likely either when the world is far more interconnected than it was in the 1860s. "Any internal conflict in the US would generate global shockwaves and thus there would be much greater international resistance and perhaps intervention to prevent another civil war occurring," Patman said. But still, secession talk isn't likely to go away anytime soon with America's politics seemingly stuck at a perpetual boiling point. "We think we've gotten to the point where it doesn't work," Ruiz Evans told CBS News recently. "There are people out there who will respond to California as a nation." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

US-China trade truce back on track, Trump says
US-China trade truce back on track, Trump says

Otago Daily Times

timean hour ago

  • Otago Daily Times

US-China trade truce back on track, Trump says

A deal getting the fragile truce in the US-China trade war back on track is done, US President Donald Trump said, after negotiators from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework covering tariff rates. The deal also removes Chinese export restrictions on rare earth minerals and allows Chinese students access to American universities. Trump took to his social media platform to offer some of the first details to emerge from two days of marathon talks held in London that had, in the words of US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, put "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on the Truth Social platform. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%." A White House official said the 55% represents the sum of a baseline 10% "reciprocal" tariff Trump has imposed on goods imported from nearly all US trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the US; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term in the White House. Lutnick said the 55% rate for Chinese imports is now fixed and unalterable. Asked on Wednesday on CNBC if the tariff levels on China would not change, he said: "You can definitely say that." Still, many specifics of the deal and details for how it would be implemented remain unclear. China's commerce ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment and more information. Framework for a deal Officials from the two superpowers had gathered at a rushed meeting in London starting on Monday following a call last week between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping that broke a standoff that had developed just weeks after a preliminary deal reached in Geneva that had defused their trade war. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. Lutnick said the agreement reached in London would remove restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earth minerals and magnets and some of the recent US export restrictions "in a balanced way," but did not provide details after the talks concluded . "We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents," Lutnick said, adding that both sides will now return to present the framework to their respective presidents for approvals. "And if that is approved, we will then implement the framework," he said. In a separate briefing, China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang also said a trade framework had been reached in principle that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. 'BACK TO SQUARE ONE' Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. US stocks drifted lower on Wednesday but have recouped most of the losses suffered earlier in the spring during Trump's wave of tariff announcements. "It's a done deal, according to President Trump, but we haven't seen any details, which is why I think the market is not reacting to it yet. As with just about everything, the devil is in the details," said Oliver Pursche, senior vice president and adviser at Wealthspire Advisors in Westport, Connecticut. The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3%, saying higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind" for nearly all economies. The US-China deal may keep the Geneva agreement from unravelling over duelling export controls, but does little to resolve deep differences over Trump's unilateral tariffs and longstanding US complaints about China's state-led, export-driven economic model. "If China will course correct by upholding its end of the initial trade agreement we outlined in Geneva - and I believe after our talks in London, they will - then the rebalancing of the world' largest economies is possible," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told members of Congress on Wednesday after returning from the London talks overnight. The two sides left Geneva with fundamentally different views of the terms of that agreement and needed to be more specific on required actions, said Josh Lipsky, senior director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington. "They are back to square one, but that's much better than square zero," Lipsky added. It was not immediately clear from Trump's comments where things stood regarding the timeline for a more comprehensive deal that had been reached last month in Geneva. There, the two sides set August 10 as the deadline to negotiate a more comprehensive agreement to ease trade tensions, or tariff rates would snap back from about 30% to 145% on the US side and from 10% to 125% on the Chinese side. (Reporting by Doina Chiacu in Washington and Alistair Smout in London; Additional reporting by David Milliken and William James in London and Sachin Ravikumar; Ethan Wang, Shi Bu, Yuhan Lin and Alessandro Diviggiano in Beijing; Caroline Valetkevitch in New York; Writing by David Lawder, Kate Holton and Liz Lee; Editing by Lincoln Feast and Paul Simao)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store