&w=3840&q=100)
SAT dismisses Reliance Industries plea in Jio-Facebook deal disclosure case
The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) on Friday dismissed Reliance Industries' (RIL) appeal against a Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) order imposing a ₹30 lakh penalty for violating Prohibition of Insider Trading (PIT) Regulations.
In its June 2022 adjudicating order, Sebi found RIL in breach of PIT Regulations for failing to disclose details of a potential investment deal with Facebook in Jio Platforms promptly.
'We find the appellants in violation of Principle 4, Schedule A of the PIT Regulations and uphold the SEBI order,' said the SAT bench, presided over by Justice PS Dinesh Kumar.
The case relates to a confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement signed between RIL and Facebook in September 2019, followed by a non-binding term sheet on March 4, 2020, for Facebook's investment in Jio Platforms.
Legal experts said that while the monetary penalty in this case was just ₹30 lakh, the SAT judgement could set a precedent for companies on handling news leaks and disclosures.
On March 24, 2020, the Financial Times reported that Facebook was nearing a deal to acquire a 10 per cent stake in Jio. Domestic media also followed up the news report, triggering a 15 per cent surge in RIL's share price.
RIL formally disclosed the Jio-Facebook deal to stock exchanges only on April 22, 2020, after executing a definitive transaction document, prompting another 10 per cent jump in its stock price.
RIL argued it was not obligated to confirm or deny market rumours or disclose the deal under Principle 4, as the regulation applies only to 'selective leaks.'
Sebi countered that confidentiality agreements do not override PIT Regulations and that undisclosed price-sensitive information (UPSI) must be disseminated promptly if leaked.
The SAT ruled that RIL was duty-bound to disclose the information once it appeared in credible media reports.
'It was RIL's responsibility to make prompt disclosure to ensure information was generally available, especially when selectively reported by international media to a limited audience,' the order stated.
The tribunal emphasised that in cases of uncertainty, companies must disclose information to protect shareholders. It also noted the credibility of the Financial Times report, given the involvement of two global conglomerates and the need for high-level approvals in a cross-border deal.
'RIL's argument that only a binding agreement triggers disclosure lacks merit and undermines the spirit of PIT Regulations,' the order added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Right to privacy not absolute, state has to prevent social harm: Madras HC
The Madras high court on Tuesday said the fundamental right to privacy is not absolute and that the state has to prevent social harm, as it dismissed petitions challenging the Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority (Real Money Games) Regulations, 2025. Online gaming companies challenged the regulations, mandating a 'blank hour' midnight to 5am ban on gaming and an Aadhaar-based user verification system. A bench of justices SM Subramaniam and K Rajasekar said the regulations amounted to 'reasonable restrictions' that govern all fundamental rights. It added that a user's fundamental right to privacy cannot be considered absolute and needs to be balanced with public interest. 'When put on a scale, public interest overweighs the right to privacy,' the bench said as it read out the operative part of the judgment. The ruling reinforces the state's authority to regulate online gaming, particularly real money games, to prevent social harm and protect vulnerable users. It could set a precedent for other states grappling with the potential for addiction and negative social consequences associated with online gaming. The ruling potentially empowers states to implement similar regulatory measures to safeguard health and well-being, even if it means limitations on the operational freedom of online gaming companies and users. The court reserved its order on April 30, saying the state government can 'step in' if online real-money games were addictive and caused social harm, provided the regulations balanced the fundamental rights of users and gaming companies. Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi and Sajjan Poovayya, representing gaming companies that offer online real-money games, opposed the regulations. They argued that the Union government already regulated such games. The lawyers said the Tamil Nadu government was trying to indirectly prohibit online gaming under the guise of protecting users from addiction. Online gaming platforms, including Play Games 24x7, Head Digital Works, and Junglee Games India, particularly opposed provisions prohibiting users under 18 from playing real-money games, 'know your customer' registration with Aadhaar for opening gaming accounts, and ban on playing during 'blank hours'. The gaming platforms challenged the rule mandating compulsory pop-up caution alerts, including those cautioning that online games are 'addictive.' The state government defended the regulations, citing alarming levels of addiction to online gaming. It said that users often included minors and that addiction was ruining their health.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Homebound Cinematographer Pratik Shah's Ex Accuses Him of Abuse: "That Would Have Been Rape If He Wasn't My Boyfriend"
Fresh allegations against Homebound cinematographer Pratik Shah have surfaced. His former partner has accused him of sexual and physical abuse. In a recent blog post, she shared disturbing details of the abuse. This isn't the first time she has spoken up against Shah. She previously levelled allegations of sexual and physical abuse against Shah in a Facebook update from 2015. While she doesn't name Shah directly in the blog, she said she is choosing to speak up again because "people need to know the truth". The former girlfriend's detailed blog paints a harrowing picture of emotional manipulation, physical violence, and sexual abuse during their relationship. The blog recounts a pattern of possessive and controlling behaviour, culminating in sexual assault. "That summer, he asked me for my Gmail and Facebook passwords, and in return gave me his. I remember the rage that flew through him when he saw that I had flirted with a guy over Facebook... He screamed in my face that he would kill himself," she writes. She also details a chilling escalation of violence. "The day that I found out that he had been cheating on me was the day he pushed me into a shelf. I should've reported it then, when the neighbours called the police. I didn't." The most serious charge is related to an incident on her birthday weekend, according to the blog post. "I won't get into the details of this situation that consumes me every day, but you get the point. 'No' wasn't an option," she writes, later adding, "That would have been considered rape if he wasn't my boyfriend." "Never, in a million years, would I have thought I would be a 'survivor of abuse'," she writes. Shah had most recently worked as director of photography on Neeraj Ghaywan's Homebound, which premiered at the 78th Cannes Film Festival to critical acclaim. Several allegations about Shah's inappropriate behaviour surfaced online last week, following Dharma Productions -- the banner behind Homebound -- distanced itself from Shah. As these allegations resurfaced, sources confirmed that Shah has been dropped from the high-profile Sourav Ganguly biopic. Dharma Productions, reportedly associated with the film, issued a brief statement: "We stand firmly against any form of abuse or misconduct. The concerned individual is no longer associated with any of our upcoming projects." Ghaywan is yet to issue a statement on allegations against Shah, who has deactivated his Instagram account since the controversy broke. The filmmaker on Monday shared an Instagram appreciation post for his Homebound team but skipped thanking the cinematographer. This is not the first time Bollywood has had to reckon with allegations of abuse from within its ranks. The resurgence of this 2015 post echoes the wave of #MeToo accounts that flooded the industry in 2018, prompting renewed conversations about accountability and silence. Pratik Shah is yet to respond publicly to the allegations.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Whitney Purvis' son Weston had multiple health issues, stepmom reveals in Facebook post
'16 and Pregnant' star Whitney Purvis announced the death of her 16-year-old son, Weston Gosa Jr., on Monday via a Facebook post. 'This is so hard to write. My beautiful son, Weston has passed away. He was only 16 years old. Life is so cruel and unfair. I just dont understand. Oh my baby is gone and I don't know what to do with myself,' she wrote in the post. "He was so perfect. This is really my worst nightmare come true. How do you go on in life after losing a child? I'm in disbelief, this cannot be happening. I don't want it to be real,' she added. 'I would do anything just to hold him. Words just can't describe the pain I am feeling.' She continued, 'I love you so much, Weston Owen Gosa. God, I love you so much. You are my heart. I was so proud of the young man you were becoming. I just can't go on without you. Rest in Peace, my angel. You are gone too soon. April 2, 2009 - June 2, 2025.' Whitney and Weston Sr. welcomed their son on April 2, 2009. Although the couple separated, they rekindled their relationship before the birth of their second son, River, in 2014. After River's birth, they broke up again. Whitney lost custody of both boys in the years following their separation. She was arrested last year for allegedly failing to make child support payments. While the exact cause of Weston's death has not been disclosed, his stepmother, Amy Gosa, revealed that he had been battling multiple health issues. 'All we know is we got up this morning around 7 am and tried to wake him up, he was not breathing, we attempted cpr and called an ambulance. The paramedics attempted it as well and took him to the hospital in Gordon County where he was pronounced dead,' she wrote in a Facebook post. Gosa continued: 'He had several health issues as well as diabetes. We are completely heartbroken and in shock. It was so unexpected. Losing a child is the most painful thing I have ever experienced and I hope I never experience it again.' 'He was the most amazing son I could have asked for. He was brilliant, smart, funny and had so much potential in life. It doesn't feel real. Please keep our family and Whitney in your thoughts and prayers as we mourn such a brilliant amazing life that was our son. Thank you,' she concluded.
