Hamas says ceasefire proposal offers ‘no guarantees' for end to Gaza war
The Palestinian group Hamas has submitted its response to a United States-backed ceasefire proposal, but a leading official from the group said the proposed deal offered 'no guarantees to end the war'.
Speaking to Al Jazeera on Saturday, Basem Naim said that Hamas had still 'responded positively' to the latest proposal relayed to it by US special envoy Steve Witkoff, despite the Palestinian group saying that the proposal was different to one it had agreed upon with Witkoff a week earlier.
'One week ago, we agreed with Mr Witkoff on one proposal, and we said, 'This is acceptable, we can consider this a negotiating paper,'' Naim said. 'He went to the other party, to the Israelis, to get their response. Instead of having a response to our proposal, he brought us a new proposal … which had nothing to do with what we agreed upon.'
In a statement released earlier on Saturday, Hamas had said that it had submitted a response to Witkoff, and that the proposal 'aims to achieve a permanent ceasefire, a comprehensive withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, and ensure the flow of aid' to Palestinians in Gaza.
Hamas added that 10 living Israeli captives would be released as part of the agreement, as well as the bodies of 18 dead Israelis, in exchange for an 'agreed-upon number of Palestinian prisoners'.
Witkoff called Hamas's response 'totally unacceptable'.
'Hamas should accept the framework proposal we put forward as the basis for proximity talks, which we can begin immediately this coming week,' the envoy said in a post on social media. 'That is the only way we can close a 60-day ceasefire deal in the coming days in which half of the living hostages and half of those who are deceased will come home to their families, and in which we can have at the proximity talks substantive negotiations in good-faith to try to reach a permanent ceasefire.'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slammed Hamas's response, 'As Witkoff said, Hamas's response is unacceptable and sets the situation back. Israel will continue its action for the return of our hostages and the defeat of Hamas.'
Israel has now killed more than 54,000 Palestinians since October 2023, with starvation looming across Gaza after weeks of Israeli blockade, and only a small flow of aid since Israel allowed it to resume in mid-May.
With hopes for a permanent truce seemingly fading once again, the level of hunger and desperation inside Gaza grows, with Israel allowing only a trickle of humanitarian aid into the Strip after it had imposed a total blockade for more than two months. The UN warned on Friday that all of the 2.3 million population of Gaza is now at risk of famine. That came after it said in mid-May that one in every five Palestinians there is experiencing starvation.
The World Food Programme (WFP), which has enough food ready near Gaza's borders to feed the besieged territory's entire population for two months, renewed its call for an immediate ceasefire as the only way to get the food to starving Palestinians.
The UN's food agency said in a statement that it brought 77 trucks loaded with flour into Gaza overnight and early on Friday, but they were stopped by people trying to feed their starving families.
The US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) is continuing with its own controversial aid distribution, which other aid groups say could violate humanitarian principles and militarise the delivery of desperately needed food. The Gaza Government Media Office said this week that at least 10 Palestinians had been killed by Israeli forces while trying to get aid.
'We went to this new area and we came out empty-handed,' resident Layla al-Masri said of a new GHF distribution point. 'What they are saying about their will to feed the people of Gaza are lies. They neither feed people nor give them anything to drink.'
Another displaced Palestinian, Abdel Qader Rabie, said people across the besieged territory have nothing left to feed their families. 'There's no flour, no food, no bread. We have nothing at home,' he said.
Rabie said that every time he tries to get a box of aid at the GHF, he is swarmed by hundreds of other people trying to get it. 'If you are strong, you get aid. If you are not, you leave empty-handed,' Rabie added.
There are also other risks. Families have reported that people have gone missing after reaching GHF distribution points.
'One of these cases is a man from the al-Mughari family – The family is appealing to the ICRC, OCHA, the civil defence teams, to go and search for him in that area – very close to the Netzarim Corridor [in central Gaza],' said Hind Khoudary, reporting from Deir el-Balah, central Gaza. Israeli authorities rejected the accusation, Khoudary added.
The Israeli army is continuing its attacks on Gaza, with the spokesperson of the territory's civil defence saying that approximately 60 homes had been bombed in the last 48 hours in Gaza City and northern Gaza.
On Saturday, there were also reports from across Gaza of the Israeli bombing killing at least 20 Palestinians. More than 3,900 Palestinians have been killed since Israel unilaterally broke a ceasefire in March and resumed its devastation of Gaza, despite growing international condemnation.
Since Friday's early hours, the Israeli army has also ordered 'all residents' of southern Khan Younis, Bani Suheila, and Abasan to evacuate immediately after it said rockets were earlier fired. 'The [army] will aggressively attack any area used as a launching pad for terrorist activity,' military spokesperson Avichay Adraee said in a statement. The area of southern Gaza 'has been warned several times in the past and has been designated a dangerous combat zone', he added.
According to the UN, nearly 200,000 people have been displaced in the past two weeks alone, with displacement orders now covering the entirety of Gaza's northernmost and southernmost governorates, as well as the eastern parts of each of the three governorates in between.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
The genocide of the Palestinian people 'starts with words'
Journalist Rula Jebreal discusses how some US media narratives have been complicit in the normalisation of Israel's genocide of the Palestinian people.
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
In Gaza, aid kills
Today, three Palestinians have been killed and 35 wounded by Israeli fire near an aid distribution centre in the Gaza Strip's southern city of Rafah. The attack came a day after Israeli tanks opened fire on thousands of desperate and hungry Palestinians at the same site, killing at least 31 people. One person was also shot dead at another distribution site near the Netzarim Corridor in central Gaza the same day. There are currently only four such sites distributing food to Gaza's starving population of two million people, who for nearly three months were forced to contend with a full Israeli blockade that prevented the entry of all aid into the enclave. On May 19, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu magnanimously opted to allow a resumption of 'minimal' aid deliveries to Gaza, having determined that impending mass starvation was a 'red line' that might jeopardise the undying support of the US, Israel's traditional partner in crime and the primary enabler of its slaughter. And yet these mass killings suggest that the new 'minimal' arrangement offers Palestinians a decidedly horrific choice: either die of starvation or die trying to obtain food – not, of course, that these are the only two options for dying in a genocidal war in which Israel has indiscriminately bombed hospitals, refugee camps and everything else that can be bombed, killing more than 54,400 people. The aid distribution hubs are run by a sketchy new outfit called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), initially an Israeli brainchild that operates as a private aid organisation registered in both Switzerland and the US state of Delaware. As The Guardian newspaper noted, the GHF has 'no experience distributing food in a famine zone'. It does, however, have ties to the US and Israeli governments and employs former US military and intelligence officers. So it is that food distribution in Gaza now transpires under the supervision of armed US security contractors at hubs conveniently located near Israeli military positions. The four sites that are currently operational are located in central and southern Gaza while a significant part of the enclave's population is in the north. To reach the hubs, many Palestinians must walk long distances and cross Israeli military lines, further endangering their lives. No mechanism is in place to distribute food to elderly, sick or wounded Palestinians – not to mention starving people unable to engage in such physical exertion in the hopes of putting something in their stomachs. Furthermore, the GHF initiative feeds into Israel's forced displacement scheme whereby surviving Palestinians will be concentrated in the south in preparation for their eventual expulsion, as per US President Donald Trump's plan for a reborn Gaza Strip largely devoid of Palestinians. In other words, the GHF is not in Gaza to alleviate hunger or cater to the needs of its population; rather, the food distribution hubs are a lucrative PR stunt aimed at creating a 'humanitarian' distraction from a continuing policy of deliberate starvation and genocide. The United Nations and aid organisations have lambasted the weaponisation of humanitarian aid while the situation was apparently too much to handle even for Jake Wood, the former US marine sniper who served as the GHF's executive director before his recent resignation on the grounds that 'it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence'. The massacres of the past two days are not the first such incidents to occur on the GHF's watch. Since the launch of the initiative in late May, there have been numerous killings of Palestinians near distribution points. According to Gaza's Government Media Office, the total number of people killed while seeking aid from this scheme has reached 52 so far. And yet the slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza trying to engage in that most necessary human activity of eating is hardly new. Recall that on February 29, 2024, at least 112 desperate Palestinians were massacred while queueing for flour southwest of Gaza City. More than 750 were wounded. After that particular episode, then-US President Joe Biden announced that the US would airdrop food into Gaza, another costly PR spectacle incapable of providing even a drop in the bucket in terms of the humanitarian needs of the population. A more straightforward and efficient move would obviously have been to pressure the Israelis to cease blocking aid trucks from entering Gaza by land – and for the US to, you know, cease bombarding Israel with billions of dollars in aid and weaponry. As it turned out, airdrops can be lethal too, and just a week after Biden's announcement, five Palestinians were killed when a parachute attached to an aid pallet failed to open. To be sure, there are few things more abominably ironic than hungry people being killed by food aid literally crashing onto their heads. Call it humanitarian slaughter. Then there was Biden's $230m humanitarian aid pier, which shut down in July after a mere 25 days of service. It was heavily criticised by aid groups as another expensive, complex and ineffective means of getting food and other aid into Gaza. But then again, effectiveness was never the point. Now, if the GHF's Gaza debut is any indication, the militarised distribution of food will continue to provide opportunities for mass killing as crowds of starving Palestinians gather around aid hubs. The phrase 'shooting fish in a barrel' comes to mind – as if the Gaza Strip weren't enough of a barrel already. To be sure, the idea of luring starving people to specific geographical points to facilitate Israel's genocidal conquest is singularly diabolical. And as the US persists in enabling Israel's fish-in-a-barrel approach, any remotely moral world would refuse to stomach the arrangement any longer. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran demands sanctions relief guarantee in nuclear talks with US
Iran has demanded that the United States clarify exactly how sanctions will be lifted if the two sides are to reach a new agreement on Tehran's nuclear programme. Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Esmail Baghaei made the comments on Monday, days after the US submitted what it described as an 'acceptable' proposal. The pair has conducted seven weeks of negotiations over the nuclear programme, with the US seeking assurances that it is peaceful, while Iran hopes to escape punishing sanctions that have battered its economy in recent years. However, Tehran is now demanding Washington detail what it is offering, reflecting scepticism voiced earlier this year by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In remarks carried by the official IRNA news agency, Baghaei stressed the need for guarantees regarding the 'real end of the sanctions', including details on 'how and through what mechanism' they would be removed. 'The American side has not yet provided the necessary clarity in this regard,' he said. Baghaei also reiterated Iran's intention to continue enriching uranium for 'peaceful' purposes. US envoy Steve Witkoff has said President Donald Trump opposes Tehran continuing any enrichment, calling it a 'red line'. A leaked United Nations report shows that Iran has ramped up production of uranium enriched to 60 percent, short of the roughly 90 percent required for atomic weapons but significantly above the 4 percent or so needed for power production. Baghaei dismissed the report as biased, accusing unnamed Western countries of pressuring the UN to act against Iran's interests. Official sources cited by The New York Times said the recent US proposal includes a call for Iran to end all enrichment. While Tehran has confirmed receipt of the proposal, which the White House described as being in Iran's 'best interest', it has said it is still reviewing the document. 'Receiving a text certainly does not mean accepting it, nor does it even mean that it is acceptable,' Baghaei said. Iran has held five rounds of talks with the US since April 12 in search of a new agreement to replace the deal with the leading powers that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018.
