
Trump's Least Favorite Judge Has Friends in High Places
Before they were federal judges, James Emanuel Boasberg and Brett M. Kavanaugh were classmates at Yale Law School and housemates in a red brick off-campus townhouse, where they forged a bond that carries forward to this day.
Their friendship, according to interviews with six law school classmates, draws on a foundation of commonalities: Both men are the sons of attorneys and attended elite private high schools in Washington — Georgetown Preparatory for Justice Kavanaugh, St. Albans for Judge Boasberg. Both went to Yale as undergraduates. Both were first appointed to the bench by President George W. Bush. As judges, they overlapped for more than seven years at the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse in Washington, D.C.
The two jurists, neither of whom commented for this story, 'have a lot in common,' said Amy Jeffress, a former law school classmate, who said Judge Boasberg and Justice Kavanaugh have been close since she knew them in school.
Friends and colleagues describe Judge Boasberg, who goes by Jeb, as a moderate, known for his calm temperament and thoughtful jurisprudence. He is also a particularly well-respected jurist with deep ties to members of the conservative legal establishment, such as Justice Kavanaugh.
In 2018, President Trump elevated Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Last month, the president called for Judge Boasberg to be removed from the bench after he issued an order temporarily stopping the administration from using the Alien Enemies Act, a wartime law, to deport men accused of being Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador. Mr. Trump called Judge Boasberg, 62, 'a Radical Left Lunatic, a troublemaker and agitator.'
Lawyers, court watchers and other judges who know Judge Boasberg say that out of the 635 trial court judges on the federal bench, Mr. Trump has chosen an especially hard target to paint as an out-of-step radical.
'He and I might have different views about how to interpret a statute or the Constitution, but in every case in which I reviewed his work, I found him to be the epitome of an impartial judge doing his best to apply the law faithfully,' said Thomas B. Griffith, a retired judge who served for 15 years on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit after being nominated by President George W. Bush.
In a hearing on Thursday, Judge Boasberg said he would soon rule on whether there was probable cause to hold the administration in contempt for ignoring his order last month barring about 100 Venezuelan deportees from being flown to El Salvador. A contempt ruling would represent a new level of constitutional tension between the judiciary and the administration.
Kenneth Christmas, who lived with Judge Boasberg and Justice Kavanaugh in the townhouse at 61 Lake Place in New Haven, Conn., said Mr. Trump's characterization of Judge Boasberg did not match up with the man he knew. Mr. Christmas said the commonalities between the two jurists went beyond their backgrounds.
'In our group, they are the ballast,' he said. 'They both stand their ground. They have a viewpoint, but they both are eager what the other side has to say.'
Mr. Christmas, now an entertainment lawyer and consultant, recalled that as students, the group called themselves the 'cubs' or 'cubbies.' For the next 30 years, the eight men have gathered annually for 'cub weekends' to 'commiserate, commemorate and support each other,' Mr. Christmas said.
Their 2001 weekend, aboard a 55-foot sailboat, surfaced years later when an email Justice Kavanaugh wrote about it came up during his tense Supreme Court confirmation process.
In 2004, Mr. Christmas said, he and Judge Boasberg were among a few dozen guests invited to the White House to celebrate the wedding of their fellow cub Justice Kavanaugh, who was then President George W. Bush's staff secretary. Judge Boasberg and the other guests enjoyed a Rose Garden dinner, an Oval Office tour and an informal chat with the president, Mr. Christmas recalled.
Judge Boasberg clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and worked in private practice, where he was briefly a colleague of Justice Neil M. Gorsuch's at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen (now Kellogg Hansen) before becoming a federal prosecutor in Washington.
He was nominated to judgeships by presidents from both parties, first by President Bush to the D.C. Superior Court in 2002, then to the Federal District Court bench by President Barack Obama in 2011, to which he was confirmed the next year by a 96-0 Senate vote.
Among the 44 Republican senators who voted in his favor were Marco Rubio of Florida and Jeff Sessions of Alabama, both of whom would become members of a Trump cabinet. Justice Kavanaugh, who was then a federal appellate judge, administered the oath at Judge Boasberg's investiture ceremony.
In 2014, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. appointed Judge Boasberg to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, also known as the FISA court. It is a sensitive assignment that deals with secret warrants for government wiretaps and searches. Chief Justice Roberts named him the court's 'presiding judge' in 2020, a position that put him in charge of its administrative matters. He became chief judge of the D.C. district court in 2023.
Judge Boasberg is known as a 'feeder judge,' with 17 clerks who served in his chambers going on to work at the Supreme Court. Five worked for justices nominated by Republican presidents — three for Chief Justice Roberts, one for Justice Kavanaugh and one for Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Judge Boasberg is 'an even-keeled judge who does what judges are supposed to do, which is simply to do the right thing in every case that comes before him,' said Judge Reggie B. Walton, an appointee of Republican presidents who served with him on the both in the district court in Washington and on the FISA court.
At the courthouse, Judge Boasberg, who is just shy of six-and-a-half feet tall, is a visible and popular figure, often seen walking the hallways chatting in a deep voice with reporters, security guards and other judges.
'He had a very easy manner with jurors,' said Ms. Jeffress, who worked with him as a federal prosecutor. 'Even though he's tall and commanding, he has a way of building rapport through his personality.'
Some of Mr. Trump's most ardent supporters, on the other hand, argue that Judge Boasberg's deep ties to his jurist peers merely illustrate their critiques of the judiciary as a cozy club. Judge Boasberg is 'a political actor,' said Mike Davis of the Article III Project, a conservative judicial advocacy group.
'The chief justice put him on the FISA court, and he's been longtime buddies with other justices,' said Mr. Davis, who was instrumental in assisting Justice Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court. 'He's way out over his skis on this one, but we'll see if his buddies protect him or follow the Constitution.'
Despite Mr. Trump's complaints, Judge Boasberg has ruled both for and against Mr. Trump and his allies in the past.
Weeks before the 2016 election, Judge Boasberg ordered the State Department to process nearly 15,000 emails from Hillary Clinton, then a candidate, for their potential release. The next year, he blocked the release of Mr. Trump's tax returns, ruling that only he or Congress could force the documents into the public eye.
As presiding judge of the FISA court in 2020, Judge Boasberg handled the fallout from an inspector general's findings that the F.B.I. had botched wiretap applications in the Trump-Russia investigation; he barred agents involved in them from working on future wiretap applications and imposed new restrictions on the bureau.
He also rejected an attempt to block Vice President Mike Pence from certifying President Biden's victory over Mr. Trump. That lawsuit 'would be risible if its target were not so grave,' Judge Boasberg wrote, 'the undermining of a democratic election for president of the United States.'
'Some may view his opinions as conservative, and others may view them as liberal, but they're all faithful applications of the law to the case before him,' said David Tatel, a retired judge who was appointed to the bench by President Bill Clinton and served for 29 years on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Judge Boasberg is 'personable' and 'his demeanor is excellent on the bench,' said Tom Fitton, the president of the conservative group Judicial Watch who is an outspoken supporter of Mr. Trump. But he disagreed that the judge's evenhanded reputation was entirely deserved. Mr. Fitton noted that Judge Boasberg had ruled against his organization when they sued for the release of images showing Osama bin Laden's corpse.
'He deferred to the government,' Mr. Fitton said, of the bin Laden case. 'Here, you have President Trump making a proclamation about foreign terrorists being present in the United States, in concert with a foreign government, and he shuts it down within a minute.'
The case dealing with the Alien Enemies Act is not Judge Boasberg's only high-profile matter. On April 14, he is scheduled to begin the trial of F.T.C. v. Meta Platforms, a blockbuster antitrust case that Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's chief executive, is lobbying Mr. Trump to drop.
Then there is American Oversight v. Hegseth, a case brought by a government watchdog seeking to preserve the contents of a group chat on the Signal app where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other top Trump administration officials accidentally shared sensitive information with Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor in chief of The Atlantic.
Mr. Trump has accused the judge of 'grabbing the 'Trump Cases' all to himself,' but the cases were assigned through a normal process of random selection. During a hearing on the Signal case, Judge Boasberg calmly explained that process from the bench and did not appear to be fazed. Then he ordered the officials involved to preserve their Signal messages.
J. Michael Luttig, a former appellate judge and respected member of the conservative legal movement who has become a critic of Mr. Trump's, called attacks on Judge Boasberg part of a larger pattern of Trump 'trying to browbeat judges into submission to his will.'
He disputed that Judge Boasberg was trying to usurp presidential power, as Mr. Trump has asserted, but said instead that the judge had issued a series of temporary orders to allow time for further deliberation about whether Mr. Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act is legal.
'That's what judges do — it's their quintessential role,' Judge Luttig said. 'They determine what the law is.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

19 minutes ago
The ACLU demands the US release and return a Dominican woman living legally in Puerto Rico
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico -- In late May, a 47-year-old woman from the Dominican Republic was detained by police in Puerto Rico after she entered a municipal building seeking a permit to sell ice cream on the beach to support herself. Upon being turned over to federal agents, the Dominican woman presented her passport, driver's license and work permits that proved she was living in the U.S. territory legally, her attorney Ángel Robles and the American Civil Liberties Union of Puerto Rico, said Monday. Despite the documents presented, authorities recently transferred her to Texas as part of a federal crackdown on migrants living illegally in U.S. jurisdictions. The woman, whose first name is Aracelis, has not been fully identified because she is a victim of domestic violence. Aracelis is among hundreds of people who have been detained in Puerto Rico since large-scale arrests began in late January, surprising many in the U.S. territory that has long welcomed migrants. Robles and the ACLU demanded Aracelis' release and return to Puerto Rico. 'It's outrageous,' Robles said in a phone interview. 'No charges have been filed against her, and she is not in the system.' Because her name does not appear in a federal database, Robles' request for a bond hearing was denied. 'This case is one of unspeakable abuse,' said Annette Martínez Orabona, the ACLU director in Puerto Rico. The case has fueled already simmering anger against the administration of Puerto Rico Gov. Jenniffer González Colón and local authorities who have been working with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to arrest those believed to be living illegally in the U.S. territory. In a letter sent Monday to the governor and the island's justice secretary, the ACLU accused Puerto Rico's government of violating the Constitution and local laws by providing ICE and U.S. Homeland Security with confidential information on nearly 6,000 immigrants. It also accused ICE of using that data to go on a 'fishing expedition' that it called 'arbitrary and abusive.' A spokesman for Homeland Security Investigations did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In Puerto Rico, undocumented immigrants are allowed to open bank accounts and obtain a special driver's license. The ACLU in Puerto Rico also accused González Colón's administration of not providing protocols to local government agencies for how to deal with such requests from the federal government. The ACLU requested, among other things, that Puerto Rico's government issue an executive order barring public agencies from collaborating with ICE subpoenas not accompanied by a court order. A spokeswoman for the governor did not immediately return a message for comment.

Business of Fashion
23 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Attorney for Deported Makeup Artist: If ‘It Could Happen to Him … It Could Happen to You.'
In a defiant speech, Lindsay Toczylowski, president and co-founder of social justice legal firm Immigrant Defenders Law Center, called the deportation of undocumented immigrants without due process a direct attack on democracy. Her client, Andry José Hernández Romero, a 31-year-old Venezuelan makeup artist seeking asylum in the US, was in March deported to El Salvador, where he was taken to the country's notorious CECOT prison along with over 200 other Venezuelan and Salvadoran deportees. The American Civil Liberties Union, which is suing the Trump administration over its use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport undocumented immigrants without due process, said in court filings that the government relied solely on Romero's tattoos to incorrectly label him a violent gang member. Family and supporters say they fear for the safety of Romero, who is gay and was seeking asylum after being persecuted for his sexual orientation in Venezuela. He has not been seen or heard from since his arrival in El Salvador, including by his legal representation. 'The only fight that we lose is the one we give up on… It's about the future of our democracy and the country we want to live in,' she said, speaking at The Business of Beauty Global Forum in Napa Valley, California. 'His story is the embodiment of it could happen to him, it could happen to me, it could happen to you, it could happen to any one of us. It's why the rule of law is so important. It's why due process is so important.' Toczylowski also addressed escalating tensions in Los Angeles, where President Donald Trump has sent thousands of National Guard and Marines to quell protests against ICE deportation roundups in the city. Opponents of the move, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, say the decision to send troops was disproportionate to the small number of violent incidents associated with the protests, and will only inflame the situation. On Monday, protests spread to other cities around the country. 'There are more than 200 residents of Los Angeles that have been picked up off the streets,' said Toczylowski. 'I have watched masked agents in plain clothes push people into service elevators in the middle of federal buildings in downtown LA in the last two weeks. This is an all-out assault on the values that we hold as Angelenos, as Californians, as Americans.' She said one of the most important methods of pushing back against the Trump administration's immigration actions, whether in LA or El Salvador, is to speak out against them as often, and as forcefully as possible. 'The moment that we stop talking about [Romero], about his story and others like him is the moment that the Trump administration is successful in completing the disappearance of Andry José Hernández Romero,' she said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Maddow Says the ‘Interesting Question' About Trump Is ‘What the Country Lets Him Get Away With'
Rachel Maddow belittled Donald Trump on Monday night whilechatting with her MSNBC colleague Lawrence O'Donnell, declaring that Trump's latest 'dictator' actions have made him 'very boring.' Not that she argued the current situation isn't serious, only that Trump is acting like, as she joked, a blonde copy of the extremely corrupt former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. But Maddow also clarified that the 'really interesting question' about all of this is 'what the country lets him get away with. The comment came up at the start of 'The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell,' as the duo discussed how Trump's current actions — calling in the national guard over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom to quell lawful protests — are the exact opposite of what he said he could legally do in 2020 during the George Floyd protests. At that time, Trump said it would be unlawful for him to do so without a request of a state governor. 'I mean the difference,' Maddow said, is that 'he's decided that he's throwing it all out. You know, 'dictator on day from day one,' and you know, going to terminate parts of the Constitution. And he's decided that he doesn't matter what Congress does, and it doesn't matter what the courts do, that he's just the strong man he's going to be.' 'He's decided to throw out all the rules,' Maddow continued. 'The thing that that has done, as far as I'm concerned, is make him very boring, because it's like it's all on the table. We know exactly what he's doing. We know exactly what his intentions are. He's blonde Berlusconi. This is, I mean, he's just trying to do the same thing all the other strongmen and would be dictators do all over the country. I think the really interesting question is, what the country lets him get away with, and we're seeing a really interesting test of that right now, all over the country, especially this week.' Later in the discussion, Maddow argued that the issue isn't that Trump has changed his mind over what he can and cannot legally do, it's that 'we can probably intuit that what he's being told is, 'yeah, it's illegal, therefore, go do it.' I think that the more laws he breaks, the more blatantly unconstitutional things he both proposes and tries, I think the more they think power accrues to him, because he's less constrained by things that don't actually stop him.' 'And so ultimately, I mean, the courts are pushing him back. Congress, to a certain extent, is pushing him back a little bit, although I think a little bit more than they're giving credit for, but mostly it's people pushing him back. He's deeply, deeply, deeply unpopular and underwater on every issue, and he is absolutely panicked by the protests against him, to the point where he's already playing the biggest cards that he's gotten. He's not even six months into this term. I just think, I think we're getting the test really early, and I think that he's failing.' Maddow later noted that Trump's rhetoric and response to the protests is vastly out of proportion with the scope of them, but 'even if these protests were 100 times the size that they are, there still wouldn't be an operational reason to bring in active duty troops or federalized National Guard. I mean, it's just, it's not, it's not that sort of thing. This is obviously not operationally necessitated, right, in terms of the security of the city. He's doing this because he's panicking and thinks that he looks weak, and therefore he has to do something that seems strong.' 'And so we will have tanks destroying the streets of Washington this Saturday, and we will have National Guardsmen and active duty US Marines standing around Los Angeles, wondering what their what this has to do with their military careers. And it's all because he has no freaking idea how to deal with this politically. And he's absolutely panicking about the, I think, trenchant and joyful and sustainable opposition against him.' Maddow added. Watch the whole conversation below: The post Rachel Maddow Says the 'Interesting Question' About Trump Is 'What the Country Lets Him Get Away With'| Video appeared first on TheWrap.