Lawyers grill Harvey Weinstein's ex-model accuser
Harvey Weinstein's lawyers have sought to raise doubts about a former model's allegation that he sexually assaulted her in her teens, portraying her as a wannabe actor who tried to leverage the former studio boss.
"You believed that if you had consensual sex with Mr. Weinstein, you'd get your foot in the door and become a movie star," defence lawyer Mike Cibella said.
"No, that's not what happened," Kaja Sokola responded.
"I never had a consensual relation with Mr. Weinstein."
Throughout a day of questioning on Friday, Cibella sought to suggest that Sokola hadn't told the full story of her interactions with Weinstein. At one point, Cibella repeatedly asked whether she invited Weinstein up to a New York apartment — and into the bedroom — where she was staying in 2005. She denied it.
"I didn't want any shortcuts from Mr. Weinstein. I wanted him to be honest with me," Sokola testified at a later point, her voice growing heated.
She said the Oscar-winning producer promised to help her fulfil her acting ambitions but instead "broke my dreams, and he broke my self-esteem."
The Polish psychotherapist has accused Weinstein of repeatedly sexually abusing her when she was a teenage fashion model. Some of those allegations are beyond the legal time limit for criminal charges, but Weinstein faces a criminal sex act charge over Sokola's claim that he forced oral sex on her in 2006.
Prosecutors added the charge to the landmark #MeToo case last year, after an appeals court overturned Weinstein's 2020 conviction. The guilty verdict pertained to allegations from two other women, who also have testified or are expected at the retrial.
Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty and denies ever sexually assaulting anyone.
The Polish-born Sokola, 39, had a jet-setting modelling career as a teen. She testified earlier this week that Weinstein exploited her youthful interest in an acting career to subject her to unwanted sexual advances, starting days after they met in 2002, while she was a 16-year-old on a modelling trip to New York.
She told jurors that four years later, when she was 19, Weinstein lured her to a hotel room by saying he had a script for her to see, then pinned her down on a bed and performed oral sex on her as she implored him not to.
Sokola never got a full-fledged role in a Weinstein movie, though he did arrange for her to be an extra in 2007's The Nanny Diaries. Her scene ultimately got cut, she said.
His company also wrote her a recommendation letter to an acting school. She said she hadn't been able to afford it.
Sokola sued Weinstein several years ago over the alleged 2002 incident, and she ultimately received about $US3.5 million ($A5.5 million) in compensation. Her suits never mentioned the alleged 2006 assault. She testified Thursday that she had had a tougher time coming to terms with it than she did with the alleged 2002 sex abuse.
Cibella underscored the omission, and he suggested that she sued to gain financial independence and be able to leave her now-estranged husband. On the contrary, she said, she was working two jobs and out-earning him.
Cibella also pointed to differences in some details of Sokola's testimony this week and what she told a grand jury last year, including the month of the alleged 2002 sexual abuse. The lawyer further noted that Sokola is pursuing various legal pathways to stay in the United States long-term, and her involvement in the criminal case could help with one of them.
Harvey Weinstein's lawyers have sought to raise doubts about a former model's allegation that he sexually assaulted her in her teens, portraying her as a wannabe actor who tried to leverage the former studio boss.
"You believed that if you had consensual sex with Mr. Weinstein, you'd get your foot in the door and become a movie star," defence lawyer Mike Cibella said.
"No, that's not what happened," Kaja Sokola responded.
"I never had a consensual relation with Mr. Weinstein."
Throughout a day of questioning on Friday, Cibella sought to suggest that Sokola hadn't told the full story of her interactions with Weinstein. At one point, Cibella repeatedly asked whether she invited Weinstein up to a New York apartment — and into the bedroom — where she was staying in 2005. She denied it.
"I didn't want any shortcuts from Mr. Weinstein. I wanted him to be honest with me," Sokola testified at a later point, her voice growing heated.
She said the Oscar-winning producer promised to help her fulfil her acting ambitions but instead "broke my dreams, and he broke my self-esteem."
The Polish psychotherapist has accused Weinstein of repeatedly sexually abusing her when she was a teenage fashion model. Some of those allegations are beyond the legal time limit for criminal charges, but Weinstein faces a criminal sex act charge over Sokola's claim that he forced oral sex on her in 2006.
Prosecutors added the charge to the landmark #MeToo case last year, after an appeals court overturned Weinstein's 2020 conviction. The guilty verdict pertained to allegations from two other women, who also have testified or are expected at the retrial.
Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty and denies ever sexually assaulting anyone.
The Polish-born Sokola, 39, had a jet-setting modelling career as a teen. She testified earlier this week that Weinstein exploited her youthful interest in an acting career to subject her to unwanted sexual advances, starting days after they met in 2002, while she was a 16-year-old on a modelling trip to New York.
She told jurors that four years later, when she was 19, Weinstein lured her to a hotel room by saying he had a script for her to see, then pinned her down on a bed and performed oral sex on her as she implored him not to.
Sokola never got a full-fledged role in a Weinstein movie, though he did arrange for her to be an extra in 2007's The Nanny Diaries. Her scene ultimately got cut, she said.
His company also wrote her a recommendation letter to an acting school. She said she hadn't been able to afford it.
Sokola sued Weinstein several years ago over the alleged 2002 incident, and she ultimately received about $US3.5 million ($A5.5 million) in compensation. Her suits never mentioned the alleged 2006 assault. She testified Thursday that she had had a tougher time coming to terms with it than she did with the alleged 2002 sex abuse.
Cibella underscored the omission, and he suggested that she sued to gain financial independence and be able to leave her now-estranged husband. On the contrary, she said, she was working two jobs and out-earning him.
Cibella also pointed to differences in some details of Sokola's testimony this week and what she told a grand jury last year, including the month of the alleged 2002 sexual abuse. The lawyer further noted that Sokola is pursuing various legal pathways to stay in the United States long-term, and her involvement in the criminal case could help with one of them.
Harvey Weinstein's lawyers have sought to raise doubts about a former model's allegation that he sexually assaulted her in her teens, portraying her as a wannabe actor who tried to leverage the former studio boss.
"You believed that if you had consensual sex with Mr. Weinstein, you'd get your foot in the door and become a movie star," defence lawyer Mike Cibella said.
"No, that's not what happened," Kaja Sokola responded.
"I never had a consensual relation with Mr. Weinstein."
Throughout a day of questioning on Friday, Cibella sought to suggest that Sokola hadn't told the full story of her interactions with Weinstein. At one point, Cibella repeatedly asked whether she invited Weinstein up to a New York apartment — and into the bedroom — where she was staying in 2005. She denied it.
"I didn't want any shortcuts from Mr. Weinstein. I wanted him to be honest with me," Sokola testified at a later point, her voice growing heated.
She said the Oscar-winning producer promised to help her fulfil her acting ambitions but instead "broke my dreams, and he broke my self-esteem."
The Polish psychotherapist has accused Weinstein of repeatedly sexually abusing her when she was a teenage fashion model. Some of those allegations are beyond the legal time limit for criminal charges, but Weinstein faces a criminal sex act charge over Sokola's claim that he forced oral sex on her in 2006.
Prosecutors added the charge to the landmark #MeToo case last year, after an appeals court overturned Weinstein's 2020 conviction. The guilty verdict pertained to allegations from two other women, who also have testified or are expected at the retrial.
Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty and denies ever sexually assaulting anyone.
The Polish-born Sokola, 39, had a jet-setting modelling career as a teen. She testified earlier this week that Weinstein exploited her youthful interest in an acting career to subject her to unwanted sexual advances, starting days after they met in 2002, while she was a 16-year-old on a modelling trip to New York.
She told jurors that four years later, when she was 19, Weinstein lured her to a hotel room by saying he had a script for her to see, then pinned her down on a bed and performed oral sex on her as she implored him not to.
Sokola never got a full-fledged role in a Weinstein movie, though he did arrange for her to be an extra in 2007's The Nanny Diaries. Her scene ultimately got cut, she said.
His company also wrote her a recommendation letter to an acting school. She said she hadn't been able to afford it.
Sokola sued Weinstein several years ago over the alleged 2002 incident, and she ultimately received about $US3.5 million ($A5.5 million) in compensation. Her suits never mentioned the alleged 2006 assault. She testified Thursday that she had had a tougher time coming to terms with it than she did with the alleged 2002 sex abuse.
Cibella underscored the omission, and he suggested that she sued to gain financial independence and be able to leave her now-estranged husband. On the contrary, she said, she was working two jobs and out-earning him.
Cibella also pointed to differences in some details of Sokola's testimony this week and what she told a grand jury last year, including the month of the alleged 2002 sexual abuse. The lawyer further noted that Sokola is pursuing various legal pathways to stay in the United States long-term, and her involvement in the criminal case could help with one of them.
Harvey Weinstein's lawyers have sought to raise doubts about a former model's allegation that he sexually assaulted her in her teens, portraying her as a wannabe actor who tried to leverage the former studio boss.
"You believed that if you had consensual sex with Mr. Weinstein, you'd get your foot in the door and become a movie star," defence lawyer Mike Cibella said.
"No, that's not what happened," Kaja Sokola responded.
"I never had a consensual relation with Mr. Weinstein."
Throughout a day of questioning on Friday, Cibella sought to suggest that Sokola hadn't told the full story of her interactions with Weinstein. At one point, Cibella repeatedly asked whether she invited Weinstein up to a New York apartment — and into the bedroom — where she was staying in 2005. She denied it.
"I didn't want any shortcuts from Mr. Weinstein. I wanted him to be honest with me," Sokola testified at a later point, her voice growing heated.
She said the Oscar-winning producer promised to help her fulfil her acting ambitions but instead "broke my dreams, and he broke my self-esteem."
The Polish psychotherapist has accused Weinstein of repeatedly sexually abusing her when she was a teenage fashion model. Some of those allegations are beyond the legal time limit for criminal charges, but Weinstein faces a criminal sex act charge over Sokola's claim that he forced oral sex on her in 2006.
Prosecutors added the charge to the landmark #MeToo case last year, after an appeals court overturned Weinstein's 2020 conviction. The guilty verdict pertained to allegations from two other women, who also have testified or are expected at the retrial.
Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty and denies ever sexually assaulting anyone.
The Polish-born Sokola, 39, had a jet-setting modelling career as a teen. She testified earlier this week that Weinstein exploited her youthful interest in an acting career to subject her to unwanted sexual advances, starting days after they met in 2002, while she was a 16-year-old on a modelling trip to New York.
She told jurors that four years later, when she was 19, Weinstein lured her to a hotel room by saying he had a script for her to see, then pinned her down on a bed and performed oral sex on her as she implored him not to.
Sokola never got a full-fledged role in a Weinstein movie, though he did arrange for her to be an extra in 2007's The Nanny Diaries. Her scene ultimately got cut, she said.
His company also wrote her a recommendation letter to an acting school. She said she hadn't been able to afford it.
Sokola sued Weinstein several years ago over the alleged 2002 incident, and she ultimately received about $US3.5 million ($A5.5 million) in compensation. Her suits never mentioned the alleged 2006 assault. She testified Thursday that she had had a tougher time coming to terms with it than she did with the alleged 2002 sex abuse.
Cibella underscored the omission, and he suggested that she sued to gain financial independence and be able to leave her now-estranged husband. On the contrary, she said, she was working two jobs and out-earning him.
Cibella also pointed to differences in some details of Sokola's testimony this week and what she told a grand jury last year, including the month of the alleged 2002 sexual abuse. The lawyer further noted that Sokola is pursuing various legal pathways to stay in the United States long-term, and her involvement in the criminal case could help with one of them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
8 hours ago
- Perth Now
Donald Sutherland wore gas mask to cast party
Donald Sutherland attended a Pride + Prejudice cast party in a gas mask. The late screen legend - who died a year ago aged 88 - had a clause in his contract that nobody be allowed to smoke cigarettes anywhere near him but he relaxed his rule to hang out with the rest of the stars on the 2005 period drama by taking his own precautions. Discussing her favourite memory from making the film, Keira Knightley told Vanity Fair: "There was the party that Donald Sutherland came to. "You weren't allowed to smoke. He had it in his contract that nobody on the set was allowed to smoke anywhere near, and you couldn't smell of smoke. "But of course everyone smoked back then. And everybody would be smoking, and then you'd be sort of spraying yourself. "But the party he came to, he came in a gas mask. And he was like, 'I want you to all be able to smoke. And I wanted to come to the party.' " Donald also amused the cast when he suddenly remembered a luxury car he'd forgotten he had owned for years and had it delivered to the set. Rosamund Pike said: "He was amazing. He also remembered halfway through shooting that he had a Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow that he'd bought while making Don't Look Now or something and completely forgotten about. [He] remembered it was garaged somewhere up near Manchester and had it delivered to set." The two actresses admitted very few co-stars have matched the entertainment they got from Donald. Keira said: "I have to say, most actors have been a disappointment since then." Rosamund agreed: "Donald was pretty legendary. We did have dinners with him sometimes, and he told us some pretty wild stories which cannot be shared." Keira was nominated for an Oscar for her work on Pride + Prejudice, which she found "confusing" because she felt she was viewed as a "terrible actress" because of her role in Pirates of the Caribbean. She reflected: "It was pretty big for my career. If people will come up to me, it'll be about that one. "Pirates of the Caribbean had already come out, but I think in the public consciousness, I was seen as a terrible actress. "But I had this phenomenally big success with Pirates. And I think this was the first one that was a phenomenally big success, but was also critically acclaimed. "So I remember it coming out maybe the same year, maybe around the same time as Pirates 2. And I got the worst reviews ever for that, and then also being nominated for an Oscar at the same time—it was, in my 21-year-old head, quite confusing."
News.com.au
13 hours ago
- News.com.au
Judge declares mistrial on one of three Harvey Weinstein rape charges
The mistrial ruling came one day after the jury convicted Weinstein on a separate sex abuse charge. It acquitted him on a second charge. Weinstein, once one of the most powerful people in Hollywood, faced a retrial that began on 23 April after a New York State appeals court overturned his 2020 conviction last year. He was accused by prosecutors of raping an aspiring and assaulting two other women. Weinstein pleaded not guilty and has denied assaulting anyone or having non-consensual sex.
The Advertiser
17 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Dakota Johnson just about convinces us that it's tough to make a match
Materialists M, 117 minutes 4 Stars The dreamy, introspective relationship drama, Past Lives, was so successful several years ago with an Oscar nomination that the challenge of creating a follow-up feature would have been a daunting task. Not for Canadian writer-director Celine Song, who has landed on her feet again with this sharp relationship drama set in the world of modern dating. Materialists is a three-cornered romantic drama with a smart, ambitious young matchmaker, Lucy (a sparkly Dakota Johnson), who works at Adore, a dating agency in New York that aims high. It promises to match singles with the love of their life, no less. She hasn't found hers yet and says she is celibate at the moment, but there is an ex (Chris Evans) who she still has feelings for, while someone very rich and tall, dark and handsome who has also just appeared in her life. Harry (Pedro Pascal) checks all the boxes - such a rare catch. Pascal (a lead in The Last of US TV series) has the unenviable role of playing the unicorn, the perfect man who scores the highest on the measures that count, namely physical attractiveness and financial worth. He's genial, with an old-fashioned matinee idol look, complete with Burt Reynolds moustache, that is vaguely amusing. While Lucy is waiting for the perfect match herself, we can see she's a skilled negotiator who has a way with words. We see her in action as she tries to convince a reluctant bride out of the bedroom where she has stalled, weeping. Flattery works a charm, and the wedding goes ahead. Brother of the groom Harry is at the event too, and introduces himself to Lucy at the singles table. He is smooth and confident, and works in finance. At precisely the moment they are making each other's acquaintance, Lucy's ex-boyfriend John (Evans) delivers her drink order. He is on the wait staff, serving guests at the function, and he is neither smooth nor wealthy. Yet, with effortless ease, Evans brings a sweet, natural presence as John. His character is an aspiring actor, taking waitering work on the side to get by, and his private life is a shambles with two guys who are serious slackers sharing his apartment. Despite the perils of having high-profile actors like Pascal and Evans (Captain America in the Avengers) in a romantic relationship drama like this, the dynamics are convincing, the light comedy effective. It's nicely balanced with the film's critique of the dating business and of assessing partners "by doing the math", played out in the sharp exchanges between characters, especially Harry and Lucy. They get right to the point. While the business of matchmaking is brought into sharp focus every now and then, the difficulties of finding partners in a hard, fast urban world of anomie are acknowledged too. What is the average punter to do? Why not trust a dating agency to find the love of your life? Moreover, there are difficult clients who lack self-awareness. A couple of montages make the point here. A gallery of random male clients at the Adore interview stating their preferences for dating much younger women, while a montage of female clients reveals how difficult it is to work with people in this intimate area. And then there are some clients who present a serious risk. While screenwriter Song has done some serious thinking about these things, her three lead actors contribute engaging performances to carry it off. With lively, mobile features and a natural, gamine presence that grounds her character, Johnson brings her familiar vibrant presence. It is easy to understand why matchmakers are sought in traditional societies where young adults have only restricted access to prospective partners. And today, it is fascinating to observe how the pace and anonymity of city life have seen matchmaking become a thriving business and online dating the name of the game. Materialists M, 117 minutes 4 Stars The dreamy, introspective relationship drama, Past Lives, was so successful several years ago with an Oscar nomination that the challenge of creating a follow-up feature would have been a daunting task. Not for Canadian writer-director Celine Song, who has landed on her feet again with this sharp relationship drama set in the world of modern dating. Materialists is a three-cornered romantic drama with a smart, ambitious young matchmaker, Lucy (a sparkly Dakota Johnson), who works at Adore, a dating agency in New York that aims high. It promises to match singles with the love of their life, no less. She hasn't found hers yet and says she is celibate at the moment, but there is an ex (Chris Evans) who she still has feelings for, while someone very rich and tall, dark and handsome who has also just appeared in her life. Harry (Pedro Pascal) checks all the boxes - such a rare catch. Pascal (a lead in The Last of US TV series) has the unenviable role of playing the unicorn, the perfect man who scores the highest on the measures that count, namely physical attractiveness and financial worth. He's genial, with an old-fashioned matinee idol look, complete with Burt Reynolds moustache, that is vaguely amusing. While Lucy is waiting for the perfect match herself, we can see she's a skilled negotiator who has a way with words. We see her in action as she tries to convince a reluctant bride out of the bedroom where she has stalled, weeping. Flattery works a charm, and the wedding goes ahead. Brother of the groom Harry is at the event too, and introduces himself to Lucy at the singles table. He is smooth and confident, and works in finance. At precisely the moment they are making each other's acquaintance, Lucy's ex-boyfriend John (Evans) delivers her drink order. He is on the wait staff, serving guests at the function, and he is neither smooth nor wealthy. Yet, with effortless ease, Evans brings a sweet, natural presence as John. His character is an aspiring actor, taking waitering work on the side to get by, and his private life is a shambles with two guys who are serious slackers sharing his apartment. Despite the perils of having high-profile actors like Pascal and Evans (Captain America in the Avengers) in a romantic relationship drama like this, the dynamics are convincing, the light comedy effective. It's nicely balanced with the film's critique of the dating business and of assessing partners "by doing the math", played out in the sharp exchanges between characters, especially Harry and Lucy. They get right to the point. While the business of matchmaking is brought into sharp focus every now and then, the difficulties of finding partners in a hard, fast urban world of anomie are acknowledged too. What is the average punter to do? Why not trust a dating agency to find the love of your life? Moreover, there are difficult clients who lack self-awareness. A couple of montages make the point here. A gallery of random male clients at the Adore interview stating their preferences for dating much younger women, while a montage of female clients reveals how difficult it is to work with people in this intimate area. And then there are some clients who present a serious risk. While screenwriter Song has done some serious thinking about these things, her three lead actors contribute engaging performances to carry it off. With lively, mobile features and a natural, gamine presence that grounds her character, Johnson brings her familiar vibrant presence. It is easy to understand why matchmakers are sought in traditional societies where young adults have only restricted access to prospective partners. And today, it is fascinating to observe how the pace and anonymity of city life have seen matchmaking become a thriving business and online dating the name of the game. Materialists M, 117 minutes 4 Stars The dreamy, introspective relationship drama, Past Lives, was so successful several years ago with an Oscar nomination that the challenge of creating a follow-up feature would have been a daunting task. Not for Canadian writer-director Celine Song, who has landed on her feet again with this sharp relationship drama set in the world of modern dating. Materialists is a three-cornered romantic drama with a smart, ambitious young matchmaker, Lucy (a sparkly Dakota Johnson), who works at Adore, a dating agency in New York that aims high. It promises to match singles with the love of their life, no less. She hasn't found hers yet and says she is celibate at the moment, but there is an ex (Chris Evans) who she still has feelings for, while someone very rich and tall, dark and handsome who has also just appeared in her life. Harry (Pedro Pascal) checks all the boxes - such a rare catch. Pascal (a lead in The Last of US TV series) has the unenviable role of playing the unicorn, the perfect man who scores the highest on the measures that count, namely physical attractiveness and financial worth. He's genial, with an old-fashioned matinee idol look, complete with Burt Reynolds moustache, that is vaguely amusing. While Lucy is waiting for the perfect match herself, we can see she's a skilled negotiator who has a way with words. We see her in action as she tries to convince a reluctant bride out of the bedroom where she has stalled, weeping. Flattery works a charm, and the wedding goes ahead. Brother of the groom Harry is at the event too, and introduces himself to Lucy at the singles table. He is smooth and confident, and works in finance. At precisely the moment they are making each other's acquaintance, Lucy's ex-boyfriend John (Evans) delivers her drink order. He is on the wait staff, serving guests at the function, and he is neither smooth nor wealthy. Yet, with effortless ease, Evans brings a sweet, natural presence as John. His character is an aspiring actor, taking waitering work on the side to get by, and his private life is a shambles with two guys who are serious slackers sharing his apartment. Despite the perils of having high-profile actors like Pascal and Evans (Captain America in the Avengers) in a romantic relationship drama like this, the dynamics are convincing, the light comedy effective. It's nicely balanced with the film's critique of the dating business and of assessing partners "by doing the math", played out in the sharp exchanges between characters, especially Harry and Lucy. They get right to the point. While the business of matchmaking is brought into sharp focus every now and then, the difficulties of finding partners in a hard, fast urban world of anomie are acknowledged too. What is the average punter to do? Why not trust a dating agency to find the love of your life? Moreover, there are difficult clients who lack self-awareness. A couple of montages make the point here. A gallery of random male clients at the Adore interview stating their preferences for dating much younger women, while a montage of female clients reveals how difficult it is to work with people in this intimate area. And then there are some clients who present a serious risk. While screenwriter Song has done some serious thinking about these things, her three lead actors contribute engaging performances to carry it off. With lively, mobile features and a natural, gamine presence that grounds her character, Johnson brings her familiar vibrant presence. It is easy to understand why matchmakers are sought in traditional societies where young adults have only restricted access to prospective partners. And today, it is fascinating to observe how the pace and anonymity of city life have seen matchmaking become a thriving business and online dating the name of the game. Materialists M, 117 minutes 4 Stars The dreamy, introspective relationship drama, Past Lives, was so successful several years ago with an Oscar nomination that the challenge of creating a follow-up feature would have been a daunting task. Not for Canadian writer-director Celine Song, who has landed on her feet again with this sharp relationship drama set in the world of modern dating. Materialists is a three-cornered romantic drama with a smart, ambitious young matchmaker, Lucy (a sparkly Dakota Johnson), who works at Adore, a dating agency in New York that aims high. It promises to match singles with the love of their life, no less. She hasn't found hers yet and says she is celibate at the moment, but there is an ex (Chris Evans) who she still has feelings for, while someone very rich and tall, dark and handsome who has also just appeared in her life. Harry (Pedro Pascal) checks all the boxes - such a rare catch. Pascal (a lead in The Last of US TV series) has the unenviable role of playing the unicorn, the perfect man who scores the highest on the measures that count, namely physical attractiveness and financial worth. He's genial, with an old-fashioned matinee idol look, complete with Burt Reynolds moustache, that is vaguely amusing. While Lucy is waiting for the perfect match herself, we can see she's a skilled negotiator who has a way with words. We see her in action as she tries to convince a reluctant bride out of the bedroom where she has stalled, weeping. Flattery works a charm, and the wedding goes ahead. Brother of the groom Harry is at the event too, and introduces himself to Lucy at the singles table. He is smooth and confident, and works in finance. At precisely the moment they are making each other's acquaintance, Lucy's ex-boyfriend John (Evans) delivers her drink order. He is on the wait staff, serving guests at the function, and he is neither smooth nor wealthy. Yet, with effortless ease, Evans brings a sweet, natural presence as John. His character is an aspiring actor, taking waitering work on the side to get by, and his private life is a shambles with two guys who are serious slackers sharing his apartment. Despite the perils of having high-profile actors like Pascal and Evans (Captain America in the Avengers) in a romantic relationship drama like this, the dynamics are convincing, the light comedy effective. It's nicely balanced with the film's critique of the dating business and of assessing partners "by doing the math", played out in the sharp exchanges between characters, especially Harry and Lucy. They get right to the point. While the business of matchmaking is brought into sharp focus every now and then, the difficulties of finding partners in a hard, fast urban world of anomie are acknowledged too. What is the average punter to do? Why not trust a dating agency to find the love of your life? Moreover, there are difficult clients who lack self-awareness. A couple of montages make the point here. A gallery of random male clients at the Adore interview stating their preferences for dating much younger women, while a montage of female clients reveals how difficult it is to work with people in this intimate area. And then there are some clients who present a serious risk. While screenwriter Song has done some serious thinking about these things, her three lead actors contribute engaging performances to carry it off. With lively, mobile features and a natural, gamine presence that grounds her character, Johnson brings her familiar vibrant presence. It is easy to understand why matchmakers are sought in traditional societies where young adults have only restricted access to prospective partners. And today, it is fascinating to observe how the pace and anonymity of city life have seen matchmaking become a thriving business and online dating the name of the game.
