logo
Axon-backed bill to cancel Scottsdale election on HQ complex sparks Republican infighting

Axon-backed bill to cancel Scottsdale election on HQ complex sparks Republican infighting

Yahoo10-04-2025

Axon brought a mobile tactical simulator to the Arizona Capitol on March 4, 2025, as part of its effort to back legislation that would stop a ballot referendum in Scottsdale brought by residents opposed to the company's plans to build a 74-acre campus near the Loop 101 and Hayden Road. Photo by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy | Arizona Mirror
Republican lawmakers fought with each other Wednesday over a proposal that would strip away the right of Scottsdale voters to challenge the sprawling headquarters project for law enforcement technology company Axon.
An earlier Axon-backed GOP effort to make it impossible for all Arizonans to let local voters challenge development projects at the ballot box failed to gain traction, so the company's allies in the legislature pivoted instead to a proposal that would disenfranchise just Scottsdale's voters.
The House International Trade Committee signed off on a bill last month that would bar Scottsdale voters from heading to the polls to decide the fate of Axon's planned 74-acre campus near Hayden Road and the Loop 101. In addition to the company's headquarters, the development would also include 1,900 apartments and a luxury hotel.
The Arizona Constitution gives residents the right to refer matters to the ballot.
Local activists, backed by a signature-gathering effort linked to a California labor union, gathered more than 25,000 signatures to send the rezoning decision made by a lame-duck city council — the votes for the project came from councilors who had been voted out of office — to the ballot in a voter referendum, which must happen by November 2026.
The measure that lawmakers advanced on Wednesday would cancel that election. It says that any municipality with between 200,000 and 500,000 residents — Scottsdale had 241,000 residents in the 2020 census — must 'allow hotel use and multifamily residential housing' for land zoned like the Axon parcel 'without requiring any type of application that will require a public hearing' if certain criteria is met.
Rep. Joseph Chaplik, R-Scottsdale, said he and other Scottsdale lawmakers were not brought to the table on the proposed legislation. He unsuccessfully tried to amend the measure, leading to lengthy debate on the House floor.
'Not one Scottsdale representative, all nine of us, was involved in this,' Chaplik said.
Rep. Tony Rivero, R-Peoria, who sponsored the strike-everything amendment at Axon's behest and chaired the committee that heard it, said that he reached out to Chaplik 'several times.' He also claimed that the referendum campaign was orchestrated by 'outside special interest groups,' a line that Axon and its supporters have repeatedly used.
Chaplik has been strongly opposed to the efforts to undermine the Scottsdale election, and has gotten into heated arguments at the Capitol with Axon CEO Patrick Smith about the legislation, something he made note of during floor debate of Senate Bill 1543.
Chaplik claimed he was 'assaulted, accosted and threatened' by Smith at the legislature, and that his colleagues had 'handed over the keys' to Smith and his lobbyists in order to let them sway lawmakers.
Last month, Axon held a large press conference on the House lawn that included a large number of their employees, technology, food and more where lawmakers were seen rubbing elbows with Axon's C-suite and lobbyists.
Rivero claimed that the bill is not specific to Axon but could not name a single other project that it could apply to, and he admitted that Axon brought the legislation to him.
'Yes, I was approached by Axon, but I am approached by many groups,' Rivero said when Rep. Pamela Carter, R-Scottsdale, asked him where the legislation originated. 'I have no history with Axon, I have no history with their leadership. I met them about a month ago.'
Rivero said the reason he sponsored the legislation was because of the economic impact that Axon and similar companies leaving the state would have. Although the bill is in response to Scottsdale's Axon referendum, he said that the issue 'goes beyond Scottsdale.'
That didn't satisfy Chaplik.
'Where is the respect for me and my colleagues in Scottsdale that oppose this bill?' Chaplik asked when explaining one of his several amendments that failed to be added. 'Folks, there is a red button on your desk. I hope that a few of you use it once and a while.'
Chaplik's amendments included requiring that the international campus have its workers work on-site, change the amount of housing meant for workers from 20% to 50% and more.
All were rejected.
The bill cleared floor debate on an informal vote and is now cleared for a formal roll-call vote. If it passes the House, it would go back to the Senate for a final vote.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion - Trump-Musk divorce threatens the president and the entire Republican Party
Opinion - Trump-Musk divorce threatens the president and the entire Republican Party

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Trump-Musk divorce threatens the president and the entire Republican Party

Few expected the relationship between President Trump and Elon Musk to survive four years, but the spectacular collapse of this partnership has shocked even seasoned observers with its speed and intensity. Now, as two of the world's most powerful men openly clash, there are seismic implications for the country as a whole and the Republican Party specifically. Put another way, not only does this fissure expose cracks in the GOP and MAGA coalition, it's also a considerable threat to Republicans' midterms hopes and Trump's signature legislation. The fight, which began two weeks ago when Musk expressed 'disappointment' with Trump's 'one big, beautiful' bill had initially been confined to disagreements over the legislation, rather than personal attacks. Then, on Thursday afternoon, it escalated in unprecedented, dramatic fashion. Following Trump's recent comment that he would have won Pennsylvania without Musk's help, Musk replied 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' That was just Musk's opening salvo against the man he spent roughly $300 million to get elected. The tech billionaire then went on a blistering war path. He claimed Trump was on 'the Epstein list,' supported impeachment — a touchy subject for the twice-impeached Trump — and claimed that tariffs would cause a recession. Not content with attacking Trump, Musk has also threatened to fund primary challenges to Republicans who support the bill, and has criticized both Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La.). With unprecedented speed, Musk went from the man who could pour hundreds of millions into Republican coffers to Republicans' enemy number one. Influential commentator Steve Bannon pushed for Musk's deportation, claiming he's an illegal alien, and Trump threatened to cancel all government contracts with Musk's multiple companies, saying Musk 'went CRAZY.' Whether or not the rumors of an impending détente between the two is enough to heal the rupture remains to be seen, but it's unlikely that all of the pieces will ever get put back together. Given Musk's deep pockets and control of social media platform X, where he has a cult-like following, Trump and the Republicans now find themselves in a treacherous spot at a precarious time. Indeed, even before the dramatic escalation, Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' was in limbo in the Senate. As Alexander Bolton noted in this publication prior to Thursday's blowup, Trump's bill is 'losing momentum in the Senate in the face of blistering attacks from Elon Musk.' To that end, Musk's criticisms of the bill and threats to primary its Republican supporters has already led two House Republicans who voted for the bill, Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and John Rose (R-Tenn.), to come out against some of it. It appears that this fight has brought some Republicans back into Trump's fold. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), who had been opposed to the bill prior to its passage in the House, condemned Musk, saying he 'crossed the line.' And Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn), another House conservative, dismissed Musk's influence, saying he is 'just another shiny object.' For their part, Republican senators who may have had doubts about Trump's signature legislation now risk being seen as taking Musk's side and being disloyal to the president. However, it would be a mistake to overlook the implications of the breakup or the dangers for Republicans. If he wants, Musk could very easily fund primaries against vulnerable GOP House members, and his control of X gives him unprecedented influence over the media ecosystem. Further, Musk's influence among the Silicon Valley cohort that moved stridently to the right in 2024 could peel off a new group of Republican voters and donors. In that same vein, there are possible electoral consequences for Republicans, even if tempers between Trump and Musk cool down. Trump was counting on the bill's passage to be a significant political tailwind that would boost his polling numbers and Republicans' midterm hopes, particularly given the ongoing chaos over tariffs and trade policy. Now, whichever version of the bill eventually passes, Republicans look like the party of chaos. It is entirely possible that this ongoing feud dents voters' confidence in Republicans' ability to competently govern, something Democrats are clearly hoping for. As the Wall Street Journal reported, Democrats are 'reveling' about the fight, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) reposting Musk's attacks and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) taking digs at the 'GOP civil war.' To be sure, despite Musk's efforts, it remains likely that a version of Trump's 'one, big, beautiful bill' will still pass, but Republicans now have a bigger headache. Ultimately, divorces are always messy, but the Trump-Musk divorce is unprecedented, and it could not have come at a worse time for Republicans. With razor-thin margins in the House and the absence of Trump's much-touted trade bills, it poses the most significant threat to Republicans' midterm hopes, and by extension, the rest of Trump's term. Douglas E. Schoen and Carly Cooperman are pollsters and partners with the public opinion company Schoen Cooperman Research based in New York. They are co-authors of the book, 'America: Unite or Die.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Biden alums could boost their House ranks in midterm elections
Biden alums could boost their House ranks in midterm elections

Miami Herald

time41 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Biden alums could boost their House ranks in midterm elections

WASHINGTON - As a senior attorney in the Commerce Department, Eric Chung helped implement the 2022 law known as the CHIPS and Science Act, a bipartisan effort championed by President Joe Biden to boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing and scientific research. But Chung left his civil service job in April, shortly after President Donald Trump called the law a "horrible, horrible thing" in a joint address to Congress and urged lawmakers to scrap the CHIPS program. (Last week, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Senate appropriators that Trump is renegotiating some of Biden's semiconductor grants.) "With elections, there are consequences and you expect some changes,'' Chung said. "But the idea of just going after a program that's so bipartisan ... for no apparent reason, just railing against it, certainly disappointed me, and I just couldn't watch it unfold." Now Chung is running for Congress - he's one of at least four Democrats hoping to flip Michigan's 10th District - and he's highlighting his experience working on one of the Biden administration's signature legislative achievements. He isn't the only one. As Trump tries to unwind much of his Democratic predecessor's agenda, a handful of federal employees who helped carry out the Biden administration's policy priorities are seeking House seats in 2026. They are mostly competing in battleground districts and are expected to face competitive primaries. The list includes Michael Roth, a former official in the Small Business Administration vying to unseat New Jersey Republican Thomas H. Kean Jr.; Sanjyot Dunung, a former member of Biden's 2020 foreign policy working group running for an open seat in Illinois; and Cait Conley, who was director of counterterrorism on the National Security Council, then served at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and is now challenging New York GOP Rep. Mike Lawler. And career diplomat and former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bridget A. Brink is considering a run in Michigan's 7th District, which is currently held by Republican freshman Tom Barrett. Brink resigned earlier this year, citing disagreements with Trump's Ukraine policy. If successful, these Democrats would join other former Biden administration officials elected to the House, including freshman Reps. Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, a former Biden Justice Department attorney, and April McClain Delaney of Maryland, a former deputy assistant secretary in the Commerce Department. Another Biden alumnus, Rhode Island Rep. Gabe Amo, came to Congress in 2023, after winning a special election for an open seat. Other prominent Biden alumni have launched 2026 gubernatorial campaigns, including former Interior Secretary Deb Haaland in New Mexico and former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra in California. The highest-profile member of the Biden team - former Vice President Kamala Harris - is also weighing a gubernatorial run in the Golden State. Moving from an executive branch appointment to elective office isn't a new trend but the reckoning over Biden's mental acuity during his time in office, spurred by the recent publication of several books, has raised complicated questions about his legacy. Amo, who worked in the White House as a senior adviser to Biden, was recently pressed about whether he saw signs of the former president's cognitive decline. The congressman told WJAR-TV in Providence that he saw Biden "execute the functions of that job in a way that I was supportive of, as someone there in the White House." "I was proud of the work that I was able to do, and proud of the work that he did to usher in key advances for the American people," Amo said. Several of the candidates seeking seats in 2026 said they were partly motivated to run after growing increasingly distressed watching Trump dismantle Biden's legacy. Trump "is squandering America's blue star reputation,'' said Dunung, who worked on international trade and policies to strengthen small-business exports as a member of Biden's foreign policy working group during the 2020 campaign cycle. "We are losing our good reputation around the world for being a trusted ally and a trusted partner,'' she said. Dunung is running for Illinois' 8th District, which Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi - a child of Indian immigrants like Dunung - is vacating to run for Senate. While Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales rates the race Solid Democratic, Trump significantly cut into his margins in the suburban Chicago district, from a 15-point loss in 2020 to a 7-point deficit last year, according to calculations by The Downballot. Dunung, who describes herself as "a pragmatic workhorse," said she launched her bid for Congress partly as a reaction to what she called the "chaos ... and crony capitalism" of the Trump administration. "I'm also about change from within our party, the Democratic Party," she said. "I think there are better ways to do things, and we need to prioritize efficiency. We need to prioritize getting results, not necessarily being beholden to special interests." Both Dunung and Chung recently won endorsements from the political arm of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. Chung is also seeking an open House seat - Michigan's 10th District outside Detroit, where Republican incumbent John James is running for governor. Chung initially intended to stay in his position at the Commerce Department even after Trump won. "If any program was going to be safe in this administration, it should have been a program like (CHIPS),'' he said. "I was hopeful that we could work all together across the aisle. And as a career civil servant, your oath is to the Constitution, and your oath is to the country." But Chung, who grew up in Michigan as the son of Vietnamese immigrants, concluded that he had to leave. "I wasn't waking up every morning thinking I'd run for office,'' he said, "but when I saw that my community and basically every part of the American dream that I had experienced growing up in Michigan was in potential jeopardy, I wanted to do all I could." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Democrat Support is Finally Bouncing Back
Democrat Support is Finally Bouncing Back

Miami Herald

time42 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Democrat Support is Finally Bouncing Back

After months of lagging poll numbers and internal party anxieties, Democrats are seeing signs of a rebound. The Democrats have faced less than impressive polling since President Donald Trump won against Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. But new polling suggests the party's popularity might be on an upward trajectory again. YouGov's generic congressional ballot tracker, which tests which party voters would choose in a congressional election, shows that the Democrats are 2 points ahead of the Republicans, with 44 percent to the GOP's 42 percent. That is the biggest lead the Democrats have held over the Republicans in the poll since August. Between October 2024 and April 2025, the two parties were practically tied in the poll. But since April, support for the Democrats has started to trend upward, with their lead over the Republicans reaching 2 points this week. The upward trajectory for the Democrats coincides with Trump introducing his "Liberation Day" tariffs in April. The policy move rattled markets, prompting a sharp sell-off before an eventual recovery. It also saw Trump's approval ratings dip after a relatively strong start to his presidency. Since then, Trump's ratings have rebounded. But YouGov's tracker, as well as recent election results, suggest the Democrats may now be gaining some momentum in the face of anxiety about the impact of Trump's tariffs. Last week, Democrat Keishan Scott defeated his Republican rival Bill Oden in a landslide win for a seat in the South Carolina House of Representatives. In April, the Democrats defeated the GOP in a special election for an Iowa State House seat in what the Democratic Party hailed as a "clear rebuke of Trump." Also in April, voters in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race delivered a major blow to Trump and Elon Musk, who had poured millions into backing the Republican candidate. Democratic strategists say the party is beginning to gain momentum by aggressively countering Donald Trump's policies and offering a message of stability amid chaos. Former Obama adviser Peter Loge pointed to what he sees as the deep unpopularity of Trump's actual policies—even among some who support his rhetoric. "Trump's policies are widely unpopular, and getting less popular," he told Newsweek. "People are afraid of a recession, their neighbors are being deported, they're losing jobs, their families and communities are losing services on which they rely. "Voters tend to like Trump acting on the U.S.–Mexico border, and many share a general rage against elites, but the nuts and bolts of what that means is not popular," he added. Loge also warned that voters may be losing patience with the spectacle of Trump-era politics. "Voters may also be tiring of what can look more like reality TV than governing. The latest spat between Trump and Musk is the stuff of tabloids, not the serious work of the world's largest economy and military." Strategist Alejandro Verdin echoed this, telling Newsweek: "Democrats are finally catching their footing with a 'flood-the-zone' strategy against Trump. Amid a steady trove of disgusting mass deportations, tariffs creating economic turmoil, and repeated attempts to gut our democracy, Democrats are offering a path out of the chaos." "Americans are waking up to the destructiveness of Trump—and Democrats have a real chance here to keep growing their margin," Verdin added. Meanwhile, strategist Max Burns told Newsweek the party's gains can be credited to both Trump's declining popularity and Democrats reconnecting with disillusioned voters. "Two things are driving this polling gain, from my POV," he said. "First, Democrats are finally listening to their voters and taking a more aggressive posture against Trump and the GOP, so some of that gain is disillusioned Democrats coming back into the fold." "Second, Trump and the GOP have shed popularity at a staggering rate, so Democrats have become more attractive to voters as Republicans have spiraled downward," he added. But Burns also warned of overconfidence. "The risk here is that Democratic leaders see their rising poll numbers and think the hard work is over. Democratic voters are still morose over 2024 and the lack of change they've seen in the party so far. They expect the party to stand up and protect regular Americans from the deep cuts of this extreme GOP budget. If Democrats don't walk the walk, voters will go right back to ignoring them." And polls also show that success in local elections for the Democrats is not necessarily translating into an increase in popularity. Across more than a dozen surveys conducted between late January and mid-May 2025, the party's unfavorable ratings consistently outpace its favorable ones—by double digits in nearly every case. The RealClearPolitics average from March 6 to May 15 puts the Democratic Party's favorable rating at 34.7 percent, with unfavorable opinions at 58.3 percent, resulting in a net negative spread of -23.6 points. Marquette University Law School's latest poll, conducted from May 5 to 15, found only 32 percent of Americans viewed the Democratic Party favorably, while 63 percent had an unfavorable view—a 31-point deficit. That marked a slight downturn from Marquette's earlier survey in March, which showed a 35–62 favorability split, indicating a steady decline in public perception. Economist/YouGov polling paints a similar picture, though with less dramatic numbers. Its April 25–28 poll found Democrats underwater by 22 points, with 37 percent favorable and 59 percent unfavorable. In late March and again in mid-March, the same pollster reported spreads of -29 and -20, respectively. While these results suggest some fluctuation, they show no meaningful improvement. Other surveys confirm the pattern. Pew Research in April reported a 38–60 split. CNN's March data showed 30 percent of Americans viewed Democrats favorably, while 58 percent did not. NBC News reported just 27 percent favorability in early March, among the lowest of any poll in the sample. Only one poll—Yahoo News, conducted from April 25 to 28—showed a somewhat narrower gap, with 43 percent viewing the party favorably and 53 percent unfavorably. But even that best-case scenario still placed Democrats 10 points underwater. YouGov's tracker also shows a downward trajectory in the Democratic Party's popularity, dropping from 40 percent favorability in December to 38 percent in May. Meanwhile, the most recent Fabrizio Ward poll, conducted between May 15-19 among 800 registered voters, shows that voters trust President Donald Trump over Democrats in Congress on the economy, with 45 percent choosing Trump compared to 39 percent who chose the Democrats. And a recent CNN/SSRS poll from May showed that Trump has nearly wiped out the Democratic Party's decades-long advantage with middle-class voters. Once seen as the dominant party for middle-class interests—with a 23-point lead over Republicans in 1989—Democrats now lead by just 2 points, per the survey. Republicans are also gaining traction on economic issues, with a 7-point lead when voters are asked which party aligns more with their economic views. A separate Reuters/Ipsos poll showed the GOP's advantage on having the better economic plan rising to 12 points, up from 9 last year, reflecting growing approval of Trump's economic approach in his second term. For Verdin, this is a wake-up call for the Democrats not to be complacent. "The party needs to put their pedal on the gas, be nimble and creative with messaging, and start reaching voters early, all the way until the midterms. It's a marathon that we're going to have to sprint the whole way," he said. It comes after polling has shown that the Democrats are more unpopular than ever after their loss to Trump in 2024. According to an NBC News poll from March 7-11, 55 percent of respondents said they had a negative view of the Democratic Party, while 27 percent said they had a positive perception. That is the lowest level recorded since NBC News began asking the question in 1990. Recent polls have also shown support for the party declining among middle class, young and Black voters, who have traditionally made up a significant part of the Democrats' base. There was also evidence of dissatisfaction with the party from its base, with 20 percent of Democratic voters viewing it negatively, twice as high as the figure for Republicans who had a negative view of their party. The survey suggested that this may be because Democratic voters want their party to take a tougher position in Congress. Among Democratic voters, 65 percent said they wanted their congressional representatives to "stick to their positions even if that means not being able to get things done in Washington," while 32 percent said they should "make compromises with Trump to gain consensus on legislation." The poll largely reflects the debates occurring in the Democratic party right now in light of their 2024 defeat. Some feel that in order to get back on track and win back the House in the 2026 midterms, the party should take a more bipartisan approach to politics, and work with Trump to pass legislation, while others feel that doing so will alienate Democratic voters who see Trump as a toxic figure. Polls have shown voters are divided on this question. In Quantus' April survey, 49 percent said they Democratic party should respond to Trump by resisting or opposing him, while 41 percent said they believe the party should work with Trump. A HarrisX poll from May 14-15 found that 47 percent of all voters support calls for the Democrats to adopt a more aggressive stance toward the Trump administration, while 53 percent said they support moves by moderate Democrats to compromise with the Trump administration. "The Democratic Party does not have a unified message or plan to respond. There is no Democratic equivalent to the clear message of Trump and the far right in the U.S.," Loge warned. "That voters are less unhappy with Democrats than they are Republicans doesn't mean that voters like Democrats, only that they dislike them marginally less than they dislike Republicans. "Voters don't much like any political party or government official. Voters are tired of politics that looks like reality TV. Voters mostly just want things to work. They want to know they can get a job, and that job can pay the bills. Politicians are spending a lot of time telling voters nothing works, and voters believe them." Related Articles Cory Booker Says He Won't Take Money From Elon MuskDonald Trump Warns of 'Serious Consequences' if Elon Musk Backs DemocratsRepublican Gets Good Sign in New Jersey Governor's Race PollGen Z Voters Are Ditching GOP for Midterms-Poll 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store