Syrian Christian leader chides president over deadly church bombing
DAMASCUS (Reuters) -Syria's top Christian leader said on Tuesday at the funeral for victims of a deadly church bombing that President Ahmed al-Sharaa's government bore responsibility for not protecting minorities and his condolences were insufficient.
At least 25 worshippers died on Sunday when a suicide bomber blew himself up at the Mar Elias Church in Damascus, the first such attack since Sharaa's Islamist-led government seized power in December after the Assad family dynasty's toppling.
The attack, which the government blamed on the Islamic State militant group, reinforced doubts among minorities about whether they can rely on government assurances of protection.
"With love and with all due respect Mr. President, you spoke yesterday by phone... to express your condolences. That is not enough for us," the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch, John (X) Yazigi, said at the funeral, drawing applause.
"We are grateful for the phone call. But the crime that took place is a little bigger than that."
Christians made up around 10% of Syria's pre-war population of 22 million, but their numbers shrunk significantly during the 14-year conflict, mainly through emigration. Only a few hundred thousand are now estimated to be living in Syria.
Yazigi said the government must prioritize protection for all. "What is important to me - and I will say it - is that the government bears responsibility in full," Yazigi said of the church attack.
Hundreds were at the service in the nearby Church of the Holy Cross to bury nine of the victims, whose bodies were placed in simple white coffins adorned with white flowers.
Social affairs minister Hind Kabawat - the only Christian and only woman in Syria's new government - attended.
On Monday, Sharaa said the attack was a crime hurting all Syrians but did not use the word "Christians" or "church".
The government said security forces raided hideouts used by Islamic State, killing two of its members including one who facilitated the suicide bomber's entry into Mar Elias Church.
IS did not issue a statement of responsibility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Pope Leo XIV urges all sides in Iran-Israel war to reject 'bullying and arrogance' and talk peace
VATICAN CITY -- Pope Leo XIV urged the warring sides in the Israel-Iran war to 'reject the logic of bullying and revenge' and choose a path of dialogue and diplomacy to reach peace as he expressed solidarity with all Christians in the Middle East. Speaking at his weekly Wednesday general audience, the American pope said he was following 'with attention and hope' recent developments in the war. He cited the biblical exhortation: 'A national shall not raise the sword against another nation.' A ceasefire is holding in the 12-day Iran-Israel conflict, which involved Israel targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites and the U.S. intervening by dropping bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear sites. Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful. 'Let us listen to this voice that comes from on High:' Leo said. 'Heal the lacerations caused by the bloody actions of recent days, reject all logic of bullying and revenge, and resolutely take the path of dialogue, diplomacy and peace.' The Chicago-born Leo also expressed solidarity with the victims of Sunday's attack on a Greek Orthodox church in Damascus, Syria and urged the international community to keep supporting Syrian reconciliation. Syria's Interior Ministry has said a sleeper cell belonging to the Islamic State group was behind the attack at the Church of the Holy Cross in Damascus, which killed at least 25 people. 'To the Christians in the Middle East, I am near you. All the church is close to you,' he said. 'This tragic event is a reminder of the profound fragility that still marks Syria after years of conflict and instability, and therefore it is crucial that the international community doesn't look away from this country, but continues to offer it support through gestures of solidarity and with a renewed commitment to peace and reconciliation.'
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Behind the Curtain: An AI Marshall Plan
If politics and public debate were a rational, fact-based exercise, the government, business and the media would be obsessed with preparation for the unfolding AI revolution — rather than ephemeral outrage eruptions. Why it matters: That's not how Washington works. So while CEOs, Silicon Valley and a few experts inside government see AI as an opportunity, and threat, worthy of a modern Marshall Plan, most of America — and Congress — shrugs. One common question: What can we actually do, anyway? A lot. We've talked to scores of CEOs, government officials and AI executives over the past few months. Based on those conversations, we pieced together specific steps the White House, Congress, businesses and workers could take now to get ahead of the high-velocity change that's unspooling. None requires regulation or dramatic shifts. All require vastly more political and public awareness, and high-level AI sophistication. 1. A global American-led AI super-alliance: President Trump, like President Biden before him, sees beating China to superhuman AI as an existential battle. Trump opposes regulations that would risk America's early lead in the AI race. Congress agrees. So lots of CEOs and AI experts are mystified about why Trump has alienated allies, including Canada and Europe, who could help form a super-alliance of like-minded countries that play by America's AI rules and strengthen our supply chain for vital AI ingredients like rare earth minerals. Imagine America, Canada, all of Europe, Australia, much of the Middle East, parts of Africa and South America — and key Asian nations like Japan, South Korea and India — all aligned against China in this AI battle. The combination of AI rules, supply-chain ingredients, and economic activity would form a formidable pro-American AI bloc. 2. A domestic Marshall Plan: The Marshall Plan was America's commitment to rebuild Europe from the ruins of World War II. Now, the U.S. needs unfathomable amounts of data, chips, energy and infrastructure to produce AI. Trump has cut deals with companies and foreign countries — and cleared away some regulations — to expedite a lot of this. But there's been little sustained public discussion about what this means for the economy and U.S. jobs. It's very improvisational. Trump himself barely mentions AI or talks about it in any specificity in private. The country really needs "a combination of the Marshall Plan, the GI Bill, the New Deal — the social programs and international aid efforts needed to make AI work for the U.S. domestically and globally," as Scott Rosenberg, Axios managing editor for tech, puts it. One smart idea: Get the federal government better aligned with states and even schools to prepare the country and workforce in advance. Some states — including Texas — are eagerly working with AI companies to meet rising demand in these new areas. Yet many others are sitting it out. Imagine all states exploiting this moment and refashioning post-high-school education and job training programs. In Pennsylvania, Gov. Josh Shapiro — a possible Democratic presidential candidate in '28 — sees the opening. He hailed "the largest private sector investment in Pennsylvania history" earlier this month when he personally announced that Amazon Web Services plans to spend $20 billion on data center complexes in his state. 3. A congressional kill switch: There's no appetite in Washington to regulate artificial intelligence, mainly out of fear China would then beat the U.S. to the most important technological advance in history. But that doesn't mean Congress needs to ignore or downplay AI's potential and risks. Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, got rich as an early investor in an earlier tech boom — cell phones — and has been one of Capitol Hill's few urgent voices on AI. "If we're serious about outcompeting China," Warner told us, "we need clear controls on advanced AI chips and strong investments in workforce training, research and development." Several lawmakers and AI experts envision a preemptive move: Create a bipartisan, bicameral special committee, much like one stood up from the 1940s through the 1970s to monitor nuclear weapons. This committee, in theory, could do four things, all vital to advancing public (and congressional) awareness: Monitor, under top-secret clearance, the various large language models (LLMs) before they're released to fully understand their capabilities. Prepare Congress and the public, ahead of time, for looming effects on specific jobs or industries. Gain absolute expertise and fluency in the latest LLMs and AI technologies, and educate other members of Congress on a regular basis. Provide extra sets of eyes and scrutiny on models that pose risks of operating outside of human control in coming years. This basically creates another break-in-case-of-emergency lever beyond the companies themselves, and White House and defense officials with special top-secret clearance. 4. A CEO AI surge: Anthropic's Dario Amodei told Axios that half of entry-level, white-collar jobs could be gone in a few years because of AI. Almost every CEO tells us they're slowing or freezing hiring across many departments, where AI is expected to displace humans. CEOs, better educated on AI, could help workers in two big ways: Provide deep instruction, free access and additional training to help each person use AI to vastly increase proficiency and productivity. This retraining/upskilling effort would be expensive, but a meaningful way for well-off people and organizations to show leadership. Get more clever leaders thinking now about new business lines AI might open up, creating jobs in new areas to make up for losses elsewhere. A few CEOs suggested they see a social obligation to ease the transition, especially if government fails to act.
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
Pope Leo XIV urges all sides in Iran-Israel war to reject 'bullying and arrogance' and talk peace
VATICAN CITY — Pope Leo XIV urged the warring sides in the Israel-Iran war to 'reject the logic of bullying and revenge' and choose a path of dialogue and diplomacy to reach peace as he expressed solidarity with all Christians in the Middle East. Speaking at his weekly Wednesday general audience, the American pope said he was following 'with attention and hope' recent developments in the war. He cited the biblical exhortation: 'A national shall not raise the sword against another nation.'
