The 2025 wildfire season is on track to be Canada's 2nd-worst on record
OTTAWA — This year's wildfire season in Canada is shaping up to be the second-worst on record and federal officials are warning of a dangerous summer in parts of British Columbia.
Officials with several government departments held a technical briefing Thursday in Ottawa with an update on the state of multiple wildfires.
Wildfires have scorched 3.7 million hectares across the country so far — six times the area of Prince Edward Island.
Wildfires have consumed about 800,000 hectares on average annually since 2014. About 76 per cent of the total area burned in Canada is in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.
"While the start of the season was relatively normal in the early spring, the forest fire situation got rapidly worse over the past weeks," said Michael Norton, director general of the Northern Forestry Centre with Natural Resources Canada.
"This had been driven by higher-than-average temperatures, especially across the west, with low accumulated precipitation on top of already dry conditions."
Modelling by Environment and Climate Change Canada suggests temperatures will be about a degree or two above normal across the country through August, though the risk of wildfires remains highest in central and western provinces and territories.
Natural Resources Canada is forecasting an extreme fire risk in southern British Columbia in July, while southwestern B.C. — including Vancouver Island — is expected to be hotter and drier than normal.
Canada has called on international aid to fight the 225 active wildfires. About 500 firefighters from the United States and Australia are helping out, while another dozen American firefighters are on their way and a federal agency is looking to request 100 more from Costa Rica.
International leaders are set to meet at the G7 summit in Alberta next week. While officials said there is little risk of fires or wildfire smoke affecting the summit, the topic of wildfires will be on the agenda.
"One of things that will be presented at the G7 is the Kananaskis Wildfire Charter," federal Emergency Management Minister Eleanor Olszewski told reporters Thursday.
She said the charter addresses "all aspects" of wildfires, including mitigation, response and recovery. Olszewski said members of the G7 have already committed in principle to the charter.
"There's not a doubt that wildfires affect us globally, and when we have a wildfire in one country it affects the others in terms of smoke, for example," she said.
"What G7 leaders will focus on is strengthening multilateral efforts to prevent, fight, and recover from wildfires," said John Kirton, head of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto.
Kirton said the discussion at the G7 likely will focus on "equipment interoperability" to allow G7 members to support each other during emergencies, and the use of satellite imagery to fight wildfires.
Kirton said the topic has become "a burning issue" in part because wildfires in places like Los Angeles and across the Prairies show how the threat is relevant to Washington and its G7 peers.
— With files from Dylan Robertson
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025
Nick Murray, The Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Second judge blocks parts of Trump order overhauling elections
A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration from implementing parts of President Trump's executive order seeking to overhaul elections. U.S. District Judge Denise Casper granted a request from a group of Democratic attorneys general to halt five sections of the executive order, most focused on Trump's new requirements for proof of citizenship to register to vote in U.S. elections. Casper is the second judge to block portions of Trump's directive. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., granted a preliminary injunction in April in three consolidated cases, which also focused on the new proof of citizenship requirements. 'There is no dispute (nor could there be) that U.S. citizenship is required to vote in federal elections and the federal voter registration forms require attestation of citizenship,' wrote Casper, an appointee of former President Obama. 'The issue here is whether the President can require documentary proof of citizenship where the authority for election requirements is in the hands of Congress, its statutes … do not require it, and the statutorily created [Election Assistance Commission (EAC)] is required to go through a notice and comment period and consult with the States before implementing any changes to the federal forms for voter registration,' she continued. Casper enjoined the administration from implementing new rules mandating documentary proof of citizenship in federal voter registration forms. She also blocked conditioning any funding for states from the EAC — an independent election administration agency — on their adoption of a ballot receipt deadline of Election Day. She also blocked a directive to Attorney General Pam Bondi to take civil or criminal action against states that violate any provisions by counting absentee or mail-in ballots received after Election Day in the final tabulation of votes for president or members of Congress. The portions of the order relating to ballots received after Election Day apply to 13 of the 19 states that filed the challenge, she ruled. 'There is nothing in the text of the Election Day statutes that bars the Ballot Receipt States from counting ballots received in accordance with their ballot receipt laws or that provides for civil enforcement or criminal action by the Attorney General against the Ballot Receipt States,' the judge wrote in her 44-page opinion. Trump's executive order, signed in March, said it was his administration's policy to enforce federal law and 'to protect the integrity of our election process.' The president has repeatedly questioned the legitimacy of American elections, most notably the 2020 election won by former President Biden. 'The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,' Casper wrote. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Key Trump officials like Gabbard, Vance quiet on Israel's attack on Iran as WH insists cabinet ‘united'
WASHINGTON — Key Trump administration officials are keeping mum and instead boosting the president's statements about Israel's attack on Iranian — even as the White House insists the cabinet is 'united' about the US response. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was the first to respond to the attack publicly with a statement Thursday evening that 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran' and the US was 'not involved in strikes' — but others have yet to comment. 'We remain committed to a Diplomatic Resolution to the Iran Nuclear Issue! My entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran,' Trump posted on his Truth Social hours before the Israeli attack launched. Advertisement 5 Key Trump administration officials have been staying quiet or boosting the president's statements about Israel's airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, missile sites and military leaders. AP 'They could be a Great Country, but they first must completely give up hopes of obtaining a Nuclear Weapon. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard reposted Trump's statement hours before Israel's airstrikes that killed at least 20 senior military leaders and six nuclear scientists for the regime in Tehran. Advertisement The White House and other cabinet officials like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also boosted Rubio's or Trump's messages without issuing statements of their own. 5 'The cabinet is united in the president's actions,' a White House official affirmed to The Post. AP 'The cabinet is united in the president's actions,' a White House official affirmed to The Post. Trump's comments Friday morning were far more aggressive — he tore into Iranian officials for having botched their 'chance to make a deal' while emphasizing how the US supplies 'lethal military equipment' to Israel. Advertisement 'I told them it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come – And they know how to use it,' Trump posted, in a statement that Vice President JD Vance reposted. 5 The White House and other cabinet officials like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also boosted Rubio's or Trump's messages without issuing statements of their own. AFP via Getty Images 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end. Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!' Rubio's comments had emphasized: 'Our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense.' Advertisement 'President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel,' the secretary of state also said. 5 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard reposted Trump's statement hours before Israel's airstrikes that killed at least 20 senior military leaders and six nuclear scientists for the regime in Tehran. Getty Images That statement had been crafted with White House input, with some disagreements arising about its precise phrasing, a Trump administration official later told Politico. Trump's administration has been staffed with more officials who support a non-interventionist foreign policy than in his first term, with conflicts in the Middle East — including earlier US strikes on Houthi terrorists in Yemen — dividing some cabinet members. 'President Trump has pledged to end wars, not start them,' Gabbard said when announcing that she'd left the Democratic Party at a Trump rally last October weeks before the 2024 election. 5 Trump's comments Friday morning — which were boosted by Vice President JD Vance — were far more aggressive in tearing into Iranian officials for having botched their 'chance to make a deal.' AP In an ominous video posted Wednesday, the director of national intelligence had also cautioned that the world was inching closer to the 'brink of nuclear annihilation,' after visiting Hiroshima, Japan. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who heavily backed Gabbard's appointment, struck a similar tone in a morning newsletter for his eponymous network, claiming it could be his final dispatch 'before an all-out war.' Advertisement Carlson also directly challenged Rubio's claim that the US was 'not involved.' 'The United States should not at any level participate in a war with Iran. No funding, no American weapons, no troops on the ground,' he wrote. '[T]here is another option: Drop Israel. Let them fight their own wars.' National security hawks in Congress took the opposite stance. 'Game on,' Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) tweeted after the bombs started falling. 'Pray for Israel.'

35 minutes ago
What to know about 'No Kings Day' protests across US to counter Trump's military parade
Thousands of "No Kings Day" protests are set to be held throughout the country on Saturday to protest President Donald Trump's administration and to counterprogram the military parade in Washington, D.C., marking the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. Here's what to know about the protests. What is the idea behind "No Kings Day"? "'No Kings Day' is the largest single-day, peaceful protest in recent American history, made up of millions of normal, everyday Americans who are showing up in more than 2,000 communities around the country to say, 'we don't do kings in America,'" Ezra Levin, the co-executive director of progressive organizing group Indivisible, told ABC News on Thursday. Indivisible and other organizations involved with the coalition coordinating the protests have said that the protests are meant to protest what they say is overreach by the Trump administration on immigration enforcement and deportations, civil rights and cuts to the federal government. They've also pointed to how the military parade is being held on Trump's birthday. Trump has denied any connection between the parade's timing and his birthday, pointing to how June 14 is Flag Day. The groups coordinating the protests originally announced the initiatives in early May, after reports of the upcoming military parade, but organizers have said that the protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles and the response from the federal government have driven much more interest to the events. Where and when will the protests be? The protests will be held across the country and even beyond the United States, with a flagship event held in Philadelphia. Levin told ABC News there are now more than 2,000 events planned "just about everywhere, everywhere but downtown D.C. -- intentionally so." According to Levin, the organizers did not want to give Trump a rationale to retaliate against peaceful protests in D.C. or to say that the protesters were protesting the military. "We are ceding downtown D.C. Trump can have it for that day, and instead, we're organizing literally everywhere else," Levin said. Most of the protests around the country will be held in the morning, ahead of the parade. Some in the western part of the country may occur concurrently with the parade, which is set to kick off at 6:30 p.m. ET. What has Trump said about the protests? Asked on Thursday about his thoughts on the "No Kings" protests planned across the country for Saturday, Trump said he did not feel like a king. "I don't feel like a king. I have to go through hell to get stuff approved," he said. "A king would say, 'I'm not gonna get this'... he wouldn't have to call up Mike Johnson and Thune and say, 'Fellas, you got to pull this off' and after years we get it done. No, no, we're not a king, we're not a king at all," he added, referencing the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate Majority leader, respectively. Trump, on Tuesday, had threatened to use "heavy force" against "any" protesters at the military parade in the nation's capital; White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later said that "of course" the president supports peaceful protestors. Organizers of the No Kings protests have continuously emphasized they are not planning protests in Washington. Are there safety concerns surrounding the protests? Organizers have emphasized that the protests should remain peaceful and nonviolent, pointing to various trainings they've held this week about safety and deescalation. Levin said there were some concerns about outside agitators trying to disrupt protests, but he said people shouldn't feel "as if we're going into battle. That's not what this is about. This is peaceful protest. People are going to have funny signs, people are going to be dancing, people are going to be chanting, people are going to be expressing their First Amendment rights." At least two states, Texas and Missouri, have said they are calling up the National Guard in their states as a precaution against the potential for any violence at protests on Saturday. The governors of both states affirmed that peaceful protests are legal. What comes next? The events on Saturday are not meant to be the be-all end-all of the groups' efforts to protest the Trump administration, Levin said. "I think sometimes folks think a protest has to be everything. It's got to solve all your problems ... We need persistent, peaceful, people-powered organizing them on the ground in blue states, red states and purple states that allow people to push back against the escalating overreach from this administration," Levin said.