Shashi Tharoor Roasts Pakistan, China For Shielding Terror Outfits In The United Nations
TOI.in
/ Jun 03, 2025, 01:07AM IST
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor exposed Pakistan's role in shielding terror groups during a closed-door meeting in Brazil. Tharoor detailed how Lashkar-e-Taiba's proxy, the Resistance Front, was omitted from UN press statements due to Pakistani objections backed by China. Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Assam police probing 1,000 social media accounts linked to Pak, Bangladesh: CM
Guwahati: Around 1,000 social media accounts suspected to have links with Pakistan and Bangladesh are under investigation by the state police, Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said on Wednesday. 'I have asked the special branch (of Assam Police) to look at over 2,000 accounts on Facebook who are commenting on social media platforms on Assam election. Half of those accounts are from Bangladesh and Pakistan,' Sarma said, after attending a cabinet meeting. The CM said that these accounts on platforms like Facebook were allegedly opened by members of a particular community on a single day keeping the next year's assembly elections in the state in mind. 'The number will increase as the election nears as Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) wants somebody to win. If you read the comments, you will notice that those don't have names of our people. I will reveal more details on September 10,' he added, The CM was referring to the date when the special investigation team (SIT) of state police is slated to make public its report on alleged links of MP and newly appointed Assam Congress president, Gaurav Gogoi, and his British wife to the military and intelligence establishments of Pakistan. Gogoi, who represents the Jorhat Lok Sabha seat in Assam, has denied the accusations and urged Sarma to make public details of the investigation earlier than the stipulated date. He has, however, admitted to visiting Pakistan in 2013 (before he had become an MP) while his wife Elizabeth was posted there with an NGO that works on climate change. Sarma said that there was no competition with Congress or any other party for next year's assembly polls in the state as no one can match Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)'s development work and the goodwill for Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 'Nationalism, identity and development are BJP's planks. But on the other hand, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi is supporting Pakistan (on the issue of Operation Sindoor),' the CM said. 'People of Assam are aware and they know that only BJP can protect the interests of indigenous people of the state and supports its policies like action against child marriages, evictions of illegal encroachers from 'satras' (Vaishnavite monasteries),' he added. Sarma said that in the past few days, the Assam government has pushed back an unspecified number of suspected Bangladeshis to the neighbouring country. 'Could any Assamese have imagined that we would push back Bangladeshis? I will give you the number later. In the past one month, we have pushed back many of them saying they can't stay here. Only BJP can do such a thing because we know what Assamese people want,' he said.
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Modi Govt Must Answer on Pahalgam Attack Security Lapse, Trump's Ceasefire Claim: Asaduddin Owaisi
/ Jun 04, 2025, 08:19PM IST AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi has once again raised demand that the Modi government must answer why there were security lapses during the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22. He also urged the government to come clean on US president Donald Trump's claim that he brokered the ceasefire deal between India and Pakistan on May 10 after a 3-day military standoff. Owaisi said that the Centre must be pushed to clarify on all these issues when the Parliament convenes for the Monsoon Session from July 21. Owaisi returned to India after completing tour as part of the multi-party delegation that went global to push Delhi's diplomatic outreach to garner support for anti-terror Operation Sindoor and expose Pakistan's terror links. After grabbing a lot of attention with his sharp critique of Pakistan, Pak Army and ISI over links with terrorist groups, Owaisi was hailed as one of the more prominent Opposition leaders who rose above domestic politics to put India first. #asaduddinowaisi #pahalgamattack #operationsindoor #trumpceasefire #modigovt #terrorismdebate #indiausrelations #pakistanterror #monsoonsession2025 #owaisivstrump #toi #toibharat #bharat #breakingnews #indianews
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC junks Rahul's plea, says free speech doesn't extend to remarks against Army
Lucknow: Observing that freedom of speech and expression is subject to reasonable restrictions and it does not include freedom to make statements which are defamatory to any person or to the Indian Army, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court on May 29 dismissed Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's plea challenging a lower court summon in a defamation case over alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army during his . Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The single-judge bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi observed that the material on record made a prima facie case against Gandhi for making defamatory statement against Indian Army and hence the summoning order of lower court could not be set aside, and he would have to stand on trial. The case stems from a complaint filed by Udai Shanker Srivastava, retired director of the Border Roads Organization (a position equivalent to a Colonel in the Indian Army), in which he alleged that on Dec 16, 2022, during his 'Bharat Jodo Yatra' in Lucknow, Gandhi made disparaging comments about a face-off between the Indian and Chinese armies in Arunachal Pradesh on Dec 9, 2022. According to the complaint, Gandhi had said, "People will ask about Bharat Jodo Yatra, here and there, Ashok Gahlot and Sachin Pilot and whatnot. But they will not ask a single question about China capturing 2000 sq kms of Indian territory, killing 20 Indian soldiers and thrashing our soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh. But the Indian press doesn't ask a question to them about this. Isn't it true? The nation is watching all this. Don't pretend that people don't know." Srivastava contended that Gandhi's statement was "false and baseless" and made with "evil intention of demoralizing the Indian Army and to damage the faith of the Indian population in the Indian Army". He highlighted that the official statement from the Indian Army on Dec 12, 2022, confirmed that "PLA troops contacted the LAC in Tawang Sector which was contested by our troops in a firm and resolute manner. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This faceoff led to minor injuries to a few personnel from both sides." The complainant said that Gandhi's "baseless and derogatory statement" deeply hurt him and other nationalists. The additional chief judicial magistrate, court no. 27, Lucknow, had on Feb 11, 2025, summoned Gandhi to face trial for the offence under Section 500 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code. The lower court observed that prima facie, Gandhi's statement appeared to demoralize the Indian Army and its personnel and was not made in the performance of his official duties. Gandhi's counsel, Pranshu Agarwal, argued that the complaint was politically motivated and lacked merit. He contended that the complainant was not an "aggrieved person" under Section 199 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as the alleged defamation was against the Indian Army as an institution, not Srivastava directly. However, Justice Subhash Vidyarthi, rejected these arguments in his ruling and observed: "No doubt, Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression, this freedom is subject to reasonable restrictions, and it does not include the freedom to make statements which are defamatory to any person or defamatory to the Indian Army." The court clarified that the complainant as an "aggrieved person" could file the complaint under Section 199 of CrPC. While dismissing Gandhi's plea challenging the lower court summons, Justice Vidyarthi also noted that the trial court's decision to summon Gandhi was based on a "judicious application of mind" after considering the complaint and witness statements, and was not mechanical.
