Washington-NoVa region named among top metros for working moms
(Photo by Getty Images)
The Washington-Arlington-Alexandria metro area has emerged as one of the best large U.S. cities for mothers juggling the demands of work and parenting, ranking second nationwide in a new analysis of economic and family-focused metrics released by CoworkingCafe.
The region stood out for its high employment rate among mothers, robust remote work options, competitive income levels, and strong access to child care, education and healthcare.
According to the report, 77% of mothers in the Washington region are employed — four percentage points above the national average. About 26% of those working moms have remote jobs, one of the highest rates among major metropolitan areas nationwide.
The metro area's performance reflects both workforce trends and longstanding infrastructure. Working mothers here earn a median income of $70,000 — the third highest among the nation's largest metros.
And despite an average commute time of 32 minutes — longer than the national average of 25.4 minutes — many are offsetting that strain with flexible work-from-home arrangements and the growing availability of coworking spaces, with nearly seven available per 100,000 working-age adults.
Child care access is another factor lifting the region's ranking. The area boasts roughly 1,000 child care centers and 100 schools per 100,000 children, helping it land sixth place nationally for education metrics. While child care costs average $13,800 annually — or about 9.2% of a typical family's income — the availability and quality of services play a key role in supporting working parents, the analysis noted.
Health care access is also a major advantage. Nearly three-quarters of employed mothers in the region — 74.4% — receive employer-based health coverage, compared to the national average of 70.4%. Pediatric care is also robust, with approximately 591 pediatricians per 100,000 children under age 21.
The new ranking analyzed large metros based on employment rates for mothers, income, work flexibility, commute times, and access to childcare, education, health care and environmental quality.
The Washington area ranked behind only one other large metro in the nation — Minneapolis — reinforcing its status as a leading hub for women striving to balance professional and parental responsibilities.
While air quality ranked 18th among large metros, the region's overall infrastructure and support systems make it one of the most favorable places in the country for mothers trying to balance it all.
In addition to the region's inherent strengths, recent legislative actions in Virginia aim to further support working mothers. The Virginia General Assembly passed a comprehensive 'momnibus' package to improve maternal health outcomes, including legislation allowing doulas to assist during labor and increasing postpartum doula visits for Medicaid recipients.
These measures address maternal health disparities and aim to provide better support for mothers across the state.
Furthermore, the legislature approved a $200 rebate for taxpayers and bonuses for state employees and teachers, providing financial relief that can benefit working families.
While proposals for permanent car tax credits and tax cuts on tips were excluded from the final budget, the enacted measures reflect a commitment to supporting working parents through both health care and economic initiatives.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats hammer Vought over Medicaid claims: ‘Outrageous lies'
Democratic lawmakers are admonishing President Trump's budget chief for claiming the GOP's mega-bill will not cause anyone to lose Medicaid benefits, contradicting independent assessments that war billions could lose coverage if it becomes law. Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought told CNN's Dana Bash on Sunday's episode of 'State of the Union' that concerns over the Trump administration's domestic policy package are 'ridiculous.' 'This bill will preserve and protect the programs, the social safety net, but it will make it much more common sense,' he said. 'No one will lose coverage as a result of this bill.' Democratic lawmakers took to social media to push back against Vought, with some including U.S. Rep. Shontel Brown (D-Ohio), calling his comments lies. 'Outrageous lies. In Ohio alone, the state has said 770,000 people will lose coverage,' Brown wrote Sunday above a repost of Vought's CNN interview on the social platform X. 'The White House is lying to you,' Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa) wrote in a post to X on Monday. 'At least 13.7 million Americans will lose their health care, according to the official non-partisan score keepers.' Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill — the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — would cut taxes and increase border and military spending. The bill, which narrowly passed in the House in May, would reduce federal spending on Medicaid by at least $600 billion over 10 years and cut enrollment in the program by about 10.3 million people, according to a preliminary estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. Several GOP senators are expressing concern about the cuts, pointing to a fight with deficit hawks that could pose major hurdles to Trump's signature legislation. Sens. Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins and Josh Hawley have opposed cuts to the health insurance program, though it's unclear where they will draw the line. Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn) suggested that Vought double check is math before speaking about the consequences of the bill. 'Math is hard…but Google is free,' Smith wrote in a post to X above a screenshot of a paragraph from the Congressional Budget Office's analysis of the bill's resulting Medicaid cuts, which was placed above a clip of Vought's CNN interview. Meanwhile, Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) posted a lengthy takedown of Vought's comments. 'The Republican budget bill 'preserved and protects' social safety net programs,' she said in a 14-post thread. 'A blatant lie as I'm unaware of how cutting over a trillion dollars and kicking millions of Americans off health care is 'preserving and protecting' this program.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alabama food banks bracing for impact as Congress moves on ‘big, beautiful bill'
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WIAT) — One Alabama food bank said $300 million are at stake in President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' that is moving through Congress. Those are federal dollars that the state would have to pick up for SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, if the bill passes. Some said that change will harm Alabama, while others said the state is ready to respond. 'I hate that the program will suffer because of this lack of funding, and I don't know where the state would come up with $300 million,' said Nicole Williams, CEO of the Community Food Bank of Central Alabama. That money has worried food banks in Alabama. Williams said over 700,000 Alabamians rely on SNAP benefits. She said families and grocery stores could feel the impact if those cuts are signed into law. 'We're also concerned about grocery stores in rural areas and them not being able to stay afloat or grocery stores closing and causing more food deserts,' Williams said. National Peanut Festival dates, parade route announced for 2025 season But the 2025 Alabama general budget chairman, state Rep. Rex Reynolds, R-Huntsville, said he's talked about those concerns with the department of finance and others. He said the state will have a better idea of what those funding changes mean closer to next year's session. 'We've got to prioritize going forward,' Reynolds said. 'So we'll understand the cuts before we go back into the session in January of '26, and we'll understand what we can and what we can't do.' Reynolds said they may be able to offset the loss of dollars next year for Medicaid and SNAP. 'That may be something that the House considers going into that '26 session and getting out ahead of any potential,' Reynolds said. Carol Gundlach with Alabama Arise said the federal government should do its part when funding SNAP and Medicaid. 'So rather than do what they need to do to adequately fund these programs, they're passing the buck onto the states,' Reynolds said. Those cuts have been passed by the U.S. House and are now making their way through the Senate. Williams said the Community Food Bank of Central Alabama gave 21 million meals to families just last year. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oregon bill would reduce administrative burden for patients seeking physician assisted suicide
A doctor holds a hospital patient's hand. (Getty Images) Terminally ill people who want their doctors' help in dying could do so twice as quickly under an Oregon bill that would cut the waiting period between asking for a lethal dose of medication from 15 days to seven. Oregon is one of 11 states and Washington, D.C., that allow terminally ill individuals to choose to end their lives by asking a physician for a lethal dose of medication. Only adults who are given six months to live and who can effectively communicate for themselves can elect for physician-assisted suicide. In 2023, the state removed a residency requirement, enabling people from other states to travel to Oregon to die. Patients must make two oral requests to their physician for the medication, each separated by at least 15 days. But Senate Bill 1003, as amended, would change the law and reduce that time frame from 15 days to seven days. The bill would allow electronic transmission of prescriptions and filings, and it would require hospices and health care facilities disclose their physician-assisted suicide policy before a patient is admitted and publish the policy on their websites. The bill would also broaden who can prescribe lethal drugs by replacing 'attending physician' and 'consulting physician' in the law with 'attending practitioner' and 'consulting practitioner' while retaining the requirement that they are licensed physicians in Oregon. The bill is sponsored by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The bill received a public hearing Monday afternoon in the Senate Committee on Rules, with dozens of individuals testifying and submitting letters mostly in opposition. It has yet to receive a vote by either chamber. The state's policy, called the 'Death by Dignity Act,' was created through a 1994 citizens initiative that passed with 51% of the vote. A lawsuit paused the act from taking effect for three years, but in 1997 that injunction was lifted and an attempt to repeal the act in a citizens initiative failed the same year. In 2024, 607 people received prescriptions for lethal doses of medications, according to the Oregon Health Authority. Most patients receiving medications were 65 or older and white. The most common diagnosis was cancer, followed by neurological disease and heart disease. Most individuals, including mental health providers and Christian medical groups, testified in opposition to the bill, saying it would undermine the time needed for patients to process their diagnosis, disregard alternative health solutions and ignore mental health concerns. The committee received 429 letters in opposition to the bill and only 12 letters in support. Rep. E. Werner Reschke, R-Malin, said it 'creates a culture of death over that of life.' But a few proponents, such as Portland resident Thomas Ngo, said it would make the process smoother and less of an administrative burden for patients enduring terminal illness and pain. Ngo said his mother used the Death with Dignity Act to die after she was diagnosed with terminal cancer. 'Her passing was peaceful and on her teams,' Ngo told the committee. Ngo's father's partner died of the same disease but could not opt for physician-assisted suicide because they were at a religiously-affiliated health care provider. Oregon health care providers are not obligated to participate in the Death by Dignity Act, and many religiously affiliated hospitals do not participate. The bill will be scheduled for a work session for a later date where the committee can decide to hold the bill — killing it for the remainder of the session — or advance the bill to the Senate floor for a vote. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
