logo
In her new book ‘Kuleana,' Sara Kehaulani Goo fights to keep her family's land

In her new book ‘Kuleana,' Sara Kehaulani Goo fights to keep her family's land

Yahoo30-05-2025

Sara Kehaulani Goo's journey to save her family's land on Maui began in 2019 with an email she read at her kitchen table in Washington, D.C.
'Sara, the Hāna property taxes went up 500%,' her dad wrote. 'If we can't find a way to pay, then the trust funds will be depleted in 7 years and we may be forced to sell it.'
Goo, who is Native Hawaiian, said it was the moment she realized she had to fight for her ancestral home, or risk it being lost forever.
In her new memoir, Kuleana — a Hawaiian word that loosely translates into both 'privilege' and 'responsibility' — Goo describes the efforts she and her relatives undertook to fight the tax increase and ensure that the land would remain in their family. But Kuleana is more than a story about rising taxes in Hawai'i, it's about what it means to be Indigenous and reclaim identity in diaspora while highlighting the costs of colonial land theft and its continuing harm to Hawaiʻi. Goo challenges readers to think about what their responsibility to Hawaiʻi is in light of how Indigenous land loss has drastically altered Hawaiʻi's environment and made the archipelago precariously dependent upon imported food.
Despite the U.S. overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Goo's family had kept the title to their ancestral land that they'd received from Hawaiian royals, and they had the documents to prove it. They had setup a trust fund to pay for the property taxes, but despite those precautions, rising property taxes — partially driven by out-of-state millionaires and billionaires buying up land — threw the future of the family's land into question.
Goo is a former staff writer at The Washington Post and former editor-in-chief of Axios. Grist spoke with her about what she learned writing her memoir, and what she hopes her readers take away from it. The following interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Q. Your memoir focuses on your fight to keep your family's land. Can you tell us more about what that land meant to you and why it was so important to keep it?
A. Some people might think of it as an inheritance, but it's more than that. This was something that my grandmother talked about to our family as something that she promised to her mother and her grandma. That it was something that she wanted us to continue to carry on. So it was an intergenerational promise, and even before I knew the word, it was how I understood kuleana to be.
I was very aware of how far a distance there was between me and Hawaiʻi. That was uncomfortable for me, and I think that's why sitting there reading that email in my home in Washington, D.C., felt so uncomfortable: It could be the end of the line, and I very much did not want that to end with me. So I realized I needed to act and it was more than just about money. It was more than being about me. I needed to act on behalf of my children. It was a big wake-up call about where I was in my life and where my generation was in our lives. We had drifted too far from Hawaiʻi in more ways than one.
Q. Climate change doesn't figure heavily in this book, but it is something you acknowledge as an ongoing threat to the islands that compounds the trauma of colonialism. How do you see the relationship between Indigenous land ownership and climate change?
A. One thing I hope that people will take away from this book is that they will think about, 'What is my kuleana?' Because I think that it is a word that Hawaiians can teach the world. The word gets boiled down to responsibility, but I don't think it's just that. The Western concept often feels like a burden, right? But the Hawaiian concept is much more than that, it is more about honor. It's more about your role in society and being part of a whole. That concept was part of the Hawaiian way of life and it had to do with stewardship, not just my role and my responsibility, but how do I care for something? My stewardship and my responsibility for my part of an ahupua'a (land divisions, often from the mountains to the sea).
If you think about the way Hawaiians lived, that is something they're trying to get back to today. You have a place that once was self-sustaining for up to 800,000 people in the middle of the ocean because they figured out how to sustain themselves with just the natural resources around them. And today, Hawaiʻi imports 90 percent of its food. Now Hawaiʻi's looking at, How do we go back to that?
I think that Hawaiians can inspire future sustainability concepts by looking to the past. That's not a crazy idea. I think it's quite an inspired idea. And especially when you think about the Lahaina fires, you look at what has gone wrong and it's not too hard to figure out. My book is not about policy, but I do think that it is about how you draw that line through history to understand a little more context for how we got here. That's a big reason I wrote this book: It wasn't really to tell a story about me. I really felt like as a journalist, the story of the Hawaiian people and the real story of their history was not accurately understood, even by people who visit Hawaiʻi and love Hawaiʻi. I felt like that story really needed to be better understood.
Q. Can you tell us more about what that real story of Hawaiʻi is that you say needs to be better understood?
A. Ten million people visit Hawaiʻi every year and they love it, and I think what's missing is the real story about the economic crisis and displacement of the Hawaiian people. It's not even just the Hawaiian people, it's the local people: The economy is not working for them and hasn't been working for them for quite a long time. It made a headline for a week, maybe, when the census in 2020 showed that more Native Hawaiians live outside of Hawaiʻi than live on the islands. But what is Hawaiʻi without Hawaiians? This has been a slow boil crisis that no one's been paying attention to.
As a journalist, I've seen this happening where housing and real estate have been out of reach for a very long time. The housing that exists is of poor quality. It's multiple generations of a family living under one roof and homes are unoccupied and owned by people who don't live there: They're owned by investors, they're owned by people who live off-island. And you have no place that is worse than in Maui, where now you have thousands of people who have had to leave because of a fire. Meanwhile, you have all these homes available for them that are empty. But they're not for them. They're for wealthy vacationers. So who is Hawaiʻi for? It's not for local people. Who is the food for? It's not for local people. What is going on? We're importing people, importing food — it doesn't feel like a real place.
I wanted to tell a real story here about our most recent colonial experience that we still haven't quite dealt with the aftermath of, and no one wants to talk about it because we just want to have a lovely vacation. I just have to bring up a really uncomfortable truth here because I've been seeing it and experiencing it for quite a long time, my whole life. This is the reality.
Q. One of the aspects of your experience was your frustration with government bureaucracy. How would you describe the role of government in your fight to keep your family's land?
A. We were fighting just the latest version of this kind of faceless, shape-shifting bureaucracy when it came to this tax fight. We didn't know who was on the other side. We didn't know when we were going to hear back. We didn't know what the timetable was. We didn't know why any decision was made. It didn't feel like we had any recourse. And I think what was interesting is that I would look through all the documents that my family had collected over the course of the 175 years this land had been in our family, and it felt like we were always fighting the same faceless bureaucracy.
We had all kinds of paper-trail evidence of court documents declaring that the land was deeded to us. We've been in this fight all along; this was just today's modern version of it, and we're always going to be in it. My kids are going to be in it too. At the end of the day, it didn't matter who was on the other side: You feel powerless. You feel like you're just at the mercy of some bureaucrat with a rubber stamp with an official set of documents, and it's very frightening.
Q. Many other Indigenous people face similar experiences of feeling disconnected, either from their land, their culture, or their communities. What can they learn from your book?
A. We're all given breadcrumbs of our family history and some of us have more and some of us have less. We all have a choice in what we choose to do with that. Some of us kind of let it go and others of us choose to investigate and are curious and we want to know more. And so that's all up to you. For me, I was so curious and I was surprised to learn that even my cousins who lived in Hawaiʻi, some of them had the same insecurities that I did about being Hawaiian. And I realized if they're feeling uncertain about their Hawaiian-ness and I'm feeling uncertain about my Hawaiian-ness, then who is anyone else to tell me how Hawaiian I am?
You either live your culture or you don't. You either embrace it or you don't. You either pass it on to your children or you don't. It's either part of you and speaks to you and brings you joy or it doesn't, and you only have one life to live, so why worry about what other people think? I think that we all are on our own journeys and each person has to decide to either connect with their community or not, and how you want to do that. But you have to do so with intention.
Q. One of the most meaningful aspects of your book was your experience learning hula and how that anchored you in your Hawaiian culture. But there were challenges too: You wrote about how your children didn't want to attend hula and how your daughter refused to wear a lei. What happened with that struggle after the book ended?
A. It has a happy ending. So my daughter Chloe is now in the eighth grade, and she has her eighth grade promotion next month. And she read the book and said, 'Mom, I was young and I didn't know, I didn't understand.' And she said, 'For my eighth grade promotion, will you make me a lei?' And I said, 'Of course I will.'
So I feel like Hawaiʻi's in their heart, you know? At some point you have to let your kids go and they will find their own way. You cannot force them. My kids have said, 'Hula is not my thing,' but they have to find their thing. It may not be next year or the year after, but they have to find their own way. I just hope that I have given them enough. I'm grateful that I found myself and was able to teach them what I could and had surrounded them, I think, with enough other people in their lives to teach them, and that they will find their own way back to Hawaiʻi and the culture, and then it speaks to them. But that is up to them and their own journey. So I can just hope that it's part of their journey. It means a lot to me, and I wrote this book for them.
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline In her new book 'Kuleana,' Sara Kehaulani Goo fights to keep her family's land on May 30, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump warns of possible military action if Iran enriches more uranium: ‘We're going to have no choice'
Trump warns of possible military action if Iran enriches more uranium: ‘We're going to have no choice'

New York Post

time7 hours ago

  • New York Post

Trump warns of possible military action if Iran enriches more uranium: ‘We're going to have no choice'

WASHINGTON — President Trump warned Friday that Iran will not be allowed to enrich uranium — hinting at possible military strikes following the revelation that Tehran has been secretly building out a near weapons-grade nuclear program for months. 'They won't be enriching. If they enrich, then we're going to have to do it the other way,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday. 'And I don't really want to do it the other way but we're going to have no choice,' he added. 'There's not going to be enrichment.' 5 'They won't be enriching. If they enrich, then we're going to have to do it the other way,' President Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday. AP Israel also reassured the White House earlier this week that it won't launch an attack on Iranian nuclear sites unless Trump signals that ongoing talks with Tehran about its nuclear program have failed, Axios reported. 'He may go into a war. But we're not getting dragged in,' Trump had said of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a Time magazine interview in April to mark his first 100 days in office. 'I may go in very willingly if we can't get a deal. If we don't make a deal, I'll be leading the pack.' In May, the president said he'd warned Netanyahu not to bomb Tehran's nuclear facilities because the US had been 'having very good discussions with' Iranian negotiators. But Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday that ending uranium enrichment was '100%' against his country's interests — and lashed out at the US for being 'arrogant' in its proposal for a revamped nuclear deal. That drafted agreement, submitted by Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff on May 31, permitted low-level uranium enrichment for civilian use. 5 Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday that ending uranium enrichment was '100%' against his country's interests. via Getty Images 'Who are you to decide whether Iran should have enrichment?' Khamenei said in a televised speech. 'If we had 100 nuclear power plants while not having enrichment, they are not usable for us.' On Tuesday, the State Department clarified that the US did not support Iran enriching uranium at any level. 5 Levels of 90% uranium enrichment are considered weapons-grade. REUTERS 'The fact is, President Trump tweeted that there is going to be no uranium enrichment,' spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters. The US and Iran have already gone through five rounds of talks over the nuclear issue — without any breakthroughs. The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency last week reportedly disclosed that, in the background, Tehran had been upping its 60%-enriched uranium stockpile — from 274.8 kilograms to 408.6 kilograms between February and May — a roughly 50% jump between February and May. 5 A nuclear deal proposal, submitted by Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff on May 31, would permit low-level uranium enrichment for civilian use. Getty Images Levels of 90% are considered weapons-grade, and US officials have warned that Iran could convert their stockpile to reach that threshold needed for a single weapon in two weeks' time. That prompted Netanyahu to call on international allies 'to stop Iran,' sounding the alarm about the uranium enrichment levels being only appropriate for 'countries actively pursuing nuclear weapons.' Trump previously revived a 'maximum pressure' of sanctions on Iran after returning to the White House — and European nations privy to the UN nuclear report's findings may also be considering further snapback sanctions previously lifted under former President Barack Obama's nuclear agreement with Tehran. 5 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week called on international allies 'to stop Iran,' sounding the alarm about the uranium enrichment levels being only appropriate for 'countries actively pursuing nuclear weapons.' AP That 2015 deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, was supposed to reduce Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium by 98%, though the UN findings have undercut that. Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal in 2018.

Trump can leverage Ukraine's 'badass' strike to make Putin blink
Trump can leverage Ukraine's 'badass' strike to make Putin blink

New York Post

time10 hours ago

  • New York Post

Trump can leverage Ukraine's 'badass' strike to make Putin blink

President Donald Trump has privately talked of Ukraine's drone operation deep inside Russia as 'strong' and 'badass,' Axios reports. He's right on that — but not so much, we'd suggest, in his worries that the attack will make it harder to reach a cease-fire. Consider: Kyiv once again targeted the enemy's military assets, specifically Moscow's long-range bombers — including nuclear-capable planes central to Russia's atomic deterrent. In that, the Ukrainians not only served their own cause, but made the whole world a bit safer. Advertisement And Vladimir Putin's response in the days that followed was simply more blitzing of Ukrainian civilians — no different from what he'd been doing before that, indeed has done from the start of his invasion. That is, Vlad didn't truly 'escalate' because he's already pulling out every stop he dares to. (All the hints of going nuclear are bluffs: Doing that would be a risk orders of magnitude beyond any he's ever taken.) Advertisement In short, the Kremlin has no more chips to add: Fearsome as its current war machine may be, it's at its limit. And it's not remotely free: Russia's losses far exceed any price it's paid since Stalin was fighting Hitler; much lower casualties in Afghanistan were a major blow to the USSR regime, hastening its end. So Putin will need to recalculate if the war continues as a near-stalemate — and, yes, think about limiting his losses if his risks grow. This is why Sen. Lindsey Graham's 'secondary sanctions' bill is a likely game-changer — threatening, as it does, Putin's vitally needed China trade. Advertisement And why US military aid to Ukraine should continue. Weeks of American diplomatic efforts have made it unmistakable that Putin is the barrier to any cease-fire: It costs him nothing he cares about to keep the war going, with an excellent chance he can score a full victory if Trump decides America has done enough — and no real chance his position will weaken anytime soon. The 'badass' gambit should have him rethinking his downside risks; the sanctions bill would reinforce that. Add clear signs that sudden victory is off the table, and Putin finally has to blink. Team Trump doesn't need to put any more work into seeking peace; it only needs Moscow to realize the game has changed.

Scoop: Rocket launchers, missiles to be featured in Army's D.C. parade
Scoop: Rocket launchers, missiles to be featured in Army's D.C. parade

Axios

time12 hours ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Rocket launchers, missiles to be featured in Army's D.C. parade

Army officials are preparing to display rocket launchers and missiles along with more than a hundred military aircraft and vehicles next weekend at the D.C. parade celebrating the Army's 250th anniversary, Axios has learned. Why it matters: President Trump has envisioned the June 14 parade — which is scheduled on his 79th birthday — as a show of U.S. military might. Zoom in: Such a display of military equipment is rare in the United States, and critics of the event have expressed concerns about that imagery as well as the damage that heavy military vehicles could pose to the city's streets. But officials are eager to showcase U.S. weaponry such as the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), which is used to launch rockets. The launchers have been used in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. There also will be a static display of precision-guided missiles, the officials said, and a flyover by F-22 fighter jets. About 7,000 military personnel will be involved in the parade, which will run along Constitution Avenue NW. It's projected to cost about $45 million — roughly one-third of that for post-parade street repairs. Zoom out: The parade is set to begin at 6:30 pm, and will start at 23rd Street and Constitution Avenue NW and end at 15th and Constitution Avenue NW. Trump will have a review stand on the Ellipse. What they're saying: "When the president came into office on Jan. 20, he made it clear that he wanted to ... feature the United States Army as the first branch of the United States military to be constituted of the American republic, and he wanted to give the U.S. Army a very special birthday parade," Ambassador Monica Crowley, chief of protocol of the United States, told Axios. By the numbers: The parade will include 28 M1A1 Abrams tanks, 28 M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicles, and four Paladin Howitzers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store