We transformed battered old barge into a 4-bed floating home with panoramic views – now we're selling it for HUGE sum
A COUPLE have renovated their dated barge home into a luxurious houseboat - and it's now worth a pretty penny.
The barge - which was previously used to transport grain - has been transformed into a luxury water home.
9
9
9
9
The opulent vessel - which measures 131ft long and 19.6ft wide - is on the market for £1.5m.
David Karat and his partner - who spent more than they had intended upgrading the flat-bottomed water boat - said it was worth every penny.
Soon to be moving back to New York, they are hoping a buyer will snap it up and enjoy the perks of water-based life.
Currently moored at St Mary's Wandsworth Pier, London, the Spitz has a long lease of 116 years.
The 52-year-old owner told Luxury Boat News: " Nothing compares to life on the water.
"The fresh air, the sounds of the water, the wildlife and the community are special and provide a unique experience.
"It's an oasis with really easy access by Thames Clipper from the Wharf to anywhere in Central London.
"Or the train from Clapham Junction is a short walk away. It is special."
Much of the renovations had already been carried out by the previous owners, but it still proved a tough challenge for the duo.
David - who acquired the barge in August 2021, said: "The owners before us had done all the hard work of sourcing this amazing grain barge from Antwerp and creating the foundation that we built upon.
Hotel owner splashes £55k to build 'world's shortest' canal with locks in garden to float barge converted into a pool
"The layout and position of the boat were perfect for updating to the most modern and advanced systems and materials. In all, we spent more than we intended.
"Hundreds of thousands of pounds that would have been wasted on other things were funnelled this way instead."
He explained: "Originally built to carry grain, the Spitz barge has been transformed into a striking and highly liveable floating residence. Meticulously refurbished, the floating property boasts bespoke finishes and high-end insulation.
9
9
9
"It even has an automated waste pump-out system - ideal for year-round, comfortable living. The entrance welcomes those on board with a decked garden complete with panoramic views across the Thames.
"Inside, the layout provides a spacious open-plan kitchen and saloon, perfect for both entertaining and day-to-day living. The home has four en-suite double bedrooms, with the master suite being a standout feature."
David concluded: "I am heading back to the US to live, so I wish to leave it to someone else to enjoy."
The vessel has its own wood-burning stove, a walk-in wardrobe, a luxurious white-themed en-suite bathroom boasting a roll-top bath and a separate shower.
Below deck is the main living room with rich wood panelling and a cosy wood-burning stove.
There's also a top-deck reception room and sun deck and a designated parking space.
The pier - located on the south bank of the Thames between Battersea and Wandsworth bridges - offers a 24-hour concierge service.
Plus it's close to local shops, restaurants and bars, and has easy access to Fulham and Chelsea.
9
9
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Banning Chinese staff isn't racist, they could be spies, judge rules
Bosses at businesses connected to national security can legally ban the recruitment of Chinese and Russian workers as they could be spies, a judge has ruled. Richard Baty, sitting at an employment tribunal, said it was not discriminatory to prevent citizens from nations that pose a threat to Britain from taking up certain jobs — specifically in defence — because of the possibility of espionage. The judge said that precautionary measures were applicable to potential job candidates from China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. His ruling came in a dispute between a Chinese scientist and an artificial intelligence company with ties to the British and US defence departments, which was triggered when security concerns were cited for not giving her a job. Tianlin Xu had applied for a £220,000 lead role at Binary AI, a software company in London, but the company's founder and director, James Patrick-Evans, rejected her application. The company uses artificial intelligence to identify flaws in software used by western governments to prevent state-backed hackers from targeting them. It has long been suspected that the Russian and Chinese governments are behind hacks Russia and China have long been suspected of orchestrating such attacks. Last year, Dutch counterterror investigators reported that both governments were behind cyberattacks on the Netherlands. The tribunal hearing in London was told that British defence officials had 'strongly advised' the 32-year-old company boss against hiring a Chinese citizen. • China set to be declared a threat to national security After her application was rejected, Xu sued Binary AI on grounds of race discrimination, claiming that the decision not to give her a job was based on 'racial stigma' and 'stereotyping'. But the tribunal dismissed her arguments, with Baty ruling that it was 'paramount that the security and operational capability of the software that drives our everyday lives should remain intact and free from malicious hackers and state actors wanting to persuade political outcomes or obtain sensitive information'. The judge added that the British government and the Five Eyes alliance — which includes the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand — 'have been under constant attack by many of these malicious groups, mainly from state-backed hacking groups from countries such as North Korea, Russia, China and Iran'. Hacking groups, the judge said, had attempted to obtain 'malicious remote access into software that forms the backbone of UK infrastructure such as 5G telecoms, NHS health networks, power plant controllers and water infrastructure systems. It is therefore imperative that the security of the software that drives these systems is verified, controlled and secured'. • 'Cyberattack on Home Office' targets foreign healthcare workers Referring to the claimant specifically, Baty said that any Chinese individual could legally be precluded from 'working in a role, such as the lead AI role, which involved working closely on matters concerning national security'. The judge noted that the recruitment prohibition 'was a decision of customers' — the British and US defence chiefs — rather than Binary AI or Patrick-Evans. He pointed out that Patrick-Evans legitimately understood that he would not be able to offer the woman the role 'because he believed that, because she was a Chinese national, she would not be able to obtain the security clearance necessary.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Crypto firm Ziglu stops trading and tells customers to withdraw funds immediately
Customers who invested their cash with platform Ziglu have been told to withdraw their funds immediately, after the FCA said it had to cease trading, This Is Money can reveal. Ziglu said it had signed a 'voluntary undertaking' with the Financial Conduct Authority, which means it will have to stop all regulated activity and registered businesses. It will not be able to issue electronic money, or act as a cryptoasset exchange provider or custodian wallet provider. In an email seen by This Is Money, Ziglu told customers that they would not need to 'withdraw all funds from the platform immediately and no later than 25 June 2025.' It also means that Ziglu cannot accept the deposit of any new funds and is unable to provide the purchase of any additional crypto assets. Mark Hipperson, chief executive, told customers: 'Crypto assets can be converted to a fiat asset and withdrawn, and if fiat funds are held in a different currency to the one required to enable you to withdraw your funds you can exchange the currency to enable you to withdraw. 'Our customer support teams are available to assist with any inquiries, concerns, or issues you may have in respect of the cessation of activities. 'You can reach us through our regular customer service channels, which remain fully operational. 'Our online and mobile platforms will remain open until 25 June 2025 and we strongly encourage you to log in, withdraw your funds and download statements that you may require before the expiry of that deadline.' This Is Money previously revealed customers who invested their cash in Ziglu's 'Boost' accounts had their accounts frozen on 16 May and a week later, said it would be closing the products. The accounts allow customers to invest cryptoassets (both stablecoins and crypto) to generate a yield. Ziglu partners with lending platforms that lend the coin to institutional investors like hedge funds. The platform froze its Boost accounts on 16 May and informed its customers on 23 May that it would be closing the products. These products remain frozen, according to the platform's latest update. While Ziglu is regulated by the FCA, Boost accounts are not and are not subject to the same safeguarding as any funds held in their cash accounts. Customers are not protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme or Financial Ombudsman Service. This latest update comes just months after Ziglu announced it had raised £5million earlier this year, with plans to introduce 'Ziglu Coin'. Ziglu and the FCA did not respond to requests for comment.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
How HS2 squandered billions to become a national embarrassment
' HS2 will provide more track, more trains, more seats and faster journeys to improve performance and reliability across Britain's rail network.' So says the hitherto dysfunctional organisation that has squandered billions of pounds of taxpayers' cash with precious little to show for it. A more accurate assessment of its role so far: 'We have an unlimited pot of taxpayers' money and we are going to spend it.' The new chief executive, Mark Wild, says: 'The position I have inherited in HS2 Ltd is unacceptable; the organisation has failed in its mission to control costs and deliver to schedule. We must intervene to regain control of the programme and reset it to deliver at the lowest feasible cost, while maintaining safety and value for money.' Labour has spent almost a year since taking office assembling evidence to pin the blame for the shamble on the Tories – but now must pick up the pieces and deliver at least something. These are the key questions and answers. What is the history of high-speed rail in the UK? High Speed 1 is the 68-mile fast railway line from London St Pancras to the Channel Tunnel at Folkestone in Kent, which opened in 2008. It cost less than £7 billion, roughly £100 million per mile. High Speed 2 is a much more ambitious rail project, originally involving 345 miles of new high-speed track. HS2 was designed to relieve pressure on the West Coast and East Coast main lines, to move intercity passengers to a dedicated network, reduce journey times and increase capacity. The existing West Coast main line is the busiest intercity route in Europe, handling a mix of Avanti express services, commuter trains and freight. There is no room for expansion, and the system has little resilience. High Speed 2 began as a dream in 2009, gathering all-party support for a project that would unify the nation with proper 21st-century rail connections from London to the Midlands and northern England, with improved journeys to Scotland. Trains were due to start running in 2026. Sixteen years and about £40 billion later, there is now no prospect of any high-speed trains running for another decade – after tens of billions more have been spent on an embarrassing stump of a line between London and Birmingham. The total cost, estimated at around £33 billion for the whole project in 2010, is now expected to reach as much as £100 billion for a much-reduced line: the 140 miles of Phase 1, which will include stations at London Euston, Old Oak Common in west London, Interchange Station in Solihull and Birmingham Curzon Street. The cost per mile? About £700 million. What went wrong? The new CEO Mark Wild says: 'Construction commenced too soon, without the conditions to enable productive delivery, such as stable and consented designs. From the start, the cost and schedule estimates were optimistic with inadequate provision for risk.' After signing nonsensical contracts with construction firms which left taxpayers on the hook for spectacular overspends, a succession of ministers – in particular transport secretaries – have wrought further expensive havoc by repeatedly changing their minds. The most essential parts of the scheme – comprising a northwest leg to Crewe and Manchester and a northeast leg to Sheffield and Leeds were scrapped in an attempt to save money amid ballooning costs and to try to drum up votes from motorists. In a crowded field of contenders for the most egregious act of vandalism against desperately needed national infrastructure, one figure stands out: Rishi Sunak, who scrapped the link to Manchester. The-then prime minister pretended that the money saved would be spent on piecemeal transport improvements collectively called 'Network North' – which surprisingly included projects in Kent and Devon. Did anybody notice? Yes. The Infrastructure and Projects Authority, which reports to the Cabinet Office and HM Treasury, concluded in 2023: 'There are major issues with project definition, schedule, budget, quality and/or benefits delivery, which at this stage do not appear to be manageable or resolvable. The project may need re-scoping and/or its overall viability reassessed.' The Department for Transport (DfT) now says: 'The long-running failure to manage the programme effectively, along with repeated de-scoping under previous governments, means that the programme will not achieve its original mission and has undermined the remaining delivery.' Through all this, HS2 Ltd has demonstrated 'insufficient capability and capacity in key commercial and technical functions' – according to CEO Mark Wild. One example quoted by the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander: 'Between 2019 and 2023, HS2 Ltd provided initial designs for Euston station, coming in almost £2 billion over budget. When asked for a more affordable option, they offered one costing £400 million more than the first attempt. The word 'affordable' was clearly not part of the HS2 lexicon. 'Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management.' When HS2 finally opens, how much faster will the journey be? The current claim is that the trip from London Euston to Birmingham Curzon Street will take 45 minutes, compared with 77 minutes at present on the conventional line. Initially, though, trains will run only from Old Oak Common in west London. And, says Mr Wild, the line might open at 'slightly reduced running speed'. So let's call it 50 minutes. HS2 claims: 'Our high-speed trains will continue to Manchester, the North West and Scotland using the conventional railway network, cutting journey times.' But the originally planned trip from London to Manchester of 67 minutes – almost halving the current journey time – will be much longer. With the new line northwest to Crewe and Manchester scrapped, the final section of HS2 will be a link from Birmingham north to Handsacre Junction on the existing and heavily congested West Coast main line. Is there any hope for the northern section? A lower-cost, 'quite high speed' link from Birmingham to Crewe and Manchester could provide some connectivity. The transport guru Thomas Ableman says: 'The purpose of HS2 is an investment to transform the economics of this country. At the moment, Britain is one of the most unequal countries when it comes to productivity: London, incredibly high; cities of the north, some of the lowest in Europe. 'This is about equalising that and it's absolutely the right thing to do. Does that mean it needs to be a 200mph or 225mph railway? Almost certainly not. Putting in place the capacity to make that transformational change possible is far more important than the precise specification that was developed for the original HS2 project. 'Quite frankly, HS2 has become something of a toxic term. A more conventional railway that provides the connectivity, provides the capacity could be exactly the way of unlocking what would otherwise be a very knotty political problem.'
