UK agrees to check-free land border for Gibraltar but EU controls for flights
The UK has reached a deal with the EU over Gibraltar's border with Spain that will allow travellers to cross by land without checks.
The agreement on a 'fluid border' clears the way to finalise a post-Brexit deal on the territory with the EU.
But those flying into Gibraltar from the UK will face one check from Gibraltarian officials and another by the Spanish on behalf of the EU.
An agreement for the future relationship between the EU and the UK in relation to Gibraltar is now a reality.
It is a historic agreement. pic.twitter.com/vN9tzDpe4r
— Fabian Picardo (@FabianPicardo) June 11, 2025
This is because the land border will allow those arriving by air access to the European Schengen free travel area unchecked once they are in Gibraltar.
The UK and Gibraltar insisted the changes would not affect the British overseas territory's sovereignty.
The airport will operate under a model similar to London's St Pancras station, where passengers pass through both UK and French passport checks to board international trains.
Goods and customs checks will also eventually be removed in both directions under the agreement.
The move could also see airlines start to add flights to Gibraltar from countries other than the UK in a boost to tourism.
Officials say a hard border would have been introduced under the EU's incoming exit and entry control system if no deal was reached, causing delays for some 15,000 people who cross the border every day as every individual passport was checked.
Talks on rules governing the border have been ongoing since Britain left the European Union in 2020.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the previous Tory government left behind a situation that 'put Gibraltar's economy and way of life under threat'.
He said the agreement was a 'breakthrough' after years of uncertainty.
He said: 'Alongside the government of Gibraltar, we have reached an agreement which protects British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the long-term once again.
'I thank the chief minister and his government for their tireless dedication throughout the negotiations. The UK's commitment to Gibraltar remains as solid as The Rock itself.'
Spanish foreign minister Jose Albares said the deal marked 'a new beginning' in the relationship between the UK and Spain.
He said that Spain 'will guarantee free movement of people and goods', adding that Gibraltar would now be linked to the Schengen Area with Spanish authorities controlling entry and exit.
I have always said nothing about Gibraltar, without Gibraltar. pic.twitter.com/SF96y31Ref
— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 11, 2025
President of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the deal.
In a post on X, she said: 'It safeguards the integrity of Schengen and the single market, while ensuring stability, legal certainty and prosperity for the region.'
Gibraltar's chief minister Fabian Picardo said the deal would 'protect future generations of British Gibraltarians and does not in any way affect our British sovereignty'.
'Now is the time to look beyond the arguments of the past and towards a time of renewed co-operation and understanding. Now the deal is done, it's time to finalise the treaty,' he said.
On Wednesday evening, Sir Keir Starmer spoke with Mr Picardo and thanked him for 'his years of hard work, commitment, and leadership to reach an agreement'.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez also had a phone call with Sir Keir, and congratulated the British PM because 'his Government had succeeded where others had failed'.
The Conservatives have said they will carefully review the UK's agreement with the EU on Gibraltar's border to see if it crosses any 'red lines' the party set out during its own negotiations when in government.
Shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said: 'Gibraltar is British, and given Labour's record of surrendering our territory and paying for the privilege, we will be reviewing carefully all the details of any agreement that is reached.'
Mr Lammy held talks with Gibraltar's leaders, members of the opposition and the business community before leaving the British overseas territory to head to Brussels on Wednesday morning.
Gibraltar was ceded to the UK by Spain in 1713 and the population is heavily in favour of remaining a British overseas territory.
The last time it voted on a proposal to share sovereignty with Spain, in 2002, almost 99% of Gibraltarians rejected the move.
Gibraltar also hosts an RAF base at its airport and an important naval facility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elanco Receives Positive Opinion on Zenrelia (ilunocitinib) from EU's Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products (CVMP)
Company expects approval and product supply in market before the end of third quarter GREENFIELD, Ind., June 12, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Elanco Animal Health Incorporated (NYSE: ELAN) announced today that Zenrelia™ (ilunocitinib) has been granted a positive opinion by the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products (CVMP), paving the way for the product's marketing authorization in the European Union in the next 60 days. The positive opinion notes, "The benefits of Zenrelia are its efficacy in the treatment of pruritus associated with allergic dermatitis in dogs, and the treatment of clinical manifestations of atopic dermatitis in dogs." The CVMP recommended granting the marketing authorization based on the quality, safety and efficacy demonstrated in the data submitted and the favorable benefit-risk balance. Elanco is pleased the label will be consistent with other markets outside the United States where the product has already been approved, once the European Commission adopts this recommendation. "This milestone marks a significant advancement in the expansion of Zenrelia, Elanco's fastest globalized product with eight major regulatory approvals expected in just 18 months," said Dr. Ellen de Brabander, Executive Vice President Innovation and Regulatory Affairs at Elanco. "As part of the EU approval process, Elanco has done a head-to-head non-inferiority study versus the marketplace incumbent, and we are very pleased with the result. With millions of itchy dogs unable to find relief, we're excited to bring this new solution to veterinarians across the EU." Elanco expects to launch the product shortly after receiving marketing authorization with supply in the marketplace before the end of third quarter. Zenrelia is already available in Brazil, Canada, Japan and the United States, and the company expects additional approvals in Australia and the United Kingdom in 2025. The positive opinion will be published on the CVMP's website in the coming days at ABOUT ELANCO Elanco Animal Health Incorporated (NYSE: ELAN) is a global leader in animal health dedicated to innovating and delivering products and services to prevent and treat disease in farm animals and pets, creating value for farmers, pet owners, veterinarians, stakeholders and society as a whole. With 70 years of animal health heritage, we are committed to breaking boundaries and going beyond to help our customers improve the health of animals in their care, while also making a meaningful impact on our local and global communities. At Elanco, we are driven by our vision of Food and Companionship Enriching Life and our Elanco Healthy Purpose™ sustainability pillars – all to advance the health of animals, people, the planet and our enterprise. Learn more at Investor Contact: Tiffany Kanaga (765) 740-0314 Media Contact: Colleen Parr Dekker (317) 989-7011 View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Elanco Animal Health Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil posts $1 bond after federal judge rules Trump admin can't detain him
Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University anti-Israel ringleader, has posted bond after the Trump administration was temporarily blocked from deporting him amid their continued effort to hold him on "foreign policy" grounds. Khalil posted his $1 bond on Thursday afternoon. He has not been released. The move came after U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz sided with Khalil on Wednesday, writing: "The government cannot claim an interest in enforcing what appears to be an unconstitutional law." The ruling was a significant legal setback for the administration's efforts to deport Khalil, who has been held at a detention facility in Louisiana following his involvement in anti-Israel demonstrations at Columbia University. The court's decision will remain on hold until Friday morning, giving the government time to appeal. Khalil, a green card holder, was arrested after leading student protests on the Ivy League campus. He has argued that his free speech rights were being "eroded" by the Trump administration. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attorneys have argued that Khalil's free speech claims were a "red herring," saying that the 30-year-old lied on his visa applications. Khalil, they said, willfully failed to disclose his employment with the Syrian office in the British Embassy in Beirut when he applied for permanent U.S. residency. The agency also accused Khalil of failing to disclose his work with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees and membership in Columbia University Apartheid Divest. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has cited a provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to justify Khalil's removal from the U.S. The provision allows the Secretary of State to deport noncitizens if the secretary determines their presence in the U.S. "would have serious adverse foreign policy consequences." Rubio accused Khalil of participating in "antisemitic protests and disruptive activities, which foster a hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States." "Condoning antisemitic conduct and disruptive protests in the United States would severely undermine that significant foreign policy objective," Rubio wrote. Khalil has Algerian citizenship through his mother, but was born in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
New York Fails To Adopt Climate Reporting Requirement In 2025 Session
The New York state Assembly Chamber is seen on the opening day of the 2023 legislative session at ... More the state Capitol Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2023, in Albany, N.Y. (AP Photo/Hans Pennink) When California adopted climate reporting requirements in 2023, it opened the door to a potential wave of state level regulations relating to sustainability and climate change that could build on federal requirements. With Trump winning the 2024 elections and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ending the climate-related risk rule, activists shifted focus to Democrat controlled states. In early 2025, the New York State Senate introduced legislation that mimicked California's requirement. However, when the legislative session closed on June 12, those proposals had failed to make it out of committee, closing the door on mandatory sustainability reporting until 2026. Climate reporting, sustainability reporting, and environmental, social, and governance reporting experienced a surge of interest starting in 2019. These reporting requirements are designed to work in tandem with regular financial reports to provide information to investors on other activities of the company not directly related to finances. Climate reporting, or climate-related risk reporting, is the main driver of new reporting requirements. It stems from the Paris Agreement and the goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 'net zero' by 2050. During the 2019 United Nations Conference of Parties in Glasgow, the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation announced the creation of the International Sustainability Standards Board to create global reporting standards. In March 2022, the SEC announced they would begin the rulemaking process to create a climate-related risk rule requiring publicly traded companies to report GHG emissions and climate risks. In the European Union, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directed was adopted in September 2022, mandating the creation of European Sustainability Reporting Standards. The IFRS Sustainability Reporting Standards were released by the ISSB in June 2023, with a focus on GHG emissions and climate action. The next month, the European Union adopted the ESRS, incorporating the IFRS standards for environmental issues, while adding human rights and governance issues for a broader ESG reporting requirement under the CSRD. After years of delays, in March 2024, the SEC adopted a climate-related risk rule, but it was promptly met with legal challenges and implementation was postponed. Following the election of President Trump to a second term, the SEC began taking steps to rollback the reporting requirement. With the certain death of sustainability reporting at a federal level, advocates shifted focus to states to get them to follow California's lead. Given its international reputation as the business hub of the U.S., New York was a major focus for this changes. As the second largest Democrat controlled state, behind California, it was more likely that they would follow California's lead. New York's proposal were introduced in the Senate in the form of Senate Bill 3456, titled the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, and Senate Bill 3697, titled the Climate-Related Financial Risk Reporting Bill. The proposals mimicked the California legislation, requiring GHG emission reporting for Scope 1 and Scope 2 starting in 2027, for FY 2026, and Scope 3 starting in 2028, for FY 2027. For most state legislatures, they are considered part time. As a result, they only meet for limited periods annually, or in some cases biennially, to conduct business in a 'legislative session.' The New York legislature meets for approximately 60 days every year. The 2025 legislative session started on January 8 and concluded on June 12. Within the respective chamber, bills must work through a committee process that requires approval from committees that are deemed to have an interest in the legislation. Once approved by the committees, the bills are sent to the floor for a vote by all members, then sent to the other chamber for their approval. New York's climate reporting bills were originally sent to the Senate's Environmental Conservation Committee and passed unanimously. That is as far as they got. Both bills were then sent to the Finance Committee, where they never called for a vote. The bills have, for all intents and purposes, died in committee. This is even more surprising when you consider the make up of the Senate. The New York State Senate is composed of 63 members. Currently, 41 are Democrats and 22 are Republicans. The Democrats have a super majority of the Senate, giving them near full autonomy to pass what legislation they deem fit. That climate reporting bills failed to make it out of committee is significant. It should be noted that the New York legislature never officially ends session. Unlike Florida that typically only meets for 60 days, then holds a ceremony signalling the official end of the legislative session, New York does not officially gavel the session closed. Instead, they go into recess. It is a procedural technicality that allows them to re-adjourn without the intervention of the Governor. However, they only meet outside the typical legislative session in exceptional circumstances. What isn't passed by June 12 will not pass. As climate activists are facing major setbacks on sustainability reporting requirements internationally, including a current debate to reduce the reporting requirements in the European Union's CSRD, the failure of New York to consider the proposal is a signal of a broader, bipartisan pushback. A similar failure in Democrat controlled Colorado further highlights the issue. It was assumed that what was lost at the federal level would be gained at the state level, that appears to be a fallacy. The question is shifting from what states will join California, to whether California will continue to stand alone.
