
Justice Department launches investigation into allegations of antisemitism at UC
The U.S. Department of Justice announced Wednesday that it has launched a civil rights investigation into allegations of antisemitism at the University of California, saying its attorneys believe there is a 'potential pattern' of discrimination against Jewish employees at the state's flagship higher education system.
The investigation would determine whether UC 'engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination based on race, religion and national origin against its professors, staff and other employees by allowing an antisemitic hostile work environment to exist on its campuses,' the department said in a statement.
Reports of antisemitism have grown across the UC system since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and Israel's war in Gaza. The department's decision did not cite specific incidents at UC campuses and did not single out campuses aside from a brief mention of UCLA.
UC officials were not immediately available to comment.
'This Department of Justice will always defend Jewish Americans, protect civil rights, and leverage our resources to eradicate institutional Antisemitism in our nation's universities,' Atty. Gen. Pamela Bondi said in the statement.
Chad Mizelle, acting associate attorney general and the department's chief of staff, cited a 'disturbing rise of antisemitism at educational institutions in California and nationwide' in the statement,.
The department said it would work with the Employment Opportunity Commission and the Federal Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism, a multi-agency group established last month, to research UC.
Task force member Leo Terrill, who is also a senior counsel in the Justice Department's civil rights unit, said in a statement that the post-Oct. 7 landscape has led to an 'outbreak of antisemitic incidents at leading institutions of higher education in America, including at my own alma mater at the UCLA campus of UC.'
Terrill said that 'the impact upon UC's students has been the subject of considerable media attention and multiple federal investigations. But these campuses are also workplaces, and the Jewish faculty and staff employed there deserve a working environment free of antisemitic hostility and hate.'
This story is developing and will be updated.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
27 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Highland Park condemns ‘acts of hate' after antisemitic letter reportedly sent to resident; ‘we will not be intimidated'
After an 'antisemitic' and 'threatening' letter was sent to a Highland Park resident, Mayor Nancy Rotering said the city stands with its Jewish community. According to an online post by the city, the Highland Park police are continuing to investigate the letter that was reported Sunday evening. Preliminary investigation indicated it had been sent through the United States Postal Service. Testing by the Hazardous Material team showed no toxic material. Highland Park 'strongly condemns antisemitism,' the post said. 'Our Jewish community deserves to live free from fear of violence, and Highland Park police will continue to partner with regional, state, and federal law enforcement to monitor antisemitic and other hate-motivated activity.' According to the post, at about 8:30 p.m. on Sunday, police responded to a residence in the 900 block of Marion Avenue for a report of a threatening letter containing antisemitic comments in their mailbox. The police notified the FBI and the State Terrorism and Intelligence Center, the post said. In the post, the city condemned 'antisemitism and all acts of hate' and professed its solidarity with the Jewish community 'In light of increased concerns regarding global antisemitic activity,' Highland Park police had already implemented a close watch on houses of worship and other significant sites, which will continue. The city has also communicated with clergy serving Highland Park's Jewish congregations. Rotering said the incident has 'shaken' many in the community, and was a reminder that even in a city striving 'to lead with compassion and inclusion — hate can still find its way to our doorstep.' She warned antisemitism was rising 'not only across the world, but here at home,' and acknowledging the 'fear, the hurt and the anger that such acts provoke.' 'We also understand the pride and strength that come from standing firm in who we are, and in what we believe,' Rotering said. Jewish families are a part of the 'story and the fabric of Highland Park for generations,' Rotering said, noting their contributions to the city's civic, cultural and spiritual life. 'That legacy will not be erased or overshadowed by hate,' she said. 'To anyone who feels afraid or targeted: please know that you are not alone. Your city stands with you. We will not be intimidated. We will not be silent. We will meet hate with unity — and with the full strength of our community.


New York Times
38 minutes ago
- New York Times
Negotiation or Capitulation? How Columbia Got Off Trump's Hot Seat.
It was a turning point in the Trump administration's efforts to bring elite academia to heel. The White House had made an example of Columbia University by axing $400 million in federal grants, and now it was saying that the Ivy League school would have to acquiesce to a bill of demands if it were to have any hope of recouping the money. One of the dictates handed down in March involved the university's Middle Eastern, South Asian and African Studies Department. The White House, which said Columbia had failed to protect Jewish students from antisemitic harassment, wanted the school to strip the department of its autonomy, a rare administrative step that was viewed as a serious blow to academic freedom. The university, which was the first high-profile target in the administration's war on higher education, had a different idea. Quietly, university officials were trying to navigate a narrower path, appeasing President Trump by cracking down on protests and making changes to student discipline. But the measures adopted by Columbia were not as drastic as what the White House had wanted. The university's leaders sought to shape Mr. Trump's demands through negotiation instead of fighting them through litigation, and to do that while maintaining core ideals that had defined the university for nearly 275 years. Columbia's approach stood in stark contrast to the tack taken by Harvard University, which turned to the courts to fight Mr. Trump. While many in the academic world have accused Columbia of caving to Mr. Trump's pressure, the university's strategy — so far — has limited the bleeding to $400 million, even as Harvard has absorbed cut after cut, stretching into billions of dollars. While opponents of the Trump administration's crackdown have lauded Harvard for standing its ground, it is far from clear which school will be better off in the long run. And the question remains whether Columbia's path can offer a road map for other universities attacked by the president. 'Following the law and attempting to resolve a complaint is not capitulation,' Claire Shipman, Columbia's acting president, said last week in a statement. 'We must maintain our autonomy and independent governance.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


San Francisco Chronicle
41 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Judge extends order suspending Trump's block on Harvard's incoming foreign students
BOSTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's order to block incoming foreign students from attending Harvard University will remain on hold temporarily following a hearing Monday, when a lawyer for the Ivy League school said its students were being used as 'pawns.' U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston extended a temporary restraining order on Trump's proclamation until June 23 while she weighs Harvard's request for a preliminary injunction. Burroughs made the decision at a hearing over Harvard's request, which Trump's Republican administration opposed. Burroughs granted the initial restraining order June 5, and it had been set to expire Thursday. Trump moved to block foreign students from entering the U.S. to attend Harvard earlier this month, citing concerns over national security. It followed a previous attempt by the Department of Homeland Security to revoke Harvard's ability to host foreign students on its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Burroughs has temporarily blocked that action, too, and is weighing whether it should remain on hold until the case is decided. Ian Gershengorn, a lawyer for Harvard, told Burroughs on Monday that Trump was 'using Harvard's international students as pawns" while arguing the administration has exceeded its authority in an attempt to retaliate against the school for not agreeing to the president's demands. Trump has been warring with Harvard for months after it rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become too liberal and has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Trump officials have cut more than $2.6 billion in research grants, ended federal contracts and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status. Foreign students were brought into the battle in April, when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any dangerous or illegal activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response fell short, and on May 22 she revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. The sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students and harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub, the school said in its lawsuit. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the suit said. The action would have upended some graduate schools that recruit heavily from abroad. Some schools overseas quickly offered invitations to Harvard's students, including two universities in Hong Kong. Harvard President Alan Garber previously said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles,' even after receiving federal ultimatums. ___