UK to buy F-35 stealth jets that can carry US nuclear warheads as global insecurity grows
The UK will buy at least 12 F-35 stealth jets that can carry nuclear warheads in the most significant strengthening of its nuclear capability in a generation, the government has said.
Today, Sir Keir Starmer will tell a summit of NATO allies in The Hague that the new squadron will join an alliance mission that can be armed with US nuclear weapons.
The dramatic move will doubtless draw condemnation and concern from Russia and China.
But it comes at a time of growing global insecurity - and as the prime minister and his European and Canadian counterparts scramble to convince Donald Trump they are serious about bolstering their ability to defend Europe, instead of overly relying on the United States.
The US president, a long-standing NATO sceptic, about whether he would uphold the alliance's founding Article 5 principle - that an attack on one is an attack on all - before he even arrived in the Dutch city last night.
An urgent need to keep Mr Trump on side has prompted NATO allies to agree to increase spending on defence and national resilience to by 2035.
As part of this push to rearm, Sir Keir will give the Royal Air Force the ability to carry airborne nuclear warheads for the first time since the 1990s.
"In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted," he said.
"These F-35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our allies.
"The UK's commitment to NATO is unquestionable, as is the alliance's contribution to keeping the UK safe and secure, but we must all step up to protect the Euro-Atlantic area for generations to come."
It was not immediately clear when the F-35 jets would be bought or how much they will cost, but the new squadron will be part of a NATO-led nuclear deterrence mission.
That is in contrast to the UK's national nuclear deterrence, based on a fleet of four nuclear-armed submarines, though they too are used to defend the whole of the alliance.
Mark Rutte, the head of NATO, applauded the plan - saying: "The UK has declared its nuclear deterrent to NATO for many decades, and I strongly welcome today's announcement that the UK will now also join NATO's nuclear mission and procure the F-35A.
"This is yet another robust British contribution to NATO."
Aircraft operated by a small number of NATO countries, including Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands, are cleared to carry US-provided nuclear weapons in a war.
The RAF and the Royal Navy already operate F-35B jets that can fly off Britain's two aircraft carriers, but they are not equipped to drop nuclear warheads.
The new planes will be the F-35A variant, operated by the air force, that take off from land but can fly further and be armed with nuclear or conventional weapons.
The government said they would all be based together at RAF Marham in Norfolk.
The government has long planned to purchase a total of 138 F-35 aircraft, but has so far only acquired around three dozen - seven years since the first jets entered service.
The decision to purchase 12 of the A-variant does not mean extra aircraft.
It just means a diversification in the fleet - something the RAF has long been pushing for - though it's a decision some in the Royal Navy have long pushed back against, believing it would reduce even further the number of the B-version that operate from their carriers.
Read more:
The government described the plan to purchase nuclear-capable aircraft as the "biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation".
Defence Secretary John Healey said a major defence review published earlier in the month highlighted new nuclear risks.
"It recommended a new UK role in our collective defence and deterrence through a NATO-first approach," he said.
However, the public version of the Strategic Defence Review stopped short of making any specific recommendation.
It merely said "the UK must explore how to support the US and its NATO allies in strengthening extended deterrence across the Euro-Atlantic".
The F-35 aircraft is made by the US defence giant Lockheed Martin, but the British defence company BAE Systems is also a key contributor.
The order will support 20,000 jobs in the F-35 programme in the UK.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
29 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump's strikes on Iran reinvigorate U.S.-Israel ties after being tested
TEL AVIV — Many Israelis were taken back Tuesday when a visibly angry President Donald Trump expressed his dismay over Israel's continued bombing of Iran shortly after he had announced he'd secured a ceasefire deal. But the discomfort that Israelis admitted feeling paled in comparison to their exuberance during recent days over Trump's intervention in the Iran conflict, long sought by the Israeli government, and the apparent reinvigoration of ties between the two countries.


Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US: Strikes Didn't Destroy Iran's Nuclear Program, EU Tariff Threat, UK's China Imports Jump
Your morning briefing, the business news you need in just 15 minutes. On today's podcast: (1) American airstrikes had only a limited impact on Iran's nuclear program, according to early US intelligence findings, as the United Nations watchdog urged fresh inspection of the sites. (2) Donald Trump ensured that NATO's high-stakes summit would be a nervy affair to the end as he flew in to The Hague fueling doubts about whether the US remains fully committed to defending its allies. (3) The European Union plans to impose retaliatory tariffs on US imports, including on Boeing aircraft, if President Donald Trump puts a baseline levy on the bloc's goods as many expect. (4) Chinese companies are ramping up shipments to Britain to levels not seen in years, a possible sign that the Asian factory powerhouse is finding export markets unimpeded by high tariffs like those President Donald Trump has imposed. (5) Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell had plenty of opportunities Tuesday to tell lawmakers definitively the central bank will cut interest rates soon. He didn't take any of them. (6) Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo conceded to his upstart rival Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary in the race to become mayor of New York City after the 33-year-old Queens lawmaker racked up commanding leads across Brooklyn, Queens and Manhattan.

Politico
35 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate GOP's tax cuts projected to cost $4.2T — with costly SALT deal pending - Live Updates
Senate Republicans' tax package would cost $4.2 trillion, according to a new estimate that will likely create additional complications for Republicans as they race to get their megabill to President Donald Trump's desk. That's already more than the $4 trillion that House Republicans say they're willing to spend on tax cuts, and it doesn't include the cost of a hoped-for deal to loosen a controversial cap on state and local tax deductions that would likely add hundreds of billions of dollars more. It's unclear whether the House will be willing to swallow the higher price tag. The estimate from the official Joint Committee on Taxation also comes as Senate Republicans are scrambling to salvage a number of provisions meant to offset some of the cost of the legislation after they were rejected by the Senate parliamentarian. Though Republicans have been debating their tax, immigration and defense bill for months, lawmakers in the two chambers have not yet settled on how much they can spend in total on the legislation — an impasse set to soon come to a head. And, confusingly, the estimate is the second official analysis of the legislation in recent days — and is radically different from the first. At the insistence of Republicans, the JCT also estimated the cost of the legislation using an alternative methodology that showed the plan only costing $442 billion. Critics call that 'current policy baseline' analysis a budget gimmick that's designed to hide the true cost of the legislation. Democrats demanded the second estimate using the conventional methodology forecasters use to project the cost of legislation. 'Republicans claim their plan costs only $440 billion, but this new analysis shows it actually costs 10 times that much,' said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore) in a joint statement. 'The Republicans want to rig the process and flout the rules.' The dueling analyses only cover the tax portion of the package. The other parts will be analyzed by JCT's sister agency, the Congressional Budget Office. The new estimate comes as Senate leaders hope to push their draft of the legislation through the chamber this weekend, with an eye toward getting it to Trump's desk by their July 4 recess. On Tuesday, Trump urged lawmakers to stay in session until the bill is passed. 'NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT'S DONE,' he wrote on Truth Social. Amid mounting concern over federal red ink, House Republicans have been adamant that lawmakers spend no more than $4 trillion on tax cuts — their tax cuts clock in at $3.8 trillion — unless they can simultaneously come up with more than $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. Senate Republicans' budget allows $5.3 trillion in tax cuts and is vague about how much in spending they intend to cut. Normally lawmakers would settle on a common approach as part of a budget plan adopted in the spring, but they were unable to find an agreement. The tax portion of the Senate's draft is now being scrubbed for violations of the chamber's arcane procedural rules for budget reconciliation, and it's possible that some of the bill's tax increases — designed to help defray the cost of the bill — could be thrown out by the parliamentarian, which would exacerbate budget pressues. Reconciliation measures, which are immune to filibusters, are supposed to be strictly focused on budgetary matters, though lawmakers frequently try to include other provisions that can be deleted by the parliamentarian. Behind closed doors, lawmakers are still massaging the tax portion of the plan, and it's possible they will add new offsets to help bring down the cost. Much of the difference between the cost of the House and Senate plans is driven by Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo's drive to make many more of the provisions a permanent part of the tax code. He'd do that not only with a trio of business provisions projected to cost $566 billion, but a number of other tax breaks as well. At the same time, he added new provisions like a new charitable break for people who don't itemize that's projected to cost $63 billion. Crapo (R-Idaho) partly makes up the difference by squeezing or throwing out altogether a number of proposals approved by the House. His draft includes smaller breaks for tips and overtime demanded by Trump while dumping plans to expand health savings accounts and spending less on a deduction for owners of unincorporated businesses. Crapo has also antagonized House Republicans by phasing out green energy credits created during the Biden administration more slowly than they'd like while cutting more out of the politically sensitive Medicaid program.