Kansas House members share family history while opposing resolution on immigration
Rep. Brooklynne Mosley talks with House Democrats during a March 19, 2025, session. She spoke in opposition to a resolution urging support of federal immigration enforcement efforts. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
TOPEKA — House members shared personal family history Thursday as they discredited anti-immigrant rhetoric that echoed through committee hearings earlier in the legislative session.
But the House still approved Senate Concurrent Resolution 1602, a nonbinding statement urges the governor to help secure the U.S. border with Mexico and work with federal authorities to enforce immigration laws.
Proponents of the bill, including Attorney General Kris Kobach, law enforcement officers and Republican legislators, routinely used dehumanizing language to describe immigrants who don't have legal residency in the United States. Some of the proponents spread false narratives about fentanyl trafficking and emphasized that simply being in the country without legal status makes immigrants criminals, though that is a civil offense rather than a crime.
The Senate adopted the resolution by a 31-9 party line vote on Jan. 29.
Rep. Angela Martinez, a Wichita Democrat who said her grandmother raised seven kids and 'died an undocumented immigrant,' took issue with a proponent of the resolution who said during a committee hearing that 'we are a nation of laws.'
'And I say to that, is it a crime to want a better life? Is it a crime to not want to be surrounded by violence, drugs and unrest, to not be able to live in peace? And I ask you to imagine what that would be like to live like that,' Martinez said during Thursday's debate.
Rep. Susan Ruiz, a Shawnee Democrat, identified herself as the proud daughter of an immigrant father from Mexico. She said he worked on the Southern Pacific Railroad for 50 years in Texas, became a U.S. citizen and learned English. But he never looked down on anyone else who came to country, she said.
Ruiz asserted the country has a broken immigration system and that Congress declined an opportunity last year to start to fix it.
'Instead, they used immigrants as a political edge, depicting immigrants as spoiling the blood of U.S., as rapists, as drug dealers, taking away our U.S. jobs and using our resources. And none of this is true,' Ruiz said. 'The drug dealing? Perhaps. But look at research and look at more than one source to look at where the fentanyl is coming from. It is not coming from the moms who are bringing their children because they're escaping turmoil from their own country.'
Rep. Bill Bloom, a Republican farmer from Clay Center, said one of his best friends had walked across the Rio Grande with his family as a child. Bloom said the friend herded the family's sheep, and for 45 years, 'he worked like a dog.'
The friend's five children were all lawyers or engineers, Bloom said.
'I know we don't like the way that people came here, but they're here,' Bloom said. 'If they're decent and they work hard, we deserve to give them a chance.'
Rep. Brooklynne Mosley, a Lawrence Democrat, said immigrants pay more taxes than billionaires and commit crimes a rate lower than American-born citizens.
Most immigrants who don't have legal status, she said, have overstayed their visas.
'People are not getting picked up on the corners committing crimes,' Mosley said. 'They're getting picked up from their jobs, the jobs to help this country run.'
She said the resolution would compel the state 'to be part of what is essentially creating a Brownshirt-esque unit,' a reference to the paramilitary unit that protected Nazis.
Rep. Ford Carr, a Wichita Democrat, said federal immigration enforcement efforts are supposed to target those who have committed 'some sort of heinous crime,' but that's not always the practice. He said the resolution before the House 'doesn't make sense' and is 'extremely unfair.'
Carr also referenced the Legislature's longstanding failure to fully pay for special education needs in public schools.
'We don't have enough money to fund special ed, but we're going to potentially allocate funds for protection at the border, which, last I checked, we don't border another country here in Kansas,' Carr said.
Rep. Melissa Oropeza, a Kansas City Democrat, said she wanted to call attention to support for the resolution by the Kansas Catholic Conference, the Kansas City, Kansas, archdiocese and the bishops of Kansas. She questioned the merits of religious groups getting involved in policy and wondered if they had 'forgotten their own teachings.'
'I will not allow the Catholic Church to hide in the shadows as they have done in the past. History will not repeat itself on my watch,' Oropeza said. 'The Pope has spoken out against this type of policy. I will not allow the priests to stand alone at the pulpit in the state of Kansas, calming the flocks of Kansas Latinos and immigrants and all nationalities, as middle management, AKA the bishops and the archdiocese, endorses this type of resolution against immigrants and Latinos, then in the same breath ask for donations from the very same immigrants and Latino communities across the state.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Trump pressed to take hard line with Iran after Israel strikes
A group of pro-Israel members of Congress is urging President Trump to ensure "zero enrichment, zero pathway to a nuclear weapon" in negotiations with Iran, Axios has learned. Why it matters: The lawmakers — including a Republican, Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) — said Israel's strikes against Iranian nuclear sites and other military targets has created a "renewed sense of urgency" on the issue. "This decisive action comes after two months of unsuccessful diplomatic attempts and represents a critical chance to stop the Iranian regime from acquiring a nuclear weapon," they wrote in a letter to Trump first obtained by Axios. The White House did not immediately respond to Axios' Saturday afternoon request for comment on the letter. Driving the news: The letter is led by Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), a staunchly pro- Israel centrist Democrat, and signed by seven other House Democrats, in addition to Bacon. The nine lawmakers noted that the two-month deadline which Trump set in March for reaching a nuclear deal arrived on Thursday — the day Israel launched its strike. They urged him to add "crushing diplomatic pressure ... to Israel's military pressure" by working with European countries to impose "Snapback" sanctions on Iran for being out of compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal. What they're saying: Trump told Axios' Barak Ravid on Friday that he believes Israel's strike improved the chance of reaching a nuclear agreement with Iran. "I couldn't get them to a deal in 60 days. They were close, they should have done it. Maybe now it will happen," he said. But Iran's foreign minister said that nuclear talks planned for Sunday have been cancelled, and Trump said Saturday that the war between Israel and Iran "should end."
31 minutes ago
The GOP's big bill would bring changes to Medicaid for millions
WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Josh Hawley has been clear about his red line as the Senate takes up the GOP's One Big Beautiful Bill Act: no Medicaid cuts. But what, exactly, would be a cut? Hawley and other Republicans acknowledge that the main cost-saving provision in the bill – new work requirements on able-bodied adults who receive health care through the Medicaid program -- would cause millions of people to lose their coverage. All told, estimates are 10.9 million fewer people would have health coverage under the bill's proposed changes to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. That includes some 8 million fewer in the Medicaid program, including 5.2 million dropping off because of the new eligibility requirements. 'I know that will reduce the number of people on Medicaid,' Hawley told a small scrum of reporters in the hallways at the Capitol. 'But I'm for that because I want people who are able bodied but not working to work.' Hawley and other Republicans are walking a politically fine line on how to reduce federal spending on Medicaid while also promising to protect a program that serves some 80 million Americans and is popular with the public. As the party pushes ahead on President Donald Trump' s priority package, Republicans insist they are not cutting the vital safety net program but simply rooting out what they call waste, fraud and abuse. Whether that argument lands with voters could go a long way toward determining whether Trump's bill ultimately ends up boosting — or dragging down — Republicans as they campaign for reelection next year. Republicans say that it's wrong to call the reductions in health care coverage 'cuts.' Instead, they've characterized the changes as rules that would purge people who are taking advantage of the system and protect it for the most vulnerable who need it most. House Republicans wrote the bill with instructions to find $880 billion in cuts from programs under the purview of the Energy and Commerce Committee, which has a sprawling jurisdiction that includes Medicaid. In the version of the bill that the House passed on a party-line vote last month, the overall cuts ended up exceeding that number. The Kaiser Family Foundation projects that the bill will result in a $793 billion reduction in spending on Medicaid. Additionally, the House Ways & Means Committee, which handles federal tax policy, imposed a freeze on a health care provider tax that many states impose. Critics say the tax improperly boosts federal Medicaid payments to the states, but supporters like Hawley say it's important funding for rural hospitals. 'What we're doing here is an important and, frankly, heroic thing to preserve the program so that it doesn't become insolvent,' Speaker Mike Johnson said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, meanwhile, has denounced the bill as an 'assault on the healthcare of the American people' and warned years of progress in reducing the number of uninsured people is at risk. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the GOP's proposed changes to federal health programs would result in 10.9 million fewer people having health care coverage. Nearly 8 million fewer people would be enrolled in Medicaid by 2034 under the legislation, the CBO found, including 5.2 million people who would lose coverage due to the proposed work requirements. It said 1.4 million immigrants without legal status would lose coverage in state programs. The new Medicaid requirements would apply to nondisabled adults under age 65 who are not caretakers or parents, with some exceptions. The bill passed by the U.S. House stipulates that those eligible would need to work, take classes, or record community service for 80 hours per month. The Kaiser Family Foundation notes that more than 90% of people enrolled in Medicaid already meet those criteria. The legislation also penalizes states that fund health insurance for immigrants who have not confirmed their immigration status, and the CBO expects that those states will stop funding Medicaid for those immigrants altogether. Republicans have cited what they call the out-of-control spending in federal programs to explain their rationale for the changes proposed in the legislation. 'What we are trying to do in the One Big Beautiful Bill is ensuring that limited resources are protected for pregnant women, for children, for seniors, for individuals with disabilities,' said Rep. Erin Houchin, R-Ind., in a speech on the House floor. Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso argued that Medicaid recipients who are not working spend their time watching television and playing video games rather than looking for employment. Republicans also criticize the CBO itself, the congressional scorekeeper, questioning whether its projections are accurate. The CBO score for decades has been providing non-partisan analysis of legislation and budgetary matters. Its staff is prohibited from making political contributions and is currently led by a former economic adviser for the George W. Bush administration. While Republicans argue that their signature legislation delivers on Trump's 2024 campaign promises, health care isn't one of the president's strongest issues with Americans. Most U.S. adults, 56%, disapproved of how Trump was handling health care policy in CNN polling from March. And according to AP VoteCast, about 6 in 10 voters in the November election said they wanted the government 'more involved' in ensuring that Americans have health care coverage. Only about 2 in 10 wanted the government less involved in this, and about 2 in 10 said its involvement was about right. Half of American adults said they expected the Trump administration's policies to increase their family's health care costs, according to a May poll from KFF, and about 6 in 10 believed those policies would weaken Medicaid. If the federal government significantly reduced Medicaid spending, about 7 in 10 adults said they worried it would negatively impact nursing homes, hospitals, and other health care providers in their community. For Hawley, the 'bottom lines' are omitting provisions that could cause rural hospitals to close and hardworking citizens to lose their benefits. He and other Republicans are especially concerned about the freeze on the providers' tax in the House's legislation that they warn could hurt rural hospitals. 'Medicaid benefits for people who are working or who are otherwise qualified,' Hawley said. 'I do not want to see them cut.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's budget bill will impact student loans: What to know
US President Trump's "big, beautiful bill," which is currently being considered by the Senate after passing the House, will change the rules for current students relying on federal loans and grants as well as borrowers working to pay down their debt. Author and student loan expert Mark Kantrowitz joins Wealth to outline these changes and what student loan borrowers need to know. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Wealth here. Sign in to access your portfolio
