Maryland PSC to set schedule for controversial energy project
Maryland's Public Service Commission will hold a virtual conference to set a procedural schedule for the controversial Piedmont Reliability Project.
The proposed 70-mile transmission line would run through Baltimore, Carroll, and Frederick counties.
Today's hearing comes as several Maryland property owners wait for a federal judge to decide whether the developer can survey property owners' land.
What is the purpose of the Piedmont Reliability Project?
The Piedmont Reliability Project would involve the construction of 70 miles of 500,000-volt overhead power lines connecting an existing transmission line through parts of Baltimore, Carroll, and Frederick counties.
PSEG Renewable Transmission, the New Jersey-based developer, says the project is needed to keep up with Maryland's growing need for power that is generated within the state.
According to the company, Maryland will face an increased energy deficit and power grid congestion if the state doesn't increase its capacity.
Why the pushback?
Residents in the path of the proposed project have expressed concerns about potential negative environmental impacts and how the transmission lines may impede personal property.
Some residents say the power lines, if built, would cut through family-owned farms.
A faith-based youth camp and outdoor education center in Carroll County said the project would jeopardize the camp experience that they provide to guests – since the transmission line would go through their property.
Janet Stratton, a Hereford resident, told WJZ her farm that's been passed down for six generations is in the path of the potential transmission line.
"I realized my childhood dream 30 years ago," Stratton said. "To have it taken away would be devastating."
When it comes to environmental concerns, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation said the project poses risks to the bay's habitat and water quality.
The CBF said the project has the potential to damage protected forests, nutrient-rich wetlands, and sources of clean water.
Maryland Governor Wes Moore has also spoken out, saying he has concerns about the project.
Developer asks court for access to residents' properties
In April, PSEG submitted a court filing requesting that residents in multiple Maryland counties allow surveyors onto their land.
The judge's ruling will determine if and how PSEG is able to move forward with the project, as the company must complete surveying before proceeding with construction.
PSEG's filing for Temporary Right to Entry asks the court to allow the surveying of 91 properties for the project.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
7 hours ago
- Associated Press
Abrego Garcia's lawyers ask judge to fine Trump administration for contempt
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia have asked a federal judge in Maryland to impose fines against the Trump administration for contempt, arguing that it flagrantly ignored court ordersfor several weeks to return him to the U.S. from El Salvador. Abrego Garcia's attorneys said the administration claimed to be powerless to retrieve him, even while it secretly built a human smuggling case against him. The U.S. brought Abrego Garcia to a federal court in Nashville, Tennessee last week to face those charges. 'The Government's defiance has not been subtle,' the attorneys said in a filing late Wednesday. 'It has been vocal and sustained and flagrant.' The attorneys also are asking U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis to compel the release of documents the federal government withheld by claiming they contain protected state secrets. Or as an alternative, the lawyers suggested a special master to investigate the government's 'willful noncompliance' of court orders. 'What the Government improperly seeks to hide must be exposed for all to see,' Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote. Their request came a day after the Trump administration said it will ask Xinis to dismiss the case, with U.S. attorneys describing recent accusations by Abrego Garcia's attorneys as baseless, desperate and disappointing. 'But the proof is in the pudding — Defendants have returned Abrego Garcia to the United States just as they were ordered to do,' they wrote. Legal experts said last month that the Abrego Garcia case may be headed for contempt. And the request by his attorneys adds to the ongoing friction between the White House and the courts during President Donald Trump's second term. Courts can hold parties to civil litigation or criminal cases in contempt for disobeying their orders. The penalty can take the form of fines or other civil punishments, or even prosecution and jail time, if pursued criminally. But contempt processes are slow and deliberative, and, when the government's involved, there's usually a resolution before penalties kick in. The U.S. mistakenly deported Abrego Garcia to an El Salvador prison in March. The expulsion violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shielded him from deportation to his native country because he likely faced gang persecution there. Abrego Garcia's American wife sued, prompting Xinis to order his return on April 4. The Supreme Court ruled April 10 that the administration must work to bring him back. Arguments ensued over the next several weeks about whether the Trump administration was following those orders or not. Trump also said publicly that he could return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. with a call to El Salvador President Nayib Bukele. Xinis ordered U.S. attorneys to submit documents and testimony to show what the government had done to follow her orders. The Trump administration claimed that much of that information is protected under the state secrets privilege. The judge has not ruled on that matter.
Fox News
8 hours ago
- Fox News
Abrego Garcia lawyers seek sanctions on Trump officials over stonewalling, defying court orders
Attorneys for Kilmar Abrego Garcia asked a judge in Maryland on Thursday to sanction Trump officials with severe fines and other penalties for what they said was an "egregious" defiance of court orders. The attorneys said the Trump administration misleadingly told a judge for months that it could not retrieve Abrego Garcia from El Salvador, where authorities mistakenly deported him in March. But the administration's decision to return him to the United States to face criminal charges in Tennessee last week proved they had the power all along to bring him back, the attorneys argued. "The Government's defiance has not been subtle," Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote in court papers. "It has been vocal and sustained and flagrant." Abrego Garcia's family sued the Trump administration in March after the Salvadoran man, who entered the country illegally around 2012 and was living in Maryland, was abruptly deported to a Salvadoran terrorist prison. An immigration judge ruled in 2019 that he could be deported, just not to El Salvador. Department of Justice attorneys told the court his deportation to the prison was a mistake, but they insisted for months that the Trump administration could not reverse the error because it had no control over El Salvador. Abrego Garcia's attorneys argued their client, an alleged member of the MS-13 gang, had not received sufficient due process. A lower court and the Supreme Court agreed and ordered the Trump administration to "facilitate" Abrego Garcia's return so that his case could be handled in a manner consistent with immigration laws. The lower court judge, Obama appointee Paula Xinis, ordered the Trump administration in April to return Abrego Garcia as quickly as possible and to inform Abrego Garcia's family, through depositions and other discovery, of all the steps it was taking to facilitate his return. The Trump administration responded by asserting various privileges instead of handing over the discovery and repeatedly told the court it could not return him. On Thursday, Abrego Garcia's attorneys cited dozens of remarks that Trump officials made outside of court that showed they were not planning to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in April, for instance, that Abrego Garcia "is not coming back to our country. . . . There is no situation ever where he was going to stay in this country. None, none." "The Defendants' defiance of judicial orders has been accompanied by misrepresentations, stonewalling, and even questioning of this Court's authority," Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote. Abrego Garcia's deportation became a lightning rod as the Trump administration has attempted to carry out its immigration agenda swiftly and aggressively. The Salvadoran national became the first known example of the administration fumbling over due process, to which illegal immigrants are entitled in a limited capacity. Abrego Garcia's attorneys suggested Xinis sanction Trump officials involved in the alleged court defiance with hefty fines, civil contempt of court, and by requiring they pay back court fees. On June 6, the DOJ announced a grand jury indictment against Abrego Garcia, charging him with three counts of trafficking illegal immigrants and conspiracy. The defendant made an initial appearance in court in Tennessee soon thereafter, marking the first sighting of him in the United States since he was deported to El Salvador. DOJ attorneys told Xinis they plan to ask her in the coming days to toss out the Maryland civil case entirely, because now that Abrego Garcia is back in the country, the case is moot.
Washington Post
8 hours ago
- Washington Post
Students at Maryland high school to protest classmate's deportation
Dozens of students at Montgomery Blair High School in Silver Spring — Maryland's largest high school by enrollment — are expected to walk out Thursday to show support for a classmate who they say was recently deported to Guatemala. The student was not detained on school grounds, according to a letter sent to Blair families from administrators ahead of the demonstration. Organizers of the protest say the student who was deported was a junior at Blair, though multiple people declined to share the student's name or specifics of the situation because of privacy concerns.
