logo
Blatter and Platini cleared in Fifa graft case

Blatter and Platini cleared in Fifa graft case

Observer25-03-2025

MUTTENZ, Switzerland: Former Fifa president Sepp Blatter and ex-Uefa chief Michel Platini on Tuesday were acquitted on appeal by a Swiss court in a long-running corruption case that shattered their careers as the most powerful figures in world football.
Blatter, 89, and Platini, 69, listened in silence as the Extraordinary Court of Appeal clerk in the town of Muttenz, near Basel, read out a decision identical to the one handed down in 2022, which had initially cleared them.
Prosectors had requested suspended sentences of 20 months for the pair, but charges of fraud, for which they risked five years' imprisonment, as well as disloyal management, breach of trust and forgery of documents were all dismissed.
After almost 10 years of legal proceedings, a final appeal is still possible before the Swiss Supreme Court, but only on limited legal grounds. The prosecutors' office said in a statement it "will decide about how to further proceed".
"The persecution by Fifa and some Swiss federal prosecutors for 10 years is now over," Platini told reporters. "Today my honour is restored, and I'm very happy."
Platini, a former France captain and manager, said he felt "from the start" that the purpose of the affair was to prevent him "from being president of Fifa".
"I know that for my enemies, it was time that was important... They kept me out for 10 years," continued Platini, whose downfall cleared the way for the election in early 2016 of Gianni Infantino as Fifa boss.
Blatter and Platini returned to court earlier this month on charges stemming from a delayed payment of two million Swiss francs (1.8 million euros) Fifa made to Platini in 2011 for consultancy services.
"After two acquittals, the federal prosecutor's office must also admit that this criminal procedure has definitively failed. Michel Platini must finally be left alone in criminal matters," said Dominic Nellen, Platini's lawyer.
GENTLEMEN'S AGREEMENT
The case began in 2015 when Blatter quit as head of Fifa in a corruption crisis.
Blatter and Platini were initially acquitted by the Swiss Federal Criminal Court in June 2022, but the Swiss Attorney General's office immediately appealed that verdict.
The defence and prosecution agreed that Platini did advise Blatter between 1998 and 2002, during the Swiss administrator's first term at the head of Fifa, and that in 1999 the two men signed a contract agreeing an annual remuneration of 300,000 Swiss francs, to be "paid in full by Fifa".
Blatter and Platini said that at the start they agreed orally, and without witnesses, on an annual salary of one million Swiss francs, but Fifa's financial state did not allow for immediate payment. Blatter called it a "gentlemen's agreement".
Prosecutor Thomas Hildbrand said the argument was implausible. Even if Fifa had transferred one million Swiss francs to Platini in 1999, it would still have had "more than 21 million francs in cash", and its reserves had reached 328 million in 2002.
To agree to such a sum without a written record, without witnesses and without ever making provision for it in the accounts was, he said, "contrary to commercial practice" as well as to Fifa's norms.
In January 2011, "more than eight years after the end of his activity as an adviser", Platini "claimed a debt of two million Swiss francs", which Fifa paid.
Prosecutors argued that this was an "unfounded" payment, obtained by "cleverly misleading" Fifa's internal controls through false statements made by the two executives.
At the time, Blatter was running for re-election as Fifa president and Platini had become head of European football. Platini backed Blatter in his successful bid for a fourth term in charge of Fifa.
Both men were eventually banned from football by Fifa's ethics committee. — AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US court blocks most Trump tariffs
US court blocks most Trump tariffs

Observer

time29-05-2025

  • Observer

US court blocks most Trump tariffs

NEW YORK:A US trade court blocked most of President Donald Trump's tariffs in a sweeping ruling on Wednesday that found the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from US trading partners. The Court of International Trade said the US Constitution gives Congress exclusive authority to regulate commerce with other countries that is not overridden by the president's emergency powers to safeguard the US economy. "The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the President's use of tariffs as leverage," a three-judge panel said. "That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because [federal law] does not allow it." Financial markets cheered the ruling. The US dollar rallied following the court's order, surging against currencies such as the euro, yen and the Swiss franc. Wall Street futures rose and equities across Asia also jumped. The judges also ordered the Trump administration to issue new orders reflecting the permanent injunction within 10 days. The administration minutes later filed a notice of appeal and questioned the authority of the court. The court invalidated with immediate effect all of Trump's orders on tariffs since January that were rooted in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law meant to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during a national emergency. The court was not asked to address some industry-specific tariffs Trump has issued on automobiles, steel and aluminum, using a different statute. Trump has made charging US importers tariffs on goods from foreign countries a central policy of his ongoing trade wars. A White House spokesperson said US trade deficits with other countries constituted "a national emergency that has decimated American communities." The ruling came in lawsuits filed by the Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small US businesses and by 12 US states. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield called Trump's tariffs unlawful, reckless and economically devastating. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The law has historically been used to impose sanctions or freeze assets. Trump is the first US president to use it to impose tariffs. — Reuters

India approves stealth fighter programme amid tensions with Pakistan
India approves stealth fighter programme amid tensions with Pakistan

Observer

time27-05-2025

  • Observer

India approves stealth fighter programme amid tensions with Pakistan

NEW DELHI: India's defence minister has approved a framework for building the country's most advanced stealth fighter jet, the defence ministry said on Tuesday, amid a new arms race with Pakistan weeks after a military conflict between the neighbours. Indian state-run Aeronautical Development Agency, which is executing the programme, will shortly invite initial interest from defence firms for developing a prototype of the warplane, envisaged as a twin-engine 5th generation fighter, the ministry said. The project is crucial for the Indian Air Force, whose squadrons of mainly Russian and ex-Soviet aircraft have fallen to 31 from an approved strength of 42 at a time when rival China is expanding its air force rapidly. Pakistan has one of China's most advanced warplanes, the J-10, in its arsenal. Militaries of nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan faced-off in four days of fighting this month, which saw use of fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery by both sides before a ceasefire was announced by U.S. President Donald Trump. It was the first time both sides utilised drones at scale and the South Asian powers are now locked in a drones arms race, according to Reuters' interviews with 15 people, including security officials, industry executives and analysts in the two countries. India will partner with a domestic firm for the stealth fighter programme, and companies can bid independently or as a joint venture, the defence ministry said in a statement, adding that the bids would be open for both private and state-owned firms. In March, an Indian defence committee had recommended including the private sector in military aircraft manufacturing to shore up the capabilities of the Indian Air Force and reduce the burden on state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd, which makes most of India's military aircraft. Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh has previously criticised Hindustan Aeronautics for slow delivery of light combat Tejas aircraft, a 4.5 generation fighter, which the firm blamed on slow delivery of engines from General Electric due to supply chain issues faced by the U.S. firm.

UN chief denounces ‘cruelest phase' in Gaza
UN chief denounces ‘cruelest phase' in Gaza

Observer

time23-05-2025

  • Observer

UN chief denounces ‘cruelest phase' in Gaza

UNITED NATIONS: United Nations chief Antonio Guterres on Friday said "Palestinians in Gaza are enduring what may be the cruelest phase of this cruel conflict" as Israel ramps up its military offensive. "For nearly 80 days, Israel blocked the entry of life-saving international aid," he said in a statement. "The entire population of Gaza is facing the risk of famine. "The Israeli military offensive is intensifying with atrocious levels of death and destruction. "Today, 80 per cent of Gaza has been either designated an Israeli-militarised zone or an area where people have been ordered to leave." Israel resumed major operations in Gaza on March 18, ending a two-month ceasefire. Aid also began trickling into the Gaza Strip on Monday for the first time in more than two months, amidst condemnation of the Israeli blockade that sparked severe shortages of food and medicine. "Israel has clear obligations under international humanitarian law," Guterres said. "As the occupying power, it must agree to allow and facilitate the aid that is needed." The foreign ministers of more than 20 countries, including Germany, France and Britain, have urged Israel to fully reopen humanitarian aid access to the Gaza Strip. "Whilst we acknowledge indications of a limited restart of aid, Israel blocked humanitarian aid entering Gaza for over two months. Food, medicines and essential supplies are exhausted. The population faces starvation. Gaza's people must receive the aid they desperately need," the joint statement, said. Meanwhile, justice watchdog TRIAL International said on Friday that Swiss authorities should investigate the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a controversial US-backed group preparing to move aid into the Gaza Strip, Describing the GHF as a private security company, it said aid distribution should be left to UN organisations and humanitarian agencies. "The dire humanitarian situation in Gaza requires an immediate response," TRIAL International's executive director, Philip Grant, said in a statement. "However, the planned use of private security companies leads to a risky militarisation of aid," he added. That, he argued, "is not justified in a context where the United Nations and humanitarian NGOs have the impartiality, resources and expertise necessary to distribute this aid without delay to the civilian population". TRIAL International said it had filed legal submissions calling on Switzerland, where GHF is registered, to check that the group was complying with its own statutes and the Swiss legal system. The GHF has said it will distribute some 300 million meals in its first 90 days of operation. But the United Nations and traditional aid agencies have already said they will not cooperate with the group, which some have accused of working with Israel. On Friday, Gaza's health ministry said at least 3,673 people had been killed in the territory since Israel resumed strikes on March 18, taking the war's overall toll to 53,822, mostly civilians. — Agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store