
Armenia's PM accuses head of Church of fathering child in febrile political row
Armenia's liberal government has never been an ally of the deeply conservative Armenian Apostolic Church (AAC), but when Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan made extraordinary allegations against an unnamed senior clergyman, it blew open a deep divide."Your Grace, go fool around with your uncle's wife. What do you want from me?" said Pashinyan.He also accused the supreme spiritual leader - Catholicos Karekin II - of breaking his vow of celibacy and fathering a child, calling on him to resign. The BBC has approached the Church for comment but has not had a response.Until now the Church and government had found a way to co-exist, but the row threatens to split an already polarised Armenian society still further – and affect the outcome of next year's election.It could also harm peace talks that have the potential to re-shape the entire region of the South Caucasus, after Armenia's bitter defeat in a war against Azerbaijan.
Armenia is believed to be the first nation to make Christianity the state religion, after its king was baptised in 301AD. Although there is a separation of Church and state by law, the Armenian constitution recognises the AAC "as a national Church". The Church has not addressed the allegations but said the prime minister had sought "to silence its voice". It has reiterated that the government has no say in the matters of Church governance. If true, Pashinyan's allegation would make the Catholicos unfit for office. Under the Church's by-laws, only monks who took a vow of celibacy can be elected a Catholicos. On these grounds Pashinyan now demands Karekin's resignation, despite having no jurisdiction over the Church. He has presented no evidence but threatened to release it.Pashinyan has also attacked other senior clergymen, including accusing one archbishop of having an affair, with the extraordinary allegation of "fooling around" with his uncle's wife. The opposition parties and two of Armenia's former presidents, Levon Ter-Petrossian and Serzh Sargsyan, have rallied behind the Church and condemned Pashinyan's move against it.The government's relationship with the Church deteriorated after the defeat in the 2020 war against neighbouring Azerbaijan, when Karekin II joined calls from various political factions for the prime minister to step down. Pashinyan stayed in power, and the Church became a prominent anti-government voice.Recently, Karekin II demanded the right of return for the Armenians who fled Nagorno-Karabakh, a region of Azerbaijan that it recaptured in 2023.The prime minister's allies are unhappy with such interventions, as they contradict the government's position in the ongoing peace talks. Pashinyan pushes for a swift peace treaty that would see both countries drop mutual claims. But Azerbaijani media seized on nationalist opposition demands as proof that Armenia is not ready for peace.The Armenian Church has benefited from becoming a hub for dissent. With personal rivalries between the leaders of opposition parties, it is drawing in those disaffected with the authorities.Political analysts in Armenia suggest this might be a real reason for the government's sudden attack on the Church leader.The next general election has been scheduled for June 2026, and the anti-Church campaign could be a pre-emptive strike against the stronghold of conservative opposition.The prime minister himself has linked his position to politics: "We returned the state to the people. Now we must return the Church to the people."When a powerful benefactor spoke out in support of the Church this week, the government swiftly moved against him. Russian-Armenian billionaire Samvel Karapetyan threatened to "intervene in the campaign against the Church in our own way" if opposition politicians failed to defend it.Hours later, his residence was raided and on Wednesday he was charged with "making public calls to overthrow the government". He denies the charge.
The conflict between Armenia's political and spiritual leader is a highly sensitive matter far beyond its national borders, as the Church has hundreds of parishes in the diaspora, from Russia and Ukraine to Western Europe, the Middle East and America. While rumours about Karekin's alleged secret family have long circulated in tabloids, for years more serious accusations were being made by diaspora parishes. They alleged that Church leaders were extorting monthly payments and micro-managing dioceses that used to enjoy operational autonomy. In 2013, the Armenian Patriarch of Jerusalem accused Karekin II of having no spiritual values and only tending to its material wellbeing. The Church said the allegations were false.Until recently, Nikol Pashinyan has largely stayed above the fray. "It is my belief that government has no place in the Church's internal issues," he said soon after taking office in 2018. After years of respecting this pledge, the prime minister might have changed his mind.Whatever the outcome of this row, it is likely to deepen polarisation in a society that has already been fractured, not just by political infighting, but by wedge issues over whether to be allied to Russia or the West and by tensions between the residents of Armenia and ethnic Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
20 minutes ago
- ITV News
Northern Ireland veterinary medicine access to continue in 'vast majority of cases'
The government has insisted that in "the vast majority of cases" vets, farmers and pet owners will continue to have access to the medicines they need when the grace period on the supply of veterinary medicines comes to end at the end of this year. The Secretary of State Hilary Benn made the promise in a ministerial statement released to Parliament on Thursday afternoon. The change means EU rules on animal medicines will apply in Northern Ireland from January 1 which will place restrictions on the supply of products from the rest of the UK. GB suppliers will need to make adaptions to continue to sell into the region, leading to concerns that some critical products, that vets traditionally source from across the Irish Sea, will no longer be available. The Government has announced two schemes designed to ease the flow of veterinary medicines from Great Britain into Northern Ireland to ensure the supply of veterinary medicines does not face a cliff edge when the new rules come into force on Jan 1. In a policy paper published by the Secretary of State Hilary Benn said government officials have undertaken 18 months of extensive research to ensure a smooth changeover. The Veterinary Medicines Internal Market Scheme pledges to streamline the process of securing the restricted medicines from GB. While vets will be asked to consider if a similar product is available in the EU, they will be permitted to purchase it from GB if they determine the cost or time taken to import it from Europe would be prohibitive. Vets will also be able to pre-emptively secure the medicines so they have stock at hand when required. The requirement for a special import certificate to move the medicines from GB to NI will also be removed. A second initiative, the Veterinary Medicines Health Situation Scheme, is being set up to monitor the industry to identify potential discontinuation issues as they emerge and ensure a supply of alternative medicines are made available. The government says it believes the majority of medicines will remain available although it admits that a small number of medicines will not. Although the new initiatives have not been negotiated with the European Union, the government says it has been kept officials aware of what the UK was developing and that the new schemes are compliant with EU law. The Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir says he is "disappointed" that concerns he had raised with the government have not been addressed. "I'm worried that the UK government are overselling this and I'll be seeking another meeting with the UK government about this," he added. Sinn Fein has welcomed today's development, but the DUP's Carla Lockhart has hit out at the move. The Upper Bann MP said: "Although these latest proposals are presented as progress, the stark reality is that the Government has chosen to prioritise placating the EU over protecting the interests of animals, vets, farmers, and the wider agri-food sector in Northern Ireland." The British Veterinary Association, which has been calling for the matter to be urgently addressed, has described today as development as "a positive development". However President Dr Elizabeth Mullineaux has said: "Whilst the remedies provide some reassurances, the detail of how the schemes work for vets in Northern Ireland will be critical to understanding how effective they are in reality."


The Herald Scotland
23 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Does a civil service shake-up loom in the £1bn crackdown?
She was not someone who tolerated unwise spending by family members or by her employer. I can't remember exactly what the issues were that so exercised her in her office many years ago, but it's clear concerns surrounding the inefficient use of public resources persist to this day. READ MORE: Scottish Government confirm plan cut to public sector 'waste' by £1bn a year STUC leader in warning to Swinney ahead of £1bn crackdown on public sector 'waste' SNP ministers to unveil £1 billion crackdown on public sector 'waste' What's behind the Scottish Government drive to cut public sector 'waste'? It's a matter that John Swinney identified back in 2011 setting up the Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services in Scotland, chaired by Dr Campbell Christie, which had been tasked with examining the long-term challenges facing public services—including budget pressures, demographic change, rising demand and persistent inequalities. The Commission's report called for preventative and collaborative approaches to address systemic challenges, prioritising prevention to reduce long-term costs, enhancing performance through technology, and closer working across sectors. In a speech on Monday, Mr Swinney referred to the creation of Police Scotland, where the country's eight police forces were amalgamated into one organisation, as one of the "key successes" from the Christie report noting the restructure had led to over £200m a year in savings. Speaking in Holyrood today public finance minister Ivan McKee said a further £280m in efficiencies savings had been made through other changes such as cutting down on duplication and through the greater use of technology. But his aim is to save a further £720m to reach a target of £1bn by 2029/30. It's a huge ambition and one likely to require significant changes, ones well beyond cutting down on duplication and greater use of AI and review of the running of costly its buildings and estates. The elephant in the room is of course the number of public bodies and the number of people they employ. There are currently 130 quangos, and 55 civil service directorates in the Scottish Government covering a wide range of responsibilities, including one for the constitution, another for the EU, multiple ones relating to health, energy and climate, the environment. The list goes on. The obvious question is does Scotland need 55 civil service directorates and 130 quangos? It's significant I think that both Mr Swinney and Mr McKee have been talking up the reorganisation of Police Scotland and the amount of money the restructure has saved - £200m a year. Against such a backdrop it would be no huge surprise if major restructures were on the cards for other organisations. But such major changes could well lead to rows with the trade unions - with the STUC already issuing a warning to the government about its reforms. So while Mr McKee has laid out his initial plans today, he and his colleagues may well be putting off the harder spending and restructuring decisions until after May 2026 election.


Daily Mirror
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Mums and dads given firm 'responsibility' warning over term-time holidays
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson told The Mirror that parents have a 'responsibility' to their kids' classmates not to take them out of school during term time A minister pleaded with parents not to take their kids out of school early for the summer holidays - saying they have a "responsibility" to their classmates. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson told The Mirror that while she understands families wanting a break together, they must think of others. She said: "If children are not in school, that doesn't just have an impact on your own child, it has an impact on the whole class. "Because what teachers tell me is that they have to cover lessons over again to help children with their catch up." And she added: "If parents then choose to take their child on termtime holidays that does have knock on consequences for everyone. "And I think it's about our responsibility not just to our own children, but our responsibility to the whole school community." Ms Phillipson has previously said she would talk to travel chiefs about pricing, while her Cabinet colleague Heidi Alexander urged airlines to "do the right thing". Last year a record 443,000 fines were issued to parents taking their children out of school during term time to go on holiday - a 53% increase since before Covid. This is despite school absence fines in England going up from £60 to £80 last September - rising to £160 for a second offence within three years. But Ms Phillipson said there are "green shoots" suggesting school absences are dropping. Analysis last year found holiday package to Greece cost £748 in term time and £1,023 in the school break. And a package to Spain cost £925 in term time and £1,179 during the school holidays. In May Transport Secretary Ms Alexander admitted there was little the Government could do to force travel firms to drive down fares. Ms Alexander told The Mirror: "Airline pricing is a matter for the airlines. And I think it's a very difficult thing for the government to interfere in. We don't have any intention of interfering in those decisions of private companies, but I can understand the frustration of parents when they are looking at the comparative costs of holidays in school holidays and school holidays. "I would ask the travel industry to consider doing the right thing. But I think there are very limited levers for Government to intervene directly in this."