Donal Fallon: How Margaret Thatcher and her knitted jumper helped nip the first attempt at Brexit in the bud, 50 years ago
Today at 21:30
While referendums are somewhat commonplace in Ireland, thanks to Bunreacht na hÉireann's requirement for questions to go before the citizenry, they are much rarer occurrences next door.
Fifty years ago this month, Britain and a considerable chunk of this island were asked to answer a question: 'Do you think the UK should stay in the European Community (Common Market)?' Coming less than three years after British membership of the European Economic Community, the referendum was in some ways more complex than the 2016 one that ultimately removed Britain from the EU.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Paul Hosford: Accusing Thunberg of Instagram activism over Gaza is missing the point
Earlier this week, I had a feeling of dread that I would wake up to news of the death of Greta Thunberg, a feeling others have echoed. When I went to sleep on Sunday night, the British-flagged yacht Madleen was sailing headlong towards Gaza carrying just a drop of the flood of aid required to ease the humanitarian disaster in the enclave. Twelve people on a yacht carrying baby formula, food, and medical supplies, including the 22-year-old climate activist, and there was legitimate concern that the Israeli administration would show no restraint — as it did in May 2010 when nine floatilla passengers were killed during a raid on a group of ships aiming to bring aid to Gaza. In the end, Israeli forces boarded the yacht and made a show of how humane the whole thing was, perhaps aware that killing innocents would be treated differently if their number included a French MEP. The captured dozen was given sandwiches and forced to turn over their phones as the yacht was escorted to Ashdod port. From there, the Israeli government began its mocking of the group. It published a picture of Ms Thunberg on social media and, before initiating deportation proceedings, was slamming the operation as a PR stunt — calling it a 'selfie ship' full of 'celebrities'. 'This wasn't humanitarian aid. It's Instagram activism,' said Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer, who extolled the virtues of his government, saying that it had delivered over 1,200 truckloads of aid in the last two weeks. This is despite the latest assessment from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) which says that people in Gaza are starving and that this demands the urgent opening of all crossings and on impeded access for humanitarian organisations to deliver aid at scale, through multiple routes. There is no question that aid to Gaza is being choked off by the Israeli government and that what is getting through is just a drop in an ocean growing every single day. Ongoing incidents Meanwhile, hospitals in Gaza City said 25 people were killed overnight on Wednesday into Thursday, near a convoy transporting flour and at a food distribution site run by the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which has been criticised as the wrong vehicle to deliver aid. Staff of the GHF died in an ambush on Thursday after a bus transporting them was raked with gunfire, an attack the Israeli government has blamed on Hamas. While the Israeli government mocked those who put their hands up and volunteered for the aid mission, it was joined online by an unlikely ally — the 'reasonable' adult. In any news story or Instagram post, or whatever tweets are called these days, you will have found a cohort of people delighting in the failure of the Madleen to deliver baby formula to starving children. These people will call themselves reasonable, they will call themselves centrists, they will call themselves good, and at the same time they will delight in the failure of a small amount of medical supplies reaching what has been described as hell on earth because they don't like the 22-year-old autistic woman from the internet. They are Christians with the best intentions, calling for a stranger's head. Ms Thunberg has long attracted this kind of commentary, particularly angering men with her activism and general refusal to just be quiet. They will have the same reaction to Paul Murphy's arrest as part of a march to the Rafah Crossing. The rationale appears to be that they genuinely believe that this was a personal mission from the Swedish woman — little more than an image-raising exercise. To what end someone who has spent most of her life engaged in the kind of full-throated activism that comes at more personal cost than benefit would do this is never really explained, but these commenters are sure that she is some kind of 'silly little girl' or some variation thereof. It couldn't be that Ms Thunberg was simply doing what she believed was right and using her immense global platform to highlight the continued suffering of Gazans; there must be an ulterior motive, one for personal benefit. Protesters took part in a demonstration outside the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in Whitehall, London, calling for the UK government to protect the crew of Madleen, which carried Ms Thunberg and other activists. Picture: James Manning/PA Those comments betray much about those who make them, those who throw 'virtue signalling' or 'do-gooder' as slurs. They cannot imagine virtue, or good or empathy, that is genuinely selfless because they lack the capacity for all three. They cannot, at the same time, understand why the residents of Los Angeles would take to the streets as their friends and neighbours are extrajudicially arrested. They cheer online as rubber bullets, which killed 14 people during The Troubles, are fired indiscriminately into crowds or with terrifying accuracy at members of the media, or women walking home, because they do not see those people as on their side. These are the same people who will say they are afraid of Dublin's O'Connell St in the daytime, mocking those who stand up to oppression or genocide. PR exercise Of course the Madleen was a PR exercise. Of course it was a publicity stunt. Nobody on board expected the aid they were carrying to fix everything. In fact, I'm sure the whole exercise finished the way most on board would have imagined. They are not ignorant to the reality of what Israel will and will not allow reach Gaza. However, great injustices require action, and if that means making social media users look at a group of people on a quixotic boat journey, then so be it. This is not about your personal feelings towards the messenger and, if your first reaction was to look at method rather than message, then that is on you. In Gaza over the last few days, the internet has collapsed, the OCHA said on Thursday, due to damage to the last fibre cable route serving central and southern Gaza — likely caused during heavy military activity. They warn that this is not a routine outage, but a total failure of Gaza's digital infrastructure. Lifelines to emergency services, humanitarian coordination, and critical information for civilians have all been cut. There is a full Internet blackout, and mobile networks are barely functioning. So if any Gazans had had worries about the online discourse surrounding attempts to bring them aid — in between trying to stay alive, of course — they would not have had the capacity by week's end to check in on the comments section. The reaction to a group of people — including a very high-profile young woman, yes — trying to do the right thing speaks volumes for where social media has driven us: To a place where a sentence can contain the words 'I'm not happy that aid was blocked from reaching Gaza' and be followed by a 'but'. Perhaps not every thought needs to be shared, not every issue opined upon. Maybe, just maybe, it is time to read and listen and understand more than we post, and talk and think. It is a time to act and support the bravery of those who act in ways we cannot ourselves. Anything else will lead to what folk singer Tyler Childers calls 'the start of a long, violent history, of tucking our tails as we try to abide'. Read More Three Irish people detained in Cairo ahead of protest walk to Gaza border
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
BBC will not appeal against Gerry Adams' defamation case victory
The BBC will not appeal over Gerry Adams' defamation victory against the organisation. Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Féin, said there needed to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 euros after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Féin leader's legal costs. The decision not to appeal by the British Broadcasting Corporation has to be followed by a substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision. 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. 'We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences.' In a statement issued through the Sinn Féin press office on Friday, Mr Adams said: 'The decision not to appeal by the British Broadcasting Corporation has to be followed by a substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland. 'It must also become more accountable to the public. 'The Dublin Court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said the damages will be donated to good causes.'
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
BBC will not appeal outcome of Gerry Adams' libel case
THE BBC WILL not be appealing former Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams' libel case victory. Adams was awarded €100,000 in damages after he sued the British broadcas ter for libel last month. Advertisement He claimed a BBC spotlight programme, aired in 2016, defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the 2006 murder of former Sinn Féin staffer Denis Donaldson. A spokesperson for the BBC said today that the broadcaster had given 'careful consideration' to the jury's decision, which agreed that Adams had been defamed. 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences,' they added. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
