logo
Jenny Boylan on humanizing the trans experience

Jenny Boylan on humanizing the trans experience

Boston Globe31-01-2025

Listen to more 'Say More' episodes at
Advertisement
The following is a lightly edited transcript of the Jan. 29 episode of the 'Say More' podcast.
Jim Dao:
Welcome to 'Say More' from Boston Globe Opinion - I'm Jim Dao, Editorial Page Editor. I've known Jenny Boylan for years, first and foremost as an endearing, funny writer. But she's also a transgender woman, who has advocated for trans rights since she came out in the early 2000s.
Dao:
And now, days into Trump's second term, she worries for the lives and work of trans people across the country. Jenny's been active on this issue for decades, and she's seen the culture change for better and for worse. She's got the long view.
Dao:
She has a new book called 'Cleavage: Men, Women and the Space Between Us.' It goes beyond the politics of trans life and deep into the personal. She talks about the boy she once was, the woman she became, and the many ways trans people are misunderstood.
Dao:
Jenny, so great to see you. Welcome to the Globe Studio.
Jenny Boylan:
Hi, Jim. Thanks for having me.
Dao:
So, we originally invited you to talk about your book, but with this timing, we felt we had to start with talking about Trump and his presidency, and what they could mean for your life and the life and work of other transgender people.
Advertisement
Dao:
Tell us a little bit about what's been on your mind for these last couple weeks.
Boylan:
Well, one thing that happened is that the day after the inauguration, I woke up in my bed and sat up and realized that for the first time in 25 years, I was a man again, at least as far as if the executive order that was issued by Donald Trump is to be taken at face value, which I guess it probably shouldn't.
Boylan:
I know that his executive order, attempting to erase transgender people, will probably be challenged in the courts and some of it is unenforceable. But, some of it is enforceable and will have an immediate effect. For instance, no non-binary passports.
Boylan:
But for someone like me, to be redefined as male, imagine my surprise to wake up, and my wife, to whom I have been married to for 36 years now, is back in apparently a heterosexual marriage for the first time in 25 years. And she was surprised, too. And what surprised us, is that in fact as far as our lives are concerned, at least that morning, nothing had changed. We still have have each other. I'm still me. I still feel the thing in my heart that I have felt since I was a child.
Boylan:
They have run into the challenge that, that they will ought to have run into in attempting to define gender in this binary way. They're saying at conception, the size of the reproductive, I mean, it won't hold up at all. But what it illustrates is that actually defining the difference between men and women turns out to be very difficult.
Advertisement
Dao:
So the debates you just described broadly over trying to define what is a man, trying to define what is a woman, has been going on for years now, right? And you've witnessed it across your adult life. It's super complicated.
Dao:
Are you astonished that it has become such a major issue for so many people in the Republican Party, in particular? There's some Democrats too, but in the Republican Party in particular, it elevated into a presidential issue this past year, and it's the first thing, or one of the first things he does when he enters the Oval Office.
Boylan:
Well, the thing is, here's a small group of people who are generally misunderstood. I mean, even after, for me, 25 years as an advocate now, I am still pretty sure that the majority of Americans could not tell you the difference between a transgender person and the Trans-Siberian Railroad. So, am I surprised that the Republicans have grabbed onto this issue? No, because it's a way of firing up the base by using a small misunderstood, maligned group as their whipping girls.
Boylan:
In some ways, it's the same thing they're trying to do with immigrants to this country who, you know, are not murderers and rapists, who are not eating the dogs. I mean, it's essentially raising middle school to the level of executive office politics, which is to say, let's find the people who are funny looking and different and exclude them. And that will give us a sense of power.
Advertisement
Boylan:
Do you think I'm right on that? Is that what's happening?
Dao:
I think there's a part of it. Absolutely. I mean, look, I think that there are also some people who are just genuinely concerned or bothered by things like having a large transgender woman playing on a field with a smaller woman.
Boylan:
Yeah, well, I think part of, and this is going to get me in trouble, but I would say transgender issues have been defined largely by some of the more extreme cases. So, trans women in women's sports, children self defining, children on hormone blockers. These are all things that I support and believe in and if you have enough time and enough interest, I could explain to you why at least those two issues are probably less controversial than they ought to be.
Boylan:
But that's not what defines our lives, by and large. You know, I've been in this body for 25 years now and for the most part I've encountered no trouble whatsoever from the outside world. I served on the the PTA in my little hometown, I volunteered in the library, I'm a parent and a member of my community. And my womanhood is generally not called into question by anybody.
Boylan:
The idea that my gender is part of a national argument, which I could well win or lose, and apparently with Trump's election, I've lost at least some parts of that argument. It's insulting and it's demeaning and, you know, 'What do I want? What's my agenda?' My agenda is to be left alone. My agenda is to be able to live my life, to raise my children, to love my wife, to teach my students at Barnard. Because what does anyone care what's in my pants? It shocks me that people finding their peace should be an occasion of such outrage.
Advertisement
Dao:
You use the word advocate to describe yourself just a moment ago. I've seen you described as an activist and yet you are, I think probably in your own mind, first and foremost, a prolific writer and a professor of English, a teacher of writing and literature.
Dao:
How do you feel about being described as an activist?
Boylan:
It's funny, when it came out, I thought I really didn't want to be an activist because I felt that that meant being angry all the time and being defined solely by who I was, as a transgender person. I wanted to be something more. I wanted to be also known as, or respected for being, a storyteller and a writer of opinions for places like the Boston Globe.
Boylan:
What I learned is that storytelling is maybe the best form of activism. It opens more hearts than lectures. There's something about a story that gets into people's hearts and opens them. I don't have a problem being called an activist or an advocate, but in some ways I think that's really just another word for storyteller.
Dao:
So, you transitioned about 25 years ago…
Boylan:
I did. You know, 25 years ago, no one had been formally given instructions on how to hate me. People were generally generous and kind. I came out to my 85-year-old Evangelical Christian Republican mother on a Sunday night. I got all weepy. I started crying. And my mother, tiny woman, sat down next to me, she wiped the tears off my face, and she said, 'Love will prevail.'' And that was generally the response that people gave to me.
Dao:
Wow. And so, do you think you would not get that response today?
Boylan:
I would not get that response now because now transgender people have been redefined as these wild-eyed people who want to, I don't know, change the gender of your child in third grade.
Boylan:
In some ways 25 years ago, it was easier because people had nothing to fall back upon in those days than their own sense of human decency. A lot of the responses I got then were along the lines of, 'Well, Jenny, I, I don't know what this is, I don't really understand this, but we've always loved you, so we'll follow wherever you want us to go.'
Dao:
Well, so your memoir, 'She's Not There,' which I only read a few years ago, but it came out, how long ago?
Boylan:
2003.
Dao:
2003. And it's a very accessible, human, open-hearted description of what it is to go from being a man, a full grown man, with a family, to a woman. And to me, it's a book that probably really helped a lot of cisgender people understand what happens.
And so, what I'm wondering is, would it be harder to write a book like that in this moment?
Boylan:
I think younger people now that are trans approach the issues differently. That's another thing that's changed. There's much more of a sense of being trans as part of a larger queer identity as a way of being kind of an outlaw. There's certainly more people who want to define themselves as non-binary.
Boylan:
When I came out, there was a relatively straight line to follow and there was a sense that transition meant, a full transition. It involved surgery, hormones, electrolysis, which is the process of, in my case, removing my beard from my face.
Boylan:
So that was the path. There's a lot more different ways of being trans now. Which, on the one hand, great, good, people get to be themselves and to follow the stars that shine down for them and to define themselves on their own terms. So yes, that's great. And I'm fighting for
those people, but also those people, people who are non-binary, these are the people who scare many of the Donald Trump voters. And actually many of the Kamala Harris voters, too, to be honest. It's maybe easy to get your mind around someone who has done the full transition and looks female than it is to get your mind around someone who is kind of deliberately and joyfully playing in the middle with gender.
Boylan:
The one thing, by the way since we're doing this podcast as obviously audio, the one thing about me that's still kind of masculine is my voice here. And a lot of people who are listening to this are like, she doesn't sound like some beautiful lady. I could attempt to give you the voice that I was trained to do during therapy, but I don't like talking like that. You know, I like my voice because it's mine. And if you're at home listening to this, you have to imagine that the person who this voice belongs to is just this fabulously beautiful woman.
Boylan:
Jim, you would agree with that, right?
Dao:
Absolutely. A hundred percent. I guarantee it.
Boylan:
And by the way, Jim, you're looking pretty good too, I might say right now.
Dao:
More of my conversation with Jenny Boylan after a short break.
Dao:
So for those of the listeners who aren't familiar with your story, you felt that you were really a girl for a long time.
Boylan:
Oh yeah, yeah, really one of my earliest memories. It''s just something I always had and my sense was one, I knew this to be true and two, I also knew that this was something that was going to get me into trouble. I knew instinctively not to talk to people about it, and, and to try whatever I could do to fit in. And, you know, that lasted about 40 years. Until finally, I just broke. I couldn't go any further. The question is really not 'Why then?,' the question is 'How did I get there? How did it go for so long?''
Dao:
Was there a moment that really made you think, 'Okay, now is the time.' You know, you're married, you have a loving wife, a great relationship, wonderful children, a good career. Was there something?
Boylan:
I was stopped at a railroad crossing near where I used to teach at Colby College in Maine. The barrier came down, and there was, you know, the
ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding
, and this freight train went by. There must have been 50 cars, 60 cars. And eventually the train went on, the barrier went up, and people behind me started honking. And I just thought, I cannot go another step. I didn't like, walk through the door, when I got home and say, 'Honey, I'm changing my name to Tiffany Chiffon.'
Boylan:
What I said was, 'Honey, I think I need to get into therapy.'' Because we talked about gender stuff before that.
Dao:
So she knew where you were coming from?
Boylan:
She knew a little bit. I don't think she knew fully what lay ahead. But I'm not sure that either of us did.
Dao:
You write in the new book that gender transition is like being fired out of a cannon. I think that's the right phrase. It's just like, it was so exciting, but it was also like, incredibly freeing, right? For those who haven't read that book or 'She's Not There,' can you describe that excitement and elation that you felt?
Boylan:
Well, just imagine, imagine your whole life you've been in a dark room and suddenly the lights come on. Or, even better, imagine that you're in a country where you know you don't belong and you've learned the language, but you know that your language is actually some other language, and you know that your home is somewhere across the sea, and the ocean is wide and perilous, but at a certain moment you realize you have to go home, you have to find the place where you belong. And so imagine stepping onto the shores of, well, what did Tolkien call it? A far green country under a swift sunrise. Where suddenly you know that you belong. And the language that you speak is the language.
Dao:
There are several parts of the book where you describe your boyhood and what I found quite lovely, quite honestly, is that you describe that period in a kind of a loving way, that you, you sort of liked being that little boy, even as you had those struggles. And maybe I'm getting that wrong, you could explain it. You were mischievous, you did kind of fun boy things.
Boylan:
Yeah, we had a rocket club.
Dao:
And then you talk about how that little boy is still part of you, which is quite an idea I think.
Boylan:
Well, what does it mean to be a woman who had a boyhood?
Boylan:
Let's be clear, there are transgender women that I know who in conversation would deny ever having been male and that they see themselves as always having been female and that going through surgery, or what we call gender confirmation surgery, essentially confirmed a thing that was always true and was always there.
Boylan:
And I mean, I feel that way as well, that who I am was always within me. I don't have any shame in talking about the fact that there was a time before and you know, everyone needs a childhood and I think feeling whole in this world is very much about being able to build a bridge between who you are and who you were. And that's true for everybody. It's not just a transgender thing.
Boylan:
So being a boy was not all abject misery. Being a boy and a young man, a lot of times, was really fun. I mean a lot of times it was horrible, too, and not only because of the gender stuff. But being a boy was okay, I guess, except knowing that I had the sense of difference that I couldn't talk to anyone about and I had the secret that I was carrying around. You know in some ways, the biggest difference is not going from male to female. The biggest difference is going from someone who has a secret to a person who doesn't have one.
Boylan:
And if you have a secret, it's kind of like having like a St. Bernard dog or something. It just follows you around everywhere. You always have to be worrying about this giant, drooling thing. And if you don't have a St. Bernard to have to worry about, if you don't have something you're trying to hide, that's so empowering.
Dao:
I wanted to ask you about transition. Transition, obviously, suggests moving from one thing to another. In your case, from being a man to a woman. But now you've been a woman for 25 years. And I'm curious as to whether you could talk a little bit about whether are you still a trans person? Or are you a woman?
Boylan:
That's a really good question, because to some degree, I would say I'm not trans anymore. I mean, and it kind of depends what you think the leading issues are, and that's where you get into trouble.
Boylan:
For me, the leading issues, most of them were physical and medical. I didn't want to be a more feminine person than I was. I'm probably about as feminine now as I was before. Being female was never about wearing stilettos and doing a French braid and eating cupcakes.
Boylan:
Can I parse this for listeners? There's a difference between maleness and femaleness, however you might define that, but I would define it, if we're talking about the physical body. And what I wanted to do was to transition from male to female, so the body that I'm in now with breasts, vagina, clitoris, pardon the expression, that's the body that I've landed in.
Boylan:
It used to be I'd wake up in the morning and I'd think, 'Oh my god, what am I gonna do? I'm gonna have to walk around wearing this mask again all day long. And it gets harder and harder and harder.' Now, I wake up in the morning, and unless I have to do a podcast with you, Jim, I don't think about gender at all.
Boylan:
I just wake up and I'm like, 'Well, I think I'm gonna make some porridge.' That's the thing that Donald Trump is trying to make illegal. Jenny Boylan, stop it with the porridge. We're gonna call you Jimbo and make you eat steak.
Boylan:
Anyway, transition. In the same way that I'm proud of my boyhood, and connecting to the person that I was. I'm proud of my trans history and having been through that amazing journey. I used to think that being trans was a curse. It was like the worst thing. Cause not only is it this terrible burden you're walking around with, but also it's one that other people find stupid,
or hilarious, or there's just people that understand this so ineptly that all they can do is think you're a joke.
Boylan:
I thought it was a curse like colorblindness, which is you tell someone you're colorblind, and instead of them putting their arms around you and saying, 'Oh, you poor thing.' They're like, 'Hey, what color is this? Ah, that's so weird, man. That's not red, that's blue.'
Boylan:
So especially when I was a kid, I just felt like, how am I going to survive in this world? It was so bad that, and I wrote about this in 'She's Not There,' that at one point I drove to Nova Scotia by myself, parked the car and climbed this mountain and stood at the edge of a cliff and looked down into the waves and said, 'Okay, this is what you came here to do, let's, let's do it.'
Boylan:
And the thing that kept me from jumping was this fierce wind off the Atlantic and I fell backwards into the moss and looked up at the blue sky and thought, 'Maybe I should hang out here a little bit longer.'
Boylan:
So what I learned in time was that it's not a curse, it's a gift. It's a gift, but it's a gift that takes a lot of courage to accept. I think one thing that's true is that young people now have more examples of being trans. I'd never met any transgender people before I came out, really. So, I think it's easier for children and young people now to see the thing that eluded me, which is that being trans is a very cool way of being in the world. But it's never easy.
Dao:
So, there's so many reasons to feel trepidation today, particularly if you're a trans person, perhaps, but is there anything specific that gives you hope about where we're going as a society?
Boylan:
Well, look, we have to admit this is a very hard moment. It is hard to walk around my little wonderful Maine town and know that the majority of the people in that town voted for somebody who put these policies into place. They may not have known that they were doing so, but they kind of did. What gives me hope is that life is long and the moment that we're experiencing now will not last forever. It probably feels like forever right now, but we cannot allow ourselves to be defined by people who hate us.
Boylan:
There are different strategies people have for coping with this time of trouble. I've always found writing to be both therapeutic and also helpful in terms of bringing about the changes that I want in the world. I think everyone, and this goes for people who are not trans too, this time around, let's not be distracted by the clown show. What we have to focus on is the policy. To the extent that if we can change the policy, we will. If we can't change it today, we'll change it tomorrow.
Boylan:
There's a wonderful Paul Simon song,
('Cool, Cool River')
. The line is I believe in the future we will suffer no more, maybe not in my lifetime, but in yours. I feel sure.
Boylan:
And in some ways, we just have to believe in the future. And to bring about that future. And the way we do that is also just to be known. To walk in the world with your head high, and try not to let all of this bullshit dominate our minds. We get to determine how much of this we give ourselves over to.
Dao:
Jenny Boylan is a writer and longtime LGBTQ activist. Her latest book is called 'Cleavage, Men, Women, and the Space Between Us.' It's funny and open hearted, and I highly recommend it. Jenny, thanks for being on Say More.
Boylan:
Thanks, Jim.
James Dao can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New England voters strongly disapprove of Kennedy's performance and polices as health secretary, according to new Globe/Suffolk poll
New England voters strongly disapprove of Kennedy's performance and polices as health secretary, according to new Globe/Suffolk poll

Boston Globe

timea day ago

  • Boston Globe

New England voters strongly disapprove of Kennedy's performance and polices as health secretary, according to new Globe/Suffolk poll

On one front, Kennedy does draw wide support from across the spectrum with his move to phase out artificial food dyes. But his most recent move this week served to underscore how polarizing his agenda can be: On Monday, Kennedy Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The move stunned and alarmed many in the medical community — as well as New Englanders who participated in the Suffolk/Globe survey, which was conducted before Kennedy fired the officials. Advertisement Logan Snierson, a 26-year old aircraft mechanic and registered Democrat from Rochester, N.H., spoke to the Globe having just seen the news that Kennedy had gutted the CDC vaccine board and was disturbed by the implications. Advertisement 'I mean, it just feels like we're regressing as a country in health care,' he said. Related : His poll numbers probably shouldn't come as much of a surprise. New England is not only more liberal than the country as a whole but has a high concentration of well-educated professionals who work in the region's nation-leading universities and hospitals, and the local economy is heavily dependent on the medical, pharmaceutical, and health care industries — all of which have been hit hard by federal budget cuts and the administration's oressure campaign on elite schools. A national survey conducted by Pew Research in April and May found more favorable results for Kennedy: 43 percent of those polled disapproved of his performance, while 36 percent approved and 21 percent were not sure. The opposition to Kennedy here is deeply felt. The single largest group of respondents, by far, were those who said they strongly disapproved of the job he's doing. By contrast, only 14 percent of those surveyed strongly approved. In the Globe poll, Kennedy's popularity broke along familiar partisan lines. Ninety-one percent of Democrats disapproved of Kennedy; 80 percent of them strongly disapproved. While just 15 percent of Republicans approve of Kennedy, that was a larger share than the 4 percent of Democrats who did. Seventy-six percent of Republicans favor Kennedy overall. The splits among independent voters closely mirrored the overall results. Sixty-two percent disapprove of Kennedy while 29 percent approve. Many of those displeased with Kennedy's performance said they haven't been surprised by his actions, given his Advertisement 'I was shocked by his appointment and therefore everything has been concordant with that,' said Craig Franz, a 72-year old retiree and registered Democrat from Narragansett, R.I. 'It's a terrible time for health in the country and for science and research.' Related : Clear majorities disagreed with several of Kennedy's most significant policy decisions and views. Sixty percent disagreed with his belief that fluoride should be removed from public water supplies, for instance, compared to 31 percent who agreed. Kennedy's most unpopular move, the survey found, was the decision of his Food and Drug Administration to limit COVID-19 booster shots to those over 65 years old or at risk of serious illness. Sixty-two percent disagreed — almost all strongly so — while 32 percent agreed. The survey did underscore the broad appeal of one staple of Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' platform: his push to Kennedy has not pursued any ban just yet, but in April, he announced a suite of actions designed to curb use of the dyes, which have been increasingly linked to health risks like cancer. The secretary's focus on food dyes and addressing food safety in general united poll respondents who otherwise expressed a wide range of views on Kennedy. Anna Morrison, a 44-year old barber and independent voter from Falmouth, said Kennedy was 'doing a very good job' overall and pointed first to his steps on tackling chemicals in food; she agrees with Kennedy that those chemicals are contributing to a chronic disease epidemic in the country. Advertisement On the other end of the spectrum, Margot Critchfield, a 69-year old retired Episcopal priest and Democrat from Cape Cod, believes Kennedy is unqualified for the job and that his views are 'dangerous,' especially when it comes to vaccination. But she agreed with his stance on food dyes, though she noted it was not an endorsement of his leadership in any way. 'I agreed with that but I felt like it was almost like a trick question, because it was hard to believe I'd agree with him on anything,' she said. David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center, said the results show there's only one issue Kennedy should be talking about — 'mandating the removal of synthetic dyes from the food supply.' 'If he leads with that and he goes aggressively on that issue, even among the people who hate him, even in the most liberal areas of the nation, people overwhelmingly agree,' Paleologos said. 'That's a gift-wrapped issue for him. And for Trump, too.' Though Kennedy is polarizing in New England, some voters are still conflicted about his overall impact. Ellen, a 71-year old retiree and independent voter from Sturbridge, who declined to give her last name, approves of Kennedy's moves on food additives and fluoride but disagrees with him on vaccines. She said that he wouldn't have been her first choice as health secretary but said 'he means well' even if 'he's misguided in a lot of ways.' 'I think personally, he's a bit out there,' she said. 'But isn't everybody in this administration?' Sam Brodey can be reached at

For Trump, California stands out as his biggest, bluest enemy
For Trump, California stands out as his biggest, bluest enemy

Boston Globe

time2 days ago

  • Boston Globe

For Trump, California stands out as his biggest, bluest enemy

The relationship between Trump and the nation's most populous state has never really recovered. And now, as the events of this past weekend showed, it might have hit rock bottom. While Trump has had his battles with Massachusetts and other Democratic-run states in his two terms in office, California stands out as his biggest, bluest enemy. But the fight, during which Trump has Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up With its progressive policies, a highly diverse population, and total Democratic control, California is the polar opposite of Trump's Make America Great Again vision. He lost the state by millions of votes in each of his three campaigns. It is home to many of his most ardent Democratic opponents over the years: Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Kamala Harris, and the current governor, Gavin Newsom. Advertisement California has frequently been the target of Trump's ire. It began with the Advertisement 'He does not like our politics. But you know what? That's OK. Because clearly based on the election, California does not like . . . the narcissistic personality of Donald Trump, and we clearly do not like his policies,' Representative Jimmy Panetta, a California Democrat, told reporters in the US Capitol Tuesday as he gathered with more than a dozen Democratic House colleagues from the state to blast Trump's latest move and pledge to 'go toe-to-toe' with him over it. That combative approach — highlighted by to do so over the weekend — dates to Trump's first term and the 'He tries to bully us . . . but we fight back,' Representative Juan Vargas, another California Democrat, told the Globe. 'We don't roll over. . . . I mean, we fight back. And so we're fighting back right now. And I think he kind of likes that actually.' One of Vargas's Republican colleagues from California, Representative Doug LaMalfa, agreed that the strong pushback from state Democrats is behind the tumultuous relationship. LaMalfa recalled the first advice he got about Trump from his 2016 running mate, Mike Pence. Advertisement 'He said, 'Trump is a counter puncher. He doesn't really want to draw the first blood. He'll want to sit in a room with you. Art of the deal, all that stuff, right?' ' LaMalfa said. 'But you attack him, he will punch back. Hard.' There are clear advantages for Trump in taking on California, said Dan Schnur, a former Republican strategist who teaches political communications at the University of Southern California and the University of California Berkeley. 'When push comes to shove, he's a deep-red president dealing with a deep-blue state. Even if Trump wanted to make it work, it wouldn't be easy,' Schnur said. 'But he doesn't want to make it work. He knows how much he benefits with his base by picking fights with California. So with rare exceptions, the political payoff is much greater than any downside.' Trump hasn't always had a problem with California. In the 1987 book he cowrote, 'The Art of the Deal,' Trump said he 'flirted briefly with the idea of attending film school at the University of Southern California' because he was 'was attracted to the glamour of the movies.' But he decided to go into his family's real estate business in New York instead. Representative Jimmy Gomez, a Southern California Democrat, said some people have suggested Trump got irked at California when 'If he was a regular former New Yorker, I would say that he didn't like the Dodgers,' Gomez joked. 'But I think it's just what he thinks California stands for.' Advertisement But Representative Ro Khanna, a Democrat from northern California, said it's hard to know what's fueling Trump's animosity. 'Who knows what's in his head?' Khanna said. 'But he's been obsessed with it.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Several Democrats said Trump was looking for a distraction after his 'He's looking for a good show. He's an entertainer,' Gomez said. 'I think he's thinking about what's going to make good television. And going after California, the most populous state, the fourth-largest economy on the face of the planet . . . is good TV for himself.' Just as in his first term, Trump returned to office on bad terms with California. Immediately after last November's election, Newsom called a special session of the state legislature Trump blasted the move on social media, using a demeaning nickname in writing that Advertisement Newsom initially tried to defuse the threat on wildfire funding, greeting Trump when he visited Los Angeles to tour the damage just four days after taking office. But Newsom also is a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate and that has added to the current tensions, said Lanhee Chen, a fellow at the conservative Hoover Institution think tank in California. 'It takes two to tango,' said Chen, who was policy director for Republican Mitt Romney's 2012 presidential campaign. 'I think a lot of governors have tried to stay above it a little bit and . . . while they've disagreed with Trump, they haven't turned it into this kind of personal macho match that it appears as though Newsom is trying to do here.' But it's exactly that kind of fight that Trump gets from California that keeps the state in his crosshairs, said Representative Pete Aguilar, the third-ranking House Democrat. 'Just look at who he surrounds himself with, a lot of people who tell him 'yes' and tell him what he wants to hear,' Aguilar said. 'You're not going to hear that when you're talking to Democrats from California.' Tal Kopan of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at

How the big, complicated bill could create headaches next tax season
How the big, complicated bill could create headaches next tax season

Boston Globe

time2 days ago

  • Boston Globe

How the big, complicated bill could create headaches next tax season

All of that has helped swell the Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Experts said the addition of numerous temporary tax breaks provides new ways for people to try to game the system while making it more difficult for everyday Americans to file their returns. Advertisement 'It most certainly doesn't simplify anything,' said Adam N. Michel, director of tax policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute think tank. 'It definitely makes the tax code significantly more complex, which doesn't just make it challenging for taxpayers to comply with the tax law, but also opens up new avenues for tax avoidance.' Advertisement For decades, Republicans have pushed to simplify the increasingly complicated tax code by eliminating or restricting targeted deductions and credits. They have argued that the savings could then be used to help lower the overall rates while making tax-filing less time-consuming. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 took that approach, in part by eliminating the deductibility of interest on auto and other personal loans. And the 2017 tax law did something similar, restricting the state and local tax deduction and allowing millions of Americans to avoid complicated itemizing by nearly doubling the standard deduction, to $12,000 for single filers and $24,000 for married couples, and tying it to inflation. The new Republican tax bill, whose main focus is to extend the expiring tax cuts to avoid across-the-board tax increases next year, makes the higher standard deduction permanent and temporarily boosts it by $1,000 for single filers and $2,000 for married couples through 2028. That alone helps further simplify the tax code, said Representative Jason Smith, a Missouri Republican who chairs the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'The increase in the standard deduction means less people itemizing,' Smith, a key player on the tax bill, told the Globe. 'So we're making it easier for more people to just do the standard deduction.' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said critics were missing the bigger picture. 'Leave it to these so-called experts that are politically opposed to anything the president does to overexaggerate and hyperfocus on so-called complications to the tax structure instead of focusing on the real story which is the massive tax cuts brought forward in this bill,' he said. 'Further deductions are music to the American taxpayers' ears, and this bill will result in more money in American families' pockets.' Advertisement But the new tax bill, which is being considered in the Senate after Exempting taxes on tips, overtime pay, and Social Security benefits through 2028 will require complex new rules. For example, the Internal Revenue Service will have to determine what occupations are eligible to prevent abuse of the new break. The bill also restores, with several restrictions, the deduction for auto loan interest through 2028, another 2024 Trump campaign promise, that was axed in the name of simplification in the 1986 law. And the legislation raises the cap on the state and local tax deduction to $40,000 from the $10,000 limit put in place in the 2017 law. Representative Don Beyer, a Virginia Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, said the 2017 tax simplification efforts were spearheaded by the panel's Republican chair at the time, Kevin Brady of Texas, who has since retired. 'I've not heard that phrase used this year,' Beyer said. He argued that making the tax code more complicated will drive more business to professional tax preparers and aligns with Republican opposition to the Direct File has proven popular, with Advertisement 'Simplification does not help out billionaires, and this bill is designed to help billionaires,' said Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat. 'Billionaires have very complex financial arrangements, and they can slip through carefully lawyered loopholes.' 'Each one entails fiscal costs, adds complexity, opens new avenues for tax avoidance, and delivers little in the way of long-term growth,' he wrote in a May 14 Cato blog post titled, He's not the only critic of the bill's added complexity. 'It gets an F for tax simplification, base-broadening, and personal rate schedule. It also adds dozens of narrow, special-interest provisions, which is the opposite of what tax reform should do,' Veronique de Rugy, a senior research fellow at George Mason University's Mercatus Center, wrote in William McBride, chief economist at the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan, center-right think tank, said simplification 'just wasn't a priority this time around,' particularly because House Republicans have a much smaller majority than they did in 2017. The bill eliminates some clean energy tax credits put in place during the Biden administration, but those were axed for political reasons, not to increase simplicity, he said. 'You might say 2017 was really the aberration and we're returning to a more normal situation in which you've just got political horse trading and all the the oddball policies that creep in in the middle of the night to satisfy this or that member,' he said. The increase in the state and local tax deduction, for example, was inserted to win the crucial votes of several moderate Republicans from competitive districts in high-tax New York and New Jersey. Advertisement Representative Tom McClintock, a conservative California Republican, acknowledged the need to limit Republican defections with unified Democratic opposition and fulfill Trump's campaign promises made the tax bill more complicated than he would have preferred. 'I think the ideal approach is a broad-based flat tax,' McClintock said. 'But as [Winston] Churchill once said, 'Democracy is the occasional necessity of deferring to the opinions of others.'' Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store