
Tesla Faces Stiff Competition By The Rise Of Chinese Auto, Tech Giants
Austin:
Chinese electric-vehicle makers led by BYD beat Tesla in the competition to produce affordable electric vehicles. Now, many of those same fierce competitors are pulling into the passing lane in the global race to produce self-driving cars.
BYD shook up China's smart-EV industry earlier this year by offering its "God's Eye" driver-assistance package for free, undercutting the technology Tesla sells for nearly $9,000 in China.
"With God's Eye, Tesla's strategy starts to fall apart," said Shenzhen-based BYD investor Taylor Ogan, an American who has owned several Teslas and driven BYD cars with God's Eye, which he called more capable than Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" (FSD).
It's not just BYD. Other Chinese auto and tech companies are offering affordable EVs with FSD-like technology for a relative pittance. China's Leapmotor and Xpeng, for instance, offer systems capable of highway and urban driving in $20,000 vehicles. A slew of Chinese firms are chasing the same technology, an industry push backed by China's government.
BYD's assisted-driving hardware costs are far lower than Tesla's, according to analyses performed for Reuters by companies that dismantle and analyze vehicles for automakers. The comparisons, which have not been previously reported, show that BYD's costs to procure components and build a system with radar and lidar are about the same as Tesla's FSD, which doesn't have such sensors. That undercuts Tesla's unusual technological approach, which aims to save costs by nixing such sensors and relying solely on cameras and artificial intelligence.
The rising competition from Chinese smart-EV players is among the chief problems confronting Tesla CEO Elon Musk after his rocky tenure as a Trump administration advisor as he refocuses on his business empire - as Tesla vehicle sales are tanking globally. The stakes are made higher by a moment-of-truth challenge this month in Tesla's home base of Austin, Texas, where it plans to launch a robotaxi trial with 10 or 20 vehicles after a decade of Musk's unfulfilled promises to deliver self-driving Teslas.
Tesla did not respond when reached for comment about its Chinese competitors. Previously, Musk has described Chinese car companies as the most competitive in the world.
Chinese competition was one factor driving Tesla's strategic pivot away from mass-market EVs last year, when Reuters reported it had killed plans to build an all-new EV expected to cost $25,000. Musk has since staked Tesla's future instead on self-driving robotaxis, the hopes for which now underpin the vast majority of the automaker's stock-market value of roughly $1 trillion.
Now Tesla faces the same stiff competition on vehicle autonomy from many of the same Chinese automakers who undercut its affordable-EV plans. Adding to the challenge are tech firms including Chinese smartphone giant Huawei, which supplies autonomous-driving technology to major Chinese automakers. Short of full autonomy, today's driver-assistance systems offer a critical competitive edge in China, the world's largest car market, where Tesla sales are falling amid a protracted price war among scores of homegrown EV brands.
Tesla is further handicapped by China's regulations preventing it from using data collected by Tesla cars in China to train the artificial intelligence underpinning FSD. Tesla has been negotiating with Chinese officials, so far without success, to get permission to transfer such data back to the United States for analysis.
Tesla's competitors in China do benefit from subsidies and other forms of policy support from Beijing for advanced assisted driving technology. Their advantages also stem from another consequential factor: cut-throat smart-EV competition that has characterized their industry over the past decade. The resulting EV boom created economies of scale and the industry's tendency to forgo some profit margins to expand new technologies' market penetration quickly, leading to lower manufacturing costs.
STREETS OF SHENZHEN
BYD investor Ogan, of Shenzhen-based Snow Bull Capital, has a front-row seat to China's autonomous-tech battleground. He recently drove several BYD models equipped with God's Eye, he said, and didn't have to take over driving in any of them while traveling the congested streets of Shenzhen, a bustling southern China megalopolis of 18 million people.
Another notable smart-EV player in China is Huawei, experts say.
Huawei lends its technology and branding to a half dozen automakers including heavyweights Chery, SAIC and Changan, and has lower-profile partnerships with more than a dozen other carmakers, Huawei representatives said.
Reuters journalists rode in an Aito M9 - a luxury electric SUV from Seres with Huawei driver-assistance technology - as it navigated Shenzhen roadways in April. With a driver's hands off the wheel, the vehicle exited a highway seamlessly into a congested urban zone, where the M9 proceeded cautiously and slowed to a crawl as a construction worker appeared like he might walk into the roadway. At one point the vehicle turned right and slowly drifted left to avoid two men unloading boxes from a parked truck. The vehicle then parallel parked itself at Huawei's Shenzhen headquarters.
Huawei was among several Chinese companies, including automakers Zeekr, Changan and Xpeng, that touted progress towards fully-autonomous cars at April's Shanghai auto show, even as Beijing announced a new marketing crackdown on terms such as "smart" and "intelligent" driving in the wake of a deadly crash in a Xiaomi vehicle involving driver-assistance technology.
Huawei said it's ready to undergo a new validation regime being developed by Chinese regulators to certify so-called Level 3 driving systems, meaning they are capable enough to allow drivers to look away unless notified by the system to take over. Zeekr, a luxury brand of China auto giant Geely, also plans to soon sell cars with Level 3 systems.
Tesla has yet to release such an "unsupervised" version of FSD because its technology needs more training to operate without a driver's hands on the wheel and eyes on the road.
Tesla plans to launch self-driving robotaxis in Austin this month. Little is known about its plans. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 fare-collecting driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of the city, which Tesla has not publicly identified.
'GOD'S EYE' ON THE CHEAP
Chinese EV makers are moving quickly to develop driver-assistance systems in a market where car-buyers are demanding them at a faster pace than in other regions, analysts say. Their ability to do so at lower costs poses the biggest threat to Tesla's new autonomy-based business model.
BYD buyers can get an FSD-comparable version of God's Eye as a standard feature in cars priced at about $30,000. The cheapest FSD-equipped Tesla in China is a Model 3 selling for about $41,500.
According to an analysis by A2MAC1, a Paris-based tear-down firm that benchmarks components, the mid-level God's Eye version most comparable to Tesla's FSD runs on an Nvidia computing chip with data collected through 12 cameras, five radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and one lidar sensor, at a cost of $2,105. That compares to $2,360 for Tesla's FSD, which uses cameras without sensors and two AI chips, the firm estimates.
Cameras, radar and ultrasonic sensors are 40% cheaper in China than comparable devices in Europe and the United States, A2MAC1 estimates. Lidar sensors cost about 20% less, the firm says. Sensor costs have fallen because China's EV boom created economies of scale, said A2MAC1 engineer Elena Zhelondz. The fierce competition also pushed carmakers and suppliers to accept lower profits on driver-assistance equipment, she said.
BYD's 22% gross margin will likely fall as it gives away God's Eye but it will benefit from a vehicle-sales boost, said Chris McNally, head of global automotive and mobility research for advisory firm Evercore.
MORE CARS, MORE MILES, BETTER AI
Falling behind the Chinese brands on driver-assistance technology would compound Tesla's challenges in China, where it's already losing market share to rivals including BYD, which sells an entry-level EV for less than $10,000. The growing scale of BYD and others could also provide a technological advantage: Racking up more miles on China roads helps train the AI technology needed to perfect automated-driving systems.
BYD has a "clear and ongoing market-share driving advantage" over Tesla in gathering such on-road data to refine God's Eye, Evercore's McNally said, adding that advantage might only increase as offering God's Eye for free helps sell more BYD vehicles.
BYD's scale also helps lower costs by providing uncommon leverage over suppliers. In November, a BYD executive in charge of passenger-vehicle operations wrote to suppliers telling them that the automaker sold 4.2 million vehicles last year (more than double the number of Teslas sold) because of "technical innovation, economies of scale, and a low-cost supply chain."
The executive noted the new year would likely bring more growth, but also fiercer competition. Without specifically mentioning God's Eye, he ended the letter by asking the suppliers for an across-the-board 10% price cut on all parts and systems starting on January 1, calling the new year a final "knockout round."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Lumpsum vs SIP: Is caution killing the case for lumpsum?
Mutual fund SIP inflows hit record highs in May amid market rally. Investors are cautious about lumpsum investments due to geopolitical tensions and slowdown fears. Vishal Dhawan suggests hybrid equity funds for lumpsum investments. Equity mutual fund inflows dropped, while hybrid funds saw increased interest. Overall mutual fund inflows decreased, but total assets under management grew. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads With mutual fund SIP inflows reaching record highs in May amid a market rally, a key question arises: Why are investors moving away from lumpsum investments? An expert explains that geopolitical tensions, trade concerns, and fears of a global slowdown—along with muted earnings and valuation worries—have made investors more cautious about lumpsum investing.'A combination of geopolitical uncertainty, trade wars, and fears of a global slowdown have made investors less confident about investing in lumpsums and more inclined towards SIPs in the current environment. Additionally, the slowdown in corporate earnings and concerns over the valuations of mid- and small-cap stocks are pushing investors to prefer SIPs as their investment strategy,' said Vishal Dhawan, CEO of Plan Ahead Wealth Advisors, a Mumbai-based wealth management firm, in a conversation with May, mutual fund SIP inflows rose marginally by 0.21% to Rs 26,688 crore, compared to Rs 26,632 crore in April. On a yearly basis, SIP inflows have surged nearly 28% from Rs 20,904 crore in May the current financial year so far, total SIP contributions by investors stand at approximately Rs 53,320 crore. For the calendar year to date, total SIP contributions have reached nearly Rs 1.31 lakh crore, up from Rs 98,571 crore during the same period last benchmark indices—Nifty50 and BSE Sensex—are down about 4% from their 52-week highs. With markets hovering near record levels, is the fear of buying at the peak discouraging lumpsum investments?Addressing the trend, Dhawan noted that investors often anchor to index highs, and their past experience of corrections from those levels tends to impact their willingness to invest in to the latest monthly data from the Association of Mutual Funds in India ( AMFI ), equity mutual funds witnessed a 22% drop in monthly inflows, receiving Rs 19,013 crore in May compared to Rs 24,269 crore in mutual funds saw an outflow of Rs 15,908 crore in May, a sharp reversal from the inflow of Rs 2.19 lakh crore in April. Meanwhile, hybrid mutual funds attracted higher inflows than equity mutual funds in May, with inflows rising 46% to Rs 20,765 crore from Rs 14,247 crore in funds saw a steep 73% decline in monthly inflows, receiving Rs 5,525 crore in May compared to Rs 20,229 crore in April. Different mutual fund categories showed mixed trends, with some attracting investor interest while others witnessed a advises that investors can still consider lumpsum investments in the current environment through hybrid equity funds, multi-asset funds, balanced advantage funds, and equity savings mutual fund inflows dropped by 89% in May. However, total assets under management (AUM) grew 3%, rising to Rs 71.93 lakh crore in May from Rs 69.73 lakh crore in April.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
43 minutes ago
- Business Standard
No disruption in operations due to rare earth supply crisis: Maruti
Automaker says situation is 'uncertain and evolving' amid report that it has made e-Vitara production cuts Deepak Patel New Delhi Maruti Suzuki India (MSIL) said on Thursday its operations are unaffected by the global rare earth magnet shortage, but added that the situation is 'uncertain and evolving'. The company said it is exploring multiple solutions to maintain continuity in operations and will notify stakeholders if any material impact arises. The clarification comes amid a Reuters report earlier this week stating that the country's largest carmaker has slashed production estimates for its upcoming electric SUV, the e-Vitara, by nearly two-thirds due to rare earth supply constraints. According to the report, MSIL has revised its production target for the e-Vitara from 26,000 units to just 8,200 units for the first half of FY26. The report, citing internal documents, attributed the change to 'supply constraints' of critical rare earth elements, particularly magnets used in electric powertrains. Despite the scale back, MSIL reportedly aims to meet its full-year target of 67,000 units by ramping up production in the second half of the financial year. 'Regarding the situation on rare earth, as of now there is no disruption in our operation due to this issue,' said a MSIL spokesperson, in a statement on Thursday. 'There is a lot of uncertainty and the situation is continuously evolving. We are monitoring the situation and pursuing multiple solutions to ensure continuity in our operations. If and when there is any material impact to our business, we will inform all stakeholders in line with regulatory requirements,' the spokesperson added. Rare earth magnets are a crucial component in electric vehicle (EV) motors and are also used in power steering systems, speakers, and other car components. Their shortage stems from China's decision in April to tighten export controls on key rare earth elements, including neodymium, dysprosium and terbium. These elements are essential in the production of permanent magnets used in EVs. According to the Federation of Automobile Dealers Associations (FADA), electric car sales in India reached 107,645 units in fiscal year 2024–25, up from 91,506 units in FY24, marking a 17.7 per cent year-over-year increase. China controls more than 90 per cent of the global rare earth magnet supply chain. China's new export rules require companies to obtain end-use certifications and licences, which has slowed shipments and created uncertainty for automakers worldwide. The disruption has raised alarm in India's automotive industry, especially among EV manufacturers who depend heavily on Chinese supplies. The Indian government is monitoring the situation. A delegation may soon travel to China to expedite clearances for shipments stuck due to regulatory bottlenecks. Additionally, the government is evaluating measures such as incentivising domestic rare earth magnet production and expanding recycling initiatives. The rare earth crunch comes at a time when Indian automakers are stepping up EV production to meet future emission targets and global demand.


Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Gold price today: MCX gold rate jumps above ₹98,000 as US inflation raises Fed rate cut hopes; US dollar rate in focus
Gold prices on MCX rose on Thursday, tracking gains in international bullion prices, as lower than expected US inflation data raised interest rate cut hopes. Escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East also increased safe-haven appeal for the yellow metal. MCX gold prices opened at ₹ 97,650 per 10 grams, up by ₹ 946, or 0.97%, as against its previous close of ₹ 96,704. Silver prices also opened higher at ₹ 1,05,850 per kg as compared with its previous close of ₹ 1,05,392. At 9:10 AM, MCX gold rate was up by 1.38%, or by ₹ 1,334, at ₹ 98,038 per 10 grams, while MCX silver rate was up by ₹ 843, or by 0.80%, at ₹ 1,06,235 per kg. In the international bullion market, gold prices rallied amid rising tensions in the Middle East and a weaker dollar. Softer-than-expected US inflation data boosted expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts, Reuters reported. Spot gold price rose 0.6% to $3,372.46 an ounce, while US gold futures gained 1.5% to $3,393. The US dollar index fell to a near two-month low, making greenback-priced bullion more attractive to overseas buyers. Additionally, the Indian rupee appreciated against the US dollar. The rupee opened 8 paise higher at 85.43 per USD a against its previous close of 85.51 per dollar. 'Gold remains well-supported in the near term. With inflation data (PPI) and jobless claims due later today, price action may remain volatile. However, sustained weakness in the dollar and elevated geopolitical risks suggest a bullish bias,' said Jigar Trivedi, Senior Research Analyst at Reliance Securities. Ajay Kedia, Director of Kedia Advisory also noted that the escalating tensions in the Middle East and increased Fed rate cut hopes due to soft US inflation have raised safe-haven appeal for gold. 'Technically, the gold-silver ratio has also risen after falling 15% in the past 50 days. This suggests buying in gold prices and the yellow metal may outperform silver prices in teh near term,' Kedia said. According to Jigar Trivedi, a break above $3,375 level in gold prices could pave the way for a test of $3,400 in the coming sessions. 'On MCX, gold rate may find support at ₹ 97,500 level, while resistance is seen at ₹ 98,400 level,' Trivedi said. Kedia believes MCX gold prices may face resistance at ₹ 98,880 level and find support at ₹ 96,640 level. 'For MCX silver prices, support is seen at ₹ 1,05,250 level, while resistance is placed at ₹ 1,07,840 level,' Kedia said.