5 Affordable Mountain Towns for Retirees in 2025
A quick search on Zillow or Redfin at famous mountain towns like Aspen or Breckenridge is enough to scare off all but the wealthiest retirees.
Discover More:
For You:
But if you love hiking and skiing, love lakes and rivers and historical downtowns, where can you find mountain life on a retiree's budget?
Average rent: $1,317
Average home price: $403,946
Less than an hour's drive from Salt Lake City, Ogden has everything you'd want in a mountain town.
Ogden offers easy access to Powder Mountain and Snowbasin ski resorts. Then there's the 13,000 acres of nearby lakes woven together by rivers, for endless fishing and paddling. Finally, the historic 25th Street features art, great dining, and entertainment.
Check Out:
Average rent: $1,650
Average home price: $327,006
Safe, walkable and surrounded by nature, Chattanooga fits the bill for many retirees.
'Chattanooga gives you incredible value, remaining under the radar which keeps home prices reasonable,' explains Joshua Eberly, owner of We Buy Homes Pinellas. 'Retirees can enjoy a high quality of life without sacrificing access to healthcare, dining, or outdoor activities.'
Average rent: $1,783
Average home price: $276,691
Known as the 'Little Switzerland of America,' Jim Thorpe offers the rare combination of historic charm, community and affordability.
'Jim Thorpe feels like something out of a storybook,' notes Austin Glanzer, real estate expert with 717HomeBuyers. 'You've got cobblestone streets, a thriving small business scene and endless outdoor activities including hiking, kayaking or just enjoying the changing seasons.'
Nestled in the Poconos Mountains, retirees can also enjoy plenty of nearby skiing, with access to both Philadelphia and New York City.
Average rent: $1,783
Average home price: $557,024
Woodland Park sits just 40 minutes from Colorado Springs — close enough for city access but far enough to feel remote. Real estate broker Andrew Fortune of Great Colorado Homes names Woodland Park as one of the best Colorado mountain towns right now.
'Many mountain towns in Colorado turn into expensive tourist cities with too many second homes for wealthy people. That drives prices so high that the towns have to subsidize housing to get locals to live there to work in the town,' Fortune explained. 'Woodland Park does not have that problem. It's charming and affordable, but not so far off the grid that you miss out on infrastructure.'
Average rent: $2,110
Average home price: $490,724
Set in the Blue Ridge Mountains, Boone features four seasons, endless outdoor activities and a walkable downtown. The Greenway Trail offers easy but scenic hikes for older seniors, while Grandfather Mountain provides more rigorous hiking.
'Boone strikes a rare balance,' observes George Shada, owner of G&R Investment Group. 'It's peaceful and quiet, yet culturally vibrant thanks to the university. Unlike many mountain towns, it hasn't been overrun by tourists or priced out everyday people. For retirees who want beauty, community and livability on a budget, Boone should be near the top of the list.'
Editor's note: Average rent and average home prices sourced from Zillow.
More From GOBankingRates
6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025
5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 5 Affordable Mountain Towns for Retirees in 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
2 key findings on Democrats' brand problem from the new CNN poll
There's new evidence that the Democratic Party's reputation is in a bad place. That doesn't mean the party is doomed, electorally speaking. There's plenty of reason to doubt that, given lots of history and its performance in the 2025 elections thus far — but it is a complicating factor for the party's path forward. And a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS provides insights into the party's problems. It's worth a breakdown. The poll, which was released Sunday, asked a battery of questions about how people view both parties. Perhaps most striking was that people were more likely to view the Republicans than Democrats as the party with strong leaders (40% to 16%) and even the 'party of change' (32% to 25%). Neither party won close to a majority in either category. But the former is notable because there is such a gulf between the two parties. And the latter is notable because the party that's out of power is usually viewed as the party of change. Not this time. So what can we read into these findings? The 'strong leaders' question might be the most troublesome finding for Democrats. Only about 1 in 6 Americans said Democrats have stronger leaders than Republicans. As remarkably, only 39% of Democrats said that. We've seen hints of this in previous polls. A March CNN poll found about 3 in 10 Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters couldn't name a single leader who best reflected the party's core values. An AP-NORC poll last month showed just 35% of Democrats said they were at least 'somewhat' optimistic about the future of their party, compared with 55% of Republicans for their party. This might not seem too surprising. We just said goodbye to a Democratic president (Joe Biden) who was a diminished figure even when he was still in office. And the Democratic nominee who replaced him (Kamala Harris) wasn't exactly viewed as the future of the party when she took over the ticket in the 2024 race — and then lost. But there was a time when Democrats were at a somewhat similar crossroads, and the numbers weren't as dismal. A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll asked the same question in 2006 — after John Kerry's unsuccessful emergence as Democrats' 2004 presidential candidate — and found a smaller 14-point advantage for Republicans. Back then, 63% of Democrats said their party had stronger leaders than Republicans — 24 points higher than today. One reason for the difference is that the 2025 and 2006 polls asked the question in a slightly different way, partly because one was conducted entirely by phone and the other mostly online. Today's poll gave people an explicit 'neither' option, which the 2006 poll didn't (though some people volunteered that option back then). Nearly half of Democrats in the new poll (48%) chose that option. That's still a remarkable finding. Combined with the 13% of Democrats who said Republicans have the stronger leaders, that's 6 in 10 Democrats this year who don't think their side has stronger leaders than a party led by a president whom a huge majority of them revile. The other notable finding is on which party is the 'party of change.' Americans chose Republicans, 32% to 25%. That's not a big gap, but it is counterintuitive given Republicans swept the House, Senate and White House last fall. Historically speaking, it's almost always the party that's out of power that's viewed as the party of change. Before the 2006 election, the same CNN-ORC poll mentioned above showed Democrats had a huge, 56% to 29% lead on this measure. Then, as now, Democrats didn't hold the presidency or either chamber of Congress. But the numbers are very different today. Not only do Democrats trail on this measure, but only a slight majority of Democrats themselves — 51% — say their party is the party of change. And only 18% of independents say that. It's likely this is, in part, about Democrats' failure to position themselves as change agents, but also about what President Donald Trump is doing — and about people not necessarily seeing 'change' as a good thing. However you feel about the changes Trump is making, there is no question he is pushing lots of them. You see that in his and the Department of Government Efficiency's rapid overhaul of the federal government and in Trump's historic efforts to expand executive power — in ways that are often being halted by the courts because they go too far, too fast. It's possible that people just see Trump changing lots of things, whether for good or ill in their opinions, so the 'party of change' mantle doesn't mean what it usually does. We already saw during the 2024 campaign that people's definitions of 'change' were somewhat jumbled by unusual circumstances — i.e., Harris replacing Biden, and a former president running as the challenger. But it's also pretty clear that Democrats have failed to make themselves into a viable and attractive alternative to the party in power. The new CNN poll also asked which party people viewed as the 'party that can get things done.' Republicans led on this by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, 36% to 19%. Only 49% of Democrats and 11% of independents picked the Democratic Party as the more formidable one. There's also, of course, Republicans' big edge on the 'strong leaders' question. None of this means Democrats are sunk in the 2026 elections — or anything close to it. History shows the party that doesn't hold the White House almost always wins midterm elections, in large part because they're viewed as a check on the president. Democrats and liberal candidates have also been doing well in special elections and other races held since the 2024 election. In other words, being not-Trump could be good enough to at least reclaim a very closely split House. But if the Democratic Party wants to run up the score in 2026 and really chart a path for the 2028 election, it has some real work to do on its branding.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
How have tariffs impacted fireworks prices?
Our nation's birthday is just about a month away, and the cost for a key element to the fun is now "up in the air." As Americans plan July Fourth festivities, WCCO wanted to know how tariffs have impacted fireworks prices. A rainbow of excitement adorns the shelves at Fireworks Nation in North Hudson, Wisconsin. "Every year the product gets better and better, and safer," said Anders Nelson, owner of Fireworks Nation. He says customers have asked him if the price of his fireworks has gone up amid President Trump's trade war with China. "We're not raising our prices at Fireworks Nation," he said confidently. "Some of our shipments were affected by the tariffs, and we definitely saw our costs are up this year. Shipping costs are up, but we're holding our prices." While their prices hold steady, other retailers might raise them, according to Julie Heckman. She's the executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Association. "(Price hikes) will depend on whether the retailer got their product here prior to the tariff hikes and if not, how much can they absorb versus what do they need to pass on to the consumer," said Heckman. She says consumer fireworks, the kind people buy at the store, already had a 5.3% tariff. It jumped to 20% in early March as the trade war got started. By April 9, reciprocal tariffs were pushed as high as 145%. "It hit at the absolute worst time when all of our products are trying to get here from China for the Fourth of July," said Heckman. Nelson and other retailers typically order their fireworks from China a year in advance. They're produced in the fall and winter, then shipped in the months leading up to the next Fourth of July. "In our case, we had ships on the water, and so, of course, we had to take them in, so we did have some tariff charges or shipping charges. But all of the ones that had not been shipped, we put a halt on the orders," said Nelson. President Trump's 90-day pause on the tariffs was helpful, but Heckman said it kick-started other issues. "When the tariffs were reduced a couple of weeks ago to 30%, many of the importers said, 'Go ahead, put my containers on the water.' But the issue will be, will they get here in time for the Fourth of July?" said Heckman. Most of Nelson's current product arrived before the new tariffs hit, so he's not worried about the upcoming holiday. "We're a volume dealer. We are more than a year ahead in our purchasing, and so we've been building our inventories," said Nelson. There is industry-wide concern regarding 2026, when the U.S. celebrates its 250th birthday. "The demand is going to be very high, plus [Fourth of July] falls on a Saturday, a weekend," said Nelson. Fireworks production in China came to a halt during the height of the tariffs, said Heckman, including workers being laid off. Production resumed once the tariffs were paused, but the delay created a potential supply chain problem that lingers into next year. "We are very concerned about 2026 because we lost vital manufacturing production time," said Heckman. Given the uncertainty with the trade war and how tariffs could impact prices in the months ahead, Heckman advises people to shop early. "Don't be surprised if there are some shortages. Shelves are not going to be bare, but there might just be a certain item that you're used to getting that maybe that retailer doesn't have in stock this year," said Heckman. Nelson wants people to shop smart and seek the best prices. More importantly, he wants them to make sure they're being smart about how they use the fireworks. "When you come together and you have your party, just make certain that you're safe. Read the labels on the packages and have a great, fun, safe, and happy Fourth of July," said Nelson. Studies show that over 96% of all fireworks in the U.S. come from China. Last year, that amounted to $452 million in product. Heckman would like to see the fireworks industry get a special exemption from heightened tariffs, which she said is what happened during Mr. Trump's first term.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
North Dakota's historic sites will finally have toilets that flush
BISMARCK, N.D. — Lawrence Welk didn't have a flush toilet where he grew up, but visitors to his childhood home in rural North Dakota now do. The bandleader's childhood family home marks the latest step in the State Historical Society of North Dakota's nearly completed goal of installing flush toilets at its dozen most popular, staffed sites. The most recent success, with the final three planned to be completed soon, came before the unveiling of a statue of Welk at a site that draws fans who recall 'The Lawrence Welk Show,' which ran on TV for decades starting in the 1950s.
