
Table the expansion talk. The College Football Playoff should stay at 12 teams.
Nicole Auerbach and Joshua Perry unpack and share their thoughts on the latest controversial changes to the College Football Playoff seeding ahead of the 2025 season.
Another day, another college commissioners' meeting — and another conversation about potential College Football Playoff expansion that has ended without resolution. Or, as I like to put it, just your typical Wednesday in June.
'Pretty much everything's on the table and they're taking a good look at all of it,' CFP executive director Rich Clark told reporters in Asheville, N.C. 'So I wouldn't say there's a leading contender right now for them, but they're taking a fresh look at it.'
Round and round we go on a topic that never seems to go away completely. Even though there's an easy (if boring) solution: The CFP should stay as is — at 12 teams.
Now, I get why there's always at least one loud voice clamoring to expand the field. College football is a sport that has crowned its champion by polls and by computer algorithm. There's always been incredible interest in a playoff model, even when college football didn't have one. Then we got a four-team bracket, approved in 2012 and implemented in time for the 2014 season. Just one year into the 12-team era, commissioners now demand further expansion.
The Big Ten has pushed for a 16-team bracket with multiple automatic qualifiers (AQs) per league, with the Big Ten and SEC each nabbing four designated spots — the so-called 4-4-2-2-1 model, which grants them double the number of AQs of the ACC and Big 12 with one spot designated for the highest-ranked Group of 5 champion. The SEC stunned those in Big Ten circles with its coaches publicly pushing for a 5+11 model — one AQ per league and the Group of 5, with 11 at-large spots — at its spring meetings last month.
The SEC's interest in the 5+11 model aligns well with what's best for both the ACC and Big 12, two leagues that did not want to accept a model that essentially defined them as second-tier conferences.
The posturing and preening over the past month has left the sport in a messy spot. It's also uncharted territory, because any format changes made for the 2026-27 season do not require unanimity. Changes do require the Big Ten and SEC to agree on them, though, and the relationship between the two is in a far more tenuous place than it was six weeks ago. Multiple sources in the Big Ten have told NBC Sports that the conference will not support the 5+11 model if the SEC remains at eight conference games. (The Big Ten plays nine.)
As the CFP expansion debate stretches further into the doldrums of the summer, even the Big Ten's coaches are jumping into the fray.
https://x.com/NicoleAuerbach/status/1935104742679519328
It is quite possible that the current Big Ten-SEC standoff delays or stymies bracket expansion. Any format changes for the 2026-27 season need to be decided on and communicated to ESPN by Dec. 1.
But if the Big Ten and SEC can't come to an agreement on a specific 16-team format by that date, the expectation is that the Playoff would simply move forward in its current iteration — with 12 total teams, including five conference champions and seven at-large selections.
And, frankly, that is the best possible outcome.
The 12-team CFP worked out exceptionally well in its first year. More teams had access to the sport's premier postseason than ever before, which meant dozens of teams that previously would have been eliminated were still fighting for spots in the final weeks of the regular season. Increased access led to increased engagement by fans. First-round games on campus were as electric as we had hoped they would be. Even early round blowouts turned out to be a blessing in disguise, as they set up some great quarterfinal games and excellent, evenly matched semifinals.
Even with just one season's worth of data, it's clear that there aren't actually going to be 12 teams truly capable of winning a national title, that there are perhaps only six to eight built to get to the finish line. But it is obvious, too, that the very best teams in college football will fall within the 12 teams picked to participate year in and year out. Teams No. 13 or 14, on the wrong side of the cut line, were flawed teams that had lost to lesser opponents multiple times. The first team out of any field will always complain, but that exclusion felt far different from the Bowl Championship System era or even the four-team bracket days. In the past, we all worried that the best team in the country might not have a chance to play for a national championship. That's no longer a fear in a 12-team world, because the buffer is so wide.
The only real problem with Year 1 of the 12-team CFP era was the way its convoluted seeding system worked — and that issue got fixed this offseason. Straight seeding 1-12 means a balanced bracket, and it also means that the four best teams (per the selection committee) are the four teams that get first-round byes. That is how the system should work, and it will give us more competitive, evenly matched early-round games.
The 12-team format worked well, and it's going to work even better with straight seeding. But this sport's leaders are impatient; they started discussing expanding beyond 12 teams before a single CFP game was played last winter. They assume bigger is better just because. Their bloated leagues need more access points, so they like the idea of 16 more than they do 12, even if the status quo is a pretty great solution to the problems that have ailed college football. The current format is fundamentally fair, and it will help the sport continue to evolve from its regional roots to its status as a national behemoth.
Ultimately, the Big Ten and SEC will surely figure out a way to work together again. The current standstill may just be a momentary (fortuitous?) blip. But while we're here and while we're paused, I hope the sport's leaders take a second to look around. The grass isn't always greener someplace else. Sometimes, it's best to stay put.
Lawrence Jackson Jr. discusses recent comments made by Jaguars general manager James Gladstone about Travis Hunter, sharing why the 22-year-old rookie will likely be a productive fantasy football wide receiver in 2025.
Dan Le Batard and the Shipping Container lay out some of the further-reaching effects of NIL at the college sports level, examining how youth sports can be affected and players risk being turned into 'commodities'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Clemson football stacks up vs returning QBs from LaNorris Sellers to Garrett Nussmeier
CLEMSON — Clemson football isn't the only team returning an experienced quarterback with NFL draft aspirations. Most of the Tigers' 2025 opponents will have new starting quarterbacks like Syracuse, Boston College, North Carolina, Florida State and Louisville. All lost their 2024 starter because of the transfer portal or expiring eligibility. Advertisement Still, Clemson has four critical games against potential College Football Playoff teams that are returning their starting quarterbacks: LSU, Georgia Tech, SMU and South Carolina. These four games could make or break Clemson's season. While Cade Klubnik prepares for his final season with Clemson, let's look at how these four of quarterbacks stack up entering the 2025 season. Garrett Nussmeier, LSU eye statement win in season opener vs Clemson This game on Aug. 30 (7:30 p.m. ET, ABC) will be a rematch of the 2020 national championship game, which LSU won 42-25 behind quarterback Joe Burrow throwing for 463 yards for five touchdowns. Advertisement Garrett Nussmeier, who was fifth in passing yards (4,052) and tied for 10th in passing touchdowns (29) last season, opted to return for his senior year in hopes of taking a leap in his second full season as a starter like former LSU quarterbacks Burrow and Jayden Daniels did. Nussmeier is a true pocket passer who lacks mobility but possesses a powerful arm with a strong supporting cast around him. He has the second-best odds to win the Heisman Trophy, behind Texas' Arch Manning and just ahead of Klubnik, who is third, according to DraftKings Sportsbook. They could be first-round selections in the NFL draft next year. LSU has missed the CFP for five straight seasons, and it has not won a season-opening game since 2019. It eyes a win against Clemson at Memorial Stadium in one of the marquee games of Week 1 to set up its path back to the CFP. Haynes King, Georgia Tech hope to make tremendous leap in 2025 Like Klubnik, Haynes King enters his third full season as a starter for Georgia Tech. King threw 14 touchdowns last year, 13 less than 2023, but he cut his interceptions from a conference-leading 16 to two, and his sacks dwindled from 15 to six. Advertisement The dual-threat quarterback improved his competition percentage to 72.9% and led ACC quarterbacks in rushing touchdowns with 11 despite missing two games with a shoulder injury. The Yellow Jackets had a 7-4 record, losing three one-possession games, when King played and can build on that in coach Brent Key's third season. Georgia Tech begins the season away against Colorado, which loses Heisman Trophy winner Travis Hunter and quarterback Shedeur Sanders, then hosts Gardner-Webb, an FCS program. It can enter its first conference home game against Clemson on Sept. 13 (noon ET, ABC or ESPN) undefeated with King feeling confident, and Georgia Tech looking to send a message to the ACC. MORE: House settlement approves revenue sharing. Here's how Clemson will pay players Kevin Jennings, SMU looking for revenge in second season in ACC Kevin Jennings returns to SMU for his first full season as a starter hoping to build on his impactful 2024. He helped the Mustangs to an 11-3 record, which earned them their first ACC championship and CFP appearances. Advertisement Jennings replaced Preston Stone as the team's starter after SMU's Week 2 loss to BYU. He threw for 3,245 yards with 23 touchdowns and 11 interceptions and rushed for 354 yards and five touchdowns as a third-year player. The dual-threat quarterback faced Clemson last year in the ACC championship, throwing for 304 yards and scoring four touchdowns. He also battled Tigers new defensive coordinator Tom Allen's defense when he was with Penn State in the CFP, and the Nittany Lions shut down Jennings. He had his worst game of the season, throwing for 195 yards for one touchdown and three interceptions. Jennings will be without SMU's top running back, Brashard Smith, and its most productive pass catcher, Roderick Daniels Jr., as both players' eligibility expired. Offensive coordinator Casey Woods remained with SMU, so Jennings will have familiarity with the scheme but will have to get acclimated to new contributors before facing Clemson on Oct. 18 at Memorial Stadium. Can Clemson stop South Carolina's LaNorris Sellers? It didn't last season Clemson could not slow down LaNorris Sellers, who rushed for 166 yards for two touchdowns last year, including a go-ahead 20-yard score with 1:08 left. It sacked him three times, but he forced 18 missed tackles, the most Pro Football Focus has ever recorded for a quarterback since it started tracking college players in 2014. Advertisement Sellers, 6-foot-3 and 242 pounds, is an elusive player whose strong frame allows him to withstand potential tackles and turn them into game-breaking plays. In his first full season as a starter, he threw for 2,534 yards, 18 touchdowns and seven interceptions and rushed for 674 yards and seven touchdowns. Sellers helped South Carolina to a 9-4 record, its best finish under coach Shane Beamer and most wins since 2017. The dual-threat quarterback returns for his third season with the seventh-best odds to win the Heisman Trophy. If Sellers improves his passing, not only could he improve his NFL draft stock but he can help the Gamecocks beat Clemson on Nov. 29 (noon ET, ABC or ESPN) for the second straight time in the Palmetto Bowl for the first time since 2012 and 2013. Derrian Carter covers Clemson athletics for The Greenville News and the USA TODAY Network. Email him at dcarter@ and follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter, @DerrianCarter00 This article originally appeared on Greenville News: Clemson football schedule 2025: Tigers' outlook vs returning QBs
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Clemson football became a popular 2025 CFP pick, even if Dabo Swinney might not agree
CLEMSON — Clemson football coach Dabo Swinney said he doesn't understand the praise his team is receiving entering the 2025 season. The Tigers are coming off their first ACC championship win since 2022 and first CFP appearance since 2020. They are a popular pick to repeat as conference champions and to achieve more. Advertisement Clemson has the eighth-best chance to win the national championship, according to ESPN's Football Power Index and DraftKings Sportsbook. It also has a Heisman trophy candidate with quarterback Cade Klubnik. But to Swinney, Clemson is nearly the same team as last year. So, when ESPN's Rece Davis mentioned the Tigers could be ranked No. 1 in preseason polls, Swinney was astonished. "We got the same team we had last year, so how are we preseason (No. 1)? What happened?" Swinney said during his sit-down interview with Davis and North Carolina coach Bill Belichick. Well, a combination of factors from development and retention of homegrown players to Swinney using the transfer portal to the addition of a new defensive coordinator has Clemson viewed as a team to be a national contender. Advertisement Here's how each has made Clemson a hot commodity in 2025. Dabo Swinney's retention of top players has Clemson in prime position Swinney touts that Clemson doesn't lose many players to the portal, and it delivered again this offseason. In the winter, they lost five players to the portal, the second fewest for a Power 4 program, and lost one in the spring. Each player who departed was not a starter. MORE: How Clemson football stacks up vs returning QBs from LaNorris Sellers to Garrett Nussmeier According to ESPN's Bill Connelly, Clemson returns the most production than any other team in Division I (80%). Klubnik was among players who returned for another season, along with top wide receiver Antonio Williams, offensive tackles Blake Miller and Tristan Leigh and linebacker Wade Woodaz. Advertisement Clemson also retained star contributors like defensive tackle Peter Woods, defensive end T.J. Parker, cornerback Avieon Terrell, linebacker Sammy Brown and wide receivers Bryant Wesco Jr. and T.J. Moore. Clemson keeping key starters out of the portal is a testament to the culture Swinney created. It also retained third-year offensive coordinator Garrett Riley. Its experienced roster with a veteran quarterback and familiar coaches is among reasons why it is valued as a premier team. Dabo Swinney lands largest transfer portal class in Clemson history Clemson added three transfer players in the winter cycle: wide receiver Tristan Smith, defensive end Will Heldt and linebacker Jeremiah Alexander. These additions are more than what they have taken in the previous six years of the portal's existence (two). Advertisement "The crazy thing is we signed a portal guy three out of the last four years," Swinney said in February. "As I always said, we do what's best for Clemson, and I've always said we'll use the portal whenever we need it, and we'll be strategic with it." Swinney was criticized for his lack of portal use last season as the Tigers were one of four FBS schools (Navy, Army, Air Force) to not add a transfer. Their inability to add a transfer, despite pursuing four offensive linemen in the offseason, came after they missed the CFP for a third straight season after making it from 2015-20. Clemson made the playoffs last year despite not adding a transfer but immersed itself in the portal after roster spots came available. Smith, 6-foot-5, will add depth behind Williams, Wesco and Moore. Heldt is expected to play opposite of Parker on the defensive line to add another pass-rushing threat. Alexander will back up Woodaz and Brown and could be featured in Clemson's heavy personnel. All three position groups suffered significant injuries last season. With these transfer additions, Clemson will have considerable depth if it suffers injuries in 2025. Tom Allen may have be missing piece for Clemson football Clemson's offense thrived last season, but its defense struggled. Clemson was 50th in the nation in scoring defense (23.4 points) and 69th in total defense (374.1 yards) last season under Wes Goodwin. Its biggest flaw was the run defense, allowing 160.6 yards per game (84th). Advertisement As a result, Swinney hired former Penn State defensive coordinator Tom Allen in January. The Nittany Lions were No. 8 in scoring defense (16.5 points), No. 7 in total defense (294.8 yards) and No. 9 against the run (101.9 yards) last year under Allen. He was a semifinalist for the 2024 Broyles Award, given to the nation's top assistant, and Swinney's fifth straight external hire. Allen is Swinney's highest-paid assistant and carries intensity, personality and defensive prowess similar to former Clemson defensive coordinator Brent Venables. Allen said in the spring there is a difference between joining Penn State, a team that was top three in scoring and total defense when he arrived in 2024, to joining Clemson. Still, Allen believes Clemson's defense is talented and experienced enough to be better in 2025. If its defense improves, it will be a key reason for it competing for the national championship. Derrian Carter covers Clemson athletics for The Greenville News and the USA TODAY Network. Email him at dcarter@ and follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter, @DerrianCarter00 This article originally appeared on Greenville News: Why Dabo Swinney doesn't agree with 2025 Clemson football predictions
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Clemson football, Dabo Swinney dismiss 2025 signee Marquise Henderson from program
CLEMSON — Clemson football has dismissed 2025 signee Marquise Henderson from the program. In a statement on June 19, a team spokesperson said "Clemson has made the decision to dismiss Marquise Henderson from its program. We wish him the best as he moves forward." Advertisement Henderson is expected to enter the transfer portal. Henderson committed to Clemson on Dec. 11, 2023, over Arizona, Boston College, Cincinnati, Georgia Tech, NC State, Vanderbilt, Virginia and Virginia Tech. He was a four-star athlete and the No. 4 player in South Carolina, according to the 247Sports Composite rankings. In his senior season at Belton-Honea Path, he rushed for 2,122 yards with 26 touchdowns to make first-team All-Upstate. Henderson was a mid-year enrollee, showing up on campus during Clemson's College Football Playoff preparations. Clemson coach Dabo Swinney planned for him to start on offense as he was expected to wear No. 3, and defensive end T.J. Parker wears No. 3 on defense. Advertisement Henderson missed most of spring practice with a hamstring injury. Derrian Carter covers Clemson athletics for The Greenville News and the USA TODAY Network. Email him at dcarter@ and follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter, @DerrianCarter00 This article originally appeared on Greenville News: Clemson football dismisses 2025 signee Marquise Henderson from program