Davidson County families impacted after food pantry loses federal funding
LEXINGTON, N.C. (WGHP) — The United States Department of Agriculture cut more than$11 million in funding to North Carolina food banks. It's a decision that's trickled down to local pantries.
One of those pantries is West Davidson Food Pantry In Lexington.
'We have already noticed that our funding has changed through Second Harv … We have been getting 55, 56 boxes per month. Now has dropped to 28 boxes,' Davidson Food Pantry Executive Director Wendy Marion said.
The West Davidson Food Pantry serves 1,190 clients every month. Its food supply from Second Harvest Food Bank has been cut nearly in half for the next month.
On top of that, they just learned they won't be receiving the usual $15,000 grant from the state, which is funding that has been crucial for keeping food on the shelves.
'That's going to hit us hard there,' Marion said.
The pantry has already helped more than 4,000 clients this year, and donations haven't kept up with demand.
The food pantry is unsure how they'll keep up with the need.
'We did not get an abundance this year of donations, and that has hurt us in just preparing for our future. We are … working with the community for donations and our churches, but I am worried about our clients and our elderly clients coming in, and we also serve the three elementary schools,' Marion said.
One of the people who relies on this pantry is Leonard Hodson.
'We got custody of six grandkids … We got a full house, and my stepson moved down here from Indiana to help us out. Trying to feed these kids. It's crazy,' Hodson said.
While he receives help, he also gives back by donating dozens of eggs from his own chickens.
'We bring them 16 to 24 dozen eggs every month because they need them all,' Hodson said.
Hodson said he and his wife hope others will give what they can to help the food pantry survive.
The N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services was notified by the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service via email on March 7 of the termination of the agreement for the Local Food Purchase Assistance 2025 Cooperative Agreement effective 60 days from the March 7 date.
The funds of $11.4 million were to be utilized over the next three years.
The state had not yet received or distributed any funds associated with this when this decision was made.
'We are always striving to create opportunities for North Carolina products across the state,' Agriculture Commissioner Steve Troxler said. 'We are disappointed with this decision, and we will be discussing it with the appropriate people to see if there is a way to continue providing opportunities to communities with local foods and support farmers.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
9 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Indian Prairie School District 204 to increase breakfast and lunch prices
Students and families buying breakfast or lunch at Indian Prairie School District 204 schools can expect to see a higher price tag for meals next year, after the school board recently approved the district's request to increase prices across the board by 25 cents per meal. Previously, lunch was set at $3.30 for elementary school students, $3.40 for middle school students and $3.45 for high schoolers, per the district's website. Breakfast was priced at $2.25 for all students. The district also offers free breakfast and lunch to eligible students, and reduced rates of 30 cents for breakfast and 40 cents for lunch for students who qualify. Next school year, lunch will cost $3.55 for elementary school students, $3.65 for middle school students and $3.70 for high school students paying full price for meals, according to a memo from the district's Director of Support Operations Ron Johnson to the school board that was included in Monday's meeting agenda. Breakfast next school year will cost $2.50 for those paying full price. The following school year, prices will increase by another 25 cents for lunch, while breakfast prices will remain at $2.50, per the memo. The meal price increases were approved unanimously by the district's school board at the meeting on Monday evening as part of the consent agenda. According to the district's memo, the increase is required for compliance with the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, passed by Congress in 2010. The district says that legislation requires that they ensure there are sufficient funds provided to the nonprofit school food service account to serve lunches for students who are not eligible for free or reduced price meals. Reimbursements for free and reduced price meals cannot subsidize the cost of paid lunches, the district noted. The 'true cost' of providing lunch to district students, a memo from Johnson to the board states, is actually $6.14, but the cost to break even is around $5.36 when factoring in the revenue generated by paid student meals and a la carte items as well as federal reimbursements from the United States Department of Agriculture. According to Johnson's memo, the district is currently paying its food service provider, OrganicLife, about $4.41 per lunch served and about $2.31 for breakfast.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
CHARLEBOIS: Where's the beef? Priced out of the Canadian grill
With summer weather finally settling in, Canadians are returning to a familiar ritual — firing up the barbecue. But as they approach the meat counter in search of steaks and burgers, many are encountering a far less familiar reality: Shockingly high prices. This year, the meat aisle has become a case study in supply-side economics and market dysfunction. Since January, according to Statistics Canada, beef prices have surged at an alarming pace. Striploin is up 34.2%, top sirloin 33.7%, and rib cuts nearly 12%. Pork rib cuts and chicken breasts have each risen 5.9%, and even meatless burger patties are 6.8% more expensive. While all proteins in the so-called 'meat trifecta' have climbed, beef leads the charge — by a wide margin. Behind these increases lies a sobering trend. Canada's beef cow inventory has dropped to just 3.38 million head — the lowest since 1989. That's a 1.2% decrease from last year, signalling more than just cyclical decline. Many cattle producers are exiting the industry while prices are favourable, opting to reinvest in less volatile sectors or shift entirely to crop production. In short, the Canadian beef industry is retreating and becoming increasingly risk-averse. South of the border, the U.S. is seeing a similar trend — but far less severe. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, the American beef cow herd declined just 0.5% to 27.9 million head. And that gap shows up in retail prices. Over the past year, U.S. boneless sirloin steak rose just 5.7%, compared to a staggering 22% in Canada. Ground beef increased 10.8% in the U.S., but by 23% here at home. Beef inflation is simply hitting Canadians harder. KINSELLA: Complaint filed after Ontario farm accused of refusing to hire Israeli LILLEY: Draft trade deal with U.S. hammered out amid 'intensive discussions' GOLDSTEIN: Tax Freedom Day is June 8, when Canadians finally start working for themselves Other than a shrinking herd, there are several other contributing factors: Canada's expansive geography, higher transportation costs, a limited number of federally licensed beef processors, carbon pricing, and higher labour costs all compound the problem. Regulations and logistical inefficiencies are more burdensome in Canada, driving up prices for retailers — and ultimately consumers. But there's another possibility we can't afford to ignore: Potential collusion within the industry. In the United States, the federal government has shown little tolerance for anti-competitive behaviour in the meat sector. Under President Joe Biden, the White House launched a 2022 investigation into price fixing among major meat packers — JBS, Tyson Foods, Cargill, and National Beef. That investigation has since resulted in several high-profile settlements, including a US$83.5-million payout by JBS in February. The Canadian Competition Bureau, by contrast, has remained largely silent on similar concerns. Perhaps it's time for that to change. The consequences are already visible. According to industry researcher IBISWorld, Canadian per capita beef consumption fell by 7.1% in 2023 and another 2.1% in 2024. This is no longer just a matter of shifting dietary preferences — it's a structural shift in consumer behaviour. Beef is increasingly seen as a luxury item, with ground beef becoming the primary choice for budget-conscious households still committed to red meat. That's unfortunate. Beef remains one of the most natural, authentic and sustainable sources of protein available to Canadians. Canadian ranchers and processors have made significant strides in improving environmental stewardship and animal welfare, often without fanfare. As a whole, beef delivers exceptional nutritional value, supports rural economies, and offers a level of traceability and food safety few protein alternatives can match. For many Canadian families, a summer steak on the grill is starting to feel more like a splurge than a staple. Consumers will continue to enjoy beef — but with moderation, and on occasions that justify the cost. Barbecue season hasn't disappeared. But for many, it's starting to look a little different: More sausages, more chicken, and less striploin. A shame, really — for a product that offers so much more than just taste.
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
North Carolina farmers' drones impacted by tariffs
(WGHP) — The back-and-forth over tariffs between the US and China is creating tension for a variety of businesses. It's also impacting a key and growing technology that helps to put food on your table. That technology is a roughly 50-pound agricultural drone. 'Farmers are amazingly efficient. They're trying to figure out, 'How can I be more productive. How can I create more product to sell?'' NC Cooperative Extension Director for Caldwell County Seth Nagy said. Nagy teaches and helps other farmers use agricultural drones for everything from seeding to spraying herbicides and pesticides to getting a birds-eye view of every corner of a field, sometimes hundreds of acres wide. 'A lot of farmers have problems getting into fields when it's wet, and a lot of our chemicals on the crops, especially fungicide on beans and corn. It's time sensitive, so they need to do it when the time is right,' owner and CEO of Ag Drone Works Jim Adams said. Those drones are also agile, getting into steep pastures and hard-to-reach places and navigating tight corners with telephone lines and cell towers. But there's a problem. 'What really disturbs me more than anything else is the fact that we're not self-sufficient,' Adams said. The drones themselves and their parts are made almost entirely in China. Adams' company sells and helps farmers use the drones that he procures from Chinese companies. Tariff uncertainty makes his job harder. 'The price basically has doubled in the last 90 days. The lead time … doubled, too. More than doubled,' Adams said. Now, it takes two months to get a drone in. The supply chain at popular companies like DJI seems to Adams like they've come to a screeching halt. 'We're just not able to get product to furnish the farmers in what they need,' Adams said. Experts say that in the US, we have the knowledge to build them, but we need the capital investment. With almost 50 registered spray drones in North Carolina and growing, the tech is attracting a new generation of those innovative farmers that Nagy said are essential. 'I think we're able to bring some younger kids inm and I think some really neat value-added stuff,' Nagy said. And Adams says we need to figure things out fast. 'The general public needs to be aware that if we can use this technology effectively and efficiently, it will really help in curbing food prices,' Adams said. 'If not, we're going to continue to see a spiral upward.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.