Israel moves troops south, braces for Gaza escalation as political turmoil and protests grow
Report by Amal Shehadeh, English adaptation by Mariella Succar
The Israeli military has relocated units from the border areas with Lebanon and Syria to the south, increasing its deployment along the Gaza border and in the buffer zone.
Claiming that Hamas is planning a surprise attack similar to October 7, the Israeli army has intensified training and preparations for a ground incursion and targeted operations across different areas.
According to the military plan formulated by Eyal Zamir, a ground assault would take place at a later stage, contingent on Hamas's response to Tel Aviv's demand for a prisoner exchange deal without halting the war.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who previously vowed to negotiate a hostage deal "under fire," reinstated far-right Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir to the National Security Ministry less than 24 hours after the Gaza offensive began.
The opposition has criticized the move, arguing that the military escalation is politically motivated.
During a government meeting that approved Ben-Gvir's return to his post, Israeli ministers also reviewed a security report claiming that Hamas recruited and trained at least 20,000 new fighters during the past two months of relative calm, while also bolstering its military capabilities.
The report indicated that Hamas is preparing for intense clashes with the Israeli army, setting up ambushes in anticipated combat zones and planting a significant number of landmines.
Meanwhile, another report presented to the government highlighted a decline in army reservists, with many refusing to re-enlist in protest of the renewed Gaza offensive. Some of these reservists have joined the growing anti-war demonstrations across Israel, including a large protest in Jerusalem on Wednesday demanding an end to the war and the release of all hostages.
The escalation of public protests and calls for mass demonstrations has also resonated within Israel's military ranks. A military intelligence officer recently refused to serve in protest of government policies and the continuation of the war.
In a social media post, the officer stated that "defending the people means refusing to fight for a corrupt group of traitors," using a play on words to reference Netanyahu's name. His refusal led to his dismissal from the army, and more resignations are expected to follow.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Manar
18 minutes ago
- Al Manar
Hezbollah's Sheikh Qassem Denounces Israeli Criminal Aggression, Backs Iran's Right to Respond
In a strongly worded statement issued Saturday, Hezbollah's Secretary General Sheikh Naim Qassem denounced the 'criminal Israeli assault' on the Islamic Republic of Iran, affirming Washington is backing the attack. 'We vehemently condemn the Israeli aggression against Iran, fully supported by the US administration. This is a deliberate attempt to silence a voice that has consistently supported the Palestinian people in Gaza, the cause of Palestine and Jerusalem, and the resistance movements in Lebanon and the region.' Sheikh Qassem warned the strike would not go unanswered and asserted significant repercussions for regional stability. 'This aggression will have major consequences—it will not pass without retaliation and accountability. Iran remains a beacon of dignity and resistance and will continue to be a leading force in defending the oppressed across the region and the world.' His Eminence dismissed the notion that Israeli or US actions could alter Iran's strategic direction or influence its crucial role. 'Neither the Israeli enemy nor the United States will succeed in undermining the Islamic Republic's resolve or position. On the contrary, Iran will emerge stronger, and Israel will come to regret its brutality and recklessness,' Sheikh Qassem added. Hezbollah's Sheikh Qassem also offered condolences to Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei and the Iranian people over the reported martyrdom of senior military and scientific figures in the strike. 'We offer our condolences and congratulations to our leader and guardian, Imam Khamenei (may his shadow endure), and to the noble, steadfast Iranian people on the martyrdom of top commanders—Major General Mohammad Bagheri, Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, and Major General Hossein Salami, Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps—as well as their comrades and nuclear scientists. Their martyrdom will only reinforce Iran's strength and resolve.' Sheikh Qassem also reaffirmed its alignment with Tehran and its right to defend itself. 'Hezbollah, within its Islamic resistance and people, stands firmly with the Islamic Republic of Iran—its rights, its positions, and whatever steps it chooses to take in defense of itself. The criminal Israeli regime and its tyrannical backer, the United States, will reap nothing but disgrace and defeat,' Sheikh Qassem concluded.
Nahar Net
21 minutes ago
- Nahar Net
Israel's attack on Iran was years in the making. How did they get here?
by Naharnet Newsdesk 13 June 2025, 14:50 Israel's massive strike on Iran on Friday morning came after decades of mutual hostility and a long-running shadow war of covert strikes and sabotage. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long identified Iran as its greatest threat, citing the country's nuclear program, its hostile rhetoric and support for anti-Israel militant groups across the region. Iran has championed the Palestinian cause and portrayed Israel as a malicious Western encroachment on the Middle East. The latest escalation was set in motion by Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which sparked a crushing Israeli response and eventually drew in Iran's other allies, who were in turn crippled by successive waves of Israeli strikes, leaving Iran largely alone in facing Friday's onslaught. Here's a closer look: Why are Israel and Iran enemies? Following Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, the country's leadership immediately identified the U.S., Britain and Israel as its main enemies because of their ties to Iran's deposed monarch and the long history of Western colonialism and military interventions in the Middle East. Over the past two decades, Israel has repeatedly accused Iran of seeking nuclear weapons and is believed to have carried out numerous covert attacks on its nuclear program, including cyberattacks and the killing of Iranian nuclear scientists — while rarely acknowledging such operations. Iran insists its nuclear program is entirely peaceful, but the U.N. atomic watchdog agency has warned that Tehran has enough uranium enriched to near-weapons-grade levels to make "several" nuclear bombs if it chooses to. The International Atomic Energy Agency and Western nations assess Iran had an organized nuclear weapons program until 2003. Iran insists its program is peaceful while still enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. Israel sees a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential threat and had long aspired to breaking up Iran's regional network of allies — including Hamas, Lebanon's Hezbollah, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad, who was overthrown in December. "For decades, the tyrants of Tehran have brazenly, openly called for Israel's destruction," Netanyahu said Friday. "They backed up their genocidal rhetoric with a program to develop nuclear weapons." Iran's Axis of Resistance has been weakened Over the past four decades, Iran built up a network of militant proxy groups it called the " Axis of Resistance " that wielded significant power across the region in recent years but has suffered major setbacks since the Oct. 7 attack. Hamas' military capabilities have been decimated in more than 20 months of ongoing war that has also killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, destroyed much of the Gaza Strip, displaced around 90% of its population and raised fears of famine. Hezbollah traded strikes with Israel for nearly a year before Israel clobbered it with a sophisticated attack involving pagers and walkie-talkies, targeted strikes that killed most of its leaders and an air and ground campaign that devastated southern Lebanon. The weakening of Hezbollah contributed to the downfall of Assad, which paved the way for Israel to seize parts of southern Syria and carry out strikes that destroyed much of its military assets. Iran itself was weakened after two previous exchanges of fire with Israel, both linked to the war in Gaza. A wave of Israeli strikes last October destroyed missile sites and weakened Iran's air defenses. Why did Israel decide to strike now? Netanyahu said time was running out to strike Iran, alleging Iran had taken recent steps to weaponize enriched uranium. "If not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon within a very short time," he said. The United States and Israel have long vowed to take military action if necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, but President Donald Trump has been seeking a diplomatic solution after scrapping an earlier nuclear agreement with Iran during his first term. A sixth round of talks was scheduled in Oman on Sunday, but it was unclear if they would be held in the aftermath of the strikes. Israel has long been skeptical of such efforts, fearing they give Iran time to develop a weapon, and has said it would only accept an agreement in which Iran gives up its entire nuclear program — something Iran has vehemently ruled out. On Thursday, for the first time in 20 years, the board of governors at the IAEA censured Iran for not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site and swap out some centrifuges for more advanced ones. Trump said he had asked Netanyahu not to attack Iran while the negotiations are ongoing, but the president has provided unprecedented support to Israel over the years, and his administration has so far expressed no opposition to Friday's strikes.
Nahar Net
21 minutes ago
- Nahar Net
Israeli strikes on Iran test Trump's ability to deliver on 'America first' agenda
by Naharnet Newsdesk 13 June 2025, 15:00 Just hours before Israel launched strikes on Iran early Friday, President Donald Trump was still holding onto tattered threads of hope that a long-simmering dispute over Tehran's nuclear program could be resolved without military action. But with the Israeli military operation called "Rising Lion" now underway — something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says will go on for "as many days as it takes" — Trump will be tested anew on his ability to make good on a campaign promise to disentangle the U.S. from foreign conflicts. "I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal," Trump said in a Friday morning social media post. "I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done." The administration's first reaction to the Israeli assault came not from Trump, but from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is doubling as Trump's national security adviser. He sought to make clear that the U.S. was "not involved" and that the Republican administration's central concern was protecting U.S. forces in the region. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense," Rubio said in a statement. "President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel." As Israel stepped up planning for strikes in recent weeks, however, Iran, had signaled that the United States would be held responsible in the event of an Israeli attack. The warning was issued by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even as he engaged in talks with Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. On Thursday, just hours before the strikes, Trump made the case that there was still time for diplomacy — but it was running out. The White House had even planned to dispatch Witkoff to Oman on Sunday for the next round of talks with Araghchi. It wasn't immediately clear how the strikes would affect plans for those discussions. But Trump on Friday urged Iran to make a nuclear deal "before there is nothing left and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire." "No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE," Trump added. Trump is set to meet with his National Security Council in the Situation Room on Friday to discuss the tricky path ahead. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., offered rare words of Democratic praise for the Trump administration after the attack "for prioritizing diplomacy" and "refraining from participating" in the military strikes. But he also expressed deep concern about what the Israeli strikes could mean for U.S. personnel in the region. Iranian officials made clear that they intended to retaliate with decisive action after the Israeli strikes targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz and the country's ballistic missile program, as well as top nuclear scientists and officials. "I cannot understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike at this juncture, knowing high level diplomatic discussions between the United States and Iran are scheduled for this weekend," Kaine said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said the U.S. Senate "stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas." Trump in the hours before the attack still appeared hopeful that there would be more time for diplomacy. The president, in an exchange with reporters, again urged Iran to negotiate a deal. He warned that a "massive conflict" could occur in the Middle East without it. He later took to social media to emphasize that his "entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran." As long as there was a chance for an agreement, Trump said of Israel, "I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it." But it was clear to the administration that Israel was edging toward taking military action against Iran. The State Department on Wednesday directed a voluntary evacuation of nonessential personnel and their families from some U.S. diplomatic outposts in the Middle East. "I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning, and missiles are flying into their buildings. It's possible. So I had to do it," Trump explained. Before Israel launched the strikes, some of Trump's strongest supporters were raising concerns about what another expansive conflict in the Mideast could mean for the Republican president who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to either of those conflicts and to make good on two of his biggest foreign policy campaign promises. And after criticizing President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. The push by the Trump administration to persuade Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the "worst deal ever." The way forward is even more clouded now. "No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy," Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and an ally of the Trump White House, posted on X Thursday. "I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency." Jack Posobiec, another prominent Trump supporter, warned a "direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition." "Trump smartly ran against starting new wars, this is what the swing states voted for — the midterms are not far and Congress' majority is already razor-thin," Posobiec added in a posting on X. Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East program at Defense Priorities, said the job ahead for Trump and his team is to protect U.S. forces who are highly vulnerable to Iranian retaliation. "Israel's strike on Iran must not become the United States' war," Kelanic said. "The U.S. public overwhelmingly opposes another military engagement in the Middle East for good reason — an open-ended military campaign in Iran would risk repeating the catastrophic mistakes of the 2003 war in Iraq, which inadvertently strengthened Tehran's influence there."
