This CEO went from bagging groceries at Publix to founding a $3.4 billion cyber company—with little tech background
Despite lacking a ritzy degree or much background in tech, Gen Xer Brian Murphy built ReliaQuest into a billion-dollar firm off the heels of credit card debt and a dream. Now his company is now valued at $3.4 billion and headed down an IPO pathway. The secret? Recognizing failure is inevitable, he tells Fortune.
Brian Murphy couldn't have started his company at a worse time.
It was late 2007, and Murphy had just quit his cushy corporate accounting job with big plans to build out his own information technology firm called ReliaQuest. But the financial crisis had other ideas.
In a 40-day period, nearly all of his business disappeared into thin air, leaving him and his eight employees scratching their heads on how to stretch one single government sub-sub-contract focused on cybersecurity of overseas satellite terminals into a sustainable business.
And despite 'turmoil for nine years,' he didn't throw in the towel—he doubled down on his belief that a growing digital age would cause a cyber explosion.
'At some point, you're far enough away from shore. You've already burned the lifeboats that you know swimming back isn't really possible, so let's just keep moving forward,' Murphy tells Fortune.
Along the way, Murphy was forced to take out a second mortgage on his house, max out his credit cards, and eliminate his own salary.
But over a decade and a half since its founding, the company is now a leader in B2B cybersecurity operations with its flagship 'GreyMatter' software. ReliaQuest has over 1,200 employees across three continents, with top clients including multiple billion-dollar companies like Southwest Airlines, Circle K, and Tractor Supply Co. Earlier this year, a funding round valued ReliaQuest at $3.4 billion.
'It just shows you, sometimes luck is undefeated,' Murphy tells Fortune.
And while the 48-year-old may call it luck, others may call it hard work. The next stop? An IPO.
Like many people growing up in Florida, Murphy was first exposed to the world of business bagging groceries and pushing carts at his local Publix Supermarket (interestingly, Murphy's brother is now the CEO of Publix). The lessons he learned as a teenager are just as relevant today.
'It taught me the customer,' he says. 'And that idea that you don't point the customer to the ketchup aisle, you walk them over there, and you show them the five or six different kinds.'
But Murphy's sights were not always set on the tech industry. In fact, he studied accounting and finance at Florida State University before starting what he imagined would be a long career as an auditor. It wasn't until he was drawn into tech consulting and learned to program that he recognized the industry's potential.
Now, as a founder and CEO, the biggest challenge to overcome is accepting that failure is inevitable and pleasing everyone can be an impossible task.
'It doesn't matter how good you are or how much you work, or how diligent you are on 'the grind.' You're always failing someone,' Murphy says.
'It's the most out-of-balance journey—ever.'
For aspiring Gen Z entrepreneurs, he offers two pieces of advice: show up willing to work hard, and don't shy away from voicing your opinion.
'You're not always going to be right, but if you say nothing, you're always going to be wrong,' Murphy says. 'As you get older, you learn that sometimes the best thing to do is shut up, but when you're young, you want to stand up and talk as much as you can to get that experience.'
One of the things that sets ReliaQuest apart from its competitors in the cybersecurity space is that the company is based in Tampa, Florida, not in Silicon Valley.
According to Paul Shoukry, CEO of Raymond James Financial (a fellow Tampa-based company), ReliaQuest's emphasis on staying well-grounded in its community is what's helped find success. In fact, he goes so far to say that Murphy is a 'once in a generation-type entrepreneur.'
'He's got a drive that is very hard to match in terms of his dedication to the business and to his people, and the intensity around which he built the business,' Shoukry, who also is a member of ReliaQuest's board, tells Fortune.
'He's just very real, and tells you like it is,' he adds. 'Whenever you ask him a question, he's never going to beat it around the bush. He's never going to give you a polished answer. For better, for worse, he's just a really authentic person.'
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
6 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Monday appeared to undercut a proposal that was offered by his special envoy to Iran, saying he will insist that Tehran fully dismantle its nuclear enrichment program as part of any deal to ease crushing sanctions. Trump and Steve Witkoff, who is leading the negotiations for the U.S., have repeatedly offered inconsistent public messages about whether Iran would be allowed to retain the capacity to enrich uranium to lower levels for civilian purposes. The Trump administration maintains that it will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The negotiations have been framed by Trump as both countries' best chance to avoid direct military conflict over Iran's nuclear program. Tehran, which denies seeking a nuclear weapon, has insisted that it will not agree to any deal that fully scraps its enrichment program. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Trump wrote on social media. The White House didn't elaborate on the post. Trump's post comes after media reports that Witkoff's latest proposal to Tehran would allow Iran to retain low levels of enrichment for civilian uses like nuclear medicine and commercial power if it agrees to shut down its heavily protected underground sites for a period of time. The U.S. and Iran have engaged in several rounds of direct nuclear talks for the first time in years. Senior officials — including Witkoff and Trump himself — have said within the last few weeks that Iran would not be able to keep enriching uranium at any level. The proposal, reported by Axios and confirmed by two U.S. officials, called for the creation of a regional consortium to handle uranium enrichment for civilian uses — a plan first studied more than a decade ago in negotiations that led to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Trump was sharply critical of that agreement — which also allowed set limits on uranium enrichment but permitted Iran to maintain such a capacity — and withdrew the U.S. from it in 2017 during his first term. The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. The International Atomic Energy Agency found that Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels since its last update in February, according to a confidential report released by the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Saturday. Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement before Trump's post. 'Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it. Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' The proposal that Trump appeared to undercut on Monday evening included significant concessions by the administration certain to anger Israel along with pro-Israel lawmakers in the United States. Several of the main points were essentially the same or very similar to conditions outlined in the 2015 nuclear deal. Early iterations of that agreement negotiated by the Obama administration also suggested the possibility of a regional consortium that would put Iranian uranium enrichment above a certain level under the control of Iran and its neighbors. The idea was scrapped, however, because of Gulf Arab nations' objections and Iranian suspicions of the ultimate aims of the consortium. People who were involved in the 18-month negotiations for the 2015 deal reacted immediately to reports that the Trump administration might allow Iran to continue with an enrichment program at any level, particularly after senior officials repeatedly said Iran would not be able to retain such programs. 'This proposal poses a moment of truth for critics of previous Iran nuclear negotiations/agreements (and) those who have called for a no-enrichment, full-dismantlement deal,' Dan Shapiro, Obama's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. 'Will they hold Trump to the same standard?'

Associated Press
10 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Monday appeared to undercut a proposal that was offered by his special envoy to Iran, saying he will insist that Tehran fully dismantle its nuclear enrichment program as part of any deal to ease crushing sanctions. Trump and Steve Witkoff, who is leading the negotiations for the U.S., have repeatedly offered inconsistent public messages about whether Iran would be allowed to retain the capacity to enrich uranium to lower levels for civilian purposes. The Trump administration maintains that it will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The negotiations have been framed by Trump as both countries' best chance to avoid direct military conflict over Iran's nuclear program. Tehran, which denies seeking a nuclear weapon, has insisted that it will not agree to any deal that fully scraps its enrichment program. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Trump wrote on social media. The White House didn't elaborate on the post. Trump's post comes after media reports that Witkoff's latest proposal to Tehran would allow Iran to retain low levels of enrichment for civilian uses like nuclear medicine and commercial power if it agrees to shut down its heavily protected underground sites for a period of time. The U.S. and Iran have engaged in several rounds of direct nuclear talks for the first time in years. Senior officials — including Witkoff and Trump himself — have said within the last few weeks that Iran would not be able to keep enriching uranium at any level. The proposal, reported by Axios and confirmed by two U.S. officials, called for the creation of a regional consortium to handle uranium enrichment for civilian uses — a plan first studied more than a decade ago in negotiations that led to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Trump was sharply critical of that agreement — which also allowed set limits on uranium enrichment but permitted Iran to maintain such a capacity — and withdrew the U.S. from it in 2017 during his first term. The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. The International Atomic Energy Agency found that Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels since its last update in February, according to a confidential report released by the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Saturday. Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement before Trump's post. 'Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it. Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' The proposal that Trump appeared to undercut on Monday evening included significant concessions by the administration certain to anger Israel along with pro-Israel lawmakers in the United States. Several of the main points were essentially the same or very similar to conditions outlined in the 2015 nuclear deal. Early iterations of that agreement negotiated by the Obama administration also suggested the possibility of a regional consortium that would put Iranian uranium enrichment above a certain level under the control of Iran and its neighbors. The idea was scrapped, however, because of Gulf Arab nations' objections and Iranian suspicions of the ultimate aims of the consortium. People who were involved in the 18-month negotiations for the 2015 deal reacted immediately to reports that the Trump administration might allow Iran to continue with an enrichment program at any level, particularly after senior officials repeatedly said Iran would not be able to retain such programs. 'This proposal poses a moment of truth for critics of previous Iran nuclear negotiations/agreements (and) those who have called for a no-enrichment, full-dismantlement deal,' Dan Shapiro, Obama's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. 'Will they hold Trump to the same standard?'


Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Doritos, M&Ms Could Be Forced to Include Warning Labels in Texas
A Texas bill on the verge of becoming law would require labels on packaged food from Skittles to Mountain Dew that warn about ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' by other countries. Texas Senate Bill 25, backed by Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is now awaiting the signature of Gov. Greg Abbott. Foods containing certain ingredients would require warning labels on new packaging beginning in 2027 in order to be sold in Texas, which is the second-most populous US state with 31 million residents.