Singaporean Malone Lam faces new US charges over US$263m crypto theft, accused of heading 13-member crime ring
SINGAPORE, May 20 — Singaporean Malone Lam, already facing charges in the United States over a cryptocurrency theft, is now accused of heading a 13-member crime ring that allegedly stole hundreds of millions of dollars in cryptocurrency, according to local media.
Lam, 20, was first charged in September last year with stealing and laundering over US$230 million (RM985 million) in cryptocurrency from a single victim.
In the new indictment, federal prosecutors alleged that he orchestrated a wider scheme with a dozen other individuals, according to CNA.
He appeared in a Washington D.C. court on Monday, where he pleaded not guilty to the superseding indictment.
Lam and Conor Flansburg, 21, from California, are named in the indictment as the group's organisers.
The group allegedly met through online gaming platforms and developed a scheme that netted a total of US$263 million.
They allegedly stole funds from cryptocurrency wallets, converted the crypto into US dollars, and laundered the proceeds.
They also allegedly carried out home burglaries, including one incident in which a member of the crime ring broke into a victim's home in New Mexico to steal a hardware wallet containing virtual currency.
The 13 suspects, including Lam, have been charged under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations (RICO) Act.
In a press release issued on May 15, the US Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia said that members of the syndicate held various roles, including database hackers, organisers, target identifiers, callers, money launderers, and burglars targeting hardware cryptocurrency wallets.
Members and associates of the enterprise allegedly used the stolen virtual currency to purchase, among others, luxury handbags, watches and clothing; rental homes in Los Angeles, the Hamptons, and Miami; private jet rentals, and a fleet of at least 28 exotic cars ranging in value from US$100,000 to US$3.8 million.
'Following his arrest in September 2024 and continuing while in pretrial detention, Lam is alleged to have continued working with members of the enterprise to pass and receive directions, collect stolen cryptocurrency, and to have members buy luxury bags and hand deliver them to his girlfriend in Miami, Florida,' the statement said. — Bernama
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump offers no rest for lifelong US activist couple
Joseph and Joyce Ellwanger insisted they still had a role in protesting Donald Trump's right-wing agenda and expanding presidential power. (AFP pic) MILWAUKEE : They've lost count of how many times they've been arrested, but even with a combined age of 180 years, American couple Joseph and Joyce Ellwanger are far from hanging up their activist boots. The pair, who joined the US civil rights rallies in the 1960s, hope protesting will again pay off against Donald Trump, whose right-wing agenda has pushed the limits of presidential power. 'Inaction and silence do not bring about change,' 92-year-old Joseph, who uses a walker, told AFP at a rally near Milwaukee in late April. He was among a few hundred people protesting the FBI's arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan, who is accused of helping an undocumented man in her court evade migration authorities. By his side – as always – was Joyce, 88, carrying a sign reading 'Hands Off Hannah.' They are certain that protesting does make a difference, despite some Americans feeling despondent about opposing Trump in his second term. 'The struggle for justice has always had so much pushback and difficulty that it almost always appeared as though we'll never win,' Joseph said. 'How did slavery end? How did Jim Crow end? How did women get the right to vote? It was the resilience and determination of people who would not give up,' he added. 'Change does happen.' The couple, who have been married for more than 60 years, can certainly speak from experience when it comes to protesting. Joseph took part in strategy meetings with Martin Luther King Jr – the only white religious leader to do so – after he became pastor of an all-Black church in Alabama at the age of 25. He also joined King in the five-day, 54-mile march from Selma to Montgomery in 1965, which historians consider a pivotal moment in the US civil rights movement. Joyce, meanwhile, was jailed for 50 days after she rallied against the US military training of soldiers from El Salvador in the 1980s. Other causes taken up by the couple included opposing the Iraq war in the early 2000s. 'You do what you have to do. You don't let them stop you just because they put up a blockade. You go around it,' Joyce told AFP. 'We'll do our part' Joseph admitted he would like to slow down, noting the only time he and his wife unplug is on Sunday evening when they do a Zoom call with their three adult children. But Trump has kept them active with his sweeping executive actions – including crackdowns on undocumented migrants and on foreign students protesting at US universities. The threats to younger protesters are particularly concerning for Joyce, who compared those demonstrating today to the students on the streets during the 1960s. 'They've been very non-violent, and to me, that's the most important part,' she said. Joyce also acknowledged the couple likely won't live to see every fight to the end, but insisted they still had a role to play. 'We're standing on the shoulders of people who have built the justice movement and who have brought things forward. So, we'll do our part,' she said. Joyce added that she and Joseph would be protesting again on June 14 as part of the national 'No Kings' rally against Trump. 'More people are taking to the streets, we will also be in the street,' she said.
Malay Mail
7 hours ago
- Malay Mail
FBI probing Molotov cocktail attack at Colorado pro-Israel protest; several injured, suspect in custody
WASHINGTON, June 2 — Several people were injured Sunday in what the FBI called a 'targeted terror attack' in the US state of Colorado, where a group was protesting for the release of Israeli hostages held in Gaza. 'We are aware of and fully investigating a targeted terror attack in Boulder, Colorado,' FBI chief Kash Patel said on X. Local media cited eyewitnesses describing a man throwing something resembling a homemade Molotov cocktail at a group calling for the release of Israeli hostages held in Gaza. Asked if it was a terror attack against the protesters, Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn insisted it was 'way too early to speculate motive' behind the incident, which took place shortly before 1.30 pm (1930 GMT). In one video apparently of the attack, a shirtless man holding clear spray bottles in his hands is seen pacing as the grass in front of him burns. He can be heard screaming 'End Zionists!', 'Palestine is Free!' and 'They are killers!' towards several people in red t-shirts as they tend to a person lying on the ground. Other images showed billowing black smoke above a park. Redfearn told reporters that 'initial callers indicated that there was a man with a weapon and that people were being set on fire,' adding that police arrived 'very quickly.' 'When we arrived, we encountered multiple victims that were injured, with injuries consistent with burns and other injuries,' he said. Police on the scene 'immediately encountered that suspect, who was taken into custody without incident,' Redfearn said. The Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish activist group, said on X that it was 'aware of reports of an attack at today's Boulder Run for Their Lives event.' That event, it said, was a 'weekly meeting of Jewish community members to run/walk in support of the hostages' who were seized during Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, sparking the war in Gaza. Israel's ambassador to the United Nations in New York voiced outrage at the attack. 'Terrorism against Jews does not stop at the Gaza border — it is already burning the streets of America,' he said in a statement. 'Today, in Boulder, Colorado, Jewish people marched with a moral and humane demand: to return the hostages. In response, the Jewish protesters were brutally attacked, with an attacker throwing a Molotov cocktails at them,' he said. 'Make no mistake — this is not a political protest, this is terrorism.' — AFP
Malay Mail
7 hours ago
- Malay Mail
In Singapore, woman gets just S$1 in divorce, but ex loses bigger share over misconduct
SINGAPORE, June 2 — A woman's bid for S$2,500 (RM8,255) in monthly maintenance from her former husband has been dismissed by the Singapore High Court, but the judge reduced the man's share of their marital assets by 10 per cent, citing his repeated attempts to sabotage the marriage and his ex-wife's welfare. In a judgment delivered on May 7, and reported by The Straits Times today, Justice Choo Han Teck upheld an earlier district court's decision to award the 39-year-old woman nominal maintenance of S$1 per month, while increasing her share of their matrimonial flat from 20 to 25 per cent. She was also granted more than S$52,000 from other assets. The woman, an administrative assistant earning S$2,340 a month, had appealed against the nominal award, citing her limited means and inability to purchase a flat on her own as a Singapore permanent resident. Her lawyer, Russell Thio of Emerald Law, reportedly argued that the district judge had failed to fully consider her accommodation needs. Her former husband, a 46-year-old regular serviceman in the Singapore Armed Forces earning S$5,212 a month, was represented by Sarbrinder Singh Naranjan Singh and Nicholas Say of Sanders Law. Justice Choo, however, found no basis for increasing the maintenance. 'She has not shown that her pay is insufficient to meet her monthly expenses, including housing, or that she has exhausted all means to find accommodation,' he was quoted as saying. He maintained the nominal S$1 order, which he described as 'a sum as inconsequential in substance as it is in appearance'. He added: 'However, as the Court of Appeal has held otherwise, I will leave the S$1 order intact.' Despite denying the woman a larger monthly sum, Justice Choo penalised her ex-husband financially, awarding him a smaller share of the assets to reflect the court's disapproval of his conduct. Lawyers said the court used the asset division to send a clear signal about the consequences of such behaviour. The man had repeatedly denied his ex-wife access to their daughter, now 12, and was found in contempt of court for breaching access orders. He also attempted to send the woman back to India and petitioned HDB to take over their flat, which she had been paying for after he refused to let her co-own or contribute officially to the mortgage. Justice Choo noted that the HDB eventually refunded her contributions and she was evicted from the flat with police assistance. The court found that the man's actions had effectively denied her a share in any potential open-market sale proceeds.
