Labour are in PANIC – Farage is streets ahead in polls & welfare rebels are set to pile more misery on flailing Starmer
WHEN it rains, it pours… and Sir Keir Starmer cannot catch a break.
A poll today shows Labour is on course for a thumping at the next election at the hands of Nigel Farage.
4
4
The YouGov 'gold-standard' MRP puts Reform on course to win the most seats on 271, while the PM's current 412 would be more than halved to 178.
Sir Keir's supporters point out there are still four years to go until the next election, giving plenty of time to turn things around.
But it is the fact his government has become so unpopular so soon after last year's landslide that should really worry them.
A map of the projected outcome shows Reform winning in all parts of the country, flipping once Labour strongholds in the Red Wall, while reducing the Tories to a rump of 46.
That so many Labour MPs - including a string of Cabinet Ministers - look to fall in a Farage wave spells trouble for Sir Keir.
Rebels who in good times would ordinarily remain loyal to the government could throw caution to the wind and vote how they like.
As one party insider tells me: 'Why would they care about rebelling on something they feel strongly about if they'll be out in four years time anyway?'.
It means the current revolt over benefits could be just the start of the PM's troubles.
Such is the scale of the revolt over the government's package of welfare savings that No10 has gone into crisis mode.
Ministers may be keeping calm in public but, like a duck's feet furiously paddling below the surface, in private they are panicking.
I can reveal that Sir Keir's diary was being rejigged today so he can personally lead the ring-round of Labour rebels upon his return from his NATO dash to Holland.
It is therefore perhaps a happy coincidence that his aides recently discovered the Downing Street vending machine has started stocking Red Bull.
They are going to need all their energy for a fraught few days that could decide the fate of Labour's entire premiership.
The golden rule in politics is knowing how to count - so some numbers: around 120 Labour backbenchers are threatening to torpedo the government's £5billion package in benefit cuts.
They say the squeeze on Personal Independence Payments specifically could push 250,000 claimants into poverty.
Combined with the opposition parties, they have marshalled enough troops to easily wipe out Sir Keir's 156 majority when the vote happens in just five days' time.
Defeat would strike a humiliating blow to Sir Keir's authority and throw into doubt his ability to push through any serious reform.
If he cannot even convince his troops to get behind £5billion in welfare cuts, what hope does he have of reining in a sickness benefits bill set to balloon to £100billion within five years?
Downing Street has been left with two options: postpone the vote and buy time to redraw their proposals in a way that satisfies the rebels, despite the stench of weakness.
Or roll the dice and try to peel off as many mutineers as possible with the prospect of concessions.
For now, Starmer has chosen to go to the negotiating table, with both him and his deputy Angela Rayner publicly stressing the vote on Tuesday will happen.
Over the next few days the PM, his ministers and his whips will use a mix of olive branches, arm-twisting, and downright dark arts to smash the revolt.
A 'bleeding stumps' pitch has seen rebels told that popular policies - like more cash for hospitals and school breakfast clubs - could all be at risk without welfare savings.
Meanwhile the more career-driven MPs are being gently warned that their hopes of a government job will evaporate if they walk through the wrong voting lobby.
The name of one ambitious newbie who has been excitably telling colleagues he wants 'regime change' has worked its way back to No10.
He can kiss goodbye to a ministerial red box…
But even MPs loyal to Starmer - and there are still a lot of them - are not convinced anything other than serious concessions will pull the rebels back from the brink.
One member of the government tells me: 'It's hard to see how they can get this over line on the current voting timeline without some concessions to get some of the heavy hitters to change course.
'But it is unclear if that reality has yet fully landed with No10.'
Another supportive MP reckons a commitment on the floor of the House of Commons to soften the package later down the line is 'the only way to keep the show on the road'.
One senior rebel insists they 'can find a compromise' but Downing Street 'need to take their fingers out of their ears'.
And the rebellion is not just contained to the backbenches. One MP swears that as many as five Parliamentary Private Secretaries - the first rung on the ministerial ladder - are willing to abstain in protest.
Whether Sir Keir wins the vote or not, this whole mess is symptomatic of a deeper problem running through his premiership: a growing sense he is not in control.
A string of embarrassing u-turns - from winter fuel cuts to the grooming gangs national inquiry - are a dangerous smoke signal to his MPs that he can be pushed around.
And worryingly to the government - much like the Brexit Spartans who hamstrung Theresa May's government - the new Labour rebels are organised.
Experienced committee chairs on the soft left of the party have developed a sophisticated shadow whipping operation to marshal their troops.
That No10 was totally blindsided by the ambush on Monday night is testament to their tactics - and exposed a Downing Street intelligence operation sorely lacking.
Terrified of party whips getting wind, the ringleaders recruited disgruntled MPs to their cause through snatched conversations in corridors and on the Commons terrace.
As one MP warns: 'They have spreadsheets and they can count. This whole saga has given them intel on how to whip'.
And you can bet that fighting benefits cuts will not be their only rallying cause over the next four years.
Axing the two-child benefit cap - on which the PM has already shown ankle at the mere flickers of backbench grumblings - will be next.
The danger for Sir Keir now is spiralling into a doom loop of chaos, which breeds unpopularity, which breeds more chaos, which breeds more unpopularity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
Pro-Palestine protester dressed as Holocaust victim goes unchallenged by Met cops — amid claims of two-tier policing
A PROTESTER dressed as a Holocaust victim goes unchallenged by Met cops — amid claims of two-tier policing. Maria Gallastegui sparked outrage by wearing a concentration camp-style uniform - swapping the yellow star for an Islamic symbol - at a Westminster demo. 2 2 Jewish leaders and MPs hit out at the Met, claiming officers warned men waving Israeli flags they could breach the peace but ignored Ms Gallastegui's stunt. It comes after a man was prosecuted for burning a Koran in London, fuelling claims of 'double standards' in policing. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said: 'We appear to have a two-tier blasphemy law in this country, which protects Islam from offensive references but not others.' Labour Against Antisemitism also slammed the outfit for 'appropriating and distorting the Holocaust.' The group said it 'was clearly designed to cause distress'. They have written to Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley demanding action over the protest outside Parliament. Ms Gallastegui, 66, defended herself, saying: 'This is a history lesson for now, and by no means is it meant to be anti-Semitic. Changing the symbols of the yellow star to the crescent and star is simply to illustrate that point.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
QUENTIN LETTS: Welcome back, PM. You didn't miss much, just a mutiny of MPs and a plot by Ange to depose you!
Good Heavens, it was Sir Keir Starmer! The Prime Minister swaggered into the Commons at 11.30am. First time for over a fortnight. He was lucky a clerk didn't ask to check his security pass. The Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, signalled subtle displeasure at Sir Keir's neglect of the House. He said MPs would be given more leeway in their questions, to allow them to catch up with the absentee. I hear that on Monday night Sir Lindsay summoned the Cabinet Secretary to his study to tear him off a strip over Sir Keir's scurvy attitude to parliamentary scrutiny. Kemi Badenoch could have said 'Welcome back, stranger, you didn't miss much – just a mutiny among your MPs, a poll saying you're now as popular as the clap and a plot by Angela Rayner to depose you'. Instead the Conservative leader, who is not excessively endowed in the humour department, came over all jabbery. She shouted that Sir Keir had 'evaded Prime Minister's question time for two weeks' and was now 'irrelevant'. Aiee, that was ill-judged. You do not have to be Kemi-sceptic to see that even our nasal plodder of a PM is more relevant than she at present. Mrs Badenoch paid for her rant. Sir Keir was able to gloat, no fewer than seven times, that his opponent was 'unserious'. Did she truly mean he should not attend G7 and Nato summits? Furthermore, should she ever become PM (a possibility he later declared not to exist), the head of Nato would need to hang a sign over her empty seat at the summit table saying 'gone to PMQs'. How the sycophants tinkled with laughter at that. Starmer was at his most patronising. The chamber was surprisingly unbusy. The Lib Dems were down to seven. Reform MPs were a total no-show. The Tories were sparse and one of them – Mark Pritchard from The Wrekin, Shropshire – was so rude about Mrs Badenoch that he might soon defect. Sir Keir's parliamentary private secretary, a shrewd lad, leaned forward and muttered something to the Prime Minister when Mr Pritchard was trumpeting. Sir Keir proceeded to baste Pritchard in warm treacle. The old bloviator loved that. More interesting than anything on the Opposition benches was the paucity of Labour bodies. Despite doughnutting behind ministers to make TV viewers think it was a big turn-out, there must have been barely a tenth of Labour's contingent on parade. This was evidence of two things: the size of the Starmer arch-loyalist faction and the much greater number of Labour MPs who are indifferent towards him. Theirs was an ominous absence. Once Mrs Badenoch had blurted out her 'evading PMQs' line, these Starmer loyalists rose one after another to hail the nasal knight's 'leadership' and to complain that Kemi's remarks were a disgrace. Such was the consistency of these contributions, it was obvious Labour's Whips were orchestrating them. You just get a Whip to send a job-hungry MP a text message saying 'Here's what to say'. Most of them oblige. It's sickeningly low-grade but it works. Those applying their suction nozzles to Sir Keir's posterior included: Gemmell (C Ayrshire), Ahmed (Glasgow SW), Bailey (Leyton), Macdonald (Norwich N), McDonald (Stockton N) and Slinger (Rugby) but for sheer, marvel-eyed sycophancy none quite matched a woman from West Bromwich called Coombes. Whenever the first ministerial shuffle happens it will be a surprise if these virtuosi are not rewarded for their heroic efforts. Two other things. First, is Sir Keir's eyesight giving him gyp? He seemed to have new spectacles – they were glinting in a way I had not seen before – and, as happens occasionally, he asked for his speech to be raised on a special platform which was placed atop the despatch box. This did not prevent him from misreading some of the words. And earlier we had another corker from Lucy Powell, the dazzlingly intellectual Leader of the Commons. In an effort to praise the military she managed to refer to our 'armed sauces'.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Rampant street crime. One alleged rape every hour. Homeless beggars. And demographic changes that have made the city unrecognisable. With a heavy heart, MATT GOODWIN says London is OVER
When I fired off a tweet about my day trip to London last week, I didn't expect it to be read by 12 million people around the world. But that's exactly what happened when I shared a few observations about our once-great capital under Labour Mayor Sadiq Khan. 'All these things happened to me in London today,' I wrote. 'I paid nearly £30 for a train ticket to take me into London from a town just 30 miles away – on a Saturday. 'The first person I sat next to decided to have a FaceTime conversation with his friend on speakerphone, so we all had to listen to it. 'The train was late by 40 minutes due to unexplained 'signalling issues'. It was also filthy. I paid nearly £8 for a pint. I offered a woman my seat on the Tube without realising she was with a man – who intervened and said: 'No man.' He was not from the UK. I think he took my gesture as an insult. 'I was asked for money by homeless people three times in one day. 'I noticed that several people who are paid to give information to taxpayers and tourists over the Tannoy on the Tube cannot speak English properly. 'A cabbie told me: 'London is dead most nights.' Restaurants are struggling and hideously overpriced. I was constantly aware I should not get my phone out on the street – as more than 70,000 were stolen last year. I also discovered there were 90,000 shoplifting offences in London last year, up 54 per cent.' Behind all these observations lies a deeper point that has gradually become unavoidable. London is over. It's so over. It's morphed into a city that is unrecognisable from years ago and is now in manifest and rapid decline, with deteriorating standards and no real sense of identity or belonging. While my tweet predictably irritated London liberals, it clearly struck a chord with a much larger audience. Millions have watched as a toxic cocktail of accelerated demographic change, mass immigration and economic stagnation have ripped the heart and soul out of our capital. Another person who has noticed this is respected British writer Professor David Goodhart, who last week pointed to many of the same concerns. A quarter-century ago, he wrote, London was a booming metropolitan centre: a beacon of openness and opportunity for the rest of the country and, indeed, the world. But no more. When a recent report suggested that white Britons with no immigrant parents look set to become a minority in the UK by the year 2063, Goodhart pointed out: 'I heard nobody saying, 'rapid demographic change is nothing to worry about – just look at London'.' He has a point. London has been irreversibly transformed. White Britons, the indigenous population for centuries, now represent one-third of the city. Only 22 per cent of children in Greater London's schools are White British – and in one school, Kobi Nazrul Primary in Whitechapel, not a single child speaks English as their first language. Four in ten people currently living in London were born overseas. Close to one in seven are Muslim. And nearly one-quarter of Londoners do not speak English as their main language. While London's liberal set may respond to this by repeating, in robotic fashion, 'diversity is our strength', Goodhart asks a more troubling question. Yes, immigration has long been a feature of London. But is all this demographic change actually improving the quality of life in the city? Or is it making it far worse? Compare the capital to the rest of the country. Shoplifting is up 15 per cent in England – but has soared by 54 per cent in the capital. Theft is down 14 per cent in England – but has rocketed by 41 per cent in London. Home ownership in London is down 20 per cent since the early 1990s – while rents are up 85 per cent on the past 15 years, and earnings are up just 21 per cent. And even in some prime areas of central London, half of all social housing includes people who were not born in Britain. Another thing that has collapsed in recent years is London's fertility rate, which has slumped 30 per cent in the past decade, making it the lowest of all UK regions. When people no longer want children, it's a pretty good sign of how they feel about their surroundings. There are other things I could add. Like the fact there is an alleged rape every hour in London. In just five years, reported sexual offences against women and girls rose 14 per cent while homelessness and rough sleeping climbed 26 per cent in one year. Does this look like a thriving city to you? Knife crime, gang violence, robberies, pickpocketing and so-called 'moped-enabled crimes' have also become everyday features of London life. And 30,000 millionaires left London in the past decade according to research from Henley & Partners, a firm that helps high net-worth clients move countries. Meanwhile, according to a recent Thames Water study, up to 600,000 illegal migrants may be living in London, flouting our laws and taking taxpayers for a ride. While these findings have been subject to debate, if correct, how can you possibly sustain the social contract in a major city when it's possible that one in every 13 people is an illegal immigrant? Or when nearly one-quarter of the people in London do not speak English as their main language –while 320,000 cannot speak English at all? If London really is so vibrant and wonderful, why, according to one survey from Opinium, do one in four Londoners say they feel unsafe in their own neighbourhood? The truth is, London's famed diversity has changed in profound and negative ways since the 1990s. The European bankers, asset managers and Polish plumbers who came two decades ago have now largely been replaced by low-wage, low-skill migrant workers from across the Middle East and Northern Africa – a situation that worsened hugely during the last Tory government, which opened the floodgates to migrants from the developing world. This more recent wave of immigration, as studies by the Office for Budget Responsibility and elsewhere have made clear, is taking more from the economy than it's putting in, exacerbating not just the housing crisis but our glaring lack of growth. To be clear, this is not to criticise the migrants themselves. It's merely to accept reality. Like much of the rest of the country, London's energy, productivity and prosperity are being drained by a model of low-skill, low-wage, non-European immigration that makes no economic sense. Take one iconic example: London's famous black cabs with a driver who possesses a deep and historic knowledge of our capital. Increasingly, he is being replaced by an Uber driver from Somalia or Afghanistan who drives you around while relying on Google Maps. Rather than build a dynamic, integrated and unified capital city with a clear sense of history and identity, these forces are inexorably pushing us towards the ongoing 'Yookayfication' of our capital city and, indeed, our country. Increasingly, the label 'Yookay' has caught on to refer to the jarring aesthetic quality of the country today – a mix of cultures, languages and identities spreading across the landscape. Examples include the proliferation of Palestinian flags and obvious signs of sectarianism in migrant communities, the spread of multicultural 'English' with its global slang, the mainstreaming of gang culture in everything from fashion to advertising, the constant smell of weed, the American candy store next to the kebab shop, the Deliveroo riders scrolling through their phone and so on. All have become symbols of a new, migration-fuelled and sagging economy. As Lord Frost pointed out recently, as these demographic changes take effect, the 'Yookay' risks gradually becoming a permanent new country: a successor state to Great Britain, with a new identity, character, culture, values and way of life. Nowhere are these changes more profound than in our capital. As David Goodhart asks: 'What happens when London's white British population falls below 20 per cent in ten years? Is there some minimum number of natives that a capital requires before it ceases to be the capital?' While I'm not sure of the answer, I am certain that unless there is a radical change of direction, London will look increasingly unlike the city I once knew.
