
‘Illegal' liquor pricing sparks outcry in Gurugram
The Gurugram excise department has launched an inquiry into allegations that liquor vends in the city are flouting pricing norms—by undercutting the minimum retail sale price (MRSP) for alcoholic beverages and overcharging bars and pubs well beyond permissible limits.
Officials said any violations of MRSP norms may indicate value-added tax (VAT) evasion and raise concerns about the sale of potentially substandard or unauthorised liquor in the market. Social activists and pub owners have also alleged the existence of a parallel, unregulated pricing system.
MRSP, under Haryana's excise policy, is the mandatory floor price for alcoholic beverages—below which no sales are allowed under any circumstances. Such sale not only distorts market competition but may also indicate that taxes are not being correctly levied or paid on transactions.
In many cases, the violation arises when outgoing L-2 license holders—retail vend operators—attempt to offload old stock by offering steep discounts as their tenure ends. With the new excise policy year beginning on June 12, some vendors are reportedly slashing prices to avoid incurring losses when handing over inventory to new licence holders.
Under the current excise policy, as well as the new policy effective from June 12, 2025 to March 31, 2027, L-2 licensees are barred from offering discounts below the MRSP. The policy also imposes a cap on how much more L-2 vends can charge bars and pubs—no more than 10% above the MRSP.
However,spot checks by HT indicate blatant violations. In one case, a 750 ml bottle of VAT 69 whisky, with an MRSP of ₹1,550, was reportedly being sold for ₹1,000—and in bulk purchases, for as little as ₹700. At the same time, some bars allege they are being charged ₹220 for a 330 ml bottle of Corona beer, which has an MRSP of ₹95—over double the allowed margin.
Supreme Court advocate Rajeev Yadav, who has been raising the issue with the excise department, said, 'The dual pricing strategy adopted by these vends is not only unethical but also illegal. Selling below MRSP suggests VAT evasion, while overcharging bars is profiteering. The excise department must initiate audits and take action.'
Pub and bar owners also voiced frustration over the unchecked practices. 'We're being charged nearly double for a single bottle of beer. The vendors tell us to take it or leave it. There's no enforcement,' said a pub manager from Sector 29, who asked to remain anonymous. Another bar owner from Cyber Hub echoed the sentiment, alleging that complaints to the excise department have gone unanswered. 'It feels like the system is compromised,' he said.
In response to the growing chorus of complaints, deputy excise and taxation commissioner (East) Amit Bhatia acknowledged the irregularities. 'We will check this activity and issue notices to the concerned L-2 licensees. Breach challans will be served, and further violations will attract stricter penalties,' he said.
But questions remain about how thoroughly these rules are being enforced. Many liquor vends reportedly fail to issue receipts with the name and address of the establishment, in violation of Clause 1.7 of the excise policy, which mandates the use of an integrated Point of Sale (POS) system. Moreover, the policy's cap on individual liquor purchases—no more than 12 bottles per customer—is being routinely flouted, say consumers.
The excise policy lays down strict penalties for MRSP violations. Clause 7.4 mandates the automatic suspension of the violator's licence for the day of detection and the following two days. Clause 2.13.5 allows for sealing of vends in cases of major violations. Despite this, vendors accused of undercutting prices and overcharging bars continue to operate.
Amit Khurana, a private sector employee, said the pricing disparities are obvious to regular buyers. 'It's a free-for-all. You find the same bottle at wildly different prices. We've complained, but nothing changes,' he said.
The practice not only disrupts fair market competition but also raises concerns about potential revenue loss for the state and questions about the quality and authenticity of discounted products. The Haryana Excise Policy for 2025-27 has introduced stricter penalties for violations, including significant fines and potential license cancellation for repeated offenses related to pricing and advertisement. However, the effectiveness of these measures is being questioned by the public given the ongoing nature of the problem.
Advocate Yadav emphasised the need for accountability, stating, 'It's imperative that the excise department not only penalises the erring vends but also investigates potential collusion within its ranks. The integrity of the system is at stake.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
'If there has been a crime, why wasn't it punished,' asks Jagdeep Dhankhar on Justice Yashwant Varma issue
Is a parliamentary motion to remove Justice Yashwant Varma the answer, Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar asked a gathering of Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, in Chandigarh on Friday (June 6, 2025) adding that 'if there has been a crime, why wasn't it punished?' Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) said the government would bring out a resolution in Parliament in the monsoon session for impeachment motion against Justice Varma. Justice Varma was subject of a probe by a Supreme Court-appointed panel after a fire incident at his Delhi residence led to the discovery of several burnt sacks of cash at the outhouse. Mr. Dhankhar said the government of the day was handicapped because of a three-decade-old judicial order that did not allow it to register a First Information Report (FIR) without permission from the judiciary. The Vice-President said, 'So I pose a question to myself, in deep pain, worried, concerned, in anguish — why was that permission not given? That was the minimum that could have been done on the earliest occasion.' He also questioned why even after the Supreme Court probe, Justice Varma has not been punished. 'I have raised the issue. Ultimately, if a motion is brought to remove a judge, is that the answer? If there has been a crime, a culpable act shaking the foundations of democracy — the rule of law, why wasn't it punished? We have lost more than three months, and the investigation has not even been initiated. Whenever you go to court, they ask why the FIR was delayed.' The permission should have been granted soon after the cash was discovered and if not then it should have come up at least when the Supreme Court-appointed panel filed its report considering the 'compulsive, expedient situation'. The cash haul, Mr. Dhankhar said, was 'obviously tainted, unaccounted, illegal and unexplained' and the system must move to find out 'whose money it is.' He further asked, 'Has the money influenced the judiciary in judicial work? All these issues are agitating not only the minds of lawyers but also people on the street. But let the lid be blown off the can of worms. Let these skeletons in the cupboards come out. Why was there no FIR? Why has there been no investigation at all?' The gap between 'may be true' and 'must be true', the Vice-President said, is very thin. 'But this thin distance has to be negotiated by evidence of unimpeachable veracity. So, I put innocence at a very high level. I am not aware of who is guilty. But one thing is for sure — a crime of great enormity, shaking the foundations of the judiciary and democracy, has taken place. I hope it will be addressed,' he said.


The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Hyderabad man duped of ₹1.4 lakh in ‘digital arrest' scam
A 57-year-old private employee from Hyderabad was conned out of ₹1.4 lakh in a 'digital arrest' scam with fraudsters posing as government officials and threatening him with arrest in a fictitious money laundering case. The case unfolded on May 12, when the victim received a phone call claiming that a bank account had been fraudulently opened using his Aadhaar details, and that a money laundering case had been registered against him in Bengaluru. The caller warned the man that unless he cooperated, he would be arrested and jailed. In an attempt to make the ploy convincing, the fraudster initiated a two-hour video call over WhatsApp, posing as an investigator. The victim, rattled by the threats, was asked to pay ₹50,000 as a 'processing fee'. Trusting the caller, he transferred the amount to a bank account provided during the call. The scam escalated when the victim was told that his case was being forwarded to a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) officer. He was asked to disclose sensitive information, including the bank balances of both himself and his wife. The fraudster cautioned that the entire matter was confidential and insisted that any disclosure would endanger his family. The victim was warned of a possible prison sentence of 2-3 years and told he might need to appear before the Supreme Court. In the days that followed, the victim was kept under sustained psychological pressure, with the fraudster continuing video calls lasting 2-3 hours each day. He was made to report every 30 minutes, share his residential address, and comply with the caller's instructions. Gradually, he ended up paying a total of ₹1,40,000. To further convince him, the fraudsters sent forged documents, including a fake acknowledgement letter from the 'Income Tax Department' for the ₹50,000 payment, a counterfeit letter purportedly from the Supreme Court bearing the forged signature of T. Rabi Sankar, Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, and a second 'tax department' letter confirming receipt of funds. The victim was told that the Supreme Court would soon approve a refund of the entire amount to his bank account. Realising he had been duped, the victim lodged a complaint with the Cybercrime Wing of the Hyderabad Police. Further investigation into the case is underway.


Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Tripura Police arrest 2 in Unakoti tea garden mob lynching case
The Tripura Police Thursday arrested two people in connection with the recent lynching of a man at a tea garden in Kailashahar under Unakoti district. 'We brought three people for questioning to the police station. We registered a case against two of them and arrested them,' said an officer at the Kailasahar police station. The police also conducted a meeting with the management and workers of the tea garden and assured them that no innocent person would undergo any harassment due to the investigation into the lynching case. According to the police, the lynching took place on Tuesday after three people, including the deceased, Pradeep Das, were spotted taking away goats from the roadside in their vehicle. As the trio was trying to flee, a group armed with sticks tried to stop them. While attempting to flee from the spot, the vehicle hit and injured a tea garden worker. The vehicle, thereafter, fell into a concrete drain, and Pradeep Das was caught and lynched. The mob also set the vehicle on fire. The others in the vehicle reportedly managed to save themselves by hiding in the nearby forest. In February, at least five people were detained after a 35-year-old suspected thief was beaten to death by an irate mob at Belonia in South Tripura district. In June 2021, three suspected cattle smugglers were lynched at two different locations in Tripura's Khowai district. Tripura hogged the headlines with a series of mob lynching incidents over rumours of child kidnappings in 2018. The state government soon introduced the Tripura Lynching/Mob Violence Victim Compensation Scheme, 2018, for the assistance of victims of mob violence. The state cabinet decided to implement the law, taking cue from a Supreme Court order in July 2018, wherein the apex court directed all state governments to frame rules for implementing the scheme within one month. According to mob violence compensation rules, the state government has to pay Rs 4 lakh to families of people who die in mob violence, and Rs 2 lakh to those who get 80 per cent crippled, among others.