Trump's purge of undocumented immigrants is already threatening North Carolina's economy
During a congressional hearing this week, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem touted her department's crackdown on the southern border, where she said daily encounters with people trying to enter the U.S. without authorization have fallen by 93%.
Noem told members of the House Homeland Security Committee, 'This astonishing turnaround is a testament to the resolve and to the leadership of President Trump to make America safe again.'
What she didn't say is how the Trump administration's sealing of the border and its targeting of undocumented people in the U.S. could put the economy at risk.
In North Carolina, workers are already in short supply.
Dave Simpson, president and CEO of the Carolina Association of General Contractors, said there's more work than workers, particularly in western North Carolina, where there is massive damage from Hurricane Helene.
'The workforce shortage in North Carolina and South Carolina is the biggest challenge we have. Nothing comes close,' he said.
Charlie Wilson, president of CT Wilson Construction Company, a 90-employee company that builds schools and other buildings in the Triangle and Triad, said the long-running standoff over immigration reform has created a chronic labor problem.
'We've had a workforce shortage for it seems like forever,' he said. 'There are just not enough people being born here to fill all the roles that need to be filled.'
Wilson said his immigrant workers are in the U.S legally, 'but in the subcontractor market, a lot of the work is being done by undocumented workers.'
The Trump administration's deportation threats are being felt across the workforce. 'There's an overwhelming sense of fear that something is going to happen, even among workers who are here legally,' he said.
Trump promised during his campaign to close an 'open' southern border and deport criminals who are in the U.S. illegally. But he's taken aim at all undocumented people and is pushing for mass deportations.
Noem stressed that hard line in a video saying, 'President Trump has a clear message for those who are in our country illegally – leave now! If you don't, we will find you and we will deport you. You will never return.'
Some undocumented workers are taking Noem's advice and leaving, said Chris Barrett, president of the Charlotte-Metrolina Labor Council. 'Because of the threat of deportation, a lot of people are saying 'I'm not going to stick around for it. I'm just going to go ahead and go,' ' he said.
It's estimated that more than 13 million unauthorized immigrants are in the U.S. Most of them are working and helping to keep the U.S. economy humming. Losing a significant share of these workers will hurt industries that rely heavily on immigrant labor, such as construction, health care and hospitality.
'It's going to hit industries hard,' said Daniel Costa, director of Immigration Law and Policy Research at the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, D.C.
Costa said the push to remove immigrants goes beyond targeting those who entered the U.S. illegally. It's also affecting people who entered the U.S. legally but their visas have expired or their protected status has been revoked.
As the Trump administration boosts spending to tighten the southern border and support more deportations, Costa said the effort is focused on the wrong end. Instead, he said, the administration should be hiring more judges to clear the backlog of asylum claims and end the long delays when immigrants seek to become legal residents or naturalized citizens.
The U.S. doesn't need to be pushing people out, Costa said. It needs more people coming in. 'We're facing a massive demographic challenge in the U.S.,' he said.
As the U.S. population ages, immigrant workers are increasingly important. Since 2019, they have accounted for 88% of the nation's labor force growth.
Trump says he supports immigration, but he wants immigrants to come in legally. That's fine, but he hasn't offered legislation that would revise outdated immigration quotas and speed the legal immigration process.
Instead, we have Noem scaring undocumented immigrants with the threat 'We will find you' at a time when employers can't find enough workers.
Associate opinion editor Ned Barnett can be reached at 919-404-7583, or nbarnett@newsobserver.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

10 minutes ago
Critical US-Iran nuclear talks on shaky ground
The future of high-stakes negotiations over Iran's nuclear program remains shrouded in uncertainty as the U.S. and Iran publicly clash over the terms of an interim agreement proposed by the Trump administration that is intended to pave the way for a longer-lasting deal. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, slammed that proposal during an address on Wednesday, saying it "contradicts our principle of power by 100%" and vowing that Iran would not agree to stop enriching uranium on its own soil, calling it "a key tool in the nuclear program." The Iranian foreign minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, succinctly underscored Iran's terms in a post on X shortly after the Ayatollah's speech, writing "no enrichment, no deal." Iran's stance contrasts sharply with that of President Donald Trump, which he emphasized on his social media platform on Monday. "Under our potential Agreement -- WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. While the president and his Cabinet officials have repeatedly said Iran would be required to end enrichment activities under the terms of a deal, U.S. officials say that the initial interim proposal -- which is only intended to be a stepping stone to a broader agreement -- did not prohibit Iran from enriching uranium at low levels while a long-term solution to fuel Iran's civilian nuclear energy program could be established. Trump's post appeared to contradict the position staked out by his negotiators, and although Iran has not yet formally responded to the interim proposal, it remained unclear on Wednesday whether the U.S. would stand by all the terms in its initial offer. Whether delegations from Iran and the U.S. would meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations also remained unclear, although a U.S. official said a possible meeting in the coming days was under discussion. After holding a phone call with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, Trump signaled that he would look to Moscow to play a greater role in negotiations with Iran. "President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!" But optimism among both U.S. and Iranian officials appears to have cooled in recent days. An Iranian official, who spoke with ABC News on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations, said that the U.S.' proposed terms are "unreasonable, greedy and unconventional." "The U.S. constantly changes its positions, which has led to a growing accumulation of mistrust regarding its intentions and heightened uncertainty about its will and seriousness to fulfil commitments, assuming any agreement is even to be formed," they told ABC News. "This document is not even open to be reviewed or responded to," the official added. Iran is pushing for relief from sanctions that have badly damaged the national economy. This week, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Tehran needs guarantees regarding the "real end of the sanctions." That would include details on "how and through what mechanism" they would be lifted, Baghaei said, in remarks carried by the official IRNA news agency. Araghchi and Khamenei were downbeat on the U.S. proposal in comments this week. The document has "many ambiguities and questions," the Iranian foreign minister said in a Telegram post on Tuesday. "Many issues in this proposal are not clear," he added.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs proclamation to ban travel from 12 countries
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday evening to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks. The ban will fully restrict entry of nationals from 12 countries: Afghanistan; Myanmar, also known as Burma; Chad; Republic of the Congo; Equatorial Guinea; Eritrea; Haiti; Iran; Libya; Somalia; Sudan; and Yemen. People from seven countries will have partial restriction: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The proclamation includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. The president made the final call on signing this proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. The White House is touting the new president's travel ban as 'fulfilling' a campaign promise to 'protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm.' 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm. These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information,' White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson wrote on X. Trump said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world.' 'The list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made. And likewise new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world, but we will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm and nothing will stop us from keeping America safe,' the president said. The proclamation takes effect at 12:01 AM on June 9, according to the White House. Wednesday's proclamation comes less than five months after the president was inaugurated into office for his second term. On his first day in office, he issued an executive order directing cabinet members, including the secretary of state, to compile a list of countries 'for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.' In his first term, Trump barred travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations from coming to the US, a policy that saw court challenges before President Joe Biden repealed it when he took office in 2021. The barring of nationals from Afghanistan could impact Afghans who worked alongside the US during its two decades of war there. Tens of thousands of Afghans have already been caught in limbo due to other Trump administration executive orders suspending the US refugee admissions program and the suspension of foreign aid funding for flights of Afghan Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders. This story and headline have been updated with additional information.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with 'hostile attitudes' to the US
President Trump has signed an order banning people from 12 countries from entering the US. He said Sunday's had shown "the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come as temporary visitors and overstay their visas". "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," he said in a video statement. The countries affected are: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The White House said they posed a "very high risk" to the US and had poor screening and vetting to identify dangerous individuals. People from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will also face partial restrictions. Mr Trump's proclamation said America must ensure people entering don't have "hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles" - and don't support terror groups. The move echoes a controversial executive order enacted eight years ago during his first term, when he banned people from predominately Muslim countries. The countries initially targeted then were Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. said on Thursday that policy was a "key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil". His new list adds more countries, but notably removes Syria after Mr Trump met the country's leader recently on a trip to the Middle East. Athletes and their coaches competing in the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics, both of which are taking place in the US, will be exempt. Permanent US residents and existing visa holders are also among those unaffected. The list was put together after the president asked homeland security officials and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on countries whose citizens could pose a threat to the US. The ban takes effect from 9 June but countries could be removed or added. The proclamation states it will be reviewed within 90 days, and every 180 days after, to decide if it should be "continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented". "These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information," said White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson. President Trump's first travel restrictions in 2017 were criticised by opponents and human rights groups as a "Muslim ban". It led to some chaotic scenes, including tourists, students and business travellers prevented from boarding planes - or held at US airports when they landed. Mr Trump denied it was Islamophobic despite calling for a ban on Muslims entering America in his first presidential campaign. It faced legal challenges and was modified until the Supreme Court upheld a third version of it in June 2018, with judges calling it "squarely within the scope of presidential authority".