logo
How RFK Jr. could restrict abortion medication access

How RFK Jr. could restrict abortion medication access

Yahoo27-02-2025

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has suggested that he is open to restricting access to abortion medication, the primary method used for abortions across the U.S.
Kennedy pledged to study the abortion drug mifepristone on President Trump's request during his confirmation hearings, citing 'safety issues.' He did not offer further explanation of what those issues were.
'President Trump has asked me to study the safety of mifepristone,' Kennedy said during the hearings last month. 'He has not yet taken a stand on how to regulate it. Whatever he does, I will implement those policies.'
If the administration does seek to restrict access to the drug, health policy experts do not think Kennedy will attempt to remove it from the market, but say he could instead try to direct agencies within HHS to limit who can take mifepristone and how it can be administered.
'If you are trying to make a product harder to access … you are going to institute restrictions that reduce the ease in which people can access the product,' said Caleb Alexander, a physician and professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health with research focus on drug utilization and safety.
HHS oversees 13 agencies including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is responsible for protecting public health in part by making sure that the country's drug supplies are safe and effective for consumption.
One way the FDA tries to ensure that medications are safe is by implementing Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). These are a series of rules the agency imposes on some drugs to prevent, monitor and manage the frequency or severity of adverse health events, according to the FDA's website. They can include some interventions to ensure the safe use of medication, like an in-person dispensing requirement. Mifepristone was previously under such a requirement until the Biden administration dropped it.
Altering the REMS associated with the drug would be the most direct way to change who can take it and how, health experts said.
Though changes to REMS are often requested by the drug manufacturer, the FDA can also determine if a change is needed, according to agency guidelines. It still typically needs to work with the drug producer in those cases, however.
'The FDA may release a REMS or remove certain components of a REMS, if, after review of REMS assessments or other information, we determine that the extra measures in a REMS are no longer necessary to ensure a medication's benefits outweigh its risks,' the agency's website reads.
To change REMS for a drug, the FDA would need to provide evidence that itposes a danger to people and that the current REMS do not protect consumers well enough from those risks, health experts said.
The FDA first approved the abortion medication Mifeprex in 2000 and more than 100 studies conducted in at least 26 countries have found that most patients who have taken the drug have not experienced a serious complication like hospitalization or surgery.
Typically, the process for changing REMS doesn't happen 'overnight,' according to Laurie Sobel, associate director of women's health policy at health research nonprofit KFF.
But she suggestedthe process could be different under Trump, saying the administration could potentiallyissue an emergency declaration based on a study arguing that mifepristone is dangerous and revert back to earlier REMS for the drug.
Such a move could eventually make it harder to access to drug by reinstituting rules thatallowed only certain clinicians the right to prescribe it, she said.
Since 2000, the abortion medication has had a series of REMS that have been modified. The Biden-era FDA's announcement in 2021 that it woulddrop its requirement that the drug be dispensed in person to patients marked one of the more recent modifications.
That requirement was officially dropped in 2023, with the agency releasing new REMS for the drug.
In addition to seeking to roll back that change, the Trump FDA could also possibly suggest placing new requirements in the REMS that patients seeking mifepristone must undergo specific tests before they can be given the drug or be observed for a certain amount of time in clinic after it, according to Alexander.
If the agency were to suggest changes to REMS for mifepristone, the drug's manufacturers Danko Laboratories and GenBioPro, which creates a generic version of the drug, would likely challenge the changes in court, health experts said.
'But it's unclear how successful that challenge might be,' said Sobel.
The FDA did not answer questions from The Hill about REMS for mifepristone.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

President Donald Trump on Saturday said that it wasn't his decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, back to the U.S. to face federal charges, saying the 'Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine.' 'That wasn't my decision,' Trump said of Abrego Garcia's return in a phone call with NBC News on Saturday. 'It should be a very easy case' for federal prosecutors, the president added. Trump added that he did not speak with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return, even though the two men spoke about Abrego Garcia during an April meeting in the Oval Office. His remarks came after Abrego Garcia arrived back in the U.S. on Friday and was charged in an indictment alleging he transported people who were not legally in the country. The indictment came amid a protracted legal battle over whether to bring him back from El Salvador that escalated all the way up to the Supreme Court. Abrego Garcia's family and lawyers have called him a family man, while Trump and his administration have alleged that he is a member of the gang MS-13. The case drew national attention amid the Trump administration's broader push for mass deportations. After Abrego Garcia's deportation, lawyers for the Trump administration said he was deported in an 'administrative error,' as Abrego Garcia had previous legal protection from deportation to El Salvador. Still, the Trump administration did not attempt to bring Abrego Garcia back, even as the Supreme Court ruled that it had to 'facilitate' his return to the U.S. Democrats, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., had for weeks said that Abrego Garcia was denied due process when he was detained and deported, arguing that he should have been allowed to defend himself from deportation before he was sent to El Salvador. Trump on Saturday called Van Hollen, who went to visit Abrego Garcia in jail in El Salvador in April, a 'loser' for defending the man's right to due process. 'He's a loser. The guy's a loser. They're going to lose because of that same thing. That's not what people want to hear,' the president said about Van Hollen. 'He's trying to defend a man who's got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular. No, he's a total loser, this guy.' On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia 'was a smuggler of humans and children and women. He made over 100 trips, the grand jury found, smuggling people throughout our country.' In a statement Friday, Abrego Garcia's lawyer called Bondi's move 'an abuse of power, not justice.' This article was originally published on

Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud
Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud

Elon Musk has deleted his X post claiming that President Donald Trump's name is mentioned in the Jeffrey Epstein files Musk's claim came after the two men clashed about a new budget bill backed by the president The tech billionaire's decision to take down the post may be a sign of de-escalation in their highly publicized feudElon Musk has taken down his explosive claim that President Donald Trump's name is in the Jeffrey Epstein files — a move which may be a step toward de-escalation in the public feud between the two men. In the since-deleted post, which Musk shared on X on Thursday, June 5, the tech billionaire claimed that Trump appears in the high-profile case files, writing that it was the 'real reason' the files had not been made public. "Have a nice day, DJT!" he added sarcastically. Trump responded to the claim on Friday, June 6, by reposting a statement on Truth Social that was originally written by Epstein's former lawyer, David Schoen, on X. In the statement, Schoen claimed that his client 'had no information to hurt President Trump.' "I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died,' the statement began. 'He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!" Trump's name has previously been publicly linked with Epstein. His name was mentioned in flight logs released earlier this year by Attorney General Pam Bondi a total of seven times. However, the appearance of Trump's name in the flight logs does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing, as many of the individuals named could have been on Epstein's plane for legitimate reasons. The president was friends with the disgraced financier and pedophile for many years, but the two had a falling out in the mid-2000s, Trump told reporters shortly before Epstein died by suicide in 2019. Musk's deleted claim came on the heels of a number of verbal jabs with the president following the release of a controversial new budget bill. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk posted to X — which he owns — on Tuesday, June 3. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." During an Oval Office press conference on Thursday, June 4, Trump responded to Musk's criticisms. "Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anyone sitting here," Trump told reporters. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the [electric vehicle] mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars." Trump also predicted Musk's attacks would get personal after saying he was "very disappointed in Elon." The war of words also came just days after it was announced Musk would be leaving the Trump administration. Read the original article on People

Bill O'Reilly Bats for Trump to Pardon to 4-Year-Old Immigrant With Serious Illness: ‘Has to Be Exceptions'
Bill O'Reilly Bats for Trump to Pardon to 4-Year-Old Immigrant With Serious Illness: ‘Has to Be Exceptions'

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bill O'Reilly Bats for Trump to Pardon to 4-Year-Old Immigrant With Serious Illness: ‘Has to Be Exceptions'

Even Bill O'Reilly knows when enough is enough. The conservative commentator who has long supported strong border security went to bat this week for President Trump to issue humanitarian pardons to certain undocumented immigrants, using the example of a young child with a serious illness being treated at a Southern California hospital who was granted a pass by Homeland Security. 'I was happy to see this story,' the 'No Spin News' host said Friday. But first, some Biden-bashing: 'Thanks to President Biden, the FBI has spent more than a million manpower hours investigating problems stemming from the open border,' he said. 'Now, on Tuesday of this week alone, 2,200 illegal migrants were taken into custody,' he continued. 'That's a lot for one day. That's a 37% jump from the week prior. So, they're stepping up. ICE is stepping up its raids and … keeping them contained. They're not out on the street anymore. The White House is pleased. Trump wants this. That's why it's happening.' He also noted that since Trump has been president, there have been 67,000 undocumented migrants taken in and about 65,000 deported, but 'there are exceptions, or there should be, and there are.' 'Homeland Security, which controls ICE, has to make exceptions here,' he said. 'One of them is little Sophia Vargas, a four-year-old Mexican girl with a very serious illness. She's being treated in Southern California in a hospital there. Her mother, who took her across the border illegally in 2023, has been detained by ICE. But ICE is now giving the family a humanitarian waiver, which is the right thing to do. All right? We have to save this girl's life. 'Now, I would, if I were President Trump, pardon her. I'd say, 'You can stay on a humanitarian basis.' Nothing wrong with that. Sophia and her mom do not pose any danger to us, and it's a humanitarian thing.' Watch the monologue in the video above. The post Bill O'Reilly Bats for Trump to Pardon to 4-Year-Old Immigrant With Serious Illness: 'Has to Be Exceptions' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store