Tulsa Zoo gives update on new elephants Billy and Tina
The Brief
Asian elephants Billy and Tina have arrived at the Tulsa Zoo from the Los Angeles Zoo.
The elephants are currently in quarantine and will not be fully viewable to the public for a while.
Their arrival has been met with controversy regarding their transportation.
LOS ANGELES - The Tulsa Zoo has provided an update on the arrival of its new Asian elephants, Billy and Tina, who recently relocated from the Los Angeles Zoo.
What we know
Asian elephants Billy and Tina have arrived at the Tulsa Zoo from the Los Angeles Zoo, according to the latest update from the zoo's Facebook page.
They are currently in a standard quarantine period, kept separate from the other elephants but able to get used to their presence from a distance.
Billy and Tina are spending this quarantine period together and were heard trumpeting upon their reintroduction at the zoo's Elephant Preserve Barn after their journey.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: LA Zoo confirms fate of elephants Billy and Tina
Zoo officials said the care team is bonding with the elephants and coordinating with the Los Angeles Zoo to facilitate their transition.
While not fully viewable to guests for a while, visitors to the Elephant Preserve Barn may catch glimpses of them.
What they're saying
In a Facebook post, the Tulsa Zoo shared their appreciation and commitment: "Thank you to the staff at Los Angeles Zoo for sharing their expertise and passion for Billy and Tina with our team. We will continue your legacy of caring for them with excellence, teamwork and individualized attention. To those who know and love our zoo, thank you for being our champions. We will continue to do the work every day as passionate advocates for these amazing animals."
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: LA Zoo confirms Billy and Tina the elephants have been moved to Tulsa
What's next
The Tulsa Zoo plans to continue sharing updates about Billy and Tina as they proceed with their transition into their new home.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Judge denies request blocking LA Zoo from sending elephants Tina and Billy to Tulsa
The elephants will remain in quarantine for a period and will not be fully viewable to the public until they have fully acclimated.
The backstory
In April, the LA Zoo announced that Tina and Billy would be relocated to Tulsa to live out their days at the newly expanded Elephant Experience and Preserve at the Tulsa Zoo.
The decision was met with some anger and protest. Just last week, a judge denied a request for a temporary restraining order that would have put a temporary stop on a bid by the LA Zoo from moving its last two beloved elephants.
Zoo officials said the decision was made with the animals' care and well-being as the top priority, and the relocation "will afford them the opportunity to live among other elephants."
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: LA Zoo being sued over plans to move elephants to Oklahoma
Billy is 40 years old and Tina is 59. Contrary to the assumption that Billy has spent his entire life at the LA Zoo, his official biography indicates he was born in Malaysia and brought to Los Angeles when he was four years old. Tina's history also reveals she was reportedly a circus performer before arriving at the zoo as an adult.
Zoo officials have mentioned evaluating the elephant exhibit since the deaths of two other elephants -- Jewel, age 61, in 2023, and Shaunzi, age 53, in 2024 -- although they attributed those deaths to "declining health due to issues unrelated to the zoo's enclosure or care."
Dig deeper
The Tulsa Zoo houses five Asian elephants and includes a 17-acre area with a 36,650-square-foot elephant barn and a 10-plus-acre wooded elephant preserve.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: LA Zoo's last remaining Asian elephants to be relocated to Oklahoma
Some in the animal rights community say the Elephant Experience and Preserve in Tulsa "was just a fancy name for the somewhat larger elephant enclosure at the Tulsa Zoo in Oklahoma."
The Source
Information for this story is from the Tulsa Zoo, LA Zoo, and previous FOX 11 reports.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
a day ago
- Buzz Feed
18 Former "Gifted" Kids Share Its Effect On Their Lives
Recently, Reddit user Somervillage asked, "All the kids who were labelled as 'gifted' when you were younger — did it follow through to adulthood? Did you burnout?" People had A LOT to say. The question received over 4,500 replies! Here are some of the best: "I found anything that required effort immediately turned me off. I never developed a work ethic, so I'm incredibly lazy. But I'm also extremely efficient by putting in as little effort as possible to get tasks done." "I'm still working on it, albeit lazily."—real_picklejuice "I wouldn't say I burned out. But when I got to college, I got a painful lesson about the difference between being 'smart' and being 'a quick learner.'" "I had to learn to study in college. It took failing a course to admit to myself that I had to buckle down." —L0cked4fun "So far, so good. But I feel like an imposter. All through high school and college, I put in just enough effort to get an A. So I never really lived up to my potential, but I think that is the only thing that kept me sane." "I've never known anyone 'gifted' who didn't also have crippling mental or emotional problems. It seems to come with the territory. Maybe it's nature's way of leveling the playing field." —weird-oh "I was 'gifted' because I was an early and prolific reader, but oops — that's also hallmark for ADHD. I recently changed jobs in my field specifically to reduce the amount of responsibility I had. My anxiety is so much better." "I got a good job, but I also have inescapable depression and anxiety — not to mention a substance abuse problem. Part of me thinks the 'gifted' label just means I was mediocre but privileged. I'm not burnt out exactly, but I'm having a weird time." —RevolutionarySundae7 "I'm Asian...I'm not allowed to burn out." "I made it through college and grad school with honors, but I'm so burnt out by adult life and the 'real world.' I miss how easy academia was for me." "I excel in what I do for about three years, then I burn out and move on to something else. I've had several fun career paths. I'm great at learning, troubleshooting, problem solving, creative solutions, processing, and thinking outside the box. But I have no patience, low emotional intelligence, poor social skills, and no common sense." —Warm_Ad7486 "I'm a gifted teacher and was also a gifted student. Depression, anxiety, imposter syndrome, perfectionism, and burnout are all super common among gifted students. They're about twice as likely to attempt suicide and far more likely to have substance abuse problems. In many states, 'social emotional' goals are now included in their educational plans alongside academic goals. It's one of the compelling arguments for identifying gifted kids and giving them special services." "I reached a point where the mindset of 'studying is something that happens to other people' wasn't enough. I took a break. Went back to university in a different field and finished a four year degree in two years. Found work I enjoyed for most of a decade. Then my brain self-destructed and blew a hole in itself. Now I have to relearn how to walk every morning. But I'm good at it!" "Don't have a stroke in your 30s, y'all."—ChemistryPerfect4534 "I found out I was neurodivergent." "As a gifted adult, I've found that corporate America sucks because people don't want your improvements and feedback unless you're the boss. So I've had some unpleasant employment experiences." —RednocNivert "I'm at that uncomfortable level where I was told I'm gifted — genius even. But I've always been keenly aware of just how much of an effing idiot I really am. And I'm also keenly aware that I'm still somehow much more intelligent than the average people I deal with every single day." "I won math competitions and science fairs growing up. Graduated college early. Went from living in a trailer to a 4,000 square foot home with a new luxury SUV. Wife stays at home. I work from home. Have a couple kids. Life is pretty good." —Moron-Whisperer "I was 'gifted' and made the honor roll and president's list. My dad beat my college goals out of me when I was in high school, so I didn't go. I started working a dead end job just like he wanted. I feel like I'm at least a decade behind where I should be in life." And finally, on a lighter note, "30 years of smoking weed took care of that!" —blackbellamy"Gifted at smoking weed."—DeadNotSleepingWI"420 IQ."—mofototheflo H/T r/AskReddit

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: How big of a threat is China really?
Last June, during an annual security conference in East Asia, then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin underscored that the United States was not seeking conflict with China. Maintaining a consistent dialogue with Beijing, he hinted, was just as vital to effective deterrence as ensuring the U.S. military was fully equipped and prepared. Fast-forward a year later and the message from Washington is far different. Unlike his predecessor, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth name-dropped China in his speech to the same security conference multiple times, as if to shame the Asian superpower for running roughshod over the so-called rules-based international order. China, Hegseth warned, was trying to become a hegemon in Asia, where it could dominate its neighbors, exploit the South China Sea's vast natural resources and coerce other countries into accepting Beijing's demands. In Hegseth's words, 'It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific.' An invasion of Taiwan, he added, could be 'imminent.' If this all sounds scary, that's because it is. His comments raise the rhetorical gamesmanship to a level U.S. officials weren't comfortable with in the past. The Biden administration was no slouch on China policy, but it still didn't want to inflame things unnecessarily. The Pentagon, for instance, repeatedly emphasized that while China's military drills around Taiwan were aggressive and designed to wear down the island's will to resist, a conflict in the Taiwan Strait was 'neither imminent nor inevitable.' In other words, there was still an opportunity to defuse any tensions before they exploded into a war that could drag the United States in, kill tens of thousands of people and throw a heavy wrench into the global economy. The Trump administration, however, has deployed noticeably sharper words during its first four months. Although the fundamentals of its wider policy in East Asia mimic the Biden administration's own — reinforcing U.S. alliances; engaging in regular freedom of navigation exercises with Japan and the Philippines; and stressing the utility of preserving the status quo in the Taiwan Strait — Trump's advisers aren't afraid of poking Beijing in the eye. If managing the systemic rivalry with Beijing was a core component of Washington's overall strategy throughout Biden's four years, it increasingly looks like the guardrails that were put in place to prevent miscalculations are now eroding. Even so, does the Trump administration have a point? Is a conflict over Taiwan imminent as Hegseth suggests? And how real is the risk of China becoming Asia's hegemon? First, we should acknowledge that China is a threat in certain respects, particularly to its neighbors who have competing jurisdictional claims. The People's Liberation Army, or PLA, is arguably the strongest military in the region today, a consequence of Chinese President Xi Jinping's long-standing policy of pouring money into its coffers to fund a large-scale modernization campaign. China spent $314 billion on defense in 2024, a 7% increase from the year prior and a whopping 59% increase from a decade ago. The PLA boasts the largest ballistic missile arsenal in Asia and continues to invest in hypersonic missiles, which are difficult for conventional air defenses to intercept. The PLA is also throwing out the old rulebook that used to govern affairs in East Asia. As I mentioned last week, the median line that once served as an unofficial boundary separating Chinese and Taiwanese airspace is now imaginary as the Chinese air force flies closer to the self-ruled island to test Taiwan's defenses and wear down morale. Yet the United States would be wise to refrain from overestimating China's military capability and underestimating the capability of its allies like Japan, the Philippines, South Korea and Australia — all of whom have an even greater interest in preventing Chinese hegemony in Asia than Washington does. China is its own worst enemy in this regard: The more it presses its territorial claims, the more incentive its neighbors have to balance Beijing. For the most part, this is exactly what China's neighbors are doing. Japan is the most obvious case study. Traditionally a pacifist country that kept to an artificially low defense budget relative to its wealth, Japan has spent the last three years adding resources to its so-called Self-Defense Forces and buying American weapons off the shelf. Tokyo's latest national security strategy, unveiled in 2022, was a sea-change in how Japan typically talks about its security environment. In that document, China was called out for challenging the international order, partnering with Russia in its war against Ukraine and trying to change the region's status quo by force. Japan's defense budget is set to double by 2027, and with more resources comes a greater capability to preserve the balance of power. The Philippines is another example. While the country can't possibly compete with China in conventional terms, the Philippine government under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has effectively given up on rapprochement with Beijing and thrown in its lot with Washington. China's incessant clashes with Philippine forces in the South China Sea have served as a wake-up call to a country whose previous administration under Rodrigo Duterte (who is now in custody at the Hague for war crimes) drifted into the Chinese camp and took a more suspicious view of U.S. intentions. Today, Manila is not only buttressing its navy and coast guard but also increasingly partnering with countries like Japan and Australia who have a similar threat perception about China. In short, Asia's middle-powers aren't standing still. Chinese coercion is bringing them together. And ultimately, this is more important for stability in this area of the world than whatever the United States chooses to do. ____ Daniel DePetris is a fellow at Defense Priorities and a foreign affairs columnist for the Chicago Tribune. ___
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
India coal-fired power output falls at fastest pace in five years in May
By Sudarshan Varadhan and Sethuraman N R SINGAPORE (Reuters) - India's coal-fired electricity generation in May fell at the fastest pace in five years, as overall power demand declined for the first time since August and renewable energy generation rose to a record high, a Reuters analysis of government data showed. Increased generation from less polluting power sources including hydro and nuclear also led to a decline in natural gas-fired power output, which fell at the steepest rate in nearly three years, a review of data from the federal power grid regulator Grid India showed. The decline in demand for fossil fuels for electricity generation in India - the second largest importer of coal and the fourth biggest buyer of liquefied natural gas (LNG) - comes at a time when benchmark prices of the fuels are under pressure. "Demand from the power sector - typically strong during peak season - remained limited. Additionally, economic headwinds have weighed on non-power industries," Indian coal trader I-Energy said in a note this week. Asian spot LNG prices have declined more than 15% this year, while benchmark prices of thermal coal have plunged to more than 4-year lows due to weak demand from China and India - the top coal importing countries. India's coal-fired power generation fell 9.5% in May on an annual basis to 113.3 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh), a review of data from the federal power grid regulator Grid India showed, marking the sharpest year-on-year decline since June 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic led to a nationwide lockdown. A sustained slowdown in demand for fossil fuels for power generation could help the world's third largest emitter of greenhouse gases slash emissions after it previously boosted its reliance on coal to power a post-pandemic economic recovery. India has repeatedly cited lower per capita emissions compared with richer nations to defend its high coal use. Utilities in China and India have cut dependence on coal and LNG imports this year also due to record coal stocks and slower growth in power demand. India had forced gas-based power plants to operate last year to meet high power demand as temperatures soared. As power demand is lower and prices are high for gas-fired power to be competitive with other sources such as solar this year, utilities will buy fewer volumes, said Prashant Vashisth, vice president at Moody's affiliate ICRA. Total electricity generation in May fell 5.3% year-on-year to 160.4 billion kWh, the data showed, with the highest peak demand about 8% lower on-year at 231 GW, mainly due to milder temperatures, government officials said. Peak demand - a measure of the maximum electricity requirement over any given time - reached 250 GW during a heatwave in May 2024. Meanwhile, renewable energy output surged to a record high of 24.7 billion kWh in May, up 17.2% from a year earlier, with its share in the overall power mix rising to 15.4% - the highest since records began in 2018. The share of coal in India's power mix dropped to 70.7% in May, down from 74.0% a year earlier and the lowest level since June 2022, according to the Grid India data. Hydropower generation jumped 8.3% to 14.5 billion kWh, accounting for 9.0% of total generation compared to 7.9% in May 2024, the data showed. Natural gas-fired power generation fell 46.5% annually to 2.78 billion kWh in May, the steepest decline since October 2022.