Books Kinokuniya to open new outlet at Raffles City in August
Books Kinokuniya will open a new outlet at Raffles City Shopping Centre in August.
In a Facebook post on April 21, the bookstore chain announced the new store, which will span 3,433 sq ft on the third floor of the mall.
Mr Tan Kay Ngee, 68, award-winning principal architect of Kay Ngee Tan Architects, who designed the first Books Kinokuniya's flagship store at Ngee Ann City in 1999, told The Straits Times: "The new Kinokuniya store is conceived as a quiet discovery - designed not to shout, but to invite."
It will feature a Blue Room at the heart of the shop. "It is a serene space dedicated to literature which evokes a quieter, more contemplative mood for immersive reading experiences."
The space will reuse the iconic blue shelves from the flagship store, which is currently being reorganised. In February, it was announced that the bookshop's 38,000 sq ft space at Ngee Ann City would be reduced. A spokesperson for Books Kinokuniya said that despite the outlet's smaller footprint, "our range of titles remains intact and we intend to expand and showcase a more varied merchandise mix".
The main entrance of the flagship store reopened on April 7, although the rest of the store is still undergoing "significant changes". The spokesperson also confirmed that there would be no staff layoffs or manpower changes at the Takashimaya outlet.
The bookshop chain closed its outlets at Jem mall in Jurong in May 2022 and at Liang Court mall in Clarke Quay in April 2019. The closures reflect a shrinking books retail scene in recent years as various brands such as Times and Epigram Books closed physical outlets, squeezed by high rentals and thin profits.
When asked about Books Kinokuniya's future plans in Singapore, the spokesperson said: "We would consider opening a new store if the right venue and price come together."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
MinLaw to propose laws targeting debt consultancy firms exploiting debt repayment scheme
Ministry of Law data showed that 2,928 bankruptcy applications were filed by debtors in 2024. PHOTO: ST FILE SINGAPORE – Laws around a scheme to help individuals avoid insolvency may be tightened, with the authorities targeting firms that encourage individuals to borrow money and file for bankruptcy to get a discount off their debts. These consultancy firms are looking to abuse the Debt Repayment Scheme (DRS), a pre-bankruptcy scheme administered by the Ministry of Law (MinLaw). On June 9, MinLaw said there has been an increasing number of debtors engaging the services of consultancy firms, which encourage debtors to self-petition for bankruptcy with the objective of being placed on the DRS. 'This is done not with the intention of being adjudged a bankrupt, but with the intention of abusing the DRS to obtain a discount off their debts,' the ministry said. A debtor can avoid being made bankrupt if he is put on the DRS, but he must file for bankruptcy first before being considered for the scheme. MinLaw said that the consultancy firms are charging debtors sizeable fees and encouraging them to borrow money from creditors to pay for their services. 'Due in part to this trend, there has been an increase in the number of debtor-initiated bankruptcy applications, where debtors borrow irresponsibly to pay for such consultancy firms' services in helping them apply for bankruptcy,' MinLaw said. The Straits Times reported in March that more than half of the bankruptcy applications in 2024 were made by the debtors themselves – the fifth consecutive year since 2020 that the number of self-filed applications was higher than applications by creditors. MinLaw data showed that 2,928 bankruptcy applications were filed by debtors in 2024. That represents 59 per cent of all applications made that year. The DRS is a voluntary, debtor-driven scheme intended to help wage-earning debtors with relatively small debts avoid bankruptcy while helping creditors receive higher repayments than they would otherwise receive in the event of insolvency. Under the DRS, debtors with unsecured debts not exceeding $150,000 can enter a debt repayment plan over a fixed period of not more than five years with their creditors and avoid bankruptcy. When the debtor meets his financial obligations under the DRS, he will be released from his debts. MinLaw said it noticed an increasing number of debtors engaging the services of consultancy firms that encourage debtors to self-petition for bankruptcy with the objective of being placed on the DRS. To address the issue, the ministry is proposing a new law that will make it a crime for businesses to solicit and canvass any person to make a bankruptcy application. Regulated professionals, in particular lawyers, accountants and financial advisers, as well as charitable entities that are institutions of a public character, will be exempted. The offence will be punishable with a $10,000 fine or three years' jail, or both. The DRS was first introduced in 2009 as people grappled with the 2008 financial crisis and the Great Recession, which caused many to lose their jobs and take pay cuts. It began with a debt threshold of $100,000, but this was increased to the current $150,000 in 2020 following a review in 2016. Under the scheme, debtors make repayments of their debt by following a structured repayment plan under the supervision of the Official Assignee (OA), an officer of the court appointed by the Law Minister. MinLaw said that as part of a review of the scheme, it is also looking to add two new grounds of unsuitability for the DRS. They include the failure to pay the preliminary fees and incurring of debts with no reasonable ground of expectation of being able to pay. Debtors who are referred to the OA to be assessed for their suitability for the DRS are required to pay preliminary fees totalling $600 . In addition, MinLaw is also looking to add as a new ground of failure individuals who incur debts with no reasonable ground of expectation of being able to pay, and imposing a four-week time limit for creditors to file their proofs of debt under the DRS. Members of the public are invited to provide their feedback on the proposed key amendments after viewing the full consultation paper at Those who wish to submit their views and feedback may do so by June 27 at Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Straits Times
19 hours ago
- Straits Times
askST Jobs: What to do if it seems like you're sidelined from the start at a new job
While prolonged inactivity in a new job can quickly turn confusing and demoralising, there are valid reasons why a new hire might not be assigned work from the outset. ST ILLUSTRATION: LEE YU HUI askST Jobs: What to do if it seems like you're sidelined from the start at a new job In this series, manpower correspondent Tay Hong Yi offers practical answers to candid questions on navigating workplace challenges and getting ahead in your career. Get more tips by signing up to The Straits Times' Headstart newsletter. Q: I just took up a new job, but my boss isn't assigning me any tasks nor training. Am I being set up to fail? A: While prolonged inactivity in a new job can quickly turn confusing and demoralising, there are valid reasons why a new hire might not be assigned work from the outset, says Mr Alvin Goh, chief executive of the Singapore Human Resources Institute. 'Sometimes, the hiring manager is not ready for the new joiner to start due to internal delays or restructuring.' Teams might need longer to integrate new hires than the timeline the human resources department has in mind, especially in multinational companies and those with complex reporting structures that interlace across seniority levels and departments, he adds. Echoing his views, Ms Loh Kaili, associate director at BTI Executive Search, says: 'Sometimes, new hires come in during a messy period when projects are stalled, headcounts were approved prematurely or teams are being restructured. 'Hiring managers may not know what to do next and will keep things at status quo.' New employees might also need to clock milestones such as probation evaluations or study modules before they can be assigned tasks, or in the case of some sensitive industries, clear security checks, both experts add. However, Mr Goh notes all these are typically short-term scenarios that should be resolved within weeks, not months. When someone repeatedly gets turned away after asking to contribute and offering their expertise over a prolonged period, it may point to a structural dysfunction or existence of personal bias against them, he adds. Some bosses may also be insecure, fearing that a new hire could grow to replace them, and intentionally set the new hire up for failure, Ms Loh notes. Still, feeling threatened by subordinates is definitely not a valid reason to withhold work, she adds. Mr Goh suggests that workers who have not received any assignments or training for more than several weeks should request a meeting with either the HR team, or a leader one level above their direct boss. However, he advises workers to signal their commitment to growing and contributing in their role, rather than complaining right away in the first such meeting. New hires should initiate structured conversations with their manager to hash out clear priorities and performance targets, says Ms Loh. She also suggests workers keep a record of their attempts to proactively request for work and seek clarity on their position. 'I would recommend the new hire to give himself or herself a clear timeline of around two to three months to observe if there is any improvement to the situation.' If there is no improvement, and workers quit within three months with little to no work experience to show for it, they may omit the stint from their curriculum vitae, she adds. Mr Goh also encourages job seekers to pre-empt any potential issues by asking prospective employers questions about what success looks like in the new job, what the onboarding experience will involve and what support is given to ensure new joiners start well. 'These questions not only help you gauge how prepared the team is, but they also signal that you are not just looking for a job but a meaningful runway to contribute.' Mr Jason Chua, a former assistant registrar at the Employment Claims Tribunals, who now teaches law at Temasek Polytechnic, says that it is possible, but unlikely, that withholding work or training amounts to constructive dismissal. Constructive dismissal is a type of unfair dismissal in which an employee is found to not have resigned voluntarily, but was forced to do so due to the action or inaction of an employer. Mr Chua notes that work may not be explicitly assigned to you because your employer might expect new employees to take the time to get to know their colleagues, observe them at work and understand where they fit into the work of the company. He also suggests that new joiners compare their workload with peers in the team, and ask their bosses if they could also help with the work their peers are doing. However, should employers or managers make explicit indications or statements that they are withholding work or training to drive an employee out of the role, Mr Chua suggests the employee could collate and gather evidence of such behaviour and words. 'This helps the employee to build a case to show that the employer, through his words or conduct, is seeking to drive the employee out of employment and, therefore, constructively dismiss the employee. 'If the employee can prove that he or she has been constructively dismissed, he or she can stop work, resign and claim for salary in lieu of notice from the employer.' Employers who have withheld work or training due to reasons such as an employee's nationality and age may also fall afoul of upcoming workplace fairness laws, Mr Chua adds. Have a question? Send it to askst@ Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.
AsiaOne
4 days ago
- AsiaOne
Queues at VEP application centres in Singapore, JB after news of enforcement from July 1 , Singapore News
SINGAPORE/JOHOR BAHRU — Waves of Singapore motorists showed up at Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) application and installation centres in Singapore and Johor Bahru a day after Malaysia announced that enforcement of the VEP will start on July 1. Singapore-registered vehicles entering the country from that date without a valid VEP will be fined RM300 (S$91), Malaysia's Transport Minister Anthony Loke said on June 4. The drivers will have to pay the fine and complete their VEP registration before leaving Malaysia. On June 5, motorists showed up at VEP centres in Woodlands in Singapore and Danga Bay in Johor Bahru because they needed help with signing up on the online portal or had problems activating their radio frequency identification (RFID) tags. VEP-registered vehicles need to have RFID tags installed and activated in order to make payments for Malaysian expressway tolls and the road charge when entering Johor via the two land checkpoints. The counters in Malaysia are operated by TCSens, Malaysia's ministry-appointed vendor for handling VEP registrations; while the one in Singapore is run by My VEP, a separate company, in collaboration with TCSens. Between 9.30am and 10.30am, around 40 people were seen queueing outside the My VEP office in Woodlands Industrial Park. They include motorists collecting their VEP RFID tags and those needing help with applications. Those without appointment slots were turned away. Around lunchtime at the TCSens inquiry centre in Danga Bay, more than 60 motorists were seen queueing to seek assistance from staff to troubleshoot their VEP registrations. The centre allows walk-in inquiries. Latiff Saleh, 64, who did not have an appointment, left the Woodlands centre in Singapore without getting any assistance. He needed help to terminate the existing VEP registration of his car, which was tagged to its previous owner, as he was not able to do so online. On hearing the June 4 announcement, he tried to log in to the VEP portal to restart the application process but faced difficulties. He had not decided whether to try his luck at Danga Bay soon or wait for the rush in Woodlands to subside before getting an appointment. Inquiries had been decreasing before the June 4 announcement, and appointment slots had been available daily since March, said Ng Poh Heng, manager of My VEP. But by the morning of June 5, all the slots until June 20 had been taken up, checks by The Straits Times found. Esther Chua, 50, received her VEP RFID tag earlier in 2025 but found that it could not be fitted to her car as required. The finance executive did not get around to exchanging the tag until after hearing the latest news. "The Malaysian side seems to keep changing their mind, so I didn't feel the need to get it fixed (so soon)," she said at Woodlands on June 5. The latest move to enforce the VEP comes eight years after the plan was first mooted in 2017. Its implementation was shelved twice, in 2019 and again in 2020. It was rolled out in October 2024, but foreign vehicles found without valid VEPs were given reminders to get registered and not the Danga Bay inquiry centre on June 5, waiting times were long, with motorists saying they began queueing from as early as 6am for the counter to open at 9am. One of the motorists, a 76-year-old Singaporean retiree who wanted to be known only as Chong, said that his VEP application was rejected in October 2024 because it was missing insurance documents. He said he never heard back after he replied with the documents. "Suddenly, they said they are going to enforce (the requirement) this July. This is very troublesome," he said, adding that the announcement on June 4 caught him by surprise. Singaporean interior designer Andrew Ho, 44, who arrived in Danga Bay at 9am, waited five hours to get help from TCSens staff. His VEP RFID tag could not be read at the Malaysian Customs gantry. A TCSens staff member at Danga Bay told ST that by 2.30pm, he had already assisted more than 100 motorists, compared with the daily number of 130 cars that the centre had handled in the past few months. Loke told reporters on June 4 that foreign-registered private vehicles have had ample time to be VEP-registered since the call to do so was made in May 2024. The minister added that 231,018 Singapore-registered private individually owned vehicles have signed up for the VEP, with 15 per cent yet to activate the RFID tags. Meanwhile, skip-the-queue VEP services in Singapore are seeing an uptick in inquiries. These services apply for the VEP on the motorists' behalf, saving drivers the hassle of making the online application or queueing at the counters. Derrick Heng, director of Radiant VEP, which offers skip-the-queue services, said inquiries have spiked since the latest announcement, after getting around 10 queries daily from the beginning of 2025. "We received about 30 inquiries on June 4, and our office (in Kaki Bukit) was full, with motorists coming in to apply for the permits at the last minute," he said. Jason Koay, director of accounting and secretarial firm Bizwise Management, which advertises its VEP application assistance service on Carousell, said he helped with 50 applications on June 5, up from two to three inquiries a day since March. A TCSens spokesman urged Singaporean motorists to register promptly for the VEP through the website, as it is anticipating a surge in applications and appointments at its four centres in Johor Bahru and Singapore. "Motorists must ensure that the VEP RFID tags are securely fixed on their vehicles and activated for use once they have received them," he added. [[nid:718706]] This article was first published in The Straits Times . Permission required for reproduction.
