Farage as PM could push independence support close to 60%, poll suggests
The survey by Norstat for the Sunday Times, which spoke to 1,007 Scots between May 27 and May 30, showed support for separation currently sits at 54% in Scotland.
But if Reform UK were to win the next general election that figure could near the 60% level some believe should be the tipping point for another referendum.
The figure rose from 50% in the last Norstat poll in January.
The highest that support for independence has reached in recent years is 58%, in an Ipsos Scotland poll for STV News in the early months of the pandemic, as Nicola Sturgeon received plaudits for her handling of Covid-19.
But the increase comes as support for the SNP continued to fall ahead of next year's Holyrood elections, with the party dropping two percentage points in both the constituency and regional list votes to 33% and 28% respectively.
Labour's support rose slightly to 19% in constituencies and 18% in Scotland's regions.
But Reform UK would see a surge, if the poll was to reflect the returns seen next May, with Mr Farage's party jumping to 18% in constituencies and 16% on the list – up two and three percentage points respectively.
Meanwhile the Scottish Tories dropped two points to 13% locally and remained at 15% in the regions.
The figures come ahead of a by-election in Lanarkshire this week, after the death of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie.
According to polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice, in projections for the Sunday Times, John Swinney was on track to win an unprecedented fifth term in office for his party next year, securing 54 seats.
Labour would drop to 20 seats, while Reform would win 18 in their first full political test in Scotland.
Meanwhile, the Tories would drop from being the second biggest party to the fourth, with just 17 MSPs, followed by the Lib Dems on 11 and the Greens on nine.
The poll also looked at Westminster voting intentions, with the SNP recording 31% of the vote, followed by Reform surging into second on 21% and Labour dropping 15 points from last year's election to 20%.
The Conservatives sit at 12%, while 8% said they would vote for the Lib Dems.
But despite leaping into second, Nigel Farage's party would not return a single MP, the polling expert said, with the SNP rising to 30, Labour falling to 16 and the Lib Dems and Tories remaining on six and five respectively.
SNP depute leader Keith Brown said his party has 'momentum' and Labour has lost Thursday's by-election in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse.
'In government, Labour has taken away the winter fuel payment, cut £5 billion of support for disabled people and watched on as energy bills rose by £150,' he said.
'With an SNP Government, the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse are getting action on what matters to them: bringing back the universal winter fuel payment, record funding for our NHS and key costs lower, with peak rail fares scrapped and lower income tax for the majority of taxpayers.
'The Labour Party has let you down and Farage is trying to stoke division, but the SNP is always on your side.'
Scottish Labour's deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: 'Scotland has been let down for too long by this tired and out-of-touch SNP government.
'After 18 years in charge, the SNP has left our NHS at breaking point, our economy flatlining and our schools tumbling down the international league tables.
'This week the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse will get a chance to call time on SNP failure and choose a new direction with Scottish Labour.
'It's clear the SNP does not deserve to win this by-election and only Scottish Labour can beat them.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Davy Russell dodges question 11 times in STV interview
Davy Russell, who snubbed a debate organised by STV's Scotland Tonight programme on Monday evening, instead took part in an individual interview with the broadcaster. The debate, which will air on STV on Monday evening, will only be attended by the SNP's Katy Loudon and Reform UK's Ross Lambie. READ MORE: Seven Scottish Tory councillors quit party as group 'collapses' Russell previously said he would not be attending the debate because he would rather be "knocking on doors" - despite the fact that the event is scheduled for 10.40pm. In an individual interview with STV journalist Colin Mackay ahead of the debate, Russell struggled to answer when asked about the failings of the current Labour Government. 🗳️Tonight we hear from five candidates in the Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse Holyrood by-election. In recent Scottish opinion polls, there are six parties enjoying significant support. We invited their candidates to debate. Only two agreed to debate, and three took up the… — ScotlandTonight (@ScotlandTonight) June 2, 2025 Mackay asked Russell a total of 11 times whether the UK Government was right to scrap the Winter Fuel Payment. The Scottish Labour candidate did not answer and instead insisted that he wasn't involved in the decision and that he was running for a Holyrood election rather than Westminster. In a clip shared on social media, Mackay asked: "You're probably speaking to quite a lot of older people. Are you getting any anger from them that Labour have scrapped the Winter Fuel Allowance?" READ MORE: What to expect from The National as we cover Hamilton by-election this week Russell responded: "Yes, there is some concern, and Scottish Labour have said from day one that we will reinstate the Winter Fuel Allowance." Mackay then said: "But at Westminster you've scrapped it, so again, you'd have to mitigate what your Government did at Westminster." Russell replied: "But there were hard decisions to be made when the Labour Government came into power in Westminster." Mackay then asked Russell four times whether the Labour Government was right to scrap the Winter Fuel Payment. "They're hard decisions to take," Russell started to reply. Mackay then asked again: "Do you think they were right?" Russell responded: "Well, they were very hard decisions." Mackay asked: "Do you think they were right to do it? It was a hard decision, do you think they made the right decision?" Russell said: "Well, they took it based on the decisions, the circumstances they'd inherited." READ MORE: Nigel Farage hides from public and press in shambolic by-election campaign visit Mackay replied: "So you backed them? You backed the Chancellor, you back the Prime Minister on it?" Russell repeated: "They're very hard decisions." Mackay asked again: "And you back them?" Russell then paused for several seconds before saying: "I totally think that the decisions they had to make were based on the previous government's mismanagement of the country–" "And you backed them on it." Russell then paused again, before he started: "On the doorsteps here, people are–" "But you backed the Government. You backed the Prime Minister and the Chancellor. You can just tell me yes or no." "Well, I wasn't involved in the decision, and this is a Scottish Parliament election, right? "If I was a member of parliament then, I would have based it on the facts I had in front of me at the time." The interview comes as Prime Minister Keir Starmer was in Scotland for a defence announcement in Govan, although he did not take part in the by-election campaign in nearby Hamilton. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage was also in Scotland, visiting Aberdeen and Hamilton – where he avoided the public and the press after protesters tracked down where he was supposed to appear.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Nigel Farage dodges public and press in shambolic Hamilton by-election visit
The Reform UK leader was in Aberdeen on Monday morning, his first visit to Scotland in six years, where he held a press conference and was due to head to Hamilton for a walkabout later in the afternoon. He expressed anger over a small number of protesters outside the Aberdeen event and, without evidence, accused one Herald journalist of leaking the location. Farage was then due to arrive for a press call in Hamilton at 2.15pm, but did not show. READ MORE: Scottish Labour councillor defects to Reform UK Journalists were left waiting in a Premier Inn car park in the town, with no sign of the Reform UK leader. Broadcast and print media was in attendance and for around an hour, outlets caught up with colleagues and discussed Farage's comments towards media in the morning. As the group waited, the National Union of Journalists published their statement about the Aberdeen press conference and it was shared round. They stated: "It is shocking that Nigel Farage, who is seeking to become the next PM, feels free to make baseless attacks without any evidence on the integrity of journalists and blame the press for protests. 'The job of journalists is to report on politicians without fear or favour. All politicians across the political spectrum will at some point, face protests and the overwhelming majority have the sense to understand that the job of journalists is to report that. 'Blaming the press for opposition to their policies may be becoming common in some countries, but politicians should understand that this won't fly with voters here. Attacking the press doesn't demonstrate strength: it just exposes a thin skin to voters.' Several called Reform UK party staff multiple times, only for calls to be sent to voicemail. One journalist did get through to a party organiser who told them Farage was on his way and cut off the call. This was at 3.20pm, around 40 minutes until his flight was due to leave Glasgow. Around this time, Farage was pictured campaigning in Larkhall with candidate Ross Lambie and newly defected Scottish Labour councillor Jamie McGuire. Media was not able to attend this walk-about and it is unclear how long Farage spent in the area. Out and about in Larkhall with @CllrRossLambie. Come and say hello! 🏴 — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) June 2, 2025 By around 3.30pm, members of the Scottish press had begun to leave the agreed meeting point, abandoning the press call altogether. Farage then posted a picture of himself with Reform UK activists, writing: "Arrived at our campaign HQ in Hamilton". Arrived at our campaign HQ in Hamilton. Scotland needs Reform! 🏴 — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) June 2, 2025 It is understood that the photograph was taken at the back court of the campaign HQ, which journalists could not access. The group of around 40 journalists walked in a pack to the hub, and once outside it was clear Farage had been and gone, just a five-minute walk from where they had waited for almost two hours. It is understood that Farage left Hamilton soon after the image was taken. As the cameras appeared on Quarry Street, protesters began arguing and shouting at each other as anti-racist and pro-Reform activists clashed outside the campaign hub. Protesters and people in Hamilton town centre began to shout back and forth while Farage headed to Glasgow airport — Laura Pollock (@laura_pollock_) June 2, 2025 Protesters could be heard shouting "no-show Nigel" outside of the campaign hub as well as singing "where's your Nigel gone?". A note on the form to apply for media accreditation had said: "Thank you for applying for media accreditation to our upcoming campaign day in Hamilton with Nigel Farage. "This will take place on Monday 2 June. Arrive 14:00 for a prompt 14:15 start. Meeting point to be confirmed to accredited journalists." As Farage headed to Glasgow Airport, the people of Hamilton were left screaming in the street at each other. The National watched as what began as a smattering of protestors on either side descended into what can only be described as a mixture of confusion and chaos. Crowds gathered outside the Reform campaign hub around 3:30pm on Quarry Street as things began to get tense, with heated arguments breaking out on both sides of the road and protestors blocking traffic. Stand Up To Racism (SUTR) chanted slogans like 'Nigel, Nigel, we know you, you're a racist through and through' whilst Reform supporters could be heard calling SUTR protestors 'tramps' and shouting 'you aren't even from Hamilton, fuck off'. Campaigners from inside the Reform hub informed members of SUTR — who played XTC's Making Plans for Nigel through a megaphone under office door — that Farage had left Hamilton the way he entered; through a back door, avoiding both the public and the press.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Ash Regan's gaffe has revealed the sorry state of politicians
Enter Alba MSP Ash Regan, former SNP MSP and leadership candidate turned party reject. In an interview with The Herald over the weekend, Regan promoted her new bill that seeks to criminalise the buying of sex in Scotland while decriminalising sex workers. However, this approach to sex work, also known as the Nordic model, is known for forcing sex workers into even more precarious working conditions. A 2016 Amnesty International report found that Nordic model laws caused sex workers to face the ongoing risk of police harassment, client violence, discrimination, eviction and exploitation. But when asked if she believed that following the flawed Nordic model would effectively push sex workers into an unregulated, underground system, Regan responded in disbelief. READ MORE: What to expect from The National as we cover Hamilton by-election this week 'You cannot possibly drive prostitution underground,' she asserted, because 'if you had a lot of women in underground cellars with a locked door, how would the punters get to them?' When I read this, I'll admit, I didn't immediately grasp what had been said for a moment. To believe that driving sex work underground meant quite literally putting women in subterranean cages was, to me, so far from how any reasonable person would interpret that question that I actively needed to pause and think. And then it was funny. Deeply funny. Just another reminder of how poorly Scotland's political class is serving its people in the cosmic horror show of contemporary Britain. Then it got a lot less funny – because Regan is an example of just how far an incompetent politician can get by exploiting fears against a minority group. OK, it's actually still pretty funny. But it's one heck of a red flag for anyone labouring under the illusion that anti-trans politics equate to feminism. For someone who has painted themselves as a champion of women to be so unfamiliar with the feminist principle of harm reduction that they would take such a question literally, you could interpret that as a mark of someone who has only learned to cloak themselves in the colours of feminism for their own benefit. You cannot stop sex work by criminalising it, just as you cannot stop drug use, or abortion or gender transition by legal means. For as long as the material conditions remain that lead people to sex work, such as economic insecurity or the threat of homelessness, then sex work will continue – but in far less safe conditions for the women who do that work. The idea of harm reduction is that we must recognise that material reality, and work to make it as safe as possible for sex workers while we focus on the actual issues that press people into going into sex work in the first place. This is not a new idea – and Regan's ignorance to it is revealing. In The Herald interview, Regan was charitably given another chance to respond to the question, this time without such challenging idioms as 'being driven underground'. The Herald reporter clarified that they meant making sex work illegal could push sex workers into a less safe working environment, where punters would just purchase sex illegally. Asked if that made sense to her, Regan said: 'No.' READ MORE: IDF bars media from visiting West Bank villages on tour organised by Oscar winners Which has really left me in a bit of a pickle (not an actual pickle, Ash, if you're reading). On one side, I suppose, we have a broad dataset that shows how criminalising sex work leads to skyrocketing rates of violence and exploitation; and on the other we have someone that thinks driving sex work underground would lead to roving bands of sex workers traversing the sewers. Who to believe… It might seem trite to ridicule a politician over one deeply daft comment, but it's a symptom of a bigger issue. Regan's opposition to the Gender Recognition Reform Bill in 2022, and subsequent resignation from Nicola Sturgeon's ministerial team was her springboard into the spotlight. And like every other grifter screaming about being 'cancelled' from the front pages of major newspapers and the guest panels of national broadcast shows alike, Regan soon fashioned herself a silenced hero, bravely taking on a trans rights movement that was out of control. And that was really all people needed to know about Regan to start treating her like a Very Serious Contender at Holyrood. I've watched over the past 10 years as Scotland's anti-trans movement has evangelically boosted every politician willing to throw a jibe at the trans community into the limelight; every outdated comedian who thinks punching down is their ticket back to relevance; every hack musician with a laughable ballad on the plight of standing up to less than 1% of the population. The quality is irrelevant – it's the message that matters. I've watched for a decade as the gender-critical community has uncritically boosted the far-right, anti-abortion activists and anti-feminists into the forefront of their campaigns over and over again – perhaps why supposedly liberal transphobes seem to keep finding themselves shoulder to shoulder with Nazis at their rallies. The problem with electing someone off the back of one issue, and one issue alone, is you'll never really be sure what the next thing out their mouth will be.
