
Over 14K Sign Christian Petition Issuing Warning on Supreme Court Case
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
More than 14,000 people have signed a petition from Christian advocacy group Faithful America in efforts to stress the importance of church-state separation while warning that leaders in Oklahoma aim to "dismantle" that boundary.
The push comes amid the Supreme Court weighing whether the nation's first publicly funded religious charter school can legally operate in the Sooner State.
"The Supreme Court seems to be open to demolishing the wall between church and state. When public dollars fund religious schools that can discriminate and exclude, we all lose. Our children lose. Our churches lose," the Reverend Shannon Fleck, executive director of Faithful America, told Newsweek via email on Friday.
Why It Matters
The Supreme Court heard arguments this week in a case centered on St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, a proposed K-12 charter that openly states its mission to evangelize students in the Catholic faith. Charter schools are considered public institutions in Oklahoma and nearly every other state, meaning they must abide by state funding and oversight rules.
Republican attorney general of Oklahoma, Gentner Drummond, sued Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board to halt creation of the school, arguing it violated Oklahoma law and both the state and U.S. Constitutions.
The Supreme Court's ruling could have significant implications for religious liberty and education, potentially opening the door for taxpayer funds to support religious schools.
Some conservative Christians back the charter school's case, while others, like Faithful America, which is a progressive Christian organization, are opposing the move.
Supporters of charter schools rally outside the Supreme Court on April 30 in Washington, D.C.
Supporters of charter schools rally outside the Supreme Court on April 30 in Washington, D.C.
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein
What To Know
Faithful America, a Christian advocacy group that often shares petitions supporting religious freedom and opposing President Donald Trump, launched one in late April emphasizing that "the separation of church and state is an important legal construct that protects both our democracy and our churches from outside influence."
As of Friday, the petition had more than 14,000 signatures and argues that the state's effort to allow a religious charter school represents "an intentional attempt to dismantle this critical separation."
"As a Christian and an Oklahoman, I am disgusted that our public education system is being used as a tool for religious indoctrination, especially while schools across Oklahoma are already struggling," Fleck told Newsweek.
The state of Oklahoma approved formation of the school in 2023, but the following year, the state Supreme Court ruled it violated the Constitution and blocked the decision.
The nation's highest court heard arguments on Wednesday, and Fleck said the justices' commentary serves as an "indication the Supreme Court may be on the verge of abandoning one of the bedrock principles of our democracy."
The First Amendment prohibits the government from establishing a national religion and protects individuals' rights to freely practice their faith.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett has recused herself due to her friendship with a St. Isidore adviser, and it appears that the court could be divided, with Chief Justice John Roberts potentially casting the deciding vote.
"This is a wake-up call for every American who believes that the government should never weaponize faith," Fleck told Newsweek.
Supporters of charter schools and Christian education rallied outside the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
What People Are Saying
The Freedom From Religion Foundation on Friday posted to X, formerly Twitter: "Let's be clear: No one is 'banning Catholic schools.' Religious institutions like St. Isidore are free to exist and educate as they wish — just not on the public's dime."
In another post, it wrote that the plaintiffs' demands are "unprecedented: direct government funding of a church-run school that openly admits it will discriminate based on religion, sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation."
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said during oral arguments: "Using history in this case is crazy because during early history, no one thought there was an obligation of the government to provide funding [for schools] at all. We don't use the history of segregation to interpret the equal protection clause now. I doubt very much we would use that history of the federal government funding the churches to teach Indian children and convert them as proving anything about the free exercise or establishment clause now."
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh said on Wednesday: "All the religious school is saying is, 'Don't exclude us on account of our religion.' ... Our cases have made very clear—and I think those are some of the most important cases we've had—of saying you can't treat religious people and religious institutions and religious speech as second class in the United States."
Drummond said in an October statement: "This unconstitutional scheme to create the nation's first state-sponsored religious charter school will open the floodgates and force taxpayers to fund all manner of religious indoctrination, including radical Islam or even the Church of Satan. My fellow Oklahomans can rest assured that I will always fight to protect their God-given rights and uphold the law."
Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma's Republican governor, wrote on X last week: "No one should have the authority to tell a parent how to educate their child. St. Isidore has every right to offer families a faith-based education. I'll keep fighting back against big-government politicians who think they know better than parents."
What Happens Next
The nation's High Court concluded final arguments in the case on Wednesday. It then enters deliberations and typically releases opinions by the end of June. If a split vote occurs, the lower court ruling will stand, effectively blocking St. Isidore from operation as a publicly funded religious charter school.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
GOP House Homeland chairman Green to retire from Congress early
NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- The House Homeland Security Committee's chairman, Republican Rep. Mark Green of Tennessee, announced Monday that he will retire from Congress once the House votes again on the sprawling tax and budget policy bill backed by President Donald Trump. In a statement, Green said he was offered a private sector opportunity that was 'that was too exciting to pass up' so he informed House Speaker Mike Johnson on Monday of his retirement plans. The move comes more than a year after Green announced he wouldn't run again in 2024, but changed his mind when fellow Republicans implored him to stick around. Green's next election would have been in 2026. Green voted for Trump's sweeping legislation when it passed the House last month. The bill is now in the Senate's hands, and would need to return to the House for agreement on any changes. Trump wants the bill on his desk for his signature by July 4. Green's delayed departure could help with the GOP's narrow margins in the House. Republican leaders need every vote they can get on their big tax bill, which they managed to pass last month by a single vote and will have to pass again once changes are made in the Senate. They now have a 220-212 majority. 'It was the honor of a lifetime to represent the people of Tennessee in Congress," Green said. "They asked me to deliver on the conservative values and principles we all hold dear, and I did my level best to do so.' Green's seat will be decided in a special election. The timing will depend on when he leaves office. Ahead of his 2024 reelection, Green had announced that February 2024 he would not run again. The decision was revealed a day after the impeachment of then-President Joe Biden's Homeland Security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. But many fellow Republicans had called on him to reconsider, and he jumped back into the running just two weeks later. He was unopposed in the Republican primary and then defeated Democrat Megan Barry — the former Nashville mayor who resigned in 2018 in scandal — by more than 21 percentage points in November 2024. Green, 60, has served since 2019 in the 7th Congressional District, which was redrawn in 2022 to include a significant portion of Nashville. The city was carved up three ways in the 2022 redistricting so Republicans could flip a Democratic district in Congress that had covered Music City, which they successfully did. Green previously served as an Army surgeon and in the state Senate and is from Montgomery County. Green flirted running for governor in 2017, but suspended his campaign after he was nominated by former President Donald Trump to become the Army secretary. He later withdrew his nomination due to criticism over his remarks about Muslims and LGBTQ+ Americans.

an hour ago
Trump heads to Fort Bragg while facing criticism for deploying military at Los Angeles protests
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump plans to speak at Fort Bragg on Tuesday to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army as he deploys the military in an attempt to quiet immigration protests in Los Angeles. Fort Bragg, located near Fayetteville, North Carolina, serves as headquarters for U.S. Army Special Operations Command. Highly trained units like the Green Berets and the Rangers are based there. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll will also be at Tuesday's event, along with service members, veterans and their families. Trump has promoted the Army's anniversary as a reason to hold a military parade in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, which is also his 79th birthday. Tanks and other vehicles will roll down city streets in a reminder of how the Republican president is reshaping the armed forces after returning to the White House this year. Trump, who sees the military as a critical tool for domestic goals, has used the recent protests in Los Angeles as an opportunity to deploy the National Guard and U.S. Marines to quell disturbances that began as protests over immigration raids. Trump has authorized the deployment of 4,000 National Guard soldiers to the city over the objections of Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom. About 700 Marines were also due to formally deploy to Los Angeles. California sued Trump over the deployment, with the state attorney general arguing that the president had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. California leaders accused Trump of fanning protesters' anger, leading crowds to block off a major freeway and set self-driving cars on fire. 'We're gonna have troops everywhere," Trump said over the weekend. 'We're not going to let this happen to our country.' Fort Bragg has been in the middle of a cultural tug-of-war over the military. It was named after a Confederate general, then renamed to Fort Liberty two years ago. Hegseth brought back the Bragg name, but said it was being used to honor an Army paratrooper who served in World War II.

2 hours ago
In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles
The swiftly evolving situation in the Los Angeles area over protests surrounding immigration enforcement actions has also cued up a public spat between President Donald Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California governor who has been one of the Republican president's most vocal Democratic critics. After Trump on Sunday called up 2,000 National Guard troops to respond, Newsom said he would sue the administration, a promise on which the state followed through a day later. Trump cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." The president also agreed with one of his top advisers that maybe the governor should be arrested. Here's a look at back-and-forth between Trump and Newsom in their own words: 'You have violent people, and we're not gonna let them get away with it.' — Trump, Sunday, in remarks to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey. ___ Newsom's ire has been elevated over Trump's decision to, without his support, call up the California National Guard for deployment into his state. In a letter Sunday, Newsom called on Trump to rescind the Guard deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' The governor, who was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and other officials, also told protesters they were playing into Trump's plans and would face arrest for violence or property destruction. 'Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' he said. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' In an interview with MSNBC, Newsom said Sunday he had spoken with Trump 'late Friday night,' after the protests had begun, but said deploying the National Guard 'never came up.' "We talked for almost 20 minutes, and he — barely, this issue never came up. I mean, I kept trying to talk about LA, he wanted to talk about all these other issues," Newsom said. 'We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard,' Newsom said of Trump, calling him 'a stone-cold liar.' Saying, 'I did call him the other night,' Trump told reporters Sunday that he told Newsom in that call: ''Look you've got to take care of this. Otherwise I'm sending in the troops.' ... That's what we did.' On Monday, Trump posted on social media that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without his intervention and referred to Newsom as 'Newscum,' a pejorative moniker he has used to refer to the governor. 'We are suing Donald Trump. This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' — Newsom, Monday, X post. ___ As Newsom promised, California officials sued the Trump administration on Monday, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorized by Trump. Late Monday, Trump authorized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops. Ahead of that move, Newsom accused the president of inflaming tensions, breaching state sovereignty and wasting resources, while warning protesters not to 'take Trump's bait.' Teasing the suit, Newsom told MSNBC that he saw the deployment as 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Asked Monday about the lawsuit, Trump said it was 'interesting' and argued 'that place would be burning down' without the federal government's intervention. 'I'm very happy I got involved," Trump added. "I think Gavin in his own way is very happy I got involved.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." — Trump, Monday, in remarks to reporters. ___ Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, previously warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Newsom's initial response to Homan, during the MSNBC interview and in subsequent posts on his own social media: 'Come and get me, tough guy.' On Monday Trump seemed to agree with his border chief, telling reporters, 'I would do it if I were Tom.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. "He's done a terrible job. Look — I like Gavin, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows." Homan later said there was 'no discussion' about actually arresting Newsom, but reiterated that 'no one's above the law.' wrote Monday on X that they represented 'a day I hoped I would never see in America' and said Trump's call for his arrest marked 'an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.'