logo
Physicists Build a ‘Black Hole Bomb' in the Laboratory

Physicists Build a ‘Black Hole Bomb' in the Laboratory

A bomb from a black hole would probably be the most destructive weapon in the universe. Hypothetically, it could be created by wrapping one of these cosmic monsters in mirrors and waiting for it to go 'boom.' Now Hendrik Ulbricht of the University of Southampton in England and his colleagues have demonstrated this principle, called superradiance, in the lab using a rotating metal cylinder instead of a black hole. They submitted their results, which have not yet been peer-reviewed, to the preprint server arXiv.org in late March.
'This work shows that a 'black hole bomb' can actually be built in the laboratory,' says physicist Vitor Cardoso of the Niels Bohr Institute in Denmark, who was not involved in the study. 'It thus provides a solid basis for studying the entire physics of black holes.'
Among the strangest objects in the universe, black holes pack so much mass into such a small space that they can radically warp spacetime. A black hole's gravitational pull is so strong that within a certain distance, nothing can escape it—not even light. Theorist Roger Penrose is one of the pioneers who first studied black holes mathematically in detail—work for which he shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2020. And amid that early work, he realized something surprising.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
As Penrose knew, nothing stands still in our cosmos, not even black holes. These massive monsters can spin, distorting spacetime in the process to form a kind of vortex. An approaching object can be caught up in this vortex and spiral around the spinning black hole. Even before the object passes the event horizon, beyond which not even light can escape gravity's clutches, it reaches an area that physicists call the 'ergosphere.' There the object would have to move faster than light to escape the rotation around the black hole.
This ergosphere is a strange place, as Penrose noted, because objects there can possess negative energy. A particle, for example, could split into two equal-but-opposite parts: one with negative energy and another with positive energy. The former would then crash into the black hole (thus reducing the black hole's energy), allowing the latter to escape the cosmic behemoth's mighty grip. An external observer would see a particle with a certain energy falling toward the black hole, only to apparently rebound outward with higher energy. The black hole loses part of its rotational energy in the process.
Black Hole Mining and Superradiance
In principle, this would allow black holes to serve as gigantic sources of energy. The process could not only imbue massive objects with more energy but also amplify electromagnetic waves in a phenomenon called superradiance. This realization spurred some physicists to even imagine how advanced alien civilizations might use superradiance to generate energy. But despite how relatively simple it is to describe on paper, no one knew how the signal of superradiance could be observed in real black holes. Thus, the concept initially remained mere speculation.
In 1971, however, two years after Penrose first described this phenomenon, physicist Yakov Zel'dovich published research that suggested that black holes aren't the only objects that can be tapped as superradiant energy sources. Any rotating, axially symmetrical body that absorbs electromagnetic radiation—such as a metal cylinder—can also exhibit superradiance under certain circumstances. 'Roughly speaking, the rotating absorber must rotate faster than the phase rotation of the incident radiation,' explains physicist Maria Chiara Braidotti of the University of Glasgow in Scotland, who was involved in the latest work. 'If this condition is met, the absorption coefficient of the cylinder changes sign, thus amplifying the radiation.'
Zel'dovich even went one step further by showing that superradiance could also take place in a vacuum and wouldn't require an incoming electromagnetic wave. That's because on quantum scales the vacuum is anything but empty. At any time, pairs of virtual particles and antiparticles can pop into existence, although they typically immediately annihilate each other again. The phenomenon is known as vacuum fluctuation. And these fluctuations could also be amplified in the vicinity of black holes —or a rotating metal cylinder. 'Stephen Hawking didn't believe this idea and tried to refute it,' explains Marion Cromb, a researcher in Ulbricht's group at the University of Southampton and a contributor to the new work. 'Not only did [Hawking] admit that Zel'dovich was right but he was also able to prove that even nonrotating black holes—without an ergosphere—spontaneously emit radiation.' This realization led to the discovery of Hawking radiation.
According to the theoretical calculations, however, vacuum-based superradiance would be so faint that it could not be detected—unless, that is, it was somehow amplified. As Zel'dovich described, the rotating body (black hole or metal cylinder) could be encased in mirrors to reflect the amplified radiation back to the rotating body, intensifying it over and over again. As physicists William Press and Saul Teukolsky realized, so much energy could accumulate inside the mirrors that a gigantic explosion would occur. Press and Teukolsky, therefore, referred to the setup as a black hole bomb.
Depending on how much rotational energy the black hole or the metal cylinder has, a result other than a gigantic explosion is conceivable, though. Cardoso and his colleagues described this possibility in a paper published in 2004 that showed how superradiance can cease if the black hole or metal cylinder loses too much angular momentum, thus defusing the explosion.
Explosions in the Laboratory
Ulbricht, Braidotti and their colleagues now wanted to test all these theoretical predictions in the laboratory. 'Originally, we thought it would be too difficult to observe the actual effect,' Braidotti says, nothing that a cylinder would have to rotate so fast that it would be destroyed in the process. For this reason, she initially turned her attention to simpler systems in which superradiance can occur, including a setup with sound waves. 'The breakthrough was our noticing how to reduce the frequencies of electromagnetic fields in a very simple way so that they are smaller than the rotation frequencies of the metal cylinders,' Ulbricht explains. The researchers only needed alternating current circuits for this. 'This finding opened up the possibility of conducting the experiment with electromagnetic waves,' Braidotti says.
The team then turned its attention to electromagnetic superradiance. 'The experimental setup itself is quite simple: it consists of a rotating cylinder and the stator coils of a commercially available induction motor, combined with some capacitors and resistors,' Cromb says. These devices were placed around the metal cylinder to generate a magnetic field inside it, which produced electromagnetic radiation. At the same time, these devices also served as mirrors because they reflected the electromagnetic waves back toward the cylinder.
'The biggest difficulty was that things were constantly exploding,' Cromb says. 'It was a balancing act between measuring a reasonable signal and overloading the system. When the current through the coils became too high, the resistors in the circuit exceeded their rated voltage and burned out. This interrupted the electrical circuit, thus destroying the 'mirror.''
The researchers initially feared that these overloads would prevent any observation of superradiance. But they were lucky. 'The reinforcement was large enough to overcome the loss and enter the area of instability,' Cromb says. In fact, the team was able to show that the voltage in their structure increased exponentially, as predicted by Zel'dovich. This underpins the researchers' claim of the first-ever lab-based demonstration of an electromagnetic version of a black hole bomb.
Note, however, that despite the martial connotations of the name, the 'bomb' Ulbricht and his team built in their lab isn't anything like a military-grade munition—or even a firecracker. It would be quite useless as a weapon because its yield is only on the order of a millijoule of energy—that is, about the same amount involved in pressing a single key on a mechanical keyboard.
Radiation-Free Superradiance?
Next, Cromb and the team used their setup to study whether superradiance can also take place in a vacuum: Would an electromagnetic signal arise in their apparatus even without a magnetic field? Because the experiment took place at room temperature, thermal fluctuations overshadowed any vacuum fluctuations—meaning that the team could not directly detect the latter. But that very same thermal background noise, the researchers realized, would spontaneously generate electromagnetic waves that could theoretically be amplified.
And that is what they did manage to demonstrate: by choosing the appropriate rotation speed of the cylinder, they generated electromagnetic waves out of nowhere, so to speak. Their work also confirmed the 'defusing' scenario predicted by Cardoso: the metal cylinder was able to lose enough rotational energy to halt superradiance and stave off any explosion.
According to Ulbricht, the most special thing about the work is its sheer simplicity. 'Many physicists think that all the simple experiments have already been done and that new insights into the fundamentals of physics can only come from very complex and very expensive projects,' he says. 'We proved the opposite.'
'I didn't expect that someone would be able to carry out such an experiment now,' Cardoso says. On the day the new work was posted to arXiv.org, he recalls, he was giving a series of lectures at Bangalore University in India. 'I talked about superradiance and told the audience that no one had ever proven the electromagnetic superradiance or the bomb effect in the laboratory. So you can imagine my surprise when I saw the paper shortly afterwards!'
The new work could lead to deeper insights about black holes, Cardoso says. 'Superradiance is a little-known classical effect that plays an important role in the physics of black holes,' he explains. For example, extremely light particles, such as axions or special types of photons considered candidates for dark matter, could absorb the rotational energy of black holes, amplifying their signals. 'This means that black holes can be used as gigantic particle detectors,' Cardoso explains. With a lab-based black hole bomb, physicists could test such hypotheses more precisely than ever before.
In the future, Ulbricht would like to carry out the quantum version of the experiment, which would entail observing the spontaneous generation of electromagnetic waves and their amplification from the vacuum. Such direct experiments with vacuum fluctuations could open up completely new possibilities for the scientific community and the world, he says, potentially representing 'a major breakthrough for physics.' Perhaps, Ulbricht muses, that work could allow researchers 'in a few decades to understand whether it is possible in principle to generate energy from the vacuum—which would be an inexhaustible new source of energy.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mathematicians Solve Multidimensional Shape-Slicing Dilemma
Mathematicians Solve Multidimensional Shape-Slicing Dilemma

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Mathematicians Solve Multidimensional Shape-Slicing Dilemma

In 1986 Belgian mathematician Jean Bourgain posed a seemingly simple question that continued to puzzle researchers for decades. No matter how you deform a convex shape—consider shaping a ball of clay into a watermelon, a football or a long noodle—will you always be able to slice a cross section bigger than a certain size? A paper by Bo'az Klartag of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, and Joseph Lehec of the University of Poitiers in France, posted to the preprint site has finally provided a definitive answer: yes. Bourgain's slicing problem asks whether every convex shape in n dimensions has a 'slice' such that the cross section is bigger than some fixed value. For three-dimensional objects, this is like asking whether an avocado of a given size, no matter the exact shape, can always be split into two halves with each side revealing at least some sizable slice. Bourgain, a titan of mathematics, is said to have spent more time on this problem than any other; although it may seem deceptively easy to resolve in the physical world's two or three dimensions, it quickly balloons in difficulty when we consider four or five. This added complexity makes determining anything in n-dimensional space seem impossible. 'If you believe in this so-called curse of dimensionality, you might just give up,' Klartag says. Fortunately, he adds, he and Lehec 'belong to a different school of thought.' The pair's breakthrough builds on recent progress by mathematician Qingyang Guan of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, who approached the problem with a technique based on physics rather than geometry. Specifically, Guan showed that modeling how heat diffuses out of a convex shape can reveal hidden geometric structures. Researchers could calculate filling any convex shape with warm gas and carefully observe the heat's dissipation according to physical laws. Guan's key insight—a precise limit on how rapidly the rate of dissipation changes during this heating process—proved to be just what Klartag and Lehec needed. 'Guan's bound tied together all the other key facts' known for the problem, says mathematician Beatrice-Helen Vritsiou of the University of Alberta. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] The result let Klartag and Lehec resolve the problem in only a few days. Klartag notes that 'it was lucky because we knew [Guan's result] was exactly one of the things we needed' to connect several seemingly disparate approaches to the puzzle. With this final piece in place, the geometry of convex bodies in high dimensions is now a little less mysterious—although, as always in mathematics, each new slice reveals more questions to explore.

AI isn't replacing radiologists. Instead, they're using it to tackle time-sucking administrative tasks.
AI isn't replacing radiologists. Instead, they're using it to tackle time-sucking administrative tasks.

Business Insider

time2 days ago

  • Business Insider

AI isn't replacing radiologists. Instead, they're using it to tackle time-sucking administrative tasks.

Generative AI powered by large language models, such as ChatGPT, is proliferating in industries like customer service and creative content production. But healthcare has moved more cautiously. Radiology, a specialty centered on analyzing digital images and recognizing patterns, is emerging as a frontrunner for adopting new AI techniques. That's not to say AI is new to radiology. Radiology was subject to one of the most infamous AI predictions when Nobel Prize winner Geoffrey Hinton said, in 2016, that " people should stop training radiologists now." But nearly a decade later, the field's AI transformation is taking a markedly different path. Radiologists aren't being replaced, but are integrating generative AI into their workflows to tackle labor-intensive tasks that don't require clinical expertise. "Rather than being worried about AI, radiologists are hoping AI can help with workforce challenges," explained Dr. Curt Langlotz, the senior associate vice provost for research and professor of radiology at Stanford. Regulatory challenges to generative AI in radiology Hinton's notion wasn't entirely off-base. Many radiologists now have access to predictive AI models that classify images or highlight potential abnormalities. Langlotz said the rise of these tools "created an industry" of more than 100 companies that focus on AI for medical imaging. The FDA lists over 1,000 AI/ML-enabled medical devices, which can include algorithms and software, a majority of which were designed for radiology. However, the approved devices are based on more traditional machine learning techniques, not on generative AI. Ankur Sharma, the head of medical affairs for medical devices and radiology at Bayer, explained that AI tools used for radiology are categorized within computer-aided detection software, which helps analyze and interpret medical images. Examples include triage, detection, and characterization. Each tool must meet regulatory standards, which include studies to determine detection accuracy and false positive rate, among other metrics. This is especially challenging for generative AI technologies, which are newer and less well understood. Characterization tools, which analyze specific abnormalities and suggest what they might be, face the highest regulatory standards, as both false positives and negatives carry risks. The idea of a kind of gen AI radiologist capable of automated diagnosis, as Hinton envisioned, would be categorized as "characterization" and would have to meet a high standard of evidence. Regulation isn't the only hurdle generative AI must leap to see broader use in radiology, either. Today's best general-purpose large language models, like OpenAI's GPT4.1, are trained on trillions of tokens of data. Scaling the model in this way has led to superb results, as new LLMs consistently beat older models. Training a generative AI model for radiology at this scale is difficult, however, because the volume of training data available is much smaller. Medical organizations also lack access to compute resources sufficient to build models at the scale of the largest large language models, which cost hundreds of millions to train. "The size of the training data used to train the largest text or language model inside medicine, versus outside medicine, shows a one-hundred-times difference," said Langlotz. The largest LLMs train on databases that scrape nearly the entire internet; medical models are limited to whatever images and data an institution has access to. Generative AI's current reality in radiology These regulatory obstacles would seem to cast doubt on generative AI's usefulness in radiology, particularly in making diagnostic decisions. However, radiologists are finding the technology helpful in their workflows, as it can undertake some of their daily labor-intensive administrative tasks. For instance, Sharma said, some tools can take notes as radiologists dictate their observations of medical images, which helps with writing reports. Some large language models, he added, are "taking those reports and translating them into more patient-friendly language." Dr. Langlotz said a product that drafts reports can give radiologists a "substantial productivity advantage." He compared it to having resident trainees who draft reports for review, a resource that's often available in academic settings, but less so in radiology practices, such as a hospital's radiology department. Sharma said that generative AI could help radiologists by automating and streamlining reporting, follow-up management, and patient communication, giving radiologists time to focus more on their "reading expertise," which includes image interpretation and diagnosis of complex cases. For example, in June 2024, Bayer and Rad AI announced a collaboration to integrate generative AI reporting solutions into Bayer's Calantic Digital Solution Platform, a cloud-hosted platform for deploying AI tools in clinical settings. The collaboration aims to use Rad AI's technology to help radiologists create reports more efficiently. For example, RadAI can use generative AI transcription to generate written reports based on a radiologist's dictated findings. Applications like this face fewer regulatory hurdles because they don't directly influence diagnosis. Looking ahead, Dr. Langlotz said he foresees even greater AI adoption in the near future. "I think there will be a change in radiologists' day-to-day work in five years," he predicted.

Mathematicians Solve Multidimensional Fruit-Slicing Dilemma
Mathematicians Solve Multidimensional Fruit-Slicing Dilemma

Scientific American

time2 days ago

  • Scientific American

Mathematicians Solve Multidimensional Fruit-Slicing Dilemma

In 1986 Belgian mathematician Jean Bourgain posed a seemingly simple question that continued to puzzle researchers for decades. No matter how you deform a convex shape—consider shaping a ball of clay into a watermelon, a football or a long noodle—will you always be able to slice a cross section bigger than a certain size? A paper by Bo'az Klartag of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, and Joseph Lehec of the University of Poitiers in France, posted to the preprint site has finally provided a definitive answer: yes. Bourgain's slicing problem asks whether every convex shape in n dimensions has a 'slice' such that the cross section is bigger than some fixed value. For three-dimensional objects, this is like asking whether an avocado of a given size, no matter the exact shape, can always be split into two halves with each side revealing at least some sizable slice. Bourgain, a titan of mathematics, is said to have spent more time on this problem than any other; although it may seem deceptively easy to resolve in the physical world's two or three dimensions, it quickly balloons in difficulty when we consider four or five. This added complexity makes determining anything in n -dimensional space seem impossible. 'If you believe in this so-called curse of dimensionality, you might just give up,' Klartag says. Fortunately, he adds, he and Lehec 'belong to a different school of thought.' The pair's breakthrough builds on recent progress by mathematician Qingyang Guan of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, who approached the problem with a technique based on physics rather than geometry. Specifically, Guan showed that modeling how heat diffuses out of a convex shape can reveal hidden geometric structures. Researchers could calculate filling any convex shape with warm gas and carefully observe the heat's dissipation according to physical laws. Guan's key insight—a precise limit on how rapidly the rate of dissipation changes during this heating process—proved to be just what Klartag and Lehec needed. 'Guan's bound tied together all the other key facts' known for the problem, says mathematician Beatrice-Helen Vritsiou of the University of Alberta. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The result let Klartag and Lehec resolve the problem in only a few days. Klartag notes that 'it was lucky because we knew [Guan's result] was exactly one of the things we needed' to connect several seemingly disparate approaches to the puzzle. With this final piece in place, the geometry of convex bodies in high dimensions is now a little less mysterious—although, as always in mathematics, each new slice reveals more questions to explore.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store