logo
Nato's dilemma: How Zelensky can attend summit without provoking Trump

Nato's dilemma: How Zelensky can attend summit without provoking Trump

Straits Timesa day ago

US and Ukrainian officials did not reply to questions about the nature of any invitation to Ukraine.. PHOTO: REUTERS
BRUSSELS - Officials organising a Nato summit in The Hague in June are expected to keep it short, restrict discussion of Ukraine, and choreograph meetings so that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky can somehow be in town without provoking US President Donald Trump.
Though the Ukrainian president is widely expected to attend the summit in some form, Nato has yet to confirm whether he is actually invited. Diplomats say he may attend a pre-summit dinner but be kept away from the main summit meeting.
Whether the brief summit statement will even identify Russia as a threat or express support for Ukraine is still up in the air.
The careful steps are all being taken to avoid angering Washington, much less provoking any repeat of February's White House blow-up between Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky that almost torpedoed the international coalition supporting Kyiv.
Nato's European members, who see Russia as an existential threat and Nato as the principal means of countering it, want to signal their continued strong support for Ukraine. But they are also desperate to avoid upsetting a volatile Mr Trump, who stunned them at a summit seven years ago by threatening to quit the alliance altogether.
If Mr Zelensky does not attend in some form, it would be 'at least a PR disaster', acknowledged a senior Nato diplomat.
Since Russia's invasion three years ago, Mr Zelensky has regularly attended Nato summits as the guest of honour, where alliance members pledged billions in weapons and condemned Russia for an illegal war of conquest. Leaders repeatedly promised that Ukraine would one day join Nato.
But since Washington's shift under Mr Trump towards partly accepting Russia's justifications for the war and disparaging Mr Zelensky, the 32-member alliance no longer speaks with a single voice about Europe's deadliest conflict since World War II. Mr Trump has taken Ukraine's Nato membership off the table, unilaterally granting Moscow one of its main demands.
After dressing down Mr Zelensky in the Oval Office in February, Mr Trump cut vital US military and intelligence support for Ukraine for days.
Since then, the two men publicly mended fences in a meeting in St Peter's Basilica for the funeral of Pope Francis. But mostly they have spoken remotely, with Mr Zelensky twice phoning the White House on speakerphone while surrounded by four friendly Europeans – Britain's Keir Starmer, France's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz and Poland's Donald Tusk.
Spending boost
Mr Trump is expected to come away from The Hague with a big diplomatic victory as Nato members heed his longstanding complaints that they do not spend enough on defence and agree a much higher target.
They are expected to boost their goal for traditional military spending to 3.5 per cent of economic output from 2 per cent. A further pledge to spend 1.5 per cent on related expenses such as infrastructure and cyber defence would raise the total to 5 per cent demanded by Mr Trump.
But the summit itself and its accompanying written statement are expected to be unusually short, minimising the chances of flare-ups or disagreements. A pledge to develop recommendations for a new Russia strategy has been kicked into the long grass.
Meanwhile, Mr Zelensky may have to be content with an invitation to a pre-summit dinner, hosted by Dutch King Willem-Alexander, diplomats say.
Unlike at Nato's previous two annual summits, the leaders do not plan to hold a formal meeting of the Nato-Ukraine Council (NUC), the official venue for talks between the alliance and Kyiv.
The senior Nato diplomat said a working dinner with either foreign ministers or defence ministers could instead serve as an NUC.
'Properly represented'
On June 4, Nato boss Mark Rutte said he had invited Ukraine to the summit, but sidestepped a question on whether the invitation included Mr Zelensky himself.
After meeting Mr Rutte on June 2, Mr Zelensky said on X that it was 'important that Ukraine is properly represented' at the summit. 'That would send the right signal to Russia,' he said.
US and Ukrainian officials did not reply to questions about the nature of any invitation to Ukraine.
Some European countries are still willing to say in public that they hope to see Mr Zelensky invited as the head of the Ukrainian delegation.
Estonian Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur said he would like to see a 'delegation led by President Zelensky'. Asked about an invitation for Mr Zelensky, German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said 'I, for my part, strongly welcome the invitation' without giving further details.
But diplomats have tried to play down the importance of the formal status of Mr Zelensky's role: 'Many allies want to have Zelensky at the summit, but there is flexibility on the precise format that would allow his presence,' said a second senior Nato diplomat.
A senior European diplomat said: 'We should not get stuck on 'NUC or no NUC'. If he comes to the leaders' dinner, that would be the minimum.' REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russian attack on Ukraine's Kharkiv kills three, wounds 22, mayor says
Russian attack on Ukraine's Kharkiv kills three, wounds 22, mayor says

Straits Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Russian attack on Ukraine's Kharkiv kills three, wounds 22, mayor says

Rescuers assist an injured resident after she was released from debris of a building hit by a Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kharkiv, Ukraine June 7, 2025. REUTERS/Sofiia Gatilova Firefighters work inside an apartment building hit by a Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kharkiv, Ukraine June 7, 2025. REUTERS/Vitalii Hnidyi Firefighters work at the site of a building hit by a Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kharkiv, Ukraine June 7, 2025. REUTERS/Sofiia Gatilova KYIV - Russia attacked the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv at night with drones, missiles and guided bombs, killing at least three people and injuring 22, including a one-and-a-half-month-old baby, the city mayor, Ihor Terekhov, said on Saturday. One of Ukraine's largest cities, Kharkiv is located just a few dozen kilometres from the Russian border and has been under constant Russian shelling during more than three years of war. "Kharkiv is currently experiencing the most powerful attack since the start of the full-scale war," Terekhov said on the Telegram messenger early on Saturday. Dozens of explosions were heard in the city through the night and Russian troops were striking simultaneously with missiles, drones and guided aerial bombs, he said. Multi-storey and private residential buildings, educational and infrastructure facilities were attacked, Terekhov noted. Photos by local authorities and Reuters showed burnt and partially destroyed houses and vehicles, and of rescuers carrying those injured to safety and removing debris. Kharkiv governor Oleh Syniehubov said that one of the city's civilian industrial facilities was attacked by 40 drones, one missile and four bombs, causing a fire, adding there may still be people under the rubble. The Ukrainian military said Russia launched 206 drones, 2 ballistic and 7 other missiles against Ukraine overnight. It said its air defence units shot down 87 drones while another 80 drones were lost - in reference to the Ukrainian military using electronic warfare to redirect them - or they were drone simulators that did not carry warheads. Ten locations were hit, the military said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Thailand and Cambodia reinforcing troops on disputed border after May skirmish, Thai minister says
Thailand and Cambodia reinforcing troops on disputed border after May skirmish, Thai minister says

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Thailand and Cambodia reinforcing troops on disputed border after May skirmish, Thai minister says

Royalist activists hold placards as they protest in front of the Royal Embassy of Cambodia in Bangkok on June 6, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS Thailand and Cambodia reinforcing troops on disputed border after May skirmish, Thai minister says BANGKOK - Thailand has reinforced its military presence along a disputed border with Cambodia, following an increase in troops on the other side, Thailand's defence minister said on June 7, as tensions simmer following a deadly clash. For days, the two South-east Asian governments have exchanged carefully worded statements committing to dialogue after a brief skirmish in an undemarcated border area on May 28 in which a Cambodian soldier was killed. But Mr Phumtham Wechayachai, who also serves as Thailand's deputy prime minister, said that during talks bilateral talks held on June 5, Cambodia had rejected proposals that could have led to a de-escalation. "Furthermore, there has been a reinforcement of military presence, which has exacerbated tensions along the border," Mr Phumtham said in a statement. "Consequently, the Royal Thai Government has deemed it necessary to implement additional measures and to reinforce our military posture accordingly." He did not provide details on the extent of reinforcements by either side. In a separate statement on June 7, the Thai army said Cambodian soldiers and civilians had repeatedly made incursions into Thailand's territory. "These provocations, and the build up of military forces, indicate a clear intent to use force," the Thai army said, adding that it would take control of all Thai checkpoints along the border with Cambodia. A spokesperson for Cambodia's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to questions from Reuters. The military reinforcements come despite efforts by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who is the current chair of the Association of South-east Asian Nations (Asean) bloc, and China to reduce tensions. Thailand and Cambodia have for more than a century contested sovereignty at various undemarcated points along their 817km land border, which was first mapped by France in 1907 when Cambodia was its colony. Tension escalated in 2008 over an 11th-century Hindu temple, leading to skirmishes over several years and at least a dozen deaths, including during a weeklong exchange of artillery in 2011. Current governments in both countries, however, have enjoyed warm ties. Former leaders Thaksin Shinawatra of Thailand and Cambodia's Hun Sen have had a close relationship, and Mr Thaksin's daughter and Mr Hun Sen's son are now the incumbent prime ministers of their countries. Still, nationalist sentiment has risen in Thailand and the Thai military said on June 6 that it is ready to launch a "high-level operation" to counter any violation of its sovereignty. Cambodia said this week it would refer disputes over four parts of the border to the International Court of Justice and asked Thailand to cooperate. Mr Phumtham reiterated in his June 7 statement that Thailand does not recognise the jurisdiction of the court and proposed that all boundary-related issues be resolved through bilateral negotiations. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

S'pore embassy in Washington seeking US clarification on Harvard's visa ban
S'pore embassy in Washington seeking US clarification on Harvard's visa ban

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

S'pore embassy in Washington seeking US clarification on Harvard's visa ban

SINGAPORE - Singapore's embassy in Washington has been seeking clarification from the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security on President Donald Trump's directive prohibiting foreigners from entering the country to study at Harvard University. The embassy is hoping for clarity from US authorities in the next few days, including on whether there will be any delay in the processing of visas for Singaporeans hoping to study in the US, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said on June 7. In a zoom call with Singapore media to wrap up his five-day visit to Washington, he noted that many current and prospective students looking to study in the United States had expressed their concern to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs over potential visa delays. Asked to elaborate on contingencies being planned should Singaporean students find themselves unable to proceeds with their plans to study in the US, he said the Government is trying to find solutions to deal with the worst case scenario where students are not able to physically study in Boston. 'We've got some ideas for how we can help them to, in a sense, deal with that eventuality without impairing their academic and professional progress,' said Dr Balakrishnan. 'For others who are not yet here, who have not yet secured visas, you may also need to have backup plans, but my main point is we will stay in touch, and we will continue to keep you informed.' Dr Balakrishnan noted that Singapore's ambassador to the US Lui Tuck Yew has also held a virtual town hall with students currently studying in Harvard. In the virtual town hall on May 30, Mr Lui told Singaporean students at Harvard that the Republic's autonomous universities can offer them placements if they wish to discontinue their studies in the US and return home. A Ministry of Education spokesperson said this message was shared with affected students so they could consider returning to Singapore as a possible option to continue their studies. There are six autonomous universities here: National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design and Singapore Institute of Technology. University statistics show that there are currently 151 Singaporean students in Harvard. Among them are 12 Public Service Commission scholarship holders. Foreign students at Harvard were thrown into limbo after Mr Trump's administration announced on May 22 that it had revoked Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification with immediate effect. The nearly 6,800 international students in the Ivy League college were given an ultimatum to either transfer to another institution, or face deportation. A federal judge later blocked the move, with the Trump administration rolling back its stance on May 29 and giving Harvard 30 days to submit evidence contesting the administration's plan to revoke the school's right to enrol international students. International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's student body, but Mr Trump said the university should cap its international intake at 15 per cent. Dr Balakrishnan said the situation confronting international students stems from domestic political issues within the US. But students, including from Singapore, can become affected as collateral damage, and there will be a period of uncertainty of at least a few days or weeks. 'Nevertheless, we will continue to pursue this with the American authorities, and I hope we'll be able to find suitable solutions for our students who want to pursue educational opportunities in the United States.' At a macro level, it remains in both Singapore and the US' interests to keep opportunities open for Singaporeans who want to study and work in the US to expand their domain experience and their networks, he added. 'So this is an issue that we will continue to pursue with the State Department.' Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store