Mamdani could be great for New York
With reference to Ahmed Issawy and Cody Combs's piece Muslim candidate Zohran Mamdani wins New York Democratic mayoral primary in stunning upset (June 24): Mamdani earned the win. He may be inexperienced in this role but he worked hard and spoke to issues that New Yorkers are concerned about, like rent and affordability. Let's see what happens in November.
Sarah Mitchell, New Jersey, US
No to socialism. Where are the representatives who are pro market and liberal democracy? Seems like we're surrounded by either Trumpists or socialists.
Amir Naghshineh-Pour, New York State, US
This is good news. He seems like a decent person.
Marvin Babtunde, Dubai
Why does his religion matter? If he has all it takes to be a great mayor, that's great for the city. Just highlighting his religion can be a foundation for division.
Ivan K, Dubai
The responsibility of leaders to strive for peace
In reference to Thomas Helm's report Netanyahu's party gets small popularity boost after Iran war, poll shows (June 25): It has seemed of late that the world is engulfed in one too many wars, most of which are avoidable. Many could have been avoided by restrained leadership. There is a new, dangerous machismo among some world leaders.
The war in Ukraine has gone on for more than three years. US President Donald Trump had promised to end this battle. It has not happened.
Israel continues to bomb the Gaza strip, in the hope of decimating Hamas. Again, this has not happened, even after 20 months of bitter fighting. In Gaza, the people are killed waiting in line for bread or water. What have we come to, in this world, that we even bomb families waiting for food?
The problem with all wars is that innocent, ordinary people die or pay the price. Soldiers die. They too are human beings, with mothers, wives and children. All wars are horrendous, all wars cause suffering. It is the moral duty of every leader to contain them and end the cycle of misery.
Rajendra Aneja, Mumbai
Is the ceasefire going to hold?
In reference to Thomas Harding's report War of words rages over Iran nuclear damage reports (June 26): It's a bit premature to declare peace. When everybody sits down to talk, we shall see if they are all mature enough to behave as adults. If Trump really has so much sway over politics in the Middle East, he should sit down with Netanyahu and demand an end to the destruction in Gaza. If he manages to pull that off, he might just get the peace prize he so craves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
36 minutes ago
- Zawya
US says deal with Beijing will expedite rare earth exports from China
WASHINGTON - The United States has reached an agreement with China on how to expedite rare earth shipments to the U.S., a White House official said on Thursday, amid efforts to end a trade war between the world's biggest economies. President Donald Trump earlier said the United States had signed a deal with China on Wednesday, without providing additional details, and that there might be a separate deal coming up that would "open up" India. During U.S.-China trade talks in May in Geneva, Beijing committed to removing non-tariff countermeasures imposed against the United States since April 2, although it was unclear how some of those measures would be walked back. As part of its retaliation against new U.S. tariffs, China suspended exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets, upending the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. "The administration and China agreed to an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement," a White House official said on Thursday. The understanding is "about how we can implement expediting rare earths shipments to the U.S. again", the official said. A separate administration official said the U.S.-China agreement took place earlier this week. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was quoted as saying by Bloomberg: "They're going to deliver rare earths to us" and once they do that "we'll take down our countermeasures." On Friday, China's commerce ministry said the two countries recently confirmed details on the framework of implementing the Geneva trade talks consensus. It said China will approve export applications of controlled items in accordance with the law. It did not mention rare earths. While the agreement shows potential progress following months of trade uncertainty and disruption since Trump took office in January, it also underscores the long road ahead to a final, definitive trade deal between the two economic rivals. China has been taking its dual-use restrictions on rare earths "very seriously" and has been vetting buyers to ensure that materials are not diverted to U.S. military uses, according to an industry source. This has slowed down the licensing process. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls of its own preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. In early June, Reuters reported China had granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three U.S. automakers, according to two sources familiar with the matter, as supply chain disruptions began to surface from export curbs on those materials. Later in the month, Trump said there was a deal with China in which Beijing would supply magnets and rare earth minerals while the U.S. would allow Chinese students in its colleges and universities. (Reporting by Nandita Bose and David Lawder; Additional reporting by Steve Holland, Ryan Patrick Jones and Kanishka Singh, Joe Cash in Beijing;writing by Costas Pitas; Editing by Lincoln Feast and Christopher Cushing)
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz shows unconditional US support for Israel could be waning
During a recent episode of The Joe Rogan Experience podcast, the documentary filmmaker Ken Burns quoted a famous Mark Twain line: 'History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes.' He was making the point about why it is important to listen to the voices of the past, even if their messages offend you today. The conversation was in the context of his upcoming project on the American Revolution. Burns argued that it is the most important historical event in terms of shaping the world we live in now, because it created a unique political and economic engine, the impact of which we are still struggling to get to grips with 250 years later. Less than a fortnight after the Rogan-Burns podcast came out, a less refined, more combative exchange took place between two other individuals, which underscores how the definition of what the US is has kept evolving since the 18th century. When the journalist Tucker Carlson confronted US Senator Ted Cruz in a now-viral interview, it marked the beginning of the end for an expectation of how the US conducts itself on the global stage – with obvious implications for those of us living in this region. Mr Cruz, for long a dependable voice for hawkish Republican policy and unwavering support for Israel, found himself cornered. Carlson, representing a surging populist strain of 'America First' conservatism that is aligned with President Donald Trump's political base, was pushing Mr Cruz to properly articulate why it was important for the US to topple the Iranian establishment. The backdrop to this interview had been pressure from senior Republicans in Congress to join Israel's attack on Iran – championed by Prime Minister Bejamin Netanyahu – with the stated aim of removing any nuclear threat it poses. Mr Netanyahu, it's important to point out, also called for ordinary Iranians to rise up against their rulers. Digging into questions about why America should risk a war with Iran, why its support for Israel needs to always be unconditional and if American interests have been co-opted by the agendas of other nations, Carlson sought a rational explanation for such long-standing beliefs of what was good for the country and its people, despite clear evidence to the contrary. Instead, Mr Cruz fumbled over his responses. He jumped from religious justifications to security jargon and then to accusations about his interviewer's motives, including suggesting that anti-Semitism and support for Russian President Vladimir Putin were behind his challenging posture. Mr Cruz came across as highly cynical and manipulative, lacking moral and intellectual depth, while Carlson seemed earnest and committed. It may have been wholly performative, but it still made my jaw drop. The exchange, quite because it was between two heavyweights from the same political and cultural strata, represents the rupture of a long-assumed ideological and religious alliance between the traditional Republican guard, still clinging to post-9/11 doctrines, and the newer class, increasingly sceptical of endless wars and foreign entanglements following the mistakes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Mr Cruz's inability to make a sensible case for decades-long foreign policies represents a breaking point for anyone who had still been working under the illusion that there aren't a multitude of transactional interests at work beyond what might benefit the average American. History resonates with examples of such stunning revelations. The one that has a similar cadence comes from the Fourth Crusade, when European knights, on their way to try to reclaim Jerusalem from Muslim control, instead attacked and looted Constantinople – considered then to be the greatest Christian city in the East – in 1204. Fuelled by Venetian debt and Byzantine intrigue, the result was a catastrophic betrayal of values that had stood for more than a century. In the wake of it, public trust eroded, unity fractured and the Great Crusades were undermined. They were exposed for what they were – political, cynical and morally hollow. It would become increasingly more difficult for people in Europe to justify spending resources, lives and years on a cause so far away from home. Yet this failure had been years in the making. The corruption of crusader kingdoms in the Holy Land, their inability to survive without external support, evolving military technology and tactics that made battlefield victories harder to attain, as well as political and economic shifts at home had made them more costly and less successful. The early religious fervour for war and its legitimacy in the eyes of the populace had begun to fade. The Cruz-Carlson interview is revelatory in its own way. It has unequivocally brought to the centre stage the widespread suspicion among Americans in the idea that US involvement in the Middle East is fundamentally necessary or noble. By shining a spotlight on this national mood, it may have contributed to a more limited engagement by Mr Trump over the past week. The 'America First' movement appears to have passed its first major test, on its way to being the loudest voice shaping the future of its country and defining a new paradigm for US support to Israel.
Crypto Insight
2 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
UAE company invests $100M in Trump family-backed crypto business
World Liberty Financial, the cryptocurrency company backed by US President Donald Trump and his family, has reported that a United Arab Emirates-based company purchased $100 million worth of the platform's governance token, WLFI. In a Thursday notice, World Liberty and Aqua1 Foundation — self-described as a 'Web3-native fund' — said the $100-million deal was 'intended to help accelerate the creation of a blockchain-powered financial ecosystem centered on blockchain development, Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization, and stablecoin integration, aiming to set new benchmarks for global capital efficiency.' The purchase makes Aqua1 a bigger WLFI tokenholder than Tron founder Justin Sun, who invested $30 million in the project in November. 'WLFI and Aqua 1 will jointly identify and nurture high-potential blockchain projects together,' said Aqua1 founding partner Dave Lee. 'WLFI's USD1 ecosystem and RWA pipeline embody the trillion-dollar structural pivot opportunity we seek to catalyze — where architects merge traditional capital markets with decentralized primitives to redefine global financial infrastructure.' World Liberty is already under scrutiny from US lawmakers due to the Trump family's connections with the firm. Trump's three sons are named as co-founders of the company, and in June the president disclosed $57.4 million in income tied to WLFI, along with personally holding 15.75 billion governance tokens. WLFI under scrutiny as US Congress looks to stablecoin bill The Trump family's crypto business had already been facing criticism after Eric Trump announced in May that an Abu Dhabi-based investment company, MGX, would use the platform's USD1 stablecoin to settle a $2 billion investment in Binance. The move came as Congress weighs bills to regulate payment stablecoins, prompting concerns from Democratic lawmakers that the president was backing legislation that could benefit his family's business ties. At a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Wednesday, US Attorney General Pam Bondi sidestepped a question from Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley over the president's connections to World Liberty Financial. 'I think it's important for the leader of the Justice Department of the United States to be very concerned about foreign influence,' said Merkley. 'And I encourage you [Bondi] to take on the topic and not consider it an offense that those of us who are concerned here, Democrats and Republicans, want Americans to make American decisions. Not foreign influence being bought through crypto coins.' Several US lawmakers have suggested different legislative paths for Congress to address potential conflicts of interest with the crypto industry. The proposals included amendments to the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins, or GENIUS Act, and separate legislation to prevent the president and future leaders from investing in digital assets while in office. Source:
