
Putin 'is pushing migrants to Britain' in an attempt to overwhelm borders, insiders claim
Russia is aggravating Britain's migrant crisis to overwhelm border defences and sow division in the nation, security sources have reportedly claimed.
Vladimir Putin 's government is believed to be providing fake documents, transport and even military escorts to smuggling gangs ferrying migrants across the Channel.
The threat overwhelming migration poses to national security is so fierce that this week NATO recognised it by allowing its members to count border protection to spending targets for the first time.
A security source told the Sun: 'Hostile states and malign actors are using illegal migration to test borders, cause disruption and destabilise countries like Britain.
'That's exactly why NATO is now treating border protection as a core part of collective defence — because the lines between traditional military threats and national security are more blurred than ever.'
So far this year, over 18,000 people have arrived in small boats. This is far higher than 2018, when just 299 people crossed the Channel.
The highest year for arrivals was 2022, which saw nearly 46,000 people arrive.
On top of the threat to British national security, Russia's alleged actions are also harming those crossing the Channel, who are often desperate and vulnerable.
Earlier this month, a man on crutches was seen hobbling over to a small boat on French soil and making his way over to England, less than 24 hours after failing in his mission.
The man was seem holding his crutch aloft like Excalibur as his fellow migrants helped him aboard.
Within minutes, the rubber boat was full to bursting, around 20 migrants sitting on each side and more in the middle.
It then set off across the Channel towards England, passing over the horizon within a quarter of an hour. Whether it arrived is unclear.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who scrapped the Conservative plan to send small boat arrivals to Rwanda, continues to declare he will be able to 'smash the gangs' and stop the boats with the aid of French police, who we are sending millions to.
Yet the migrants continue to exploit the loophole which means once they are in the sea, even up to the ankles, police will touch neither them nor their dinghies, through fear of harming them, meaning they are free to sail to England.
And police have told the Mail there are simply too many migrants, and too much shoreline near England, for them ever to be stopped - particularly as they are confident they will be welcomed here.
A bearded middle-aged man, who could only hobble towards the waves aided by a friend
Latest figures show £3.1 billion was spent on housing asylum seekers in hotels in 2023-24, out of a total asylum support bill of £4.7 billion.
More than 30,000 asylum seekers are housed in about 200 hotels across Britain, many of whom arrived illegally in dinghies, and ministers are looking at moving them into derelict tower blocks and student digs.
But despite Ms Reeves' pledge to end the use of hotels, the Tories pointed out that the small print of her Spending Review documents revealed that £2.5 billion will still be spent each year on asylum support by the end of the decade.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Britain will need America's permission to carry out tactical nuclear strikes with new fighter jets
Britain will not be able to deploy its new air-launched nuclear weapons without the United States' say-so. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer confirmed this week that the UK is set to buy 12 F-35A fighter jets from the US as world leaders flocked to The Hague for a two-day NATO summit. The £80million jets, a variant of the F-35Bs the UK already uses, can carry conventional weapons but can also be equipped with nuclear weapons - specifically the US B61-12 gravity bomb. When the UK receives its jets and the bombs at the end of the decade, it will be the first time that Britain has boasted an air-launched tactical nuclear weapon since 1998, when Tony Blair 's Labour government shuttered the WE177 programme. But while the Royal Air Force will own the jets and be able to operate them freely, nuclear non-proliferation controls dictate that the US will retain ownership of the nuclear weapons they come with. That means that the UK cannot deliver a nuclear strike with a B61 bomb without explicit approval from Washington, raising concerns over Britain's operational autonomy. For a B61 to be deployed, the strike would require sign-off from NATO's Nuclear Planning Group, the British Prime Minister, and the US President - a complex process that could limit response times in the event of a crisis. Britain's existing nuclear deterrent rests entirely on the Trident system, in which a submarine carrying dozens of strategic nuclear missiles is always at sea, ready to fire at a moment's notice. But last year, Trident misfired during a test - the second successive failure after a missile veered off course in 2016. The B61 bomb differs from the Trident system in that it is a tactical nuclear weapon designed to be delivered on a battlefield, rather than fired vast distances to strike at a target thousands of miles away. The weapons come in varying degrees of destructive power, from small nuclear blasts measuring 0.5 kilotons to 50 kilotons - more than three times the power of the Little Boy dropped on Hiroshima in 1945, but considerably less than the 80-100 kilotons yielded by the Trident missiles. GPS, laser guidance systems and steerable tail fins allow the B61 to lock on to its target and glide in with lethal precision. Britain's purchase of the nuclear-capable F-35A jets and associated equipment - the cost of which is said to amount to more than £1 billion - aligns Downing Street more closely with NATO allies France and the US, which maintain land, sea, and air-based nuclear capabilities. The Government called it 'the biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation', while NATO boss Mark Rutte declared it 'yet another robust British contribution to NATO'. Britain plans to procure as many as 138 F-35s in the coming years - a move that Westminster says will support 20,000 jobs, with British military firms BAE Systems, Cobham and Rolls-Royce playing a role in their construction. The jets will continue to be manufactured by Lockheed Martin in the US, but 15 per cent of the parts which go into them will be made in Britain. At the NATO summit this week, Prime Minister Starmer vowed to increase Britain's defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035 in line with a new bloc-wide target. The total includes 3.5% on defence and another 1.5% on broader security and resilience efforts. Britain currently spends 2.3% of national income on defence, and says that will rise to 2.6% by 2027. The purchase of F-35A jets follows a recent announcement that the UK will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered and conventionally armed attack submarines to replace the Royal Navy's seven-strong fleet of Astute-class subs from the late 2030s onwards. Both announcements come as part of an effort to bolster Britain's military capabilities across the board as a chilling new report outlined the growing threats faced by the UK. The National Security Strategy, published yesterday, warned that Britain must prepare for the prospect of a direct attack as the world enters a new age of warfare. 'For the first time in many years, we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario,' it said. In a foreword to the document, Sir Keir wrote: 'Russian aggression menaces our continent. 'Strategic competition is intensifying. Extremist ideologies are on the rise. 'Technology is transforming the nature of both war and domestic security. Hostile state activity takes place on British soil. 'It is an era of radical uncertainty and we must navigate it with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest. 'That is what keeping the British people safe demands. In a statement to the House of Commons, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden said the strategy would aim to deliver 'three crucial things'. The first of these is to 'protect security at home', by bolstering the borders and making the UK 'more resilient to future threats'. Ministers are stepping up calls for the whole of society to become more resilient and plan to carry out a cross-government exercise on how to deal with crises, such as a future pandemic, later this year. The UK must also work to 'promote strength abroad' with allies in order to defend their 'collective security', Mr McFadden said. The third step Mr McFadden set out was for the UK to increase its 'sovereign and asymmetric capabilities', including by rebuilding its defence industries and building 'advantages in new frontier technologies' like AI.


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reform would dominate UK election if held imminently: polling
A new YouGov megapoll indicates Reform UK would become Britain's largest party if a general election were held tomorrow, with Nigel Farage potentially forming a minority government. The poll projects Reform UK would secure 271 seats, a significant increase from their current five, while Labour would see a dramatic collapse from 403 to 178 seats. The Conservative party is predicted to fall to fourth place with only 46 seats, behind the Liberal Democrats, marking their worst election performance on record. Several prominent Labour cabinet ministers, including Angela Rayner and Yvette Cooper, would lose their seats, and Reform would dominate multiple regions across England and Wales. The poll attributes Reform's surge to Labour's plummeting popularity, with 194 Labour-held seats potentially turning to Reform, amid internal party rebellions over proposed welfare cuts and recent policy U-turns.


Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
Danish pension fund lifts ban on investments in European defence stocks
COPENHAGEN, June 26 (Reuters) - Danish pension fund AkademikerPension has lifted a self-imposed ban on investment in six of Europe's largest arms makers and some smaller groups, it said on Thursday, citing a worsening security situation and the need to boost European defences. Many of the continent's investment funds exclude weapons manufacturers from their portfolios on ethical grounds, such as their involvement in the manufacture of components for nuclear arms. AkademikerPension's decision to end its ban comes as Europe faces its largest military build-up in recent history, the fund said in a statement. "We believe it is the most responsible thing to do - both in terms of return and social responsibility in the current situation," CEO Jens Munch Holst said. "We don't want a small turnover from nuclear weapons-related activities to prevent us from providing capital to support the building of a European defence," he said. The fund manages 157 billion Danish crowns ($24.61 billion), it said on its website. NATO leaders on Wednesday backed the big increase in defence spending as demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump, and restated their commitment to defend each other from attack as tensions with Russia rise. But there are question marks over how member nations will afford the targeted 5% of output on defence, leading to potentially difficult budget choices. AkademikerPension's change of policy meant that the fund can again invest in Airbus ( opens new tab, Babcock International (BAB.L), opens new tab, Dassault Aviation ( opens new tab, Leonardo ( opens new tab, Safran ( opens new tab and Thales ( opens new tab, it said. Britain's Babcock said it expected to benefit from more UK government spending on defence as it lifted its medium-term forecast on Wednesday. Serco Group, Ultra Electronics and Groupe Reel were also removed from AkademikerPension's blacklist, but it maintained a ban on 46 defence groups globally over links to controversial weapons or human rights violations. ($1 = 6.3788 Danish crowns)