
Elizabeth Catlett: Black Revolutionary Artist, At National Gallery Of Art
Elizabeth Catlett, 'There is A Woman In Every Color,' 1975, woocut/linocut sheet: 55.9 x 76.2 cm (22 x 30 in.) framed: 77.5 x 91.4 cm (30 1/2 x 36 in.). From the Hampton University Museum Collection, Hampton, VA
Alexanders Photography. © 2024 Mora-Catlett Family / Licensed by VAGA at Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY
'A Black Revolutionary Artist and all that it implies.'
Elizabeth Catlett (1915–2012) spoke those words from Mexico, having been denied a visa by the United States, her country of birth, for entry to attend and speak at a 1970 conference. Catlett was banned in the U.S.A.
Her banishment was set in motion by receiving Mexican citizenship in 1962. Pursuing Mexican citizenship was set in motion by imprisonment in Mexico in 1959. Catlett was tossed in jail for participating in a railroad workers strike, labelled a 'foreign agitator' by the Mexican government. By acquiring Mexican citizenship, she couldn't be considered a 'foreign agitator' there.
But she could in America.
As soon as Catlett's Mexican citizenship was granted, she became an outlaw on the other side of the border. The notorious House Un-American Activities Committee immediately labeled her an 'undesirable alien' and barred her from returning.
Catlett was swept up in the Red Scare, a mid-century mania infecting American politics seeking to prove its thesis that the government had been infiltrated by communists working to take down capitalism and democracy. Everyone with opinions left of center or anyone who'd ever run afoul of the Red Scare communist purity-testers was targeted. Most famously, the fever overtook Hollywood, but union organizers, civil rights activists, homosexuals, and artists were all prime suspects as well.
The artist's life of activism in the United States in pursuit of equal rights for African Americans and women and her association with communist artist colleagues in Mexico–Diego Rivera, Frida Kahlo, David Siqueiros, among them–was more than enough evidence for Red Scare witch hunters to forbid her from returning to the good 'ole U.S. of A, land of the free, home of the brave.
Catlett's full 'Black Revolutionary Artist' quote was: 'I was refused on the grounds that, as a foreigner, there was a possibility that I would interfere in social or political problems, and thus, I constituted a threat to the well-being of the United States of America.
'To the degree and in the proportion that the United States constitutes a threat to Black people, to that degree and more, do I hope that I have earned that honor. For I have been, and am currently, and always hope to be a Black Revolutionary Artist and all that it implies.'
Catlett's words give inspiration to the most comprehensive presentation ever devoted to her work in the United States, 'Elizabeth Catlett: A Black Revolutionary Artist and All That It Implies,' on view now through July 6, 2025, at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., the artist's hometown. More than 150 works, including iconic sculptures and prints, along with rare paintings and drawings, and important ephemera, are on view.
Admission to the National Gallery, and all the nation's Smithsonian Institute museums, is free. Government is a public service, not a for-profit enterprise.
Catlett was finally allowed to return to America in 1971 for the opening of her solo exhibition at the Studio Museum in Harlem following a lobbying effort with the State Department by friends. By 1983, she could freely travel between Mexico and the U.S. and spent part of each year in New York.
Elizabeth Catlett, 'Sharecropper,' (1952) linocut. © 2019 Catlett Mora Family Trust / Licensed by VAGA at Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY
Art Institute of Chicago
What is the 'all' Catlett implied about being a 'Black Revolutionary Artist?'
The cost.
Targeting by your government? Banishment from your country? Jailing? Appearing on lists of 'agitators.' Surveillance?
Was the 'all' the work? Not just the artwork, but the activism. Tirelessly fighting oppression and racism and patriarchy and the governmental, economic, and societal systems built on them, systems carefully and historically designed to benefit the few at the expense of the many?
Yes.
'Black Revolutionary Artist' is all encompassing. More than a profession. A way of life.
Catlett lived every day of her life as a 'Black Revolutionary Artist.' She lived every day of her life as the grandchild of enslaved people, both sets of grandparents. She heard those stories as a child visiting them in North Carolina.
She saw sharecropping. Her most famous individual image, 1952's Sharecropper linocut, possesses an insight only possible from up-close observation.
'As a young artist, Catlett thoughtfully worked through and studied the art movements of her moment,' Catherine Morris, Sackler Senior Curator, Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist Art, Brooklyn Museum, where the exhibition debuted, told Forbes.com. 'Engaging with various emergent tenets of modernism, from the geometric lyricism of Lois Mailou Jones to the Social Realism of Grant Wood; from Picasso's Cubism to the organic abstraction of Henry Moore; from Käthe Kollwitz's expressionistic woodcuts to the mural painting of David Alfaro Siqueiros. From these histories, Catlett developed a language that prioritized legibility and the adding of the long overlooked voices of Black women.'
Catlett's prints of Black women, like Sharecropper, are particularly powerful. They reveal a tension around the eyes. Weariness. Wariness. Sad. Resolute. Generational trauma. Empty promises. Dreams denied. Low expectations. The eyes of her Black men don't have that. The eyes of her Mexican women don't have that.
Catlett witnessed the failures of capitalism. She lived through the Great Depression.
Jim Crow, too.
She organized protests as a high schooler against lynchings in Washington, D.C. She earned a scholarship to the Carnegie Institute of Technology in Pittsburgh, but her offer was pulled when administrators learned she was Black. Catlett was light skinned enough to 'pass' for white, but never chose to. She did even better and went to historically Black Howard University in D.C. where she came under the influence of renowned African American educator and artist, Lois Mailou Jones.
'I admire Elizabeth Catlett's innate understanding of herself as part of a long history of activism,' Morris said. 'Catlett understood the job of her creative work was to keep the history that came before her alive and vital in the present while also supporting and championing the generations of activists and artists who came after her. Catlett's art proves her determination to directly address injustices she saw in the present, while also linking them to the past in order to order to offer a roadmap for the future.'
Catlett's fusion of art and politics was cemented in 1946 when she moved to Mexico. She was pursuing printmaking at the highly regarded artist collective Taller de Gráfica Popular, then labeled a "Communist front organization" by the American Embassy.
She became deeply involved with leftist cultural circles in Mexico City and Cuernavaca. She recognized how the Mexican Revolution and the Civil Rights Movement in America were connected–how the struggle of all marginalized, colonized, abused, disenfranchised people fighting the powerful across the globe were connected.
'Art is only important in that it aids to the liberation of our people,' Catlett said.
Catlett desired more than equality, that should be the baseline, the least to expect; she wanted liberation. Liberation, the freedom and empowerment to pursue the highest individual and community aspirations.
While raising a family and teaching in Mexico, Catlett never lost sight of the Black liberation struggle in the United States. As she told Ebony magazine in 1970, 'I am inspired by Black people and Mexican people, my two peoples.'
'What I admire most about Elizabeth Catlett is her remarkable clarity both artistically and politically. Catlett saw her politics and her art as inextricable,' Morris said. 'That isn't to say that she didn't go through a process as a young artist to think through how to accomplish the sophisticated merging of the two, but I would say that from 1946 onward, all the work she had done in D.C., Iowa, Chicago, and New York were a scaffold for her experience in Mexico. Working at the Taller de Gráfica Popular allowed for a clarifying moment of vision, one that drove her work—politically and artistically—for the rest of her life. Very few of us have the grace of that clarity, and Catlett is remarkable for embracing her vision and maintaining it for decades.'
Catlett's life spanned lynching to Obama. World War I to the War on Terror. The Great Depression and the Great Recession. Her long life, activism, and artwork are impossible to consider without drawing parallels between them and America circa 2025.
Elizabeth Catlett, 'Homage to My Young Black Sisters,' 1968 red cedar, overall (without pedestal): 181.6 x 33 x 31.8 cm (71 1/2 x 13 x 12 1/2 in.); pedestal: 57.8 x 58.4 x 58.4 cm (22 3/4 x 23 x 23 in.).
Art Bridges © 2024 Mora-Catlett Family / Licensed by VAGA at Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY
America's new Red Scare has government, corporate and cultural forces targeting activists speaking out against the Israeli genocide in Gaza, smearing pro-Palestinian protestors as antisemitic. Students are being deported. Artists, their funding and exhibitions pulled. Professors fired.
They understand the 'all' Catlett was talking about. 'All' implies sacrifice.
Citizenship. Statelessness. Borders. Banishment.
'A Black Revolutionary Artist and All That It Implies' being staged at the National Gallery in Washington, D.C., one mile from the White House, makes it all the more so impossible to divorce from current events. The exhibition has a 'see it while you can feel,' before the barbarians get to it.
On March 27, 2025, Donald Trump issued an executive order attempting to bring the Smithsonian Institution, of which the National Gallery is part, to heel. The order seeks to reinforce the political right's desired white supremacist, patriarchal, colonial story of America. The flag-waving, 'we're #1' version. The story Elizabeth Catlett spent a lifetime combatting.
Anything taking place at the Smithsonian Trump considers 'improper, divisive, or anti-American ideology' is in the crosshairs. The work of a 'Black Revolutionary Artist' is in the crosshairs.
Catlett's defiant Homage to My Young Black Sisters (1968) feels sculpted and installed to confront the Trump administration, although that was not the intent of either.
'In honoring Elizabeth Catlett's legacy, we hope that her work will resonate as a poignant reminder of art's power to ignite change and unite communities in the ongoing struggle for equality and liberation,' Dalila Scruggs, Augusta Savage Curator of African American Art at the Smithsonian American Art Museum, said when announcing the exhibition. 'A Black revolutionary artist, Catlett made real, material sacrifices—including nine years of political exile—to speak truth to power and to make art for all.'
Cultural workers will soon be put to the decision of making similar 'material sacrifices' or bending their knee to tyranny. The White House and its hatchet men attacking culture are coming for the artists, curators, museum directors, docents, writers, and editors who value freedom and liberation and Black history and women's history and ideas and progress. Jobs will be lost. Careers lost. Imprisonment and deportation possible. Government surveillance.
The 'all' Catlett spoke of.
Being a 'Black Revolutionary Artist and all that it implies' will be visited upon them. Look to her for strength. Stay true to your principles, come what may. When the world faces darkness, every individual shining light is required for the fight, no matter how seemingly small.
After opening last year at the Brooklyn Museum, following its presentation in Washington, the exhibition travels to the Art Institute of Chicago later in 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Sasha Velour's ‘Big Reveal' redraws the boundaries of drag and theater
Other performers might dread glitches during shows. Sasha Velour makes them her co-stars. Her 'The Big Reveal Live Show!' offers no straightforward lip sync. Phone rings, TV static and vertical colored bars, smashed dishes, recording skips, computer viruses and flickering lights constantly interrupt her drag numbers, video art, autobiographical anecdotes and mini lectures on drag history and theory. But if these on-purpose mistakes rip the fabric of the mostly solo show, which opened Wednesday, June 4, at Berkeley Repertory Theatre, the 'RuPaul's Drag Race' champion, author and Berkeley native widens them into wormholes and crawls inside to do battle with them. As she tries to claw back control of her bit, she might wind up on the floor in tears, but she's the winner all the same. It's partly a clown show: the garish makeup, the padded body parts, the nightmarish facial expressions, the wordless physical theater fight against absurdist forces too large to understand. But in all those gaffes, larger ideas are also at work. Imperfection is key to understanding drag and camp more generally, Velour says at one point. The art form doesn't work if you don't have self-awareness — if you don't understand your flaws but 'press on' anyway. (The implied corollary: Someone like Trump couldn't do camp even if he wanted to.) In a tough time for theater locally and nationwide, with companies scaling back or closing as funding sources dwindle, 'The Big Reveal Live Show!' suggests that institutional theater programming more drag might be one way forward. Audience members certainly showed up on Wednesday, some even glammed up in drag as opposed to the standard Berkeley Rep audience uniform of earth tones and sensible shoes. And Velour's show itself is more daring, artistic and intellectual than a lot of straight plays. Some of her patter — 'After so many years of backlash,' 'Drag serves as a mirror,' 'We are here, and we are not going away' — is boilerplate; the points might be more effectively made without didacticism. But other bits of monologue evince the scholarly yet frisky understanding of drag that undergirds her book, also called 'The Big Reveal,' with the subtitle 'An Illustrated Manifesto of Drag.' 'Queerness isn't shocking or groundbreaking at all,' she says in the show. 'It's normal. It's boring.' Cultures throughout history have had some kind of drag performance, she points out — even the American military in World War II. It only becomes threatening, she says, when it's no longer performed by straight men. Her costumes — by Diego Montoya Studio, Pierretta Viktori, Jazzmint Dash, Gloria Swansong and Casey Caldwell — are celestial wonders. One skirt hem resembles the orbit of the sometime-planet Pluto, both elliptical and noncoplanar, forming part of an outfit that looks like a bottle of pink Champagne frozen right in the moment of exploding. Another piece blurs the boundary between human and furniture. In one heart-stopping moment, she lines herself up with an outline of a human form projected on a large screen behind her. Without any perceptible change in lighting, she seems to change color, blazing in the gold of a desert sunset. Graffiti gets written on her, and ropes wrap around her; body parts metamorphose and enlarge. Your eyes search for signs as to what's projected and what's tangible. She dissolves in flames. By the end, you half expect her to be able to step through the screen and get swallowed whole, the wormholes covering their tracks like magic. As Velour finds the deviant in the familiar — talk shows, Disney princesses having animal friends, audio montages of iconic phone calls in film, the pixelated desktop of 1990s-era Windows — she makes the case that drag is available to everyone, no matter how weird or normie you are. That thing that tickles you? That you find yourself returning to again and again? Drag is a way you can talk about it, and it belongs on every stage and in every sitting room in America.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Combs' ex accuses him of abuse but says she loves him
An ex-girlfriend of Sean "Diddy" Combs who accuses him of kicking, punching and dragging her has testified at his sex trafficking trial that she still loves the hip-hop mogul. "He was my baby," said the woman, who is testifying under the pseudonym Jane to protect her privacy. Asked under cross-examination by defence lawyer Teny Geragos if she still loves Combs, Jane said, "I do". The woman said she enjoyed taking care of Combs, bathing him and falling asleep with him while watching television after "hotel nights", their phrase for drug-fuelled encounters in which she would have sex with male entertainers while Combs watched. The questioning was part of Combs' strategy to portray Jane as a willing participant in the sexual encounters with him, not a victim of sex trafficking as prosecutors allege. She said she agreed to these "hotel nights" while "under a lot of emotional pressure" - and already hooked on love and a desire to stay in a relationship with Combs. Jane testified that she partook in the encounters, sometimes grudgingly, because they pleased Combs and she enjoyed spending time alone with him afterward. Combs, 55, and the founder of Bad Boy Records, has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors say Combs used force and threats of cutting off financial support to coerce women into taking part in the encounters, sometimes known as "Freak Offs". Over three days under questioning by prosecutors in Manhattan federal court, Jane said that she agreed to have sex with a male escort in front of Combs early in their relationship but that he later dismissed her requests to stop and threatened to stop paying her rent. On Monday, Jane said Combs kicked, punched and dragged her during an altercation at her Los Angeles home last June. Later that night, he told her to perform oral sex on a male entertainer even though she said she did not want to, Jane said. Under questioning on Tuesday, Jane said she researched the terms "cuck" and "cuckold" during her relationship with Combs to try to understand his desires. The words refer to men who enjoy watching female partners with other men, Jane said. "I just wanted to know why my partner wanted so many of these nights and what was driving him," Jane said. Combs' defence lawyers are expected to cross-examine Jane until Thursday. Testimony is in its fifth week. Combs could face life in prison if convicted on all counts. Also known throughout his career as Puff Daddy and P Diddy, Combs turned artists like Notorious B.I.G. and Usher into stars, elevating hip-hop in American culture and becoming a billionaire in the process. with AP
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Trade War Plot Twist May Be a Hollywood That Looks for Even More Co-Productions
Donald Trump talked about slapping a 100 percent tariff on all foreign movies to make a 'troubled' Hollywood great again. But judging by the conversations at the Banff World Media Festival — both among content creators and acquisition execs and during panel and keynote speeches — global collaboration to create new partnerships and content across borders and tackle mutual financial challenges is the byword this week in the Canadian Rockies. Advertisement More from The Hollywood Reporter 'Collaboration is the one word that keeps coming up. I've never seen people all over the world — buyers, producers – more open to finding ways to get projects made and over the line,' Allison Wallach, head of unscripted programming at Fox Entertainment Studios, told a Banff fest panel on unscripted content. The discussion on the evolution of unscripted fare took place against the backdrop of Trump's talk of a foreign movie tariff quickly pivoting to a discussion of Americans possibly taking part in official international co-productions for the first time. And that plays directly into the wheelhouse of Canadian and other international producers that have been doing multi-passport films and TV series for decades. 'Deals I never thought I'd get away making, all of a sudden 50 percent of something is better than 100 percent of nothing,' Wallach added about recent dealmaking. Advertisement Sharon Scott, president, A+E Factual Studios, added during the unscripted content panel that global collaboration has moved from the sidelines to front and center for recent dealmaking. 'I love a coproduction. I didn't used to, but they definitely help on the financial side, and you make new friends and partners,' she said. Scott also touted the benefits of tapping film tax credits, including in Canada. 'Anything that can be done anywhere, should be done here,' she said of shooting content in Canada, whether TV shows or just expert interviews for an unscripted series. The result in Banff for an entertainment industry looking to cut content budgets and produce for and with the world was more deliberative conversations between potential partners. 'Everything is a conversation now. That's a really good thing. We just want to get the best content for our customers and we want to work with fantastic partners from all around the world to do that,' Anais Baker, head of international formats at Amazon MGM Studios, told the unscripted TV panel. Advertisement Michaela Di Mondo, executive vp of distribution, international at Fremantle Canada, at one point directly addressed producers in Banff and urged them to take advantage of American and other international producers looking to forge new partnerships. 'For you guys in the room, producers, this is your time. Here's an opportunity where the world is kind of saying, where else can we work? Where else can we do hub structures. Where else can we do co-productions? How can we cost save where it doesn't mean 'that's too Canadian,' versus look how amazing that was, and the cost was even better,' Di Mondo said. Best of The Hollywood Reporter Sign up for THR's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.