logo
‘Forced Joy': The New Corporate Mandate Of Employees Gone Too Far?

‘Forced Joy': The New Corporate Mandate Of Employees Gone Too Far?

Forbes03-04-2025

Some big businesses are peddling "forced joy," mandating that employees put on a happy face even if ... More they're not feeling it.
First it was return-to-office (RTO) mandates, forcing the American workforce out of remote working and back into the office, causing a huge back lash, especially among younger workers. Now, there's a new movement afoot called 'forced joy"--acting 'as if' on steroids, smile or else, if you will--a simple, yet powerful tool that says you can lift your mood by acting as if you already feel better than you actually do.
According to Beth Kowitt, Bloomberg opinion columnist, 'forced joy' is a new job requirement that Starbucks Corp. is imposing on their baristas. She adds that as other corporations end their remote work policies, 'they want butts back in seats--and they want employees to be happy about it.' She calls 'forced joy' a miserable corporate trend at companies like Starbucks and Tiffany where fun has become a job requirement.
Kowitt raises a larger question of why corporate America feels the need to force anything upon employees in today's job market--given that the American workforce is so disengaged. It's one thing to mandate workers back into the office. But mandating specific feelings is quite another, treating employees like robots, expecting them to manufacture feelings on cue while selling products.
I asked Dr. Jason Helfrich, co-founder of 100% Chiropractic, to identify some of the signs of 'forced joy' in the workplace. "Any savvy consumer can tell sincere joy and appreciation from forced," he told me. 'The tell-tale signs are insincere smiles and laughter, work attitude doesn't match (i.e. name on a cup with a heart and then slams down the pen). The message is not consistent, one consumer may get a smile while the next three do not and finally the way the employee treats their coworkers does not match up with the forced smile and gratitude they show to customers. '
Helfrich points out that his organization tries their best to provide a culture where "forced joy" isn't needed, but we all have those days . . . put on a smile, turn up the music and watch that mood turn around. I asked Helfrich about 'forced joy's' purpose, and he explains it as twofold. "The owner or manager wishes to create an environment conducive to first class service and experience for their customer. Or the owner or manager strives to provide an enjoyable work environment leading to happier and more productive employees.'
By nature, joy is drawn, not driven. I asked Helfrich how employees can handle 'forced joy' when it's dictated from top down. He explains first of all, it's important to understand the purpose is to create an environment that promotes business and financial success, leading to job security, promotions and competitive pay for employees. 'Sometimes the 'fake it till you make it' mentality works and often changes one's mood by simply smiling or saying something nice to a customer.'
And he's right. I have written for Forbes.com about the research on how a simple smile tricks your mind into a positive workday mood. Smiling can change your attitude, even if you don't mean it, tricking your mind simply by how you move your facial muscles. When you smile, you feel good not just because it reflects how you feel, but the facial expression contributes to how you feel.
Neuroscience shows when we 'force joy,' it stimulates the amygdala—the emotional brain center, which in turn releases neurotransmitters to encourage an emotionally positive state. Although there's a science behind 'forced smiling,' it's doubtful that it's part of corporate America's rationale. The major difference is that the 'forced smiling' is an authentic technique that draws from within, not coerced from an outside force.
Kowitt points out that the 'forced joy' directive comes from CEO Brian Niccol. She asserts that the underlying message to employees is this: 'It's not enough to manufacture a product for customers; they must also manufacture a feeling. And if Niccol can't motivate workers to do so organically, he'll decree it by edict.'
And that's the bigger issue. The American workforce is tired of decrees and edicts that resurrect dinosaur leadership practices that we already know don't work. The old fashioned hatchet-boss leadership style destroys employee engagement and the company's bottom line. Younger employees are unwilling to crouch behind the potted plant in the corner or pay the price of coercion, humiliation or burnout from iron-fisted leadership to climb the career ladder.
'The power of making someone's day is often overlooked,' Helfrich says. 'You may be the best part of someone's day. Take the responsibility seriously, one smile can change someone's day, and in turn they treat everyone in their life a little bit differently. Some research suggests the average person passes 1,000 people per day. Imagine the impact you can have by showing a smile.'
We all want to put our best foot forward in our jobs. But workers want authentic joy in supportive work environments where empathy, inclusion and compassion are expressed--not mandated--by leaders. According to Kowitt, 'In the age of forced joy, employers are requiring positivity and passion because workers aren't voluntarily producing a whole lot of either right now.'
Bringing joy back to the workplace is critical, especially with RTO mandates, massive layoffs, 'boreout syndrome" sweeping the country and 50% of workers 18-34 feeling burnt out.
Vickie Chen, CEO and co-founder of the mobile gaming company Avia, believes authentic strategies bring joy to the workplace. Her company placed two foster cats in its office, and employees collaborate to take care of them. More than 75% of Avia's employees believe the office cats have strengthened team cohesion, and the animals have become like mascots in the office.
Paycom, a leading HR tech software and payroll provider, has created an employee campus that more closely resembles a college campus than a corporate office. The company has created spaces where people go to relax, work away from their desk or even take time for themselves. Also included are a fitness center, a courtyard with fountains, cafes, zen rooms and sound-proofed privacy booths.
When steps are available that draw authentic joy, it's begs the question why companies need to demand or manufacture 'forced joy' when they can have the real thing. Plus, it's more effective for employees, customers and company profitability .

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PensionBee Survey Reveals Nearly Half of Americans Have Less Than One Year of Retirement Savings
PensionBee Survey Reveals Nearly Half of Americans Have Less Than One Year of Retirement Savings

Business Upturn

time18 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

PensionBee Survey Reveals Nearly Half of Americans Have Less Than One Year of Retirement Savings

NEW YORK, June 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Nearly one in three Americans (30%) couldn't survive more than six months on their retirement savings if they had to stop working tomorrow, while 42% have less than one year of savings total, according to new data from PensionBee's Q2 Happy Retirement Report. Just one in ten Americans believes they can live off their savings for 10 years or more. These findings reveal more than a retirement problem—they expose a survival crisis hiding in plain sight. With traditional pensions declining and Social Security facing potential cuts, Americans across all generations are more dependent on personal savings than ever before. Yet most are lacking basic financial resilience. 'Low saving levels among older workers are particularly troubling,' said Romi Savova, CEO of PensionBee. 'In an economy where companies are cutting costs and older workers often face the longest unemployment periods, inadequate savings isn't just about retirement, it's about basic survival. Too many people are one layoff away from being forced into a retirement they can't afford. With AI poised to reshape entire industries, this financial vulnerability becomes an existential threat for millions of American families.' The Actions Behind the Numbers But here's what separates financial confidence from financial fantasy: specific, measurable actions. The survey reveals that confidence isn't built on hope—it's built on behavior. Among respondents who feel 'very positive' about retirement, 61% have structured retirement plans, half with professional guidance, and 25% have consolidated multiple accounts. In stark contrast, just 9% of Americans who feel 'very negative' about retirement have any structured retirement planning in place. Americans who felt 'very negative' about their retirement were also twice as likely (41%) to have delayed saving until age 30, compared to just 20% of those who reported a 'very positive' outlook. The data reveals the specific actions that separate confident savers from worried ones: starting early, maximizing employer benefits, consolidating old retirement accounts, and, when it makes sense, working with financial advisors. These aren't just nice-to-haves—they're the foundation of financial security in an uncertain economy. Retirement Preparedness Across Generations Gen Z: Building Financial Foundation Despite Early Challenges At 43%, Gen Z reports the second-highest retirement optimism, yet their behavior suggests financial vulnerability. Nearly one in five (19%) have already taken hardship withdrawals from retirement accounts—a concerning trend for a generation just starting their careers. However, they're also the most proactive: 25% plan to seek financial advice this year, and 29% are embracing online planning tools. Their challenge isn't awareness—it's building financial resilience while navigating an increasingly expensive economy. Millennials: Navigating Multiple Financial Priorities Millennials show clear signs of economic pressure from competing priorities. They report the lowest retirement confidence (41%) and are most likely to be managing student debt, aging parents, and childcare. Nearly one in four (22%) cash out their 401(k)s when changing jobs, compared to just 14% of Baby Boomers. Having entered the job market during the Great Recession, many developed financial habits that prioritize immediate needs over long-term wealth building. At 29%, they're most likely to delay starting retirement savings, missing crucial years of compound growth. Gen X: Managing Time Constraints and Competing Demands Gen X faces significant time pressure: 36% have less than one year of savings with fewer than 10 years until retirement age. Supporting both aging parents and college-bound children, they're working to build adequate retirement funds within a compressed timeframe. Further, only 23% consistently contribute enough to receive full employer matching funds, representing missed opportunities that could meaningfully improve their retirement outlook. Baby Boomers: Confident Outlook with Limited Savings Baby Boomers report the highest optimism (51%), though this confidence may not fully align with current retirement trends showing later retirement ages and continued reliance on part-time work. Despite being around retirement age, nearly half (49%) of Baby Boomers reported having five years or less of savings. This generation's optimism reflects a different economic era—one with pensions, affordable healthcare, and more predictable career paths. What Comes Next Despite these challenges, the survey reveals reason for optimism: half of Americans plan to increase contributions this year, suggesting growing awareness of the problem. 41% of Americans reported a positive retirement outlook in Q2—down over 10% from Q1's survey . This declining confidence seems to reflect not only the market volatility but perhaps a growing awareness that individual effort alone cannot solve a systemic problem. 'The widespread lack of retirement preparedness we're seeing isn't something workers can solve alone,' added Savova. 'Employers have a critical role beyond just offering a 401(k). When workers are cashing out accounts during job changes and missing employer matches, that's a clear signal that current benefit structures aren't working. We need to reform our system and take active steps: automatic enrollment, better education, and support systems that help departing employees preserve their savings rather than lose them.' About PensionBee PensionBee is a leading online retirement provider, helping people easily consolidate, manage, and grow their retirement savings. The company manages approximately $8 billion in assets and serves over 275,000 customers globally, with a focus on simplicity, transparency, and accessibility. Survey Methodology* Participation Details: The survey data was gathered and sent out by Attest between May 9, 2025 and May 13, 2025 to a total of 1,000 Americans across the 18 – 100 age groups. Voluntary Participation: Participation in the survey was voluntary. Respondents were free to decline participation or skip any questions they chose not to answer. Your investment can go down as well as up. This survey is provided solely for informational and educational purposes and should not be relied upon as sole decision-making tools. Nothing presented here constitutes tax, legal, financial or investment advice. This information does not take into account the specific financial, legal or tax situation, objectives, risk tolerance, or investment needs of any individual investor. All information provided is based on publicly available data and research at the time of posting. This information, and any associated customer testimonial or third party endorsement, does not constitute an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell any securities or investments. Your investment is at risk. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Media Contact: Adela McVicarSR PR Manager [email protected]

Meta is making a frightening foray into military technology
Meta is making a frightening foray into military technology

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Meta is making a frightening foray into military technology

Under CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Meta is plunging headfirst into the world of military technology. Literally. Last month, in a joint statement, the social media and technology giant announced it's working with defense contractor Anduril to develop virtual reality devices that will deploy artificial intelligence to train military service members. According to The Wall Street Journal, which interviewed Anduril founder, Palmer Luckey, the devices include "new rugged helmets, glasses and other wearables that provide a virtual-reality or augmented-reality experience." The outlet reported: The system, called EagleEye, will carry sensors that enhance soldiers' hearing and vision — detecting drones flying miles away or sighting hidden targets, for instance. It will also let soldiers operate and interact with AI-powered weapon systems. Anduril's autonomy software and Meta's AI models will underpin the devices. But the deal, and Meta's apparent eagerness to wet its beak under the seemingly endless spigot of U.S. defense spending, raises a question for all to consider. That is: Should a company that's been tied to various disinformation scandals, even admitting at one point that its platform was used by violent extremists to promote genocidal propaganda, be given such access and influence when it comes to training the American military? In comments to Bloomberg last week, Meta's chief technology officer, Andrew Bosworth, described a "silent majority" within the tech industry eager to pursue such projects: Meta Platforms Inc. Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth said that the 'tides have turned' in Silicon Valley and made it more palatable for the tech industry to support the US military's efforts. There's long existed a 'silent majority' who wanted to pursue defense projects, Bosworth said during an interview at the Bloomberg Tech summit in San Francisco on Wednesday. 'There's a much stronger patriotic underpinning than I think people give Silicon Valley credit for,' he said. Silicon Valley was founded on military development and 'there's really a long history here that we are kind of hoping to return to, but it is not even day one,' Bosworth added. For the record, that history Bosworth speaks of — which includes Silicon Valley's development of nuclear weapons — isn't as glowing as he suggests. In fact, journalist Malcom Harris' book, 'Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World,' helps chronicle the death and plunder that have historically undergirded the relationship between Silicon Valley and the defense industry. And Meta itself has repeatedly been used as a tool to promote propaganda and misinformation. In 2018, the company publicly acknowledged that its executives didn't do enough to prevent the spread of hate speech that helped fuel the genocide of the Rohingya people living in Myanmar. And in 2019, a bipartisan Senate report concluded that various social media platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, had been used by Russian officials to suppress the Black vote in 2016 to benefit Donald Trump's presidential campaign. The fact that Meta is currently facing Senate scrutiny over allegations it sought to develop censorship tools for China's autocratic regime in the past certainly doesn't inspire confidence that patriotism is its guiding light. A Meta spokesperson downplayed the company's development of those tools in comments to The Washington Post, saying the news had been "widely reported beginning a decade ago" and that the company "ultimately opted not to go through with the ideas we'd explored, which Mark Zuckerberg announced in 2019.' Nonetheless, one could say Meta has a blemished record of upholding human and civil rights that makes its foray into defense technology for an antidemocratic Trump administration all the more unnerving. It's not hard to imagine any number of horrifying things a virtual reality military helmet could train its users to do in the hands of a Trump administration led by a man who A) brazenly uses political propaganda against his perceived enemies, foreign and domestic, B) opposes efforts to root discriminatory bias out of artificial intelligence tools, and C) has threatened to deploy the armed forces against American citizens. In lieu of much needed regulation designed to rein in artificial intelligence, Americans ought to keep close watch of this Meta partnership, perhaps to ensure it isn't deployed in ways that undermine human rights and civil society — just as our previous president warned AI, in the wrong hands, could do. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store