logo
Airlines issue Heathrow third runway warning as they slam ‘quality of service'

Airlines issue Heathrow third runway warning as they slam ‘quality of service'

Independent20-03-2025

Airlines have raised concerns over Heathrow's third runway plans as they believe its effectiveness as a hub airport is hampered by the way it is run.
Some 90% of respondents to a survey of 50 carriers which use the west London airport agreed with the assertion.
The standard of services and a lack of engagement were among the reasons cited by airlines for why they believe Heathrow's capability is hindered.
Heathrow's Airline Operators Committee (AOC), which represents the airport's airlines and commissioned the research, said it shows a third runway would be 'unaffordable' under the current system.
In response, the airport said it agrees that 'adjustments to the regulatory model are needed', but insisted 'airlines and passengers get good value for money'.
More than two out of three (67%) airlines agreed that the airport's operation stifles their ability to increase investment.
Some 60% of respondents believe Heathrow's service levels inside terminals is worse than at other major airports, with claims of long security lines, baggage system failures and poor treatment of passengers with restricted mobility.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves gave her backing for Heathrow's third runway project in a speech on growth in January.
The airport responded by saying it would submit detailed plans to the Government in the summer.
The cost of the project was estimated at £14 billion in 2014, but this is likely to have risen sharply.
Heathrow's AOC is part of the Heathrow Reimagined campaign, which is calling on the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) to reform how the airport is regulated.
Among the other organisations represented by the body are British Airways' owner International Airlines Group (IAG), Virgin Atlantic and tycoon Surinder Arora, who operates a number of hotels serving the airport.
The campaign claims Heathrow is the world's most expensive airport for charges, with airlines paying £1.1 billion more each year than if fees were in line with equivalent major European airports.
Airlines typically pass charges on to passengers through fares.
Nigel Wicking, chief executive of Heathrow's AOC, told the PA news agency the results of the survey reflect 'the performance challenges airlines have day to day at Heathrow'.
He said: 'When you when you look at that relative to the amount we spend at Heathrow, something's going wrong.
'We're spending a lot of money, it is the most expensive airport for charges, and yet the quality of service keeps on dropping, whether that's loss of bags, congestion or lack of availability of check-in space.'
He said New York's JFK airport offers a 'far better experience' because it has refreshed all its terminals within a 27-year period, whereas at Heathrow, Terminal 3 is more than 60 years old and Terminal 4 is nearly 40 years old.
The regulatory asset base (Rab) model used at Heathrow allows it to charge fees to airlines based on infrastructure improvement plans agreed with the CAA and permitted rates of return for investors.
Mr Wicking said: 'They've realised what they're sitting on in terms of the asset that is Heathrow, and with the regulatory model they've worked out how to make really good money.
'If they can get money onto the Rab – if they get capital spend – they will have a really good return on that capital spend, which is obviously very attractive to their shareholders but it doesn't drive efficiency.
'Whenever I see an another capital plan coming across my table for Heathrow to invest in, I just look to the skies and think 'where do you get these numbers from' because some of them are absolutely ludicrous.'
He added: 'The (airlines) do want expansion but it cannot be at any price.
'The current price is already too much.
'If you extrapolate that to the kind of spend we're talking about for a third runway and terminals, it would just make it unaffordable.'
Heathrow reported pre-tax profits of £917 million for 2024, up 31% from £701 million in 2023.
In December 2024, French company Ardian completed a deal to become Heathrow's largest shareholder with a 23% stake, while Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund purchased a 15% share.
Mr Arora claimed Heathrow bosses 'take advantage of the monopoly' position as the UK's only major hub airport.
He gave examples – disputed by Heathrow – of the airport charging airlines £76,000 to remove three trees, spending £1.1 million on a smoking shelter at Terminal 4, and charging more than half a million each for two disabled toilets.
He said: 'We are 110% behind the Chancellor and the Government for expansion, for growth, except just a couple of caveats.
'We must do it for the right reasons, and we must do it for the benefit of the nation, and not for the benefit of lining the shareholders' pockets.
'We must make sure that we get value for money.'
A spokesperson for Heathrow said: 'Every penny invested in infrastructure at Heathrow is approved by airlines and our regulator.
'We agree adjustments to the regulatory model are needed to deliver a third runway, but airlines and passengers get good value for money at Heathrow.
'Our operational performance is good and improving, and the value we provide to airlines and passengers is easily seen by how many airlines want to include Heathrow in their network.
'Expanding Heathrow will drive a further step change and address many of the challenges identified with operating an airport that is already at full capacity.'
Heathrow recorded a 6% rise in the number of passengers travelling through its four terminals last year, to 83.9 million.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU
Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU

Daily Mirror

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU

Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights, and the second related to free hand luggage Four European countries are outraged at new rules that could limit how much delayed passengers can claim in compensation and when airlines can charge passengers for carrying hand luggage. Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights. ‌ The Council decided that passengers on short-haul flights would have to be delayed by four hours or more before they could claim compensation, rather than the current three. For long-haul flights, delays will have to be six or more hours. ‌ The good news for passengers is that compensation for those delayed on short-haul flights will increase from €250 (£211) to €300. However, compensation for long-haul flights will be cut from €600 to €500. The changes were first tabled 13 years ago and must still be approved by the European Parliament before they become law. The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, has argued that the changes will be a huge blow for consumers and deprive 'the majority of passengers from their compensation rights". The BEUC claims that most delays are between two and four hours. While the UK now sets its own compensation rules following Brexit, the changes will impact Brits if they come into force, as it will apply to passengers taking flights with an EU carrier. This means it could affect a passenger travelling to and from an EU country on an EU airline. The second decision relates to baggage allowance. Under the new rules, the concept to free luggage will be limited to 'personal items' that can be placed under the front seat. That will leave other stowed cabin bags exposed to charges. ‌ Spain, Germany, Slovenia, and Portugal voted against the changes, warning that they could mean passengers end up paying extra for almost any cabin bag. The Spanish government criticised the new rules as 'too restrictive.' Spain's Minister for Social Rights, Consumer Affairs and the 2030 Agenda, Pablo Bustinduy, described the changes as an 'outrage'. The political agreement, adopted by a qualified majority in the EU Council, was voted against by Spain, Germany, Slovenia and Portugal. Minister Bustinduy argued that the new rules would violate consumer rights and "only strengthen the power and profits of airlines." If the rules are accepted, then Ryanair would have to change its free hand luggage policy. Right now, the budget Irish airline require customers to have a bag no larger than 40x20x25 centimetres, which must fit under the seat in front. Under the new rules, the dimensions will be changed to 40x30x15 centimetres. That means Ryanair would be obliged to allow a bag 10 centimetres wider, but could also reduce the depth currently allowed by 10 centimetres.

Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C
Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C

The Chancellor is set to confirm the funding at the GMB Congress on Tuesday. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves is set to confirm £14.2 billion of investment in the new Sizewell C nuclear plant(Stefan Rousseau/PA) Trade unions welcomed the move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The Government is also due to confirm one of Europe's first small modular reactor programmes and will invest £2.5 billion over five years in fusion energy research as part of plans to boost the UK's nuclear industry. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance' (Kin Cheung/PA) Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: 'Delivering this funding for Sizewell C is a vital step forward, this project is critical to securing the future of the nuclear industry in the UK. 'New nuclear is essential to achieving net zero, providing a baseload of clean and secure energy, as well as supporting good, unionised jobs. 'Further investment in SMRs and fusion research shows we are finally serious about developing a 21st-century nuclear industry. All funding must be backed up by a whole-industry plan to ensure we have the workforce and skills we need for these plans to succeed.' Alison Downes of Stop Sizewell C said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. 'There still appears to be no final investment decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2 billion in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret. 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? 'Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark 2.'

Sizewell C: Govt commits £14.2bn to new nuclear power station
Sizewell C: Govt commits £14.2bn to new nuclear power station

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Sizewell C: Govt commits £14.2bn to new nuclear power station

Fifteen years after the Sizewell C nuclear power station was proposed, the government will announce a £14.2bn commitment to the Suffolk site. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is set to confirm the funding at the GMB union conference ahead of the spending review on Wednesday, which will set departmental budgets until 2029. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband will call it a "golden age" of nuclear to boost the UK's energy security. The funding will go towards creating 10,000 jobs, the government will say, including 1,500 apprenticeships, and will support thousands more jobs across the UK. On Monday, it was revealed Britain's nuclear power sector grew by a quarter in 2024 to £20bn compared with three years ago, underpinned by a record workforce which has increased by a third, according to research by the Nuclear Power Association. About 87,000 people now work in the industry, with the rise largely driven by new nuclear power projects at Sizewell C and Hinkley Point C in Somerset. Sizewell C was initially proposed by French energy company EDF and China General Nuclear Power Group, but in 2022 the Conservative government bought the Chinese company out and the state now owns 83.5% of the project with EDF. The green light for construction to begin was given in January 2024 under the Conservative government, and at last autumn's budget, Ms Reeves announced a £2.7bn commitment to Sizewell C and said a final commitment would be announced in the 2025 spending review. Construction is expected to take between nine and 12 years and when it is complete, it will provide around six million homes with nuclear energy. A total of £330m of contracts have been signed with local companies, with 70% of all contracts expected to go to 3,500 British suppliers. Ms Reeves said: "Today we are once again investing in Britain's renewal, with the biggest nuclear building programme in a generation. This landmark decision is our Plan for Change in action. "We are creating thousands of jobs, kickstarting economic growth and putting more money in people's pockets." HS2 all over again? Campaign group Stop Sizewell C called it "HS2 mark 2" after the high-speed train line that has faced high costs, delays and parts of it being axed. They questioned how much money the government will ultimately invest in the nuclear power station as they said no information has been provided about the expected total costs. 2:09 Alison Downes, from Stop Sizewell C, said: "Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? "Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark 2." Or vital step towards domestic clean energy? But the funding was called a "vital step toward delivering the secure, domestic clean energy" the UK needs by "pro-growth" campaign group Britain Remade. Sam Richards, CEO of the Conservative thinktank, added: "The government must go much further."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store